Data at a Preprint from 20231De preprint v1 suggested that the willingness to vaccination among the American population increased as the puncture campaign and associated advertising activities took place. They received a more positive opinion about the COVID vaccines. Something special was also observed: the small group of highest educated people (PhD, professionals) did not change his mind. The willingness to vaccination even fell slightly in that group and ultimately came lower than all other groups after the 2021 vaccination campaign.
That could be explained, as I described at the time Higher educated more pricked, phd less2 https://virusvaria.nl/hoger-opgeleiden-meer-geprikt-gepromoveerden-juist-minder/ Now, a year and a half later, that post was shared on X by Martijntje Smits3Martijntje Smits on X Martijntje Smits) And that again caught the attention of Skepticus Pepijn van Erp, who noticed that it was not right: in the published version, the highest educated people were not the least punctual preparation at all. In the meantime that turned out to be adjusted.
It turns out: my article was based on preprint version 14The three versions of the study. The data has been adjusted in PrePrint version 2. Or re-Weighed, interpreted or ge-asmr'd or whatever: we don't know because there is no word about it, while it still has a radical consequence. At "Study Sample" in version 2 it has been added that suspicious respondents have been deleted, but that concerned less than 1% of all respondents. Of these, 28% was "highly educated". That is therefore 0.28% of all respondents. The deletion of this can lead to an increase of 5%. Apparently there was reason to take a critical look at this in version 2.
Pepijn found a fact check In which doubts were already expressed after the first preprint about the validity of the figures. If those figures were in favor of the vaccines, the criticism would probably have come from other sides, but well. In any case, the figures have been adjusted and to what extent that it has been wet and whether the undesirability of the outcome played a role in this cannot be traced.
Possibly the Peer reviewers also thought it was not such a good idea to publish that those who themselves have experience with reading and/or writing scientific studies were the least enthusiastic about the vaccinations at the end of 2021. Who will say it? Or they didn't recognize herself in it? Or the willingness to vaccination is paramount? We have seen more reports in which the sentence “The Vaccines Saved Millions of Lives†must alleviate what can be found in the data. But that the data itself is adjusted is remarkable. It may have happened on good grounds, but then report it and be more specific.5"Respondents who have not filled in the questions about vaccination rate and intention (n = 365.426) or have indicated their gender as" prefer to describe yourself "(n = 31,664), resulting in a sample of 5.088.772; self -described gender (selected by the Ravings and the Ravings and the Ravings and the Ravings and the Ravings and the Ravings and the Ravings and the Ravings and the Ravings Unusual answers (eg Spanish ethnicity [41.4%], the oldest age group [23.2% ≥75 years] and the highest level of education [28.1% doctorate]), which indicates that the survey is not filled in good faith. "
Why don't they say what their vaccination willingness was, that is the investigation about that?
All in all, it turns out to be a study that we cannot do much with. Below the 6 groups that were distinguished in the study. Almost all groups have remained the same, only the highest educated shoot up 5% ..
Go with your mouse over the graph to compare (or tap the graph)
Facebook scholars
It was a Facebook survey. Perhaps there were many people who were profiled by Facebook as "scientific professional" or as "promoted". That could well, that group benefits in the advertisements. Many advertisers are Kien on those more difficult to reach groups. So something was corrected afterwards, but how? In the second instance, how did they know who the real PhD students were ...? Estimated by age or something like that? On vaccination willingness? It won't. And how many people with a lower vaccination agency did not have to have been deleted from that group to get that percentage up 5%?
What you could in any case state as a hypothesis is that one is more receptive up to and including Master's level for what is banged around in the media. The group above seems to be a little better.
Just change data!? That doesn't happen!
So, if the importance of care and in particular the willingness to vaccination is at stake. Wouter Aukema shows it.
