Waarover zou het moeten gaan deze week? De kansen van het URT, het Uitbraak Reparatie Team, o.l.v. Khadija Arib met leden als Wybren en Pepijn, dat de leden van de parlementaire enquêtecommissie ondersteunt? Want wie dat nu moet gaan doen... Alle coronadossierkennis is verdwenen uit de Tweede Kamer.
Or a comparison between the EMA's letter to Engel et al., which shows that the governments have made up their own narrative, and Steve Kirsch's futile attempts to get the FDA and CDC to look at verified, other data than their own studies? In any case, the government institutes have in common that they only test their advice against their own excellent and therefore unapproachable expertise.
Of een wat speelser stukje dat uitlegt waarom de term 'theoretisch geschoold' beter kan worden vervangen door 'onpraktisch geschoold'... Dat zou misschien de aandacht kunnen trekken van Marianne Zwagerman. Maar ja, een paar dagen geleden sprak ik Stan Baggen toevallig en die had geen weet van mijn artikel, over zijn stuk in Trouw. Ik had toch gedacht dat via-via dat wel bij hem terecht zou komen.
So here is a slightly more detailed report of my introduction to the youth programme of the Anne Frank House.
The good works of the Anne Frank House
I attended a presentation afternoon of the Anne Frank House. Head of the Education Department · Anne Frank House, Norbert Winterleitner, explained the purpose of the youth programme, whose participants were going to present their projects. The aim of this programme is to make young people aware of universal rights so that they can guard against the signals that started in the 1930s. He specifically mentioned:
- Exclusion of groups of people
- violation of human rights
- Restrictions on freedom of expression
- A government that decides where you belong
"OK, nou gaan we het krijgen" dacht ik nog eventjes.
During various talks, there were sporadic hints at the dark times in which we live, but this was referring to the results of the recently held democratic elections.
Geen woord over de afgelopen vier jaar, geen woord. Ik heb dat in de na-borrel nog even bij deze en gene laten vallen maar ik kreeg dan te horen dat dat toch echt 'heel wat anders was' en dat 'de intenties heus wel goed waren'. Dat bevestigde voor mij het probleem. Het niet benoemen, het niet willen zien van wat er gebeurt omdat 'de intenties goed zijn' en 'ze het beste met ons voor hebben'. Omdat het in de krant staat. En daar hebben we dat vermaledijde vertrouwen weer. De goedgelovigheid die alles oppervlakkig houdt.
This is precisely the behaviour that I had expected the Anne Frank House to be keen on. But they are in the middle of it themselves, they march along in the narrative. Their own key points are being violated and they just don't see it.
Mij werd ook nog omzichtig te verstaan gegeven dat het onderwerp eigenlijk ook niet zo geschikt was om hier te bespreken, dat zette maar kwaad bloed, wat bij mij weer vragen opriep over hoe vrij we nog kunnen spreken. Toen er ook nog werd vergoelijkt met 'ja en achteraf is het makkelijk praten, ze moesten toch wat, ze wisten het niet, er was nog niets bekend', toen dacht ik onwillekeurig aan 'wir haben es nicht gewusst'. Dat heb ik maar niet hardop gezegd.
Achteraf besefte ik dat ik de Neurenbergcode had gemist. Die leek mij toch best relevant maar werd niet genoemd. Ik denk dat ze dat voor de enthousiaste jongeren, bij wie ik een hoge vaccinatiegraad vermoed, een 'te-ver-van-mijn-bed-show' vinden. Maar het was een leerzaam bezoek. Het is altijd krachtig geweest om de meest geëngageerde jongeren vroeg aan te spreken en ze meteen in jeugdgroepen met de neus in de juiste richting te zetten.
What an intriguing rollercoaster it was again, this week. And to think that people go on holiday to experience something.
Enough about that. I spent most of my writing time on something else: the Dutch subtitles for a German lecture by emeritus Professor Sucharit Bhakdi.
