Het is wat kort op de onthullende post van gisteren maar deze tweet verdient directe aandacht. Hij is geplaatst door advocaat Tobias Ulbrich (@AnwaltUlbrich) die zich de afgelopen jaren heeft toegelegd op vaccinatieletsel. Aanleiding is een uitzending van Die Tagesschau, een van de meest bekeken nieuwsprogramma’s in Duitsland, geproduceerd door de publieke omroep ARD1. Die Tagesschau is bekend om zijn objectieve en onpartijdige berichtgeving en heeft een goede reputatie opgebouwd als een betrouwbare bron van nieuws. Het werkelijke nieuws voor virusvaria is dus: de mainstream in Duitsland begint te keren - en je kent het gezegde: "Als Duitsland niest wordt Nederland verkouden". Zou de omerta ook hier breken? In mainstream Duitsland wordt er, weliswaar nog verhullend, nieuws gebracht dat in Nederland als wappienieuws of desinformatie wordt weggezet. Advocaat Tobias Ulbrich schrijft op X over de recente ARD-uitzending:
Onderwerp van vandaag: "Presenteert de tagesschau uiteindelijk de vaccinatie als de reden voor de recessie zonder het te vermelden?"
https://tagesschau.de/wirtschaft/konjunktur/rekord-krankenstand-rezession-100.html
The Tagesschau begins with the statement:
"Zonder het hoge ziektecijfer zou de Duitse economie in 2023 blijkbaar gegroeid zijn en niet gekrompen. Dit is het resultaat van een studie van de Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies."
Op de site van die "vfa. Die forschenden Pharma-Unternehmen" zien we voor Duitsland een stijging van 50% t.o.v. 2020. (57% t.o.v. 2015).
[Note VV: Strangely enough, the graph below was shown in the broadcast, taken from the German CBS. This is an increase of approximately 90% compared to 2015, an unprecedented score compared to the turnover since 2008. Also double what the graph of the pharmaceutical companies shows, which is mentioned as a source by the ARD.]
Every company realizes it and knows it. With an average of 19.4 working days per employee, the sickness rate has never been higher.
The exciting thing is that this trend didn't start with the pandemic, but with the vaccination.
De gegevens van de ziektekostenverzekering van meer dan 5,5 miljoen gevallen die behandeling nodig hadden na vaccinatie met verwijzing naar de vaccinatie spreken duidelijke taal, net als de waarschuwingen van het toenmalige hoofd van het BKK, die nu geen bestuurslid meer is vanwege zijn waarschuwingen. Hoewel het een wettelijke verplichting is voor het PEI om de gegevens van de ziektekostenverzekeraars te analyseren, is dit zelfs 3 jaar na het begin van de vaccinatie nog niet gebeurd, omdat er volgens de federale overheid 'nog geen interface voor gegevensoverdracht van de ziektekostenverzekeraars naar het PEI is geprogrammeerd'.
No citizen believes the protective claims, because it is clear that the goal is to cover up and hide the extent of the disaster.
A country with this mental constitution, which prefers lies to the truth in all political areas, will not want to see any connection with vaccination even with such reports from the Tagesschau.
That is why the questions that are immediately on the tip of everyone's tongue are not even asked, as was once the case in the supposedly real socialism in the GDR, because the answer would have to be denied in advance for state reasons and now also for the protection of the pharmaceutical industry. That is why everyone is allowed to think their part in the economic damage caused, but not to express it.
Uiteindelijk moet er een volledige analyse komen van alle ziekteverzekeringsgegevens en ziekmeldingen. Hetzelfde geldt voor de opheldering van overmatige sterfte door middel van autopsies door professionals die bekend zijn met alle aspecten van vaccinatieschade en de gevolgen daarvan, zodat de doodsoorzaak duidelijk kan worden vastgesteld door middel van differentiaaldiagnostiek. Nooit eerder in de geschiedenis van de geneeskunde is er een gentherapie ten onrechte als "vaccinatie" gedeclareerd, die vervolgens als "geneesmiddel" werd vermomd en in zo'n korte tijd zo'n gigantische schade aan de gezondheid veroorzaakte, waarvan volgens een Harvard-studie slechts 1 procent van de waarheid te zien was in verdachte rapporten. Elke vorm van voorlichting in Duitsland - geen reactie. Bijgevolg leidt een gebrekkig immuunsysteem ook tot meer infectieziekten en dus tot een hoger ziekteverzuim. Wie de wetenschappelijke studies over immuundeficiënties na zogenaamde vaccinaties had gelezen, zou het verband onmiddellijk hebben ingezien.
https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/10/6/ofad209/7131292 (among other things).
The CDU/CSU together with the FDP and SPD eschew clarification like the devil shuns holy water because they know what the end of the story will be. So they prefer to discredit scientists and me as a person instead of dealing with the content of the reporting.