Wouter Aukema has a mission: getting data to the table. Since last year he has access to a powerful system and with his IT knowledge and with the help of AI, he knows public data, which can be requested in small fragments, to put together automated again into a searchable database. He was able to download the hospital admission data supplied by the Netherlands via the EMA website.
Alarming:
- NL Doctors only report 1 op 45 Serious side effects
- Medicines = 97% under reporting
- Official figures CBS and EMA for 2013-2020:
On average 38,569 hospital admissions [Diagnosis group ICD-10: Side effects] With only 854 reports.
- How long are Lareb+CBG+IGJ+VWS aware of this?
- Why is no enforcement committed to this, all those years? (Red: The question that we also asked in the increasing number of missing cause of death forms)
The state renounces its duty of care (The European Convention on Human Rights) To protect our health: "The State has a positive obligation to take measures to protect the life and health of individuals, including the guarantee of safe medication use and adequate monitoring of side effects. This also includes effective implementation and enforcement of pharmaco giant systems, such as the reporting obligation for serious side effects."
Even after 2020 this under reporting will continue systematically. The most positive year turns out to be 2021, with "only" 95% sub -report (42,630 recordings at 2,253 reports). We can therefore conclude that for> 10 years, systematically> 95% of all serious side effects remain under the carpet. But wait, there’s more ...
When I look at the "score" of every ICD-10 code itself, I see an anomaly: an explosion in hospital admissions in 2021, as a result of serious side effects hormone drugs.
Was the pill suddenly so harmful? Doesn't seem like me.
Are serious side effects such as, for example, thromboses attributed to the pill instead of Corona Vaccins? Possible.
If all doctors had reported 100% of these hospital admissions, then Lareb/CBG would have immediately removed the pill from the market, don't you think?
Were thousands - serious side effects admitted to women - lied to by their doctor? That doesn't seem to me.
Or feel (D) and doctors so threatened by the state that they were afraid of being prosecuted as their colleagues, the heroes who have saved so many lives with (and still!) But are destroyed by, among others. @IGjnl one (all) minister's @ministervws ?
I know: I will of course not do such a suggestion. And yet I do it: all official government data, all facts, all patterns. It doesn't matter where I look, they all show each time in the direction of one and the same image: A colossal health scandal with the state in the driver's seat.
Finally, the sources:
CBS https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/84069NED/table?dl=C32BA…
EMA, https://adrreports.eu
It was Genesmid. art 78: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0021505/2025-01-01#Hoofdstuk8_Paragraaf2…
ECHR: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBV0001000/2010-06-10#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst…
References
- 1
- 2
- 3Martijntje Smits on X Martijntje Smits
- 4The three versions of the study
- 5"Respondents who have not filled in the questions about vaccination rate and intention (n = 365.426) or have indicated their gender as" prefer to describe yourself "(n = 31,664), resulting in a sample of 5.088.772; self -described gender (selected by the Ravings and the Ravings and the Ravings and the Ravings and the Ravings and the Ravings and the Ravings and the Ravings and the Ravings Unusual answers (eg Spanish ethnicity [41.4%], the oldest age group [23.2% ≥75 years] and the highest level of education [28.1% doctorate]), which indicates that the survey is not filled in good faith. "
Why don't they say what their vaccination willingness was, that is the investigation about that?
Because of my education as a complementary therapist, I was already extremely critical of vaccination.
When I also realized that the media were completely wrong, it was simple for me.
Linking the level of training to what is desired is Stupiede.
And yet we do it.
No idea why except that we are too stupid despite training level.
"That which is desired" can be seen as "preference reality". This is designed by people with higher courses.
I myself think that the percentage of dumbbells and reptiles in all training levels is approximately the same. Without a high education you normally do not get to administrative positions (unless someone might really do something, but those are exceptions).
The dumbbells/reptiles with the higher training seals turn much more harm, simply because they are in higher functions and therefore have more impact.
The actual value of people is not in their IQ or training. In that respect, the entire Western world is a huge trail. We have decorated it with our schools and training courses that everyone with good memory can rake the privileges of wisdom together.
