On Facebook I sometimes post messages to which I don't have much to add or for which I see little supporting evidence from other sides. A report from yesterday about a shocking pathological examination is against FB guidelines. Apparently that Taiwanese-looking German emeritus professor is Dr. Bhakdi is just as crazy as that Dutch retired microbiologist who is now on bitchute, Dr. Pierre Capel. Both are desperate and are heavily censored. Geert Vandenbossche is also such a person, just like Robert Malone. Did that German falsify figures to prove his point? The acclaimed German pathologist must then be involved in some kind of conspiracy. I can't imagine it.
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is a Thai-German microbiologist who has been speaking out against the COVID-19 hysteria since the beginning of the crisis.
He was a postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics in Freiburg and at The Protein Laboratory in Copenhagen. He joined the Institute of Medical Microbiology at the University of Giessen and became President of Medical Microbiology at the University of Mainz. Dr. Bhakdi has published more than three hundred articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology and parasitology, for which he has received numerous awards and the Order of Merit of Rhineland-Palatinate.
Deskundigen geven in de coronacrisis over het algemeen weinig blijk van voortschrijdend inzicht, zien we in de legacy media. Daartegenover staan de gecensureerde dissidenten. Bhakdi zit in de hoek van Robert Malone, Geert Vandenbossche, Pierre Capel: gepensioneerde en dus onafhankelijke wetenschappers, zonder verplichtingen aan hun broodheer - in elk geval totdat er een spoedwetje komt om verspreiders van desinformatie te korten op hun pensioen.
In any case, according to the fact-checkers, this man doesn't understand it at all.
Of 17 autopsies, on vaccinated non-covid cases, died naturally but still requested an autopsy by the family, 90% appear to have died due to the vaccination.
Dr. S. Bhakdi, Dr. Anne Burkhardt
These are deaths registered as natural causes, while the family apparently did not agree and went through with an autopsy, probably because they had a vaccine suspicion. According to this research, this is largely justified.
Criticism
n=17 is certainly not representative. Still a signal and in the absence of transparent data, we have to pick up signals.
There is no peer review. That seems to me to be essential, especially with something like autopsies. However, in the absence of higher-quality data, we will have to make do with this. This is a direct result of the surreptitious, sneaky and partly because of this unscientific behavior of RIVM and VWS.
I say this as a concerned layman. This is a task for science journalists.
Het ging om de links in dit blog-artikel: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/bhakdiburkhardt-pathology-results
Directe link naar de studie :
https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/end-covax.pdf
De link naar de video.
Burkhardt begint 9:35, presentatie rond 16:00. https://odysee.com/@de:d/Pressekonferenz--Tod-durch-Impfung-Undeklarierte-Bestandteile-der-COVID-19-Impfstoffe:b
of https://www.bitchute.com/embed/hEzDeDUSnKfM (beter beeld, slecht geluid)
Persconferentie: https://odysee.com/@de:d/Pathologie-Konferenz-2-de:d
