Een opsomming van Covid-dissidente wetenschappers, politici en andere publieke figuren. Het vormt een storyline waar zowel Orwell als Kafka goed mee ut de voeten zouden kunnen.
The dilemma of anti-institutional science
Science and government policy are at odds with each other: where science seeks improvement and innovation by rejecting previous conclusions, the government strives for consistency and stability based on a chosen course. A marriage of convenience in the...
Six Persistent Misconceptions in Scientific Research – Kenneth J. Rothman
Since I started delving into medical and epidemiological studies, armed only with my communication analytical background and a basic equipment of argumentation theory, statistics, logic, philosophy of science, etc., I have often been amazed by the...
The academic bankrupt in four companies: Useful idiots, the Science ™, A.I. and Ronald Meester
First company: a scientist ™ is grilled the recent hearing in the US Senate exposed a painful problem. Dr. Jake Scott, COVID-19 Specialist at Stanfordbio Jake Scott, witnesses there in a hearing about “The corruption of the ...
Vaccintrials safety illusion
Looking back on the introduction of the proven "Safe and Effective" MRNA vaccines, the "effective" aspect has disappointed: vaccination figures under COVID oversen are not reassuring and are at most unintentionally released. 80% of the deaths to COVID-19 ...
Flawed researchers brush up their act with a novelty: the ‘Healthy Vaccinee Effect’
Brechje de Gier, head researcher of the RIVM, gets a new study as a co-author with criticism that she has served for years and ignorant disinformation, both from scientific and unscientific angle. Brechje de Gier is ...
Legacy Science™ en pro-vax fraude: een horrorvoorbeeld.
There was a lot to do about this Study Preliminary Findings of MRNA COVID-19 Safety in Pregnant Persons before and he remains controversial. Conclusions have been drawn from incomplete data and that was accepted by a respected magazine, that was ...
Cruciale aanvulling op de open brief van Maurice aan Robbert Dijkgraaf
Robbert Dijkgraaf staat voor mij model voor de vriendelijke, intelligente, erudiete, geïnteresseerde en beschaafde intellectueel met groot vertrouwen in de instituten waarbinnen hij die overdaad aan talenten heeft weten te verzilveren. Het verband tussen een "hoog IQ"...
Academic freedom and academic naivety
Aan het woord is dr. Jona Walk MSc, MD, PhD: "Er is een soort ongeschreven regel in de academisch-medische wereld: je mag nooit iets zeggen ten nadele van vaccins, ook niet als je het wetenschappelijk kunt onderbouwen. Dat mag gewoon niet. Dat is een ongeschreven maar...
Nivel violates the Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity on more than two points
On the basis of the first two key points of the Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, Maurice de Hond filed a complaint with ZonMW about violations of that code in the Nivel report on excess mortality and vaccination. He was all about Honesty and...
'Et tu-John' – filleted, but now real
The stunning research that resulted in 14.8 million years of life saved thanks to Covid vaccines (see earlier short response here) has now also been put through the wringer on LinkedIn. Ronald Meester posted a review of Bram Bakker and himself, in English (download...
Et tu, John?
Before MSM runs off with it, you should know that Norman Fenton and Martin Neil reviewed (let's say: debunked) an article that states that the vaccines would have saved 14.8 million years of life. You can download the pre-print of that paper here as a PDF. It...