I remember that article and also its change very well. The changed data did not detract from two important insights that can be correct:
- medium to higher educated people seem the most sheepishly docile,
- There are more independent, critical thinkers among PhDs. I know from experience that many non -independent thinkers are also helped, but that is not the intention. And a post-pandemic interview with a group of fresh PhDs showed that most of them had been punctured, but that was to be able to travel and not because they believed the propaganda.
Incidentally, the willingness to vaccination as a function of education level remained a "U" curve; Your title of 2023 "Higher educated more pricked, promoted less" remained valid.
You really only get those "privileges of wisdom" when you lick up and kick down and, above all, play a lot with the prevailing opinion. Fortunately my family consists of honest people with a pure conscience with ethics of paramount importance and helpful! From university (technical) training to school never completed, but all have had a hard time in these bizarre times. So proud of these people but I see them walking in mind on the long winding path full of obstacles instead of that wide slippery short route on the drawing in the children's bible from my youth ...
During the planning, it was also suggested that the higher educated are more often punctured. Because, highly educated, his mind uses ... This would indirectly appeal to educated people that you will be seen as intelligent if you let yourself be punctured. That must have won some extra souls.
Apologies Anton that I will place this reaction under your response, but I would like to share this:
https://www.volkskrant.nl/wetenschap/kabinet-wil-met-miljoenen-vijftig-buitenlandse-topwetenschappers-naar-nederland-lokken~bad3a271/
Do I now understand that scientists have to be brought in who feel threatened, because there is a little more room in the USA to think outside the narrative? Or is it the intention that we get more scientists here who confirm the narrative?
In any case, it will cost a lot of money ...
It looks like paying profiteers to win votes. I see that De Volkskrant has really become a despicable propaganda magazine. Gatverdamme what a nest of people's traitors.
Our money is nothing more worth:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92LzOeeJgyg
Clear and simple lesson about the real cause of inflation.
And why and how you want negative interest rates through CBDC.
Everything clearly in a row, I think this man should also tell his story in the UK.
Nobody wants to be accused of a low IQ? Well, it is in any case to try to influence the vaccination willingness in this way…. "Only stupid people doubt science."
According to science, it consists of constantly questioning, doubting, investigating and especially a long breath.
But I am not a scientist. ….
Personally, the framing on my person doesn't care.
It reminds me of a bicycle seller who thought it would work to say that poor people do not have an e-bike. Well I happen to be poor and vital and so ..
Fear rules?
I suspect that fear than IQ is important in the acceptance of a reasoned reality and taking the vaccinations via media.
Fear of thinking outside the presented. But possibly fear at all.
A PhD student (of the old stamp) entered an uncertain, lonely route and must be somewhat fearless.
See:
https://open.substack.com/pub/paramaniac/p/the-covid-delusion-why-the-only-place?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1lysl7
Think that (with handling of Ockhams Razor) that no pathogenic coronavirus is needed for the pre-vaccination, maybe many go too far here (under virus! Varia readers).
The thought that doctors can be so wrong (say the medical negligence also named by Willem here) is also an anxious idea.
The fact that vaccination is more good than evil is done is perhaps easier for non -vaccinated people to plum.
But for the vaccinated again a fear image.
Perhaps higher educated people are more of the absurdity of mouth caps, are without mouth caps as an indication of unreliability. Visiting 8 people with 1 person, but not visiting 1 person with 8 people. That the LNPs did not get in the arm but spread throughout the body and concentrated in the testes, ovaria, lymph system and bone marrow as 12 years earlier studies had already demonstrated. That for an intramuscular injection it is really necessary to aspirate. That do not aspirate to boost the willingness to vaccination is not medicine but is quackery. That endless stream of lies and absurdities stood out for two categories in the US. The PhDs with STEM study background (say exact studies) and minorities who, often rightly, have a distrust of the government. A large part of the black population in the US refused vaccination for that reason.
