How realistic is it to expect a scientist to stand up against the degeneration of his/her own field? Whether it is a conflict of interest, corruption, loss of integrity: there are complaints procedures against individual violations, but there is no defense against the derailment of a field or institute. Especially if a scientist is (still) institutionally anchored. In this article some examples of what awaits protest voting.
The corona years have exposed how deep the entanglement between media, science, governance and even the rule of law really is. Hundreds and thousands of doctors, researchers, public figures and even ministers have experienced what happens when they step out of line: they lose positions, their reputations, access to publicity, sometimes their jobs, their money, even their freedom.
Al die persoonlijke drama's worden veroorzaakt doordat het publieke waarheidsbegrip niet langer de tussenstand van een open debat is, maar het eindresultaat van een communicatief productieproces moet zijn. Wie dat resultaat in de weg staat, zal het bezuren. De media bepalen -in samenspraak met politiek en mogelijk andere stakeholders- welke feiten socially mogen bestaan. (Een van de aangelegde criteria daarbij is compliance aan de SDG's - waarover in een later artikel meer.)
De lijst van gedegradeerde of monddood gemaakte professionals kunnen we zien als een indringende waarschuwing voor wat revolterende wetenschappers, publicisten of publieke figuren te wachten staat: van Bhattacharya en Theo Schetters tot Mona Keijzer – stukken van dezelfde puzzel waarin instituties zich zelfbevestigen via een mediacratisch ecosysteem, buigend voor het grotere goed dat wordt aangereikt vanuit supranationale organen. Kritiek daarop hoeft niet te worden weerlegd. Die wordt in de communicatie omgekat naar desinformatie, morele afwijking of nazisme. Canceling wordt geëffectueerd onder aanvoering van de centraal gedirigeerde media - ook al hebben journalisten dat zelf niet in de gaten. Hun denkkaders worden bepaald door EU, NAVO1Video: Fleur Agema explains, UN, WHO, just like those of the politicians they emulate.
Scientists, politicians
Met de wetenschappelijke methode heeft het niets te maken. Het zijn zelfs praktijken waar een werkelijk 'vrije' democratie zich nooit toe zou wenden.
From ware 'vrijen' zitten in de hoogste bestuurslagen van de overheid. Hun overschrijdingen van fatsoensnormen en mensenrechten kunnen ze zelf legaliseren, dat biedt een hoge mate van vrijheid. De media wassen het wel wit. De supposed 'vrijen' accepteren alles wat er in hun krant staat. De boodschap die altijd werkt: "Samen voor een hoger doel". En o wee als je aan dat hoger doel twijfelt - of aan dat "samen".
| Name | Land | Capacity | Incitement to conflict | Sanction/consequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AfD (Alternative for Germany), Alice Weidel | 🇩🇪 | Political party | Against EU corona rules and mandates | Exclusion from parliamentary committees |
| Annemans, Lieven | 🇧🇪 | Health economist, Ghent University | Cost-benefit analysis of lockdown | Resignation from advisory board |
| Anderson, Christine | 🇩🇪 / 🇪🇺 | MEP | Demanded Pfizer contract disclosure | Media‑blacklist |
| Baber, Roman | 🇨🇦 | Provincial Member of Parliament (Ontario) | Criticism of lockdowns | Expelled from party |
| Bhakdi, Sucharit | 🇩🇪 | Microbiologist Mainz | Criticism of PCR policy and mRNA safety | Criminal case (acquittal 2023) |
| Bhattacharya, Jay | 🇺🇸 | Epidemiologist Stanford | Great Barrington Declaration | Censorship, reputation attack |
