Wie het virusvaria-artikel van vorige week "Drip virology, zoonosis and disproportionate measures fit together seamlessly" heeft gelezen, kan naar punt 4 doorskippen. Maurice nam de aerosol-gerelateerde punten over in een artikel op zijn eigen site. Maar ik had er nog een laag onder die hij weglaat. Die vereist wat meer durf en in mijn positie hangt er verder niets vanaf dus ik heb makkelijk praten. Hieronder nog een keer uitgelegd hoe alle ogenschijnlijk irrationele gedragingen van autoriteiten naadloos in elkaar passen.
1. The zoonosis excuse
The zoonosis theory was supposed to conceal the lab leak. Those involved in the lab leak insist that the virus jumped from nature (the market) to humans, while the opposite has been clear for some time.1See article from December 2021. Why this frantic tenacity? Lab leaks have happened before. At least some of these were properly reported, including the illness and deaths caused.
This time, apparently, something different is going on, because not only was the reporting missing. It was worse: the databases with research information from the lab were taken off-line by the Chinese. All of a sudden, the whole history was a mess. That, too, is deviant behavior, which indicates that there is more to it this time.
Then there are the microbiological arguments and the fraudulent papers in corrupt scientific journals. Absolutely everything has been pulled out of the closet. And all this to keep a medical-biological investigation out of the wind? Go away anyway.
What was absolutely not allowed to come out, what was really 'Classified' because the State interest was involved, was not at all that an accident had happened in a lab with a virus that causes a particularly nasty flu. For the virologists involved, the revelation of their irresponsible and even banned long-term research was of course problematic - if only because of the fundraising - but that is also secondary. There really aren't any soldiers who will step into the breach for that.
The Real Problem is that American taxpayer money goes through devious channels to America's greatest threat (China), where knowledge about increasingly dangerous aerogenic viruses is then shared. Which also makes them even more dangerous for people. And as we know, especially in China, science and the military are not strictly separate containers, especially when it comes to technologies that can potentially be used as bioweapons. (For example, think of a virus & vaccine package, comparable to poison gas & gas masks.)
Illegal and irresponsible virological research with aerogenic viruses in the U.S. banned, was still carried out in China. In China of all places: the country that profiles the US as its greatest enemy. Chinese life-threatening, illegal research facilitated and paid for by the U.S. authorities through detours of money flows and failed supervision.
You can't imagine anything more frightening.
Wouldn't the American Secret Services and Department of Defense have known about bioweapons research? That would be a disgrace. But yes, if they did know, the shame might be even greater. Two archenemies who could continue to tinker with illegal bioweapons together. And the same applies to NATO, which is suddenly concerned about our public health. What should a military organization do with our epidemics?
2. They're just drops
Then the drip theory. Virologists do not like to admit that dangerous virological research is carried out at too low a safety level. By insisting on 'droplet contamination', they justify the low level of security used in the majority of their investigations. At least, the security level is too low for research into unknown aerogenic viruses or for experimental tinkering with viruses. This must be at BSL-3 level or even BSL-4. The common cold virus, on the other hand, may be examined ('characterized') at BSL-2 level, but if it is tinkered with, then it becomes a different story: Gain-of-Function problems then come into the picture.
This has created a grey area in which the virologists have pushed the boundaries and where they have also coloured outside the lines by combining virus components. That went best in China.
And once again we come to that collaboration between two superpowers with failing regulators and governments. That cannot be sold to the citizens. They were raised with a completely different narrative.
Die overheidsbelangen wegen vele malen zwaarder dan de reputatiekwestie van virologisch onderzoek. Laat staan dat een schuldvraag op het niveau van “welke labmedewerker heeft precies het buisje stuk laten vallen?” ertoe doet. Het gaat om de onttakeling van de falende systemen van de grootste machten op deze planeet, die werken aan technieken die wereldwijde desastreuze gevolgen kunnen hebben - en zullen krijgen, want ze gaan ermee door tot het voorgoed afloopt. Juist bij die partijen zit het meeste geld, de meeste connecties met het rechtssysteem, toegang tot de media, daar zitten de politici met onschendbaarheid en ongelimiteerde middelen. Miljarden nodig? Miljarden op tafel. Iedereen die subsidies ontvangt, ook elke wetenschapper, beschouwt zich onderdeel van dat kamp. Het is de vraag of het nog te stoppen is.