In the Netherlands they had to go into the power districts with leaflets in Arabic and Turkish? In particular, immigrant people maintain ties with family members in countries where at one male was not enough money to exploit the hysteria. Anyone who spoke an uncle in Eritrea came to know that people are too poor to worry about a flu. Such contacts, but also media in unknown languages, remained completely under the radar by the geniuses of VWS, but have played an important role for those groups in the population that were completely not vulnerable and with their backs to Dutch society.
It was a Facebook investigation. If I look at my higher -educated acquaintance, then there is quite a big difference between those who use social media for news and information and those who don't. The latter trust entirely on the mainstream media and are fully scored. The social media users are largely also vaccinated, but are slightly more open to criticism of the vaccines. They are also younger.
I think that the willingness to vaccination is largely related to media use and the confidence you have in the various media variants.
This study is therefore a specific group of PhD people. Namely those who have no reluctance against social media.
You can expect PhD people to be able to assess information. But if some information does not reach you, you cannot use it either. I therefore suspect that the vaccination agency among PhD people who do not use social media is higher and does not deviate much from the average highly educated, not because they are "more stupid", but because they do not have access to relevant info.
Halfway through the Corona period I also only found out that the mainstream media have become propaganda channels. Since then I use social and alternative media much more.
In fact, it is a massive consciousness for various causes, of indifference, self -interest first (on vacation, etc.) to fear through propaganda. With a sauce of censorship and coercion. Quite a few lies and rumbling with data. The recipe for a disaster with a lot of sectors also among the PhDs. In my eyes, consciousness is the only explanation. You can call people with common sense.
I entered the IT myself when there were no computer science training. Had very good internal training. Acquired because I had a good grade for mathematics on my final list. In those days, our team was a mixed bag of sucked students, from Mulo and HAVO people to sea biologists. But incredibly professional (without excess rules) and especially concrete. We coded in IBM Assembler. In the end ICT architect and achieved beautiful things, but never easy.
In the past - without academic training - I often had awe for people with titles. Later, when more and more academics were hired, that awe disappeared. Of course there were also very good ones, and they really stood out, but there were also people who fell through the lower limit in all sorts of ways. Often a good chat.
Piet Vroon called it all the Zulo (very extensive primary education), and I think people also learn to accept pre -chewed opinions. Moreover, a specific thinking pattern will arise within such a training bubble, and once you are in it, it is difficult to become critical. Scepsis should be encouraged, but it seems that docility is seen as a virtue. Just break out there. They are there, of course, but in general, academics seem very authority.
During Covid there were only 3 in our team of about 30 people who were critical. 2 of them, including me) have never taken a shot. The third with reluctance because he had to (wanted?) Because of traveling.
I have been wondering for a long time if there is a "cut" with which you can determine which groups are critical and dare to speak out and who the followers are. The condescendingness in the MSM in which one would explain why vaccinations had to be made on the vaccine critical mob did my blood cook. I would have liked to have seen it explained. And then they can also answer how those LNPs were told that they should stay mainly at the puncture place. Science? Didn't think so. We called the GGD once. At the start of the "vaccine" rounds. Had Covid "endured", and therefore assumed that we had of course developed immunity. The GGD thought we had to get a shot (never done of course). I still asked if they could make that advice medical or logical. They got no further than "it's just better".
"I have been wondering for a long time if there is a" cut "with which you can determine which groups are critical and dare to speak out and who the followers are."
Me, too. Nothing to the detriment of the "misfits" but think it has to do with that. You must have experienced something in your life so that you learn to see through another glasses. You should not all come up.
Academics are often born in families who are not misfit, who are used to everything running according to the so -called "line". That makes you absolutistic: you only see the world in one way: the preference way (the line).