| Variegated, Jan | 🇳🇱 | Neurologist, publicist | Public criticism of OMT policy, vaccine strategy | Censorship, reputation attack, work ended |
| Chunks, Sam | 🇧🇪 | Health scientist PXL | Criticism of mandates | Immediate dismissal |
| Burkhardt †, Arne | 🇩🇪 | Pathologist | Autopsies post‑vaccin | Ignored, reputational damage |
| BVNL (Interest of the Netherlands), Wybren van Haga | 🇳🇱 | Political party | Corona and media criticism | Media Removal |
| Capel, Pierre | 🇳🇱 | Former professor of Immunology UU | Criticism of mRNA effects | Media Removal |
| Cartland, David | 🇬🇧 | General practitioner (GP) | Public criticism of vaccine safety & pressure within NHS | Schorsing, mag zelfs niet meer met mensen werken - alles kwijt (recent) |
| Campbell, John | 🇬🇧 | Docent / YouTuber | Critical data analysis NHS mortality | NHS‑waarschuwmaating, demonetisatie |
| Dettmar, Christoph | 🇩🇪 | Familierechter | Hief per spoedbeschikking maatregelen op voor enkele scholen. | Woning en kantoor doorzocht (ook van de getuige-deskundigen), twee jaar gevangenis voorwaardelijk, verlies van zijn ambt en al zijn pensioenrechten. |
| Doshi, Peter | 🇺🇸 | Associate Professor (University of Maryland) én senior editor BMJ | Published several critical articles about transparency of studies; early disclosure of raw trial data, methodological analyzes of suspected cases in controls | Globally framed as “anti-vaxxer”; banned from CNN and Twitter; pressured privately to do other work, lost funding channels (NIH / HHS). |
| Fuelmich, Reiner | 🇩🇪 | Lawyer | Prepared major Covid case | Arrested, pretrial detention lasts forever |
| Fukushima, Masonry | 🇯🇵 | Oncologist Kyoto Univ. | Criticism of youth vaccination | Damage to reputation, media censorship |
| Forum for Democracy (FvD), whole faction | 🇳🇱 | Political party | Against corona pass, lockdowns | Exclusion, demonization, media removal |
| Guérot, Ulrike | 🇩🇪 | Political scientist / professor of European politics (University of Bonn) | Criticism of democratic erosion under lockdown policies; author of Those who remain silent agree (2021) in which she warned about the concentration of power in the EU and medical technocracy | Onderzoek en interne tuchtprocedure (2022); ontslag door Universiteit Bonn in 2023; geframed in media als "complotdenker"; is nu onafhankelijk publicist en spreker |
| Hatchard, Guy | 🇳🇿 | Biotech researcher | Analysis mortality ↔ vaccinations | Defamation, exclusion |
| Hockertz, Stefan | 🇩🇪 | Immunologist, ex-Fraunhofer Institute | Criticism of LNP toxicology | House search, flight to Switzerland |
| wooden iron, Renate | 🇮🇹 | Lawyer / EU candidate | Lawsuits against mandates | Threat of professional suspension |
| Homburg, Stefan | 🇩🇪 | Professor of Public Finance, Leibniz University Hannover | Analyzed illogic in lockdown policy, statistical manipulation RKI; criticized calculus v.d. pandemic and media collusion | University distance, professional isolation, mass media smear (“conspiracy theorist”), loss of research networks and public appearances |
| Hudson, Nick | 🇿🇦 | PANDA data analyst | Excess mortality research | Censorship, bank blockade |
| Inoue, Masayasu | 🇯🇵 | Molecular biologist (emeritus Gunma) | Criticism of pharmacovigilance | University distance |
| Ioannidis, John | 🇺🇸 | Epidemiologist Stanford | Location of IFR models | Academic isolation |
| Joron, Virginia | 🇫🇷 / 🇪🇺 | MEP | Pfizer hearing | Cargo campaign |
| Joosten, Koen | 🇳🇱 | Kinderintensivist Erasmus MC | Refused to support childhood vaccination policies | Research budget stopped |
