shortlink to this article: https://t.ly/Co-Z
In between the overwhelming statistical evidence, now a gripping story that I missed last year. In April 2021, Ernesto Ramirez Jr. will die at the age of 17, five days after his covid injection (Pfizer). As a cause of death, myocarditis is determined. Father Ernesto Ramirez realizes what must have happened. His mission will be to warn people about the shots and to work for vaccine-damaged people. He starts speaking at meetings and gives interviews.
Fema (Federal Emergency Management Agency) contacts the father several months later and offers financial support, provided the cause of death is converted to Covid.
Benefits can range from $10,000 to $35,000. An amount of $13,000 is mentioned but father Ramirez refuses.
Six months later, FEMA tries again, again to no avail.
Ramirez doesn't have it wide. He starts a GoFundMe page. If donations come in, the page will be taken offline for not complying with the company's guidelines.
I'm not going to put into words what I think of all this because I don't want to fall into FVD rhetoric, which I often find strategically/communicatively inconvenient. The tropes used by Forum usually stem from exaggeration, at least that's how we know that vocabulary of "corruption, genocide, bribery, witches, tribunals, WEF, Big Pharma, Big Tech, EU, von der Leyen, Bourla, fascism." More and more often I have to admit that I don't really find those terms that hyperbolic anymore. It is about behaviour that is beyond the imagination of decent citizens, which makes the terminology seem exaggerated and therefore considered inappropriate and inflammatory. So it is better not to use those words if you do not only want to preach to your own parish. However, the facts make it increasingly difficult to circumvent them.
So we stick to the typically neat Dutch way of responding to practices that can even cost our own children their lives: "This should be investigated further."
If there are often enough parents agreeing to such a surrender - and there are quite a few - then the vaccines will become enormously effective. More young corona deaths and safer vaccines, two birds with one stone.
Parents who accept the confluence of vaccination and heart failure as an unfortunate coincidence will of course take advantage of such an offer. A small minority may be "awake" enough to blame themselves. (Ramirez: "The worst decision in my entire life.")
The vast majority of the population will acquiesce to the horrific fate. The idea that the myocarditis may have been caused by the vaccine will gnaw at them somewhere – but, they imagine, it has not been proven. Autopsies hardly take place. In addition, the doctor says that it is safe: "They really know what they are doing. Myocarditis is so rare as a side effect that it is just stupid bad luck if it affects you. And it's usually innocent and goes away on its own." Unfortunate coincidence...
In addition, the doctor says that myocarditis can also be the result of an undiscovered corona infection! Maybe that is the case and it was actually the fault of Covid... with a bonus of $13,000.
Who pays for all that? Those benefits do come back left or right from the pharmaceutical companies, who budget for them. And if that cost item runs out of the budget, the price of the vaccines just has to go up a little bit.
Price increase August 2021
Price increase October 2022
Do you want to count: $13,000 for autopsies or bribes?
Let's assume that mentioned amount of $13,000. An autopsy costs about $650. So you could do twenty autopsies for the cost of one bribe.
Bribing twenty times costs $260,000. Wouldn't it be better to have autopsies done with that money? Then you might pick out a few false claims. If, for example, of the 20 myocarditis cases after vaccination, two are vaccine-indicated, then you already save on the benefits and the money can go to the people who are actually entitled to it: the Covid victims.
Suppose that all those myocarditis-after-injection cases come through the vaccine, then the vaccine victims get nothing at all and there is an extra $ 247,000 for the real corona deaths!
A wringing business model whose logic escapes me completely. It can only be followed from the certainty that victims of the injections do not really exist. They are scammers, poseurs. After all, these syringes are safe and effective, which is why it is important to correct those incorrect death certificates. Autopsies only cost extra money... Kind of?
Below is Ernesto Ramirez at one of his contributions at a manifestation for vaccination patients.
And then there were the news agencies that helped the vaccine manufacturers stifle criticism from experts. https://dpa-factchecking.com/netherlands/211117-99-31886/.
Ps. In this fact-checking article, the name of Paul Offit also indicates. In 2021, another enthusiastic advocate of the covid vaccinations. In recent months, more critical articles have appeared from him. The umpteenth 'expert' who discovers the havoc he is doing in healthcare and still tries to get on the right side of history.
National media must maintain the relationship with the government in order to continue to exist. Their 'fact' checkers therefore test against laws and regulations and government guidelines, not against 'science', let alone against 'facts'.
I don't blame Paul Offitt for switching and pleading for a reduction in sentence. We may just have to keep track of the date on which everyone comes to their senses, make a timeline.
I know this story from the Ramirez family, but I continue to find the story about offering money to change the cause of death strange. Because as many people on Twitter I think have already indicated, a parent is not at all about that, and therefore does not have the power to change that or not (I like to hear it if I am wrong, of course). Quite an important detail, it seems to me. Without evidence, it looks a lot like a baseless accusation to an institution like FEMA, however justified it may be.
I did my best to find out if the story might have been made up but couldn't find anything about it. A parent can't change that, but FEMA can. I also understand that FEMA wants to prevent relatives from kicking tennis. So a signature that they agree with the change and maybe some additional provisions about publicity etc. are in that line. Hospitals also do that with patients if they arrange something that has not gone well, that is common.
Disagree with Anton, absolutely no reduction in sentence for responsible doctors like Paul Offit. This friendly-looking older man is evil in person. He has used his authority as director of the Vaccine Education Center in Philadelphia and member of the FDA advisary board to get a few hundred million people in the US to get vaccinated. This includes children (!) and pregnant women (!). And all this with the story that they posed a great risk unvaccinated, for themselves but especially for the vaccinated. https://www.chop.edu/centers-programs/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-conversations
The consequences are well known. And as a scientist, Offit should have known better. Because already in 2020, warnings were issued for the mRNA vaccines and in 2021 came the studies that provided these warnings with evidence. Philadelphia is located in the state of Pennsylvania. This state still has the death penalty, albeit suspended. For a person who is responsible for hundreds / thousands / tens of thousands of deaths (or even more, just say it) they may well undo that suspension!
Agreed, I rest my case. I don't know the history of Offit, I must confess. It was more about us in general that we should be happy with everyone who steps out of the narrative, look at John Campbell for example.
In the future, it may be necessary to look for a new Bishop Tutu for a yet-to-be-established Truth Commission that will examine the course of events surrounding the vaccination crimes and confront the participants and the victims with each other and let them speak and hear.
Allowing everyone to suffer his just punishment will be impossible; many "small" and perhaps "big" fish will be able to live on with impunity BUT not until after the issues have been clearly raised publicly