The scientific method is based on comparing. I think that is only to learn at The School of Life: by often being confronted that life can also be different. Gain experience. Experience disappointments. To travel. = I think it is a lot to play for critical people
I would also like to know where that "cut" is. Media use seems like a kind of indicator (as Miranda says). But yes, the chicken or the egg?
Although I think media use and trust are important explanatory factors, a predisposition will also play a role. It matters whether someone is willing to take into account different perspectives at all. And therefore also want to listen to dissenters. In addition, a negative life experience can also be a trigger to become more critical of the information from the government and the MSM.
A large part of my (highly educated) acquaintances has a pronounced negative opinion about FVD and PVV. If I ask them if they have ever taken the trouble to read their election programs, they say something in the trend of: "No of course not, I will look out".
Indoctrination and cognitive dissonance go very well together.
For many people it is also a conscious choice not to be concerned with things that they cannot change or, like a guitar buddy of mine, always says: "who are outside my circle of influence." And it is often not the stupidest who decide that they have a more fun if they are not trying to fight against Cervantes or more recent windmills.
There are many people I know who are in life that way. Many people who "earn it with their hands" are surprisingly pragmatic. They know that there is a lot of wrong with the stories we get to hear, often have not been punctured, but have no sense and time to propagate that. A kind of silent minority.
The "cut" as I experienced it myself is in something that you have really touched, a fierce personal insult, a family member who has died by a medical miss or something else that you have made very disappointed.
For some, HDJ's QR was enough to get to the other state of contemporary. Others found it easier to just participate.
How to get it over? I wonder.
The cut is in the following for me.
NATO spends 5 percent on an imaginary enemy without any problem and without a plan.
That money must be borrowed and repaid by whom?
Then I am unable to buy a laptop of 4 mille with tons of savings.
Because imagine that I am being misled?
We were at an invitation at a party with more than 100,000 people last weekend. The worldwide largest event of its kind. The visitors and artists came from many different countries, also countries that have a conflict with each other, but there was no expression of hatred. Some flags from various countries but otherwise no expressions and everyone respected each other. What we all had in common was a critical attitude. Many have suffered heavily under the corona measures. It always emerged in conversations. The conversations were short and the music hard. The majority of young people. Defqon 1 is called the event and it went without a discord with barely agents because they arrange everything to the last detail itself! Especially young people! Nowhere to be heard or read in the MSM that this is possible. Was it too positive, too successful? It is bigger than organizing the NATO summit! Apart from some interviews in advance, with parents who came to bring their children, where people mainly wanted to talk about the negative aspects such as drug use. Of course I am against drugs (trade) and all other addictions but also against patronizing and for prevention and appropriate help! No one has succumbed to the warmth despite the growing group of obese people we were shocked by. The youth has the future and let us help them broaden their minds in a healthy way! I hope there will be many events to heal what people deliberately destroyed. In conversations I always mention the numbers of this site. Apparently that is still oral because the youth is not surprised 😉
Overnu.nl Book discussion Laura Delano In the (bridge) classes of my grandchildren, several children with medication for different defects are supposedly supposedly on their brain. There are already more than in my children in the classroom. With a healthy lifestyle where people are mainly eaten in particular, these problems are hardly found! Also real interest and a consistent just upbringing where one should also be able to say sorry or "I don't know, we will look it together" saves a lot. Not everyone is put in front of it, but in the end it saves misery and time and especially it yields being happy for children and their (in -laws) parents. All that gain of disease must stop! My children are affiliated with disputes and therefore we know many where we see the consequences of medication and therapies while sitting at home with (burn-out) complaints and now also a lot of puncture damage. The misery with fertility has also been added and if there is a baby that is wrong. In the meantime, they earn way too much money with bull-shit jobs where they hardly go. During the corona period my children received "tips" almost daily in the mailboxes for new bull-shit jobs, for example developing models to promote Long Covid together with the Longfonds (early 2021 but the idea was already created in 2020 and a company was founded). Fortunately we also see the other side as I described in a previous comment. And Amalia is of course completely the "good example" now that she is going to work at Defense ... what do they know what we don't know yet? Aunt Ursula checks Amalia her study assignments so that is very "reliable" ... I have done it completely wrong with my (small) children that is clear to me now. Thank you for reading. Read especially the story about Laura Delano on Overnu.nl!