An intense lecture by Sucharit Bhakdi
Toen enkele maanden geleden bekend werd dat de vaccins verontreinigd waren en dat de productiemethode en de samenstelling van de uitgerolde vaccins een andere was dan de productiemethode en de samenstelling van de goedgekeurde vaccins, hadden overheden en hun falende instituten nog op hun schreden kunnen terugkeren. Dat waren immers daadwerkelijk nieuwe feiten waarvan ze hadden kunnen zeggen: "dat wisten we niet, dat zou wel van alles kunnen verklaren". Steve Kirsch zei dat meteen al, Campbell meen ik ook, later.
Watch the video below with Sucharit Bhakdi and realize that despite the pile of available and unrefuted scientific evidence about the dangers of the vaccines, neither governments nor their institutions have made a U-turn. So they let this moment pass. Bhakdi says at the end of the video that they can still pull their heads out of the noose, but it is already clear that they are not going to do that. There are misdeeds that are so serious that you know that your head will have to go back into that noose. There's no turning back now. Every wrongdoing is now committed knowingly, with premeditation.
Het bewijs dat de onderzoeksrapporten en dus de goedkeuring van de vaccins over een ander product gingen dan over de uitgerolde vaccins, had voldoende moeten zijn voor terugtrekking. Desondanks wordt er stug doorgeprikt. We hadden het kunnen weten: de WPG met de 'gereedschapskist' vol sociale dwangwerktuigen wordt ook in ere gehouden, terwijl duidelijk is hoe onzinnig en zelfs schadelijk de maatregelen zijn die de farma-minister zo graag in handen wilde hebben.
Does Sucharit Bhakdi know what he's talking about?
Vanaf 1972 deed Bhakdi onderzoek naar de werking van de niet-specifieke afweermechanismen van het lichaam aan het Max Planck Instituut voor Immunobiologie in Freiburg. Hij droeg bij aan een beter begrip van de mechanismen waarmee moleculen in het bloed lichaamsvreemde stoffen onschadelijk maken. In 1978 ontdekte Bhakdi een eiwit dat cellen aanvalt en beschadigt door in het celmembraan te zinken. Dit was het 'handhavingsmolecuul', dat wordt gevormd op het oppervlak van lichaamsvreemde cellen als gevolg van een kettingreactie waarbij het immuunsysteem betrokken is. Dit werd gevolgd door de ontdekking dat bacteriën op hun beurt soortgelijke eiwitten kunnen produceren. In 1984 nodigde de Royal Society in Londen Bhakdi uit om zijn concept van celmembraanschade te presenteren. Vanaf dat moment concentreerde Bhakdi zich op onderzoek naar dit onderwerp.
Memberships & Features
- Lid van de Collaborative Research Centres van de Duitse Onderzoeksstichting "Proteins as Tools in Biology" aan de Universiteit van Giessen (1987-1990),
- Plaatsvervangend woordvoerder van het onderzoekscentrum "Immunopathogenesis" (1990-1999)
- Woordvoerder van het Collaborative Research Center "490 Infection and Persistence in Infections" in Mainz (2000-2011).
- Co-founder and board member of the Association of Physicians and Scientists for Health, Freedom and Democracy, which was founded in May 2020 and lost its non-profit status in October 2020. The aim of the association is to take action against the measures taken by the German government to contain the corona pandemic.
In de herfst van 2020 was hij een van de eerste ondertekenaars van de "oproep voor vrije debatruimtes" (Appell für freie Debattenräume [de], een Duitse bewerking van het eerder in de VS gelanceerde project "A Letter on Justice and Open Debate" van de Amerikaan Thomas C. Williams).
He was editor-in-chief of Medical Microbiology and Immunology from 1990 to 2012.
Bhakdi has been retired for some time. All the medical institutes mentioned above have cancelled him. Read on Wikipedia how he is dismissed as an anti-Semite. Hallo Anne Frank Stichting...? Ze spelen jullie troefkaarten uit. Goede intenties of niet: dit had je niet mogen laten gebeuren.
Watch the video of Sucharit Bhakdi with English subtitles. There are some mistakes in it, but it is easy to follow. The original (without Dutch subtitles) is on YouTube.
An updated transcript can be found here here.
The 2nd Corona Symposium of the AfD parliamentary group in the German Bundestag took place on 11 and 12 November 2023. For two days, renowned experts such as Prof Dr Sucharit Bhakdi, Prof Dr Stefan Homburg, Prof Dr Andreas Sönnichsen, Dr Ronald Weikl, Dr Gunter Frank, data analyst Tom Lausen, Prof Dr Paul Cullen and pathologist Prof Dr Walter Lang made the event an unforgettable experience for all involved thanks to their high level of expertise.
The statements made during the symposium reflect the opinion of the speaker in question.
Via the official YT channel of the AfD parliamentary group in the German Bundestag
Thanks again for this article again Herman.
By the way, the video has already been removed. Maybe replace it with a version of Rumble?
It's Anton this time, not Herman. But thanks anyway, Arnoud.
The video does it again!
Hahaha. Sorry. 😉 Thnx. 🙂
Again a good article Anton. And thanks for the translation. Thanks in part to you, I keep up to date with the vaccination genocide. Please keep going.
When exactly was this lecture of Bhakdi given and who were the people present in the room?
Good question! I've added that at the bottom of the article, just above the video.
I read in this, in a nutshell, that there may be at least two very harmful effects of the vaccines
1: creating too long a period of continuous reactions of the immune system (which eventually weakens the immune system itself)
2: foreign DNA can enter the body that will reside in the cell nucleus and go along with cell division. The cells are then eventually seen as foreign and therefore attacked by the immune system.
Is this a bit true?
Sure, and there's a few more to come, but at the heart of it all, you've completely understood!
If you've had those, the damage will continue permanently, won't it? I am very worried, look forward to your reply.
What I wonder is: whether this will be a very slow process or whether this process can play out differently for different people. Of course, the vaccine has only been around for almost 3 years. It is an extraordinarily complicated event that only makes me dizzy as a layman. That's how many questions I have. By the way, also the disease itself in addition to the vaccine. What part does the disease itself have, as side effects because I don't find it at all implausible that the virus has been tinkered with and it has escaped from a lab. So two double misery.
Well, there is now also a lot of reporting about the reasons why so many people voted for the PVV. It is clear that the Rutte cabinets have caused a lot of dissatisfaction. Many reasons are mentioned, but I have not yet seen the technocratic, hateful and discriminatory model practices of Hugo, Rutte and co. And yet, millions are still angry about it. I hope Pieter Omtzigt still has it on his list.
That Bhakdi clearly has no idea what he's talking about. The scientific insights of lightweights like Hugo carry more weight. 'We don't know exactly what's in a frikandel either'. In Germany, of course, you have the same idiots, such as Lauterbach.
Yesterday I went to Apeldoorn at BLCKBX. It's fun and admirable what Flavio and his team do. With admiration we looked at the team of the Doctors Collective, with whom a valuable panel discussion was held about healthcare. What worries me is that they are still seen as anti-vaxxers and obstructionists. Hannah Visser cannot become chairman because otherwise she will lose her job. Berufsverbot, and then we're back to your first topic. A few 100 kindred spirits, 'awake' as Flavio calls them.
Strange times, Anton.
Yes, but they (the Government) had to do something and they didn't know it. How is it possible that a very ordinary citizen without superintelligence knew in no time that there had already been studies by doctors and scientists and not the least that showed us what was really going on and completely different from what our Government told us. They must have known. I would have liked to have told the people of that foundation, but I stopped. I'm not really allowed to say it, because it can come across as arrogant, but I can't see it any other way than: they're stupid. Oil-stupid. That's what I've kept from the corona period.
Well, I think that's the key question: why do some people see it, and others (the majority) don't? Has only a limited amount to do with intelligence.
According to Mattias de Smet, around 80% of a population usually follows a narrative. Can also be 80-90, it doesn't really matter. Mass formation, often fueled by fear. This fear is deliberately created.
Like you, I've been skeptical from the start, and the more you see, the more you read, the more you experience, the firmer the conviction that it's no good. It goes from a feeling of distrust to a well-founded opinion. I can defend that opinion to anyone who believes in the government narrative. But I never get the opportunity.
I read Mattias' book and asked him exactly this question via email: what is the difference between these 10-20% skeptics and between the 80-90% followers? He doesn't know that either.
All I know is that from an early age I have been curious, have always wanted to understand things and have always been a bit cross. Perhaps the same is true for the other skeptics.
'We' see the madness so clearly, we don't have to convince each other of it anymore. It's maddening to see that so few people see through it, and then you start to think they're stupid indeed. No one knows exactly how that works. I'm glad that we can exchange ideas on sites like this one without being judged.
Ik heb vandaag nog eens het verhaal van de kleine prins, gehoord (deze keer, ipv gelezen), misschien is hier het verschil tussen die 80% en 20% uit te analyseren…
https://youtu.be/5wvgJePdZ7s?feature=shared
Hi Anton,
I'm participating in a study by the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), but only to know how they cheat.
And they do blood tests every year :-), useful to know if I have had Corona, not once according to the tests but I have had the flu twice, once heavy and 1 time mild, which were very different from before. My virus may have escaped from somewhere else.
Here are some links of info I get:
According to Vasco, the side effects are very rare, reliable research you think.
https://www.rivm.nl/corona/coronaprik/bijwerkingen
https://www.rivm.nl/vasco/resultaten
Curious would then perhaps be the answer why a small percentage does not follow the narrative. Not curious about what the neighbor does or says in his or her spare time, to name just one example, but curious about how things work. The how, what, where and the why. I do think that there is a head on that small percentage, including myself. Because it strikes me very much that people are not curious at all in the sense as I indicated. It could very well be that the majority of the people could live just fine in a dictatorship.
If you want to see how that feels, I recommend the movie Total Trust (at the suggestion of the fourth wave). Should actually see the law bown, because that's how it can very well end. Also here. There is more of a hierarchical culture in China than here, but a totalitarian system can also emerge here. And technology helps with that. The QR code that was introduced because of the covid 'pandemic' is used there to block people. Unfortunately, this is not a scary future, but a reality. I've mentioned this one before I think, but it doesn't hurt me:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBfoAn2WrX8&ab_channel=FilmMovement
This is just a hypothesis: you learn from your parents that the NOS news is reliable and brings the "facts". And you learn that the government does lie about some things, but that when it comes down to it, they have your best interests at heart, they don't want you dead... Then you grow up, you get a smartphone, you work your ass off, you have children, they have to go to ballet, football, etc. and as soon as all those things have happened, you plop down on the couch and watch the news, which you think, because your parents (and others) once told you, is reliable....
Oh, no... they won't lie...
At school you didn't learn to think for yourself, your smartphone does that for you...
Just some empathy with the people who think it is/was all true... Curiosity has been rammed out! It's all about "fitting in", and you don't want to stand out... So don't go against the majority and/or go along with any narrative...
Just like in WWII... Hitler came up with horrible things, the people (in Germany) worshipped him, because there were free bratwurst und bier parties...
I think it's curiosity combined with a healthy dose of suspicion and skepticism about the reliability of those above us that make us belong to the 10-20%. From the moment I saw the images of people falling over (it was always the same 2 people; one fell and one was already lying down) I knew; 'Oh, they want to sell a drug'. Then came the info that this is only one aspect of the power grab. I wonder what will happen if forced vaccinations, authorized and ordered by the WHO, take place. Exciting, 'more angry times' lie ahead.
It's so unpredictable that so many don't (want to) see it.
One of the things I keep doing is trying to "connect" and make them think.
So from now on I try to ask them a question instead of giving them an opinion.
That's the beauty of our brains: ask a question and "the system" automatically goes to work thinking.
I've also never had so many social media accounts and been active on them. Now I use it to post links to documentaries, interviews, etc etc every week, I know that friends/colleagues etc watch it every now and then, it does spread drop by drop.
If only one "wakes up", they will do the same thing again, i.e. try to make others think, etc.
It is spreading steadily.
In short, my tip / request: keep sharing / posting info.
If they don't want to see it through Corona, then maybe through the "climate crisis".
Sooner or later, more and more people start to think about all the absurdity that is happening in society.
Propaganda prikexperiment, oversterfte, oorlogen sponsoren, vluchtelingenstroom creëren, CO2 & klimaat nonsense, insects & fake lab food, schandaal na schandaal na schandaal.
** (leer te leggen = neer te leggen)