Lawyer Tobias Ulbrich.
Tagesschau.de previously wrote about him:
"Het advocatenkantoor van Ulbrich is nu primair verantwoordelijk voor de golf van rechtszaken tegen vaccinfabrikanten in Duitsland - waaronder BioNTech. Het zijn er inmiddels (dd 27-4-2023) meer dan 160 en er komen elke dag nieuwe bij. Zijn cliënten zouden gezondheidsproblemen hebben als gevolg van de vaccinatie met het coronavirus.
Although it is undisputed that such problems exist, zijn ze zeer zeldzaam. Deskundigen en gezondheidsautoriteiten benadrukken daarom dat de vaccinaties over het algemeen veilig zijn. Ulbrich daarentegen geeft al maanden media-interviews waarin hij dit in twijfel trekt."
Shocking numbers again.
We have seen a small opening in NRC. On the front page, but weak in terms of content. But it has been mentioned, and at least real victims have been given the floor. A start?
Interesting that the proponents are so certain that the side effects are 'very rare'. Very rare is not really a factual fact. Is very rare 1 in 800, 1 in a million or something in between? And what's wrong with having doubts about that? And at what number does the cure become worse than the disease?
I would like to see journalists ask these kinds of questions to Ms. Kant, for example: What does 'very rare' mean, and if a number is known, how did they come to that conclusion?
Reporting side effects has not exactly been encouraged by Lareb. On the contrary, Kant has been honking his horn in the vaccination coercion orchestra. And apparently, everything is being done to keep the numbers low.
The accumulated disease rates are very interesting. They must also be known in a bureaucracy such as the Netherlands. Must be the same pattern.
For me, the house of cards has long since collapsed. Can only hope that more and more people see it.
Every now and then I try to write something to NRC, but my letters are never published. Lack of quality undoubtedly. Or not according to the gospel, that is also possible of course.
Cees, I have the same experience with NRC. Anything that is critical or investigative with regard to the narrative is rejected by NRC. I have a whole series of rejected documents from 2020-2023 on my computer; I'm going to share them again, because they in themselves provide a beautiful account of ever-increasing amazement culminating in bewilderment. Pfff….
After having had a subscription to Trouw for at least 50 years, I canceled it because of their deafening silence on all Corona-related matters that go against the politically correct story. Also
there were regular taunts towards Musk/
In short, the reporting in that newspaper, especially in a newspaper that originated in WWII as a resistance newspaper, is a lost cause. And now there is some noise from Germany that can give us some hope!
Oh well, Bredero already knew: 'Things can change'.
Extra Boosters, Darwin Awards. Nothing else.
But, more seriously:
We have school-age children and it is a horror autumn and winter in terms of diseases. In my opinion, all those destroyed immune systems from the Hugo amusement park shots cause enormous disease pressure, which radiates to the “pure bloods”.
Destroyed immune systems have a similar effect on public health as poor sanitation.
Who is suffering here because of whom? I think it's really the uninjected by the pharma citizen rats.
In the NRC of March 18, 2023 (the accusations stick to you), the work by virologists with “Gain of Function” techniques is described as indispensable. My repeated requests to the editors of the NRC to publish an objective story about the origins of Sars Cov 2 (with facts and arguments) get stuck in the NRC cover-up
I am very close to virology myself, including through previous contacts with Dutch virologists, and have been seriously concerned about gain-of-function research for some time. Yes, that has also been carried out in the Netherlands. Exactly the dangerous research from which SARS-CoV2 emerged in the period 2016-2019. But…. indeed, every attempt at discussion about this in the mainstream media (now also in Trouw, in addition to VK - in the person of Maarten Keulemans) seems to be nipped in the bud again and again. By whom? There are indeed dark forces at work, but fortunately not yet on this platform... Would a joint piece to NRC, with some pushing and pulling, offer relief? We need an opening quickly to finally discuss the lab leak, the outbreak, the measures and the vaccine damage (all the misery resulting from the GOF research). Could an action towards the House of Representatives and the corona committee yield something?
Good idea, but then it becomes more of an opinion piece than a letter to the editor. The latter is too short to really give a decent explanation. It must be very well constructed. It may not be too radical (because then it will not be posted), but it must contain criticism of the government narrative. It would be great if people with a medical background could also participate. Personally, I believe that a medical background is not relevant, because with the facts and figures you can clearly demonstrate that it is not correct on any side. But you have to anticipate this kind of criticism.
Perhaps an idea to respond to the piece about the relationship between vaccination and 'long covid'? That opened the door to looking for the floor. Something that NRC itself left behind. I think we should exchange/collect email addresses. Preferably not via a public site like this. Maybe Anton wants to play a role in collecting email addresses of people who want to participate?
New: Robert Kennedy about gain of function with 10 minutes short video.
https://youtu.be/G0NaBKzKF_M?si=eCIzqfIOaGUz2vtc