Ultra-Processed Foods have a very negative influence on the brain.
https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/ultra-processed-foods-linked-brain-changes-drive-overeating
Measurable differences have been found in crucial areas of the brain in people who frequently eat UPF`s (ultra-prcessed foods). These are areas that influence behavior, reward and motivation. The feeling of having eaten enough seems to change so that people start eating more than good. And then I am not talking about the lack of necessary nutrients.
Even after a few days UPF`s, a short circuit seems to be created in the control of insulin on the brain cells.
And then there are all the added elements that are all approved (negative influence manufacturers on politics), but you really don't want them in your body.
I understand that the political party of Aunt Ursula was happy that she left for Brussels.
https://www.politico.eu/article/ursula-von-der-leyen-biography-career-inconvenient-truth/
Just not breaking through and the approximately 80 % healthy, fresh, etc. and 20 % Ultra edited or beer with or dinner without paying attention and the like. You will automatically notice where the border is for you. At Diabetes I advise "stricter". And a little "poison" doesn't hurt because sometimes medication is needed. Stress and panic is certainly not necessary!
Don't go through if not too often UFP's. I am curious than where you think that every individual lies the border?
Many people with pre diabetes have no idea but think they are doing well.
Then even a little poison is the famous drop.
Stress and panic contribute to the effect, but a person is not a machine.
More than 60 years of experience with lifestyle and nutrition, already raised by a lifestyle conscious mother. More than 40 years "in the profession" with always struggle in the medical sector. Thus it was. An uneven battle too. I involve the brain, the thought ("need") as it is now called UPF or "Help an invitation for dinner/party" etc. Eating diary, strict diet but short, pitfalls, etc. Allergies, etc. Supermarktout. It is never the same for everyone. Little "Gif" is everywhere and sometimes even necessary (or temporary). It can be a perfect meal in a wrong container warmed for example with plasticizers in the microwave and also given to your baby. Or a second beer with a party taken. Antibiotics needed by an inflamed wound after a bite from the neighbor's cat. Etc. That stress and panic is certainly not necessary. Exactly that, people are not a machine and we all know the examples of a too fanatic (Corona) religion ... My oldest would say: "Take another glass of vinegar" because we have no message to look and patronizing. We do not make burnt meat, but when the neighbor is proudly at the door, we gratefully take it. My oldest was the first in 2020 to lose the scientific career because it was not about real health! Pre-diabetes is not a disease! Even after diagnosis of diabetes 2, the process is reversible if one is therefore stricter than the 80/20 rule is going to live! Some herbs, spices help with the glucose balance. Also usable for other disorders but never exaggerate. With always respect for (genetic) abnormalities, severe illness, serious accidents and irreversible medical misses, I have been promoting a healthy lifestyle all my life and people are never too old to start with.
The corrected data "fit" in my personal environment. Know a lot of promoted people and they are all (multiple) stung. They were not very smart. Conversations with them went as follows: "Willem, you have to hear: I am vaccinated, let me, just to be sure, test it and now I have Covid! How would that come "question mark, question mark.
With regard to the hormone side effects: yes, that is interpreted as piltrombosis, it seems to me to be wschl. Such as this publication
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40172984/) Show there were 50% more pulmonary embolisms in 2021 (TOV 2019) and they have to be written off something. Vaccin cannot be (rare and only VITT in the first 2 weeks after the injection). And "so" the pill came across as a replacement risk factor for thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
That's how it would have happened.
Please note that a pill user is normally removed from the pill if the pill is explained by the doctor as the cause of the thrombosis. And therefore ... becomes more susceptible to pregnancy.
In other words: doctors who cannot see that vaccine leads to thrombosis in fertile age women, are a risk factor for ... pregnancy!
That too ...
Or does a medicine against obesity cause pregnancy? Oh wait, of course, it is different, but that's how it is written in the MSM. "Fortunately", the pricks then have much less chance of a (normal) pregnancy and the birth rates in the most C-puncture countries fall. End well but not well.
I assume that there is not something like knowledge or the associated truth. There is only faith. Science is also a form of faith. The and direction more than the other. The higher educated think they know more, but that is not the case, they only have more information. I know very stupid promoted and super -limmed painters, to name a little. Highly educated often earn a lot of money and sit and a religious community, and if you adhere to other ideas than the rest, then you are out. Daaag career. Highly educated, especially the older ones, still read the newspaper, and watch 5 journals per day, and then think they are aware, and they do not realize that fairy tales are sown. What you need nowadays is a good bullshit detector, so that you learn to recognize lies and fairy tales. In my opinion, simply educated people often have an excellent bullshit detector, and the higher educated are the most fanatic believers.
I myself didn't watch much TV or read newspapers, but in my mother's nursing home was - and certainly in 2020 - the TV all day long ... was terrible in that! But that is why I also got "the Coronaverhaal". At home, it is to turn on the TV that was told about it. Has it been my level of education, wisdom, (work) experiences, intuition that almost immediately knew I knew and felt that what I heard was not right at all? My mother also realized this and has never been able to finish a course i.v.m. The Second World War. But the nursing was already in a re-and-rider ...
I consciously went looking for social media "answers" that could confirm my thought; A world opened up for me and read as much as possible what spoke both for and against. From that moment I used both my courses, experiences and intuition and started asking questions. Almost everything confirmed my line of thought "it's not right", and certainly not with the new platforms Vector and MRNA of the vaccinations. Even my mother at a very old age did not want the puncture (but was misled by denying her the family visit if she was not punctured ...!)
Within our family there are two with a university course and every push message from NU.nl, the AD, etc. on their mobile and went entirely with what was told in the MSM and politics. Substantive conversations was no longer possible, I was "too stupid" and mother "too old" ... The dogmatics was not to harden, and the gap was growing. I did not understand anything, intelligent enough to be university -trained, but completely indoctrinated by MSM and not to mention the "experts".
Although anecdotal, I think that in the first instance the level of education does not have that much to do with it, but much rather how the psychology of the impact of "being open" for different thoughts, from where you "stand" on the social ladder, the "fear" sometimes make the wrong choice "because imagine ...!"
Much is based on guilt and shame, feelings that we do not want, but are still subject to our behavior in large sizes.
After the death of mother in 2022 at old age and underlying suffering, I have no longer seen or spoken to both family members. The contact has been completely broken by them. Sad, in and in sad. Education level?
With their incompetent crades, they have destroyed so much ... and then those road viewers who can now no longer go back out of pure shame.
A number of doctors and former fellow students, who also did, have avoided I have avoided since then. They will never be heard again, they will look out. I have also lost all my interest in them, I have to admit.
I think that "De Knip" could often arise in people who have largely said goodbye to regular medicine or who combine with alternative medicine. That's how it is for me and so I have often seen it in my area. People who investigate alternative medicine often have their confidence in regular medicine partly lost or cannot be helped there for their "vague complaints". People who are for a long time with their health will of course also be left out of society anyway. And that way also have less to lose.
Only vaccination can help us out of this misery were the words of Hugo de Jonge.
It was the moment of saying goodbye to so -called science.
Hugo de Jonge and science, I challenge you to come up with a little more meaningless.
The fact was that whole tribes were happy to dance with Janssen.
Or deeper understanding of the contents of Frikandellen.
Where did that failed gnome actually gone?
He converts the province of Zeeland into a very large barracks, among other things ... he was assumed just before. Apparently everywhere understanding ...