3. Chinese methods of the WHO
The entanglement of U.S. and China has also had its impact on political-medical decision-making. There too, the top showed deviant behavior. The tyrannical lockdowns were contrary to all knowledge that had been acquired (there were excellent pandemic protocols) and went directly against the WHO guidelines at the time, which stated that society should not be disrupted too much. But China has an influential position within the WHO; the WHO hung on the lips of the Chinese.
The WHO itself sailed blind because all data had been deleted and only the Chinese knew everything about it. They also had different types of solutions for the problem that arose, with less attention to the individual or to the dynamics in society. The view was so different that it led to an appeal to the Federal government in the US in March 2021. to investigate where all those measures came from and whether they could not have been intended to cause damage.
Below are the most important points that could not be reconciled with the state of science or pandemic protocols.
Key takeaways from the call
- Lockdowns arose on the orders of Xi Jinping, General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, and were disseminated into global policy by the World Health Organization with little analysis or logic
- The most influential institution for Covid-19 modeling, described as 'China's best academic partner in the West', is by far the most alarming and inaccurate Covid-19 modeler (Imperial College)
- Deadly Recommendations for Early Mechanical Ventilation Came From China
- The world-dominating, wildly inaccurate PCR testing protocols are based on incomplete, theoretical genome sequences provided by China
- Excessive PCR testing protocols came from China
- Studies showing significant asymptomatic transmission, the only scientific basis for lockdown of healthy individuals, came from China
- The CCP conducted an early, broad, systematic, and global propaganda campaign to promote its lockdown response
- Many leading pro-lockdown scientists and top public health officials among the nations are dramatically unqualified and show conspicuous pro-China bias
- Prominent Lockdown supporters have proven to be unusually indifferent to the devastating consequences of their policies
Measures have been implemented without even discussing these doubts, let alone removing them. Why would they do that, announce measures that go so far, which we already knew would cause great harm? Well, here we go again: it went way beyond public health. Not only the (American) State interest was at stake, but also the world order. The pressure was put on maximum.
China and the US, two superpowers, had collaborated. There was collaboration on technology that can produce banned bioweapons: a deadly virus with a matching immunizing vaccine. Somewhere during that development process something had leaked - they didn't know what exactly at the beginning, it hadn't even been tested on humans yet. The WHO was committed to stopping both China and the U.S. to keep friends. So every conceivable means was used to keep it as small as possible.
De positie van de WHO laat twee opties open. De eerste is dat de top heel goed wist wat er al jaren aan de hand was en dus als medeplichtige moest meespelen, al was het maar om zichzelf in stand te houden. Tweede optie: De WHO is een clubje useful idiots dat danst naar de pijpen van de financiers. De B&M Gates Stichting is niet voor niets een van de grootste bijdragers. Voorzitter Tedros riep het op de eerste persconferentie nog uit: "It's airborne! Corona is airborne!", werd daarin ter plekke gecorrigeerd en zwakte het onmiddellijk af met iets van "niet in militaire zin". Hij zei maar wat, kennelijk bereid om zijn belangrijke en nadrukkelijke waarschuwing onmiddellijk te laten vallen. Niet duidelijk beargumenteerd, maar het had iets met het leger te maken. "Oh ja: we hadden afgesproken dat we niets van het virus wisten." Zoiets.
Toen de draconische aanpak bleek te mislukken, konden ze niet zeggen ‘eh, laat maar dan, foutje...’. En waarom zouden ze, eindelijk hadden ze grip. Als ze nu doorpakten zouden ze alle ellende uit de wereld kunnen wegvaccineren, meneer Gates had het zelf gezegd... Dus gingen we jarenlang gebukt onder een dwangregime, separatisme en nieuwe opportunities voor sommigen, van de WPG tot en met prinses Maxima met haar aan een Digital Identity gekoppelde CBDC van de EU. Power grabs lagen voor het oprapen.