| Keijzer, Mona | 🇳🇱 | State Secretary for Economic Affairs and Climate Policy (CDA) | Criticism of corona pass | 24-hour layoff (2021) |
| Kelly, Craig | 🇦🇺 | Parliamentarian | Against lockdowns, mandates | From party, later UAP leader |
| Kessel, van, Arno | 🇦🇺 | Lawyer | Civil case filed against Gates, Rutte et al. | Gearresteerd, praktijk moeten opgeven. Na 200 dagen in voorarrest met enkelband vrijgelaten. Sinds april 2026 vrij. |
| Kohn, Stefan | 🇦🇺 | Senior analist, Duitse min. BiZa | Schreef een kritisch rapport over het pandemiebeleid in 2020, onthulde overdrijving, zag datamanipulatie | Abrupt geschorst en later ontslagen. |
| Kodama, Hideki | 🇯🇵 | Immunologist U. Tokyo (Emeritus) | Toxicological questions LNPs | Publication ban |
| Kory, Pierre | 🇺🇸 | IC‑arts FLCCC | Treatment alternatives | Licensing issues |
| Kulldorff, Martin | 🇺🇸 | Epidemiologist Harvard | Data vs. mandates | Contract not renewed |
| Louwen, Roger | 🇳🇱 | molecular biologist (Erasmus MC) | Warned against inaccurate PCR tests | Suspended (2021); disappeared from advisory bodies; fully acquitted by LOWI in 2024 |
| Malhotra, Aseem | 🇬🇧 | Cardiologist / author | Published critically about the risk-benefit balance of the Covid mRNA vaccines and about pharmaceutical interests in healthcare | Royal College of Physicians membership suspended; disciplinary investigation by General Medical Council due to complaints; defamation in politics and media |
| Meester, Ronald | 🇳🇱 | Professor of Probability Theory, VU | Data analyzes of, among other things, mortality rates | Rejection of research proposals, ignoring reports, labeled as unreliable by VWS |
| Lareb employees, anonymously | 🇳🇱 | Data analysts | Internal reclassifications side effects | Reprimand/departure |
| Licensing, Willem | 🇳🇱 | Epidemiologist | "Covid=Griep+medische nalatigheid" | Departure due to traumatic work, loss of BIG registration |
| Levi, Retsef | 🇮🇱 / 🇺🇸 | Data scientist MIT | Myocarditis‑analyse | Internal pressure WITH |
| Malone, Robert | 🇺🇸 | mRNA inventor | Against mass vaccination | Deplatforming |
| Michielsen, Vivienne | 🇧🇪 | Provincial board CD&V | Vaccine safety critical | Not re-elected |
| Montagnier †, Luc | 🇫🇷 | Nobel Prize in Virology | mRNA risk warning | Defamation, posthumous rehabilitation |
| Sudden, Kazuhiro | 🇯🇵 | Cardiologist | Myocarditis observations | Temporary suspension |
| Ogasawara, Hiroshi | 🇯🇵 | Medical data analyst | Prefecture mortality dates | Not reappointed |
| Ozaki, Hair | 🇯🇵 | Chairman Tokyo Medical Ass. | Advocated early treatment | No re-election |
| Pavlovsky, Arthur | 🇨🇦 | Arts / pastor | Refused segregation policy | Arrests, license revocation |
| Peeters, Carla | 🇳🇱 | Immunologist ex-RIVM | Criticism of boosting | Network exclusion |
| Perronne, Christian | 🇫🇷 | Infectioloog Sorbonne | Vaccine risk warning | Discharge, rehabilitation 2023 |
| PPC (People’s Party of Canada) | 🇨🇦 | Political party | Against mandates | Media neglect |
| Rancourt, Denis | 🇨🇦 | Physicist / data analyst | Excess mortality statistics | University resigned, deplatformed from Researchgate |
| Reform UK | 🇬🇧 | Libertarian party | Against lockdowns and mandates | Marginalization |
| RIVM whistleblowers (× 2), anonymously | 🇳🇱 | Epidemiologists | Internal data inconsistencies | Transfer/dismissal |
| Rob Roos | 🇳🇱 / 🇪🇺 | MEP (JA21) | Transmission question Pfizer | marginalization: less speaking time, excluded from relevant committees |
| Rose, Jessica | 🇨🇦 / 🇮🇱 | Biostatisticus | VAERS‑analyse myocarditis | Paper withdrawn |
| Schetters, Theo | 🇳🇱 | Immunologist, em. prof. University of Pretoria | Batch mortality analysis | media banishment, lost consultancy work |
| Rock, Stefano | 🇮🇹 | Pharmacologist | EMA registrations | Exclusion of conferences |
| Sloan, Derek | 🇨🇦 | Member of Parliament CPC | Against mandates | Out of party |
| United Australia Party (UAP), — | 🇦🇺 | Political party (Craig Kelly) | Freedom of treatment | Censorship, banking supervision |
| Van Veen, The | 🇳🇱 | General Practitioner / Doctors Collective | Critical policies and side effects | IGJ investigation, practice closed |
| Virus truth, Engel & Pols | 🇳🇱 | Citizen movement | Against corona pass | Prohibitions on demonstrations, debanking, stage arrest |
| Wittkowski, Knut | 🇩🇪 / 🇺🇸 | Epidemiologist | Lockdown criticism | Dismissal, censorship |
| Wiesendanger, Roland | 🇩🇪 | Physicist, University of Hamburg | Lab origins, criticism of transparency at WHO and German media | Portrayed as a “conspiracy theorist”; research funding has come to a standstill; reputational damage (despite later confirmations) |
| Wodarg, Wolfgang | 🇩🇪 | Doctor, epidemiologist, former SPD Bundestag member, ex-chairman of the Council of Europe's health committee | Criticized PCR tests, WHO pandemic definition and conflict of interest in the pharmaceutical sector | Criminal proceedings, defamation in media, removal from advisory positions, social censorship and bank accounts temporarily blocked |
| Young, Barry | 🇳🇿 | IT manager MinZorg | Vaccine mortality data leak | Arrest |
| Zoffoli, Francesco | 🇮🇹 | Regional Member of Parliament | Against mandatory vaccination for staff | Fraction removal |
(Disclaimer: Although the lists have been compiled with care, they will still contain errors. If you see any errors, please report them in the comments or by email.)
Journalists
Hetzelfde geldt voor journalisten. Echte journalisten dus, niet geshadowbande krabbelaars zoals ik, zonder enig kwantitatief bereik, die nauwelijks worden gedeeld. Ik bedoel de 'echte', de zichtbare wetenschapsprofessionals, de Diederik Jekels, Sjamadriaans, Keulemansen, de veronderstelde waarheidszoekende luizen in de pels die kunnen (of konden) rekenen op plekjes in de krant of op airtime. Die zijn net zo rolvast als factcheckers. Prijzen zijn er voor degenen die met ware doodsverachting het overheidsnarratief verdedigden (en dat nog steeds doen!!!). Hieronder weer een willekeurige greep uit journalisten die zich wél kritisch uitlieten over het Covidbeleid en/of de vaccinaties.
| Name | Land | Capacity | Incitement to conflict | Sanction/consequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breggin, Ginger | 🇺🇸 | Investigative journalist/publisher America Out Loud | Documented links between pharmaceutical giants and media advertising systems | De‑platforming YouTube & Twitter 2021; bank account frozen for “disinformation risk” |
| Carlson, Tucker | 🇺🇸 | Journalist / presentator Fox News | From 2021 onwards, he asked critical questions about the origins of corona policy, Pfizer contracts and censorship between government and media | Fired from Fox News (2023) shortly after *Twitter Files * broadcast; entire program slate removed from streaming; started independent video channel that quickly reached tens of millions |
| Dore, Jimmy | 🇺🇸 | Satirical journalist/commentator | Criticism of Pfizer advertisements in mainstream media | YouTube revenue suspended 2021 – 2023 |
| Evans, Michael | 🇦🇺 | ABC‑editor | Internal criticism that the Australian public broadcaster was 'too servile' towards the government | Contract not renewed (2022), was internally called “unreliable”. |
| Greenwald, Glenn | 🇧🇷 / 🇺🇸 | Co-founder The Intercept | Refused to change editorial script on pandemic | Departed 2020; own Substack – framed as “anti-vax sympathizer” |
| The Young, Mauro | 🇫🇷 | Political journalist (CNews) | Points to media‐collusion between Élysée and pharmaceutical PR | Program cancelled; separate contract not extended (2022) |
| Lempke, Floor | 🇳🇱 | Freelance datajournalist (De Correspondent) | She published critical Woo requests at RIVM and Lareb online herself | Correspondent assignments suspended; important medium broke collaboration (2023) |
| Moran, Bob | 🇬🇧 | Cartoonist / illustrator (The Daily Telegraph) | Critical cartoons about lockdowns, vaccination policies and the psychological damage to children; used satire against moral panic and bureaucratic authority | Fired by The Daily Telegraph in 2021 for “unprofessional social media statements”; Since then, he has been an independent cartoonist and publicist with a large online reach |
| Nagumo, Takashi | 🇯🇵 | Investigative reporter NHK Tokyo | Reported on unpublished adverse event rates in Japan | Transfer to internal desk (media graveyard), no more transmitting antenna access |
| Pauwels, Peter | 🇧🇪 | Presenter & journalist (VRT) | Gave broadcasting space to critical experts (Broken and Schetters) | Program canceled |
| Partland, Neil Oliver | 🇬🇧 | BBC‑presenter | Public critic of lockdowns and mandates | Sidelined; left for GB News |
| pilgrim †, John | 🇦🇺 / 🇬🇧 | War & investigative journalist | Wrote 2021 that “fear industry is destroying the free press” | All major newspapers stopped publication; refused to sign 'correction line'; died 2024 |
| Riding cobbler, Boris | 🇩🇪 | German press correspondent | Critical of Merkel's pandemic policy | Banned from BPK, YouTube channel closed 2021 |
| Ross Henderson, Alex | 🇳🇿 | Onafh. reporter Covid reprots (NZ) | Debunked Government Correspondence on Vaccine PR | Brief arrest (“data misuse”), laptop confiscation (2022) |
| Skordelis, Sofia | 🇬🇷 | Medical journalist / ANSA Balkan Desk | Published WHO emails on media coordination | Was internally suspended, not reappointed (2022) |
| Timmerman, Maurice | 🇳🇱 | Freelance investigative journalist / editor-in-chief blog | Woo analyzed mortality data for blckbx.tv – revealed dashboard manipulations | Research budget withdrawn, registered medium with support from council fund blockade (2024) |
| Velázquez, Aya | 🇩🇪 | Journalist | Published leaked uncensored RKI files | Debanked and classified as a potential traitor by the German NCTV ('Suspicion' of the 'Verfassungsschutz') |
| Wolf, Naomi | 🇺🇸 | Author, publicist, director Daily Clout / Pfizer Docs Project | Led volunteer team that analyzed Pfizer trial data and published irregularities | Twitter‑ban 2021 – reinstatement 2023; payment platforms and accounts blocked; massive online smears; no factual refutation of her data – only discreditation |
| Zyrousky, Stéphane | 🇨🇭 | Freelance editor Le Temps | Editorial insubordination – refused to write “reduction of side effects”. | Dismissal 2021 — later rehabilitation by independent. media |
De journalistieke infrastructuur heeft het ethische fundament van de wetenschap overgenomen - of gekaapt, wat je wil. De redacties beslissen wat geldt als onderzoek dat mag worden gepubliceerd en wat als “reëel risico” wordt erkend. Ook wetenschappelijke uitgeverijen hebben de SDG's (en One Health) hoger op de prioriteitenlijst dan waarheidsvinding. De media legitimeren de instituties die zij zouden moeten controleren.
Columnists, commentators
| Name | Capacity / medium | Core of the criticism | Consequence/reaction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ab Gietelink | Theater maker / columnist (formerly Volkskrant) | Filtered fear rhetoric and media self-censorship; requested publicity regarding Pfizer contracts | No more space in newspapers; own interviews via Café Weltschmerz |
| Ebru Umar | Columnist (Metro → Telegraaf) | Acted against “fear and regulatory disease”; called for personal responsibility and normal relations | Temporary interruption of columns (2021); less visible on TV; later self-return |
| Evelien de Bruijn | Radio 10 presenter / columnist (ad‑hoc) | Speech freedom plea in 2021 against media panic and censorship online | Radio silence in 2022; no longer a regular column |
| Hans van Willigenburg | Columnist (TPO, own site) | Satirical corona criticism – fear and virtue as a new religion | Partly ignored by mainstream; no more invitations to public debates |
| Jack van Gelder | Sports presenter / regular table guest Oranjezomer | Criticized illogical measures (Stadiums vs. catering, travel restrictions); asked for a sense of reality | Contract with SBS not renewed; It is unclear whether the corona criticism was decisive, but the timing is striking |
| Jan Dijkgraaf | Writer / columnist (GeenStijl, OpinieZ*, Briefje van Jan*) | Verbal fierce opposition to lockdown morality and pseudo-science in the media | No formal dismissal but complete exclusion from NPO and newspapers |
| Karel Beckman | Journalist / publicist (Elsevier → De Andere Krant) | Examined data on measures, vaccines and media corruption | Departed Elsevier in 2020; completely to independent media |
| Leon de Winter | Columnist (De Telegraaf) | Conducted cultural-psychological criticism of lockdowns and moral division between vaccinated/unvaccinated | Editorial pressure to moderate tone; less frequent columns from 2023 |
| Marcel van Silfhout | Journalist / ex‑NOS | Critical of RIVM data and interests of pharmaceutical alliances | Freelance contracts scaled down and no longer mentioned in talk shows |
| Marianne Zwagerman | Columnist (De Telegraaf, BNR) | Criticized fear politics, one-sided media reporting and “care propaganda” | BNR temporarily suspended her (2021); definitively to own channels; no more mainstream talk shows |
| Maurice de Hond | Data‑analist / opiniepeiler (Peil.nl) | Statistical analysis of respiratory infections and ventilation; unmasked RIVM model errors | Dismissed as “disinformation”; no more broadcasts at NPO after 2021 |
| Ronald Plasterk | Columnist (Telegraaf) | Scientific criticism of models and optimism about vaccines – required a sober cost-benefit analysis | No direct sanction, but some periods of notable radio silence (2021) |
| Rosanne Hertzberger | Columnist / microbiologist (NRC) | In 2023, criticism of scientific conformity and institutional self-protection | Not punished but strongly encapsulated: no more columns during the pandemic peak |
This list is also far from complete. The Doctors Collective alone has more than 1,000 members, doctors and healthcare professionals, many of whom will have similar stories.
If change has to start somewhere, it will have to happen outside the narrative web: in decentralized channels, repetition with nuance, and making multiple perspectives visible. Academic courage will only return when the mediacracy loses its grip.
Een zoektocht naar uitsluitend sterke, integere, moedige wetenschappers en journalisten is niet de oplossing - die kunnen we dan binnen de kortste keren bijschrijven in bovenstaande lijsten
A social and economic death sentence for David Cartland
Dr. David Cartland (on X: @CartlandDavid) was a respected GP in Cornwall for many years. Education: BMedSc, MBChB, ex-MRCGP. Patients appreciated him for his dedication and his ability to listen. He had a good reputation, a family, a stable practice. Until in 2021 he started to doubt the official narrative surrounding the COVID-19 vaccinations and the way in which governments limited medical autonomy.
What then followed is indicative of the new way Western institutions are handling Covid dissent. His words misquoted, inflated and ridiculed. Complaints from colleagues and activist groups poured in. The General Medical Council started investigations. His admission to the medical register expired, and he chose not to renew it in protest against what he called “institutional moral cowardice”.
The pressure didn't end there. In 2026 it concluded Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service that he had behaved unprofessionally via social media and discussed an unjustified vaccine exemption advice. Verdict: “serious professional misconduct”. Cartland was removed from the register.
After the removal, two additional provisions now follow: The first is that he is no longer allowed to perform work in which he comes into contact with adults. The second provision: he may no longer perform work where he comes into contact with children (intended for child molesters, for example). A legal stair construction. On paper this is called “protective conditions”, intended for cases of physically or sexually inappropriate behavior. For Cartland it means something completely different: a public execution. He is suspended.
Because the reason is formally called “protection of the public”, obtaining legal assistance will be difficult. Anyone who defends him runs the risk of being classified as a “security risk”. Cartland is in fact criminalized.
He has admitted that he “sometimes overreacted” on social media. He apologized for harsh words but emphasized that his patient care was never in question. But where medicine used to be about conscientious discussion, now there is a zero-tolerance culture. Anyone who criticizes is defined as a danger.
And this raises an uncomfortable question for a civilized country:
How many doctors are now silent for fear of being next?
The unknown story of Dale Richardson
And then we're not even talking about the really small boys. Take Dale Richardson, for example. Never heard of it, coincidentally Steve Kirsch mentioned it recently. Like Maurice de Hond, Richardson took early action against droplet transmission. Maurice was canceled from the media (and fought back admirably) but in Canada they were more decisive. Below is his story in brief.
In the early months of 2020, when the world was still being told that hand washing and six feet of distance provided sufficient protection, Canadian mechanical engineering technologist Dale Richardson warned of something more fundamental. From his field of expertise, he saw a simple but fatal flaw: the entire pandemic policy lacked basic knowledge engineering controls — ventilation, air flow, pressure differences. “We are combating an aerosol with rules of conduct,” he wrote in his reports, “while it is a technical problem.”
He filed official warnings at institutions in Saskatchewan and Alberta, asking questions about ventilation standards and about so-called “biocontainment” – the technical protection that is taken for granted in laboratories but lacking in public buildings. His message was not answered. When, six weeks later, he formally reported it criminal negligence in pandemic response, everything changed.
Shortly before the hearing of his trial, court staff (probably on orders from the judge in the case) ordered the police to arrest him for mental illness, based on the testimony of a woman who had been to his home the day before. He was taken away, injected, and held in a hospital ward for three weeks without access to legal assistance. He was drugged under police guard.
His divorce hearing was scheduled for the same day (and before the same judge) as his case against the police. Because he did not appear at that hearing, they awarded all his assets to his wife. He lost everything like that. The technical reports that started it all disappeared into the bureaucracy.
He still didn't give up. In 2021, he tried to bring his documentation to the United States — claiming to have data on the transport of the Nipah virus to Wuhan in 2019. He ended up in immigration detention and was deported. A repeated attempt in 2025 earned him a ten-year travel ban.
He is now homeless and destitute. He lives with family. He has filed complaints with the RCMP alleging torture and abuse of process, but police are calling it “a political file.”
In zijn ogen is het simpel: bio‑veiligheid begint met techniek, niet met propaganda. “Engineering fout heeft menselijke prijs,” schrijft hij. Maar wie een systeem op zijn technische fundament aanspreekt, raakt aan macht. En welk bedrijf gaat iemand met zo'n geschiedenis nog aannemen?
Here it is the story of Dale Richardson in his own words and here's an 18-minute interview with him with even more shocking details.
Footnotes
- 1Video: Fleur Agema explains
Nuclear physicist Ronald Wiesendanger also belongs to this group of heroes. Wiesendanger has had the entire German media (Spiegel, etc.) against him with his study in 2020 about the Covid 19 origins. He has conducted several lawsuits against virologist Christian Drosten and is still fighting for ethical scientific practice. See: https://youtu.be/CojqRJzjDnE
It's there, thanks!
Good and at the same time sad list.
You have forgotten the many brave people who refused to be vaccinated and were therefore fired.
This lady also had a lot of fun in Nijmegen….
https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2021:4701
This is unbelievable. They frustrate you until you become radicalized and eventually they catch you. Horrible.
A statement that is based on the assumption that one's own view is correct and therefore that of the other person is dangerous is good propaganda: "If her statements fuel employees' doubts about vaccination and fewer people get vaccinated, this poses a risk to employees and residents of De Waalboog."
Nicely worded too, I must admit. Speaking of propaganda, the following is somewhat comical: “De Waalboog also considers it relevant in this context that [defendant] in an email of December 21, 2020, labels an information film made by De Waalboog [sