De kwaliteit van de data bleek niet te deugen. Lees hierover the next article in which objections are considered.
With the latest figures from Germany, a turning point has been reached: we can now really speak of vaccination damage and vaccination deaths. The circumstantial evidence is now piled up sky high, only the corpus delicti is still missing: the data manipulation, data concealment, misrepresentation, whatever you want to call it. Our governments have that data in their hands. Only those can provide hard evidence that the vaccinations have nothing to do with tens of thousands of unnecessary deaths in the Netherlands.
I will spare you the German names, institutes and protocols. Protagonists are in any case
- Paul Ehrlich Institute
The Paul Ehrlich Institute is a German federal agency, medical regulatory body and research institute for vaccines and biomedicines.
- Robert Koch Institute
The Robert Koch Institute is a German federal government agency and research institute responsible for disease control and prevention.
- Kassenärtzlichen Vereinigungen (KV-en)
Political party: Alternative für Deutschland.
The German AfD presents data here from a kind of WOB request, which is still well honored in Germany. The AfD is considered by many to be (extreme) right. what is it that only the extreme right wants to get the facts out... Or will anyone who wants to see the facts be portrayed as extreme right-wing?
In any case, the data request provided a PDF with 90 pages as below. (At the bottom of this article you will also find links to Excel files). It immediately indicates how outdated our laws are, there should have been a legally prescribed data format for that a long time ago, at least an open importable standard as is often behind download buttons (CSV, XLS, JSON for example). There is no bombshell data behind those download buttons.
Data analyst Tom Lausen (see also previous article) went to work with it and filtered on the codes mentioned by the Paul Ehrlich Institute as important signal values to keep an eye on when introducing new drugs.
Signals of Special Interest
- R96.0 Sudden death
- R96.1. Onset of death within 24 hours of onset of symptoms, with no other cause
- R98. Death without the presence of others
- R99. Other uncertain or unspecified causes of death
These codes do not require any further explanation. And of course Maarten: even without vaccination, people can die in this way. But that can't explain the graph below.
Later it was added: "I46.1. Sudden heart failure" but that is not yet specified in the graph above.
In the earlier article with Tom Lausen, the legal obligations to which the German Institutes have to comply were also mentioned. They don't, through all kinds of delaying tactics. In the Netherlands we have no such laws. We have never before experienced first-hand what a Nazi-like collective can achieve in our own country. In good faith we start from promises and intentions. We still rely on parliament and the nonsensical, incompetent designs of debates, despite the fact that WOB requests are ignored, data is hidden, promises are broken, laws are broken, communication erased and/or painted away, the big magazines are currently the flyerers of state propaganda and the broadcasters serve as soapbox where anyone can stand on who wants to support the state narrative with meaning or nonsense.
It even goes so far that Beau was ridiculed last night elon Musk. That's dust for another blog but I wonder at all those shows how on earth they find those guys together? So united, so in the same tunnel vision... that must become increasingly difficult. After all, the group of good noses in the corona story is getting smaller and smaller. Whoever changes camps leaves the state narrative; never does anyone walk the other way with motivations like: "Oh my gosh – the lockdowns actually seem to have helped and the vaccines have been a godsend after all, a miracle of technology! And contamination just goes through droplets, so masks do work! And hand pumps too. Sorry I didn't want to take that all this time."
Does anyone know of a proven doubter who now supports government policy? Let us know in the comments.
Graphs and tables
These are also based on data from the Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung – KBV Publication of 29.11.2022 / Diagnosis data of approximately 72 million legally insured Germans.
Reports of death. How do we look at this? It seems that the longer the jab has been suffered, the fewer people link a sudden death to the jab. After 42 days I can imagine something. But not within three days.
For example, look at 18-59 years. Between 30 days, about 2.1 deaths per day have been reported.
Day 1 after vaccination: 85 reported! On day two: only 44. On day three, only 15 more will be added. A sudden death within three days is just as suspicious for relatives as after two days, or even within 1 day. The drop from 85 to 15 is not because people have forgotten that someone has recently been vaccinated.
The first quarter of 2022 does not look hopeful
See also the video on Odysee: Press conference of the AfD, including the text of this article, also as a Dutch version.
The course of myocarditis and pericarditis, compared quarterly over the last seven years.
Percentage increase in various complaints and disorders first quarter 2022 vs first quarter 2019.
- Stroke up 6%
- Headaches: up 25%
- Acute respiratory infections: up 60%
- Lung cancer: 93% up
Germany is not the Netherlands...
That's right, in the Netherlands similar research is not allowed, the data are state secrets. No doubt it is also a drama here. How long will government agencies and media succeed in hiding this from view in the Netherlands?
It is understandable that Elon Musk's transparency initiative is being convulsively sabotaged by the media, health initiatives, governments and the EU. After all, when the truth comes to light, state security comes into question, hence the blackening.
Unfortunately, shaking up the state order is entirely justified. The State should be there for the citizen and that time is clearly over. Health care ditto and the media that should be controlling have been pushed into alternative corners.
It is an incompetent clump of power that needs to be thoroughly revised. And then 'incompetent' is the most gentle qualification I can think of. And vaccination is still encouraged for everyone from the age of 12...
The PDF does not make it easy to check the data. Critical reviews are now also available. The data also remains intact in the fact checks.
If you want to check the source yourself: in this discussion of amidwesterndoctor there are links to Excel data.
And yet another, "Citizen Scientist" is with that again got started, including the text of this article, also as a Dutch version.
No matter how they turn it, the image remains consistent with Lausen's presentation. Tom Lausen is certainly not a cookie cutter.