4. Only the vaccine can save us
Medicines with suspected efficacy against corona were banned, and antibiotics were also prescribed much less. Off-label medication was considered a crime. All of that was far from normal. In the case of an incipient serious flu epidemic, there has never been a trace of such rules. How did people become so convinced that we would soon have a vaccine that would solve everything?
Het verkoopverhaal van het mRNA-platform was dat farmaceuten in de toekomst met een druk op de knop een 100% passend vaccin op eender welk virus konden bouwen. Dat zou ideaal zijn om het hele probleem grondig op te ruimen. Alleen, dat platform was nog niet helemaal af, de mRNA-injecties nog niet getest. Maar er moesten snel besluiten worden genomen, de druk liet geen uitstel toe - en de oplossing zat aan tafel bij de eerste ring betrokkenen: de vaccinproducenten. Want tegen een gericht biowapen moet je je eigen mensen kunnen beschermen. De farmaceuten kregen dus een opdracht. Weliswaar een once-in-a lifetime-opportunity maar de risico's wilden ze niet zelf nemen.
Ministers with responsibility for public health clung to the sales speak of the pharmaceutical companies, while at the same time signing the purchase contracts in which the same pharmaceutical companies explicitly stipulated a turnover guarantee on a product that would probably not work, could have side effects and could have long-term effects.
Men vertrouwde op de belangenverstrengelde NIH en de FDA, tekende en moest miljoenen vaccins zien weg te spuiten. Met een overtuigend ‘safe and effective’ bestreden de insiders hun cognitieve dissonantie. Ondanks degenen die bovenstaand contract kenden. Die hielden hun mond. Er was geen weg terug. Mensen die lont roken bij de leugen 'safe and effective' werden gechanteerd met de leugen 'je doet het voor een ander', met de toelichting dat vooral jouw naasten en geliefden het zouden moeten ontgelden. Zo werkt de maffia ook.
Of dit ook zo gelopen was bij een pandemie van natuurlijke oorsprong, zonder China/VS-affaire weten we niet - het is in elk geval nooit eerder zo gelopen, terwijl we in het verleden toch best al wat pandemieën en zelfs lab-uitbraken hebben gehad.
Looking back on the panic
Top virologists and first-line government officials had a common goal: this outbreak had to be nipped in the bud no matter what, at all costs. In addition to the State interest, the reputation of the Virology/pharmaceutical sector was of course also at stake in the background, especially important for some officials.
To justify the draconian interventions, lies campaigns were rolled out and the news services happily supplemented this with people falling to their deaths on the streets and army columns with coffins. Media received a subsidy for their communication assistance to the government. After all, it resulted in a lot of extra work and it was in the national interest that people were properly informed, so you make agreements about that. With one mouth.
De zorgindustrie haakte gretig in op de nieuwe protocollen. Ze zorgden voor (mogelijk) dodelijke intubaties bij wanhopige Covid- en pneumoniepatiënten die geen antibiotica kregen, op IC's die dan weer met graagte werden gefilmd en geframed als de verschrikkingen van deze epidemische ziekte.
Perhaps the virologists themselves did not know exactly which sample had 'escaped' or how that would turn out in people and they decided to err on the side of caution, who knows. Probably not herself. After all, the virus was far from over, otherwise the production of the vaccine would have been started more expeditiously.
The WHO spread the fear propaganda, partly at the instigation of the generously sponsoring Chinese. After such an overemphasized horror story, experts and authorities cannot of course come back with "Oh that? Yes, that may have been a bit exaggerated at the time."
Top officials worldwide were so frightened that they created their own panic and intensified everything to make clear the political weight in their own parliaments: they had to be at the forefront of everything that would come from the WHO. With leaders like Trudeau and Netanyahu (who are his own people as guinea pigs to Big Pharma) in the lead in distributing the vaccines. You can't take all that back.
The sequel
It applies not only to politicians but especially to OMT members and relatives: anyone who fell for this and continued to do it after six months while counter-evidence piled up, both in terms of aerosols, zoonoses, measures and later with the vaccines, was either incompetent or complicit and has entered an area where criminal offenses have been committed such as negligence, carelessness, deception, data fraud, forgery, conflict of interest, conspiracy, disinformation – resulting in preventable deaths. Attempted multiple manslaughter.
Even more reason to keep the lid on the pot. I wish the members of Parliament's Committee of Inquiry much strength and wisdom, but above all unselfishness.
Footnotes
- 1See article from December 2021
Dazzlingly clear. It's never been a real pandemic. People have indeed become seriously ill from it, and people have certainly died from it. But that is of all times. This also happens during flu waves. I do wonder how many people have died because of the adjusted protocols.
It is obvious that the measures (medical and non-medical interventions) have caused many times more misery than the virus itself. But whether that can ever be traced remains to be seen.
Furthermore, it remains amazing that 'we' (I mean the skeptics who read these kinds of blogs) look at the same situation so completely differently than the believers. It has nothing to do with facts, but with an almost religious belief in a narrative. We are the Gentiles. Ever since I was a child, I have been amazed by the phenomenon of religion and the misery that comes with it.
Nietzsche had already figured it out:
Nein, gerade Tatsachen gibt es nicht, nur Interpretationen.
Furthermore, it is interesting to understand where the line was (is) between malice and useful idiots. Hugo is an evil useful idiot. That is also possible. I won't say anything about Rutte, we want to keep it tidy here.
I agree with you that at a certain point 'they' couldn't go back. With which they gradually worked themselves deeper into misery. What percentage of the population(s) would still believe in it?
And then that vaccination urge. Is that purely commercially driven? Saw ads promoting vaccines against the RS virus for the elderly. Scare tactics. But this also goes further. Pets are also being vaccinated en masse. A lot of money is made with that too.
Another bull's-eye, Anton! What more is there to say? We can only hope that the 'committee' dares to hit the nail on the head, and does not lose itself in side issues. It won't be up to a few (e.g. PvH), but I have huge doubts about the rest. Just think of the alignment of the proposal to finally start research into the link between excess mortality and the jabs. What a shame again, and with a new House of Representatives. It is clear that the usual suspects (D66, GLPVDA, VVD, CU,...) are once again obstructive, but that NSC is also joining that herd: unbelievable and unheard of. What a country, what a government, what a bunch of bastards...
Chapeau! Best article (so far...) on the 'Covid19 pandemic' on this blog.
A nice sketch of the possible hare path. You attribute a central role to the WHO, where I myself think of the security services. Everyone in the parliaments and media was on the same page internationally. What power does that applause machine get so synchronized? In my opinion, the WOB and WOO messages provide a clear answer to this.
I see the security services more as experts who have flown in to set out the lines. If the army could have been deployed, they would have done so. That is not to say that the army would have been the cause of the misery. They carry out a task that they are good at, because it is requested by other government experts who do not have the necessary expertise and infrastructure themselves.
Hello Anton,
According to Sacha Latypova, it's the other way around. The U.S. military has made things laugh. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EgRzLpA0QM from minute 11). Personally, I think that is a view that could explain the unanimous Western idiocy in science, politics and media.
Here is an extensive substantiation from the video of the Stockholm Conference, Lakaruppropet, January 21, 2023 from minute 7.
https://rumble.com/v28x6zk-sasha-latypova-msc.-nsa-team-enigma-covid-19-countermeasures-evidence-of-th.html
This also makes it clear that the cause of all the misery certainly does not lie with the WEF, and that all WEF wappies equally have butter on their heads and should do some soul-searching about this. Although it may be defensible that certain forces in society thought they had an interest in incentivizing things for personal gain, however, that these forces would have set up a worldwide conspiracy to enslave us is just as absurd as the theory that Covid is a zoonosis and spreads via droplets.
Hey Rogier! Long time no see. No, I don't see that plan either. WEF is more the 'never waste a good crisis' idea. They have tried to take advantage of the chaos and fear to push through their centralist (EU) and totalitarian-technocratic (CBDC, Digital Identity) plans. The career hunters in the Dutch cabinet were only too happy to score points on that, even the WPG got them through. I agree with you that it is also easy to explain without a preconceived plan.
I don't know if it's premeditated or not. The fact that the IDEA seems unlikely is no reason to rule it out. William T. Still's 1996 documentary The Money Masters shows that people at the top can be evil through and through. Maybe that's also a prerequisite for getting there?
I think it's a bit blunt, Rogier. Why this choice of words, 'WEF wappies'? Agree that the WEF community, as Anton calls it, has taken advantage of the 'crisis', and has not consciously orchestrated it. What was needed at the beginning of 2020 was peace and reason. But it is precisely those people who have been silenced. Ioanidis and Jay Bhattacharya. Recognized scientists. Because the media was in the pocket of the governments. Organizations like WHO and WEF have only fanned the fire, and you can blame them for that. That doesn't necessarily make it a conspiracy, but increasing control of citizens is clearly part of the agenda. Rutte and Trudeau play the most well-behaved boys in the class to impress Uncle Klaus. Rutte behaves like a kind of king who makes promises to indicate that the Netherlands wants to be at the forefront of the 'green transition'. What do you mean by democracy?
At best, a prime minister is first among equals. Even the phrase "Prime Minister" is relatively young. Until 1945 the title was 'chairman of the Council of Ministers'. Animal farm where the democratically elected pigs impose a dictatorship on the other animals. Rutte plays the big man abroad. Of course, people then start to believe in conspiracies. It's more of a definitional issue. A conspiracy in the sense that a number of people prepare a scenario and also know how to implement it is rare. But what does exist is that a ruling class (let's call them the elite) shares a common belief that can no longer be questioned.
Amsterdam is a great example. Where a crooked 'left-wing' woke mayor fails to properly arrange the garbage collection, gets into financial trouble, but makes apologies on behalf of 'all Amsterdammers' for a slavery past, where an idiotic 30 kilometers per hour rule has been set, and where they want to make the fire brigade 'inclusive' at all costs (see the NPO documentary). It's all well-intentioned, but these people are completely detached from reality. Dijksma in Utrecht who bans open fires. Jetten who really has no idea. A fool like the Younger who, like a kind of negative king Midas, turns everything he touches into poop. Kuipers disappearing, and Rutte refusing to say what's going on. Not to mention King Rutte himself. I have a firm belief in the unrestricted clumsiness of these self-appointed administrators. I've seen it all happen around me. Large organizations that outsiders think are well managed. Idiotic decisions by 'managers', such as those that have slowly replaced the Rhineland model since the adoption of the Anglo-Saxon model, have gained the upper hand. Without any substantive knowledge. To outsiders, this kind of deeply sad amateurism must come across as a conspiracy. Those directors can't be that bad, can they?
Parkinson's Law squared.
You can call me a wappie, Rogier.
Nice exchanges of thoughts again...
WEF and WHO are certainly not going free. They have already set up the next panic pandemic, of course with the best intentions of their own.
Trick: fear-mongering, power harvesting is fully deployed again. See: https://videopress.com/v/s19hi8nN with illness X in combination with the successfully assured slogan: 'not if, but when'.
(The question is not if, but when the people will be😉 resurrected en masse)
For the time being, we allow ourselves to be frightened and thus supposedly brought further under control in our own interest. With an upcoming virus that is probably no more than a (dead) canary in the coal mine (read: a non-pathogenic but simply findable in vulnerable, sick bodies) in an environment polluted by aerosols and medication, among other things.
Infantilisation, supposedly for the purpose of
civil protection continues cheerfully in Adam (the municipality now transfers money to charity if you stick to the thirty kilometers in Noord)
Indicate via a cheerful green glowing LED lighting powered by solar cells (probably only money is transferred when the weather is nice). If successful, it will soon be used elsewhere in the city.
Now. (Sorry, just had to get this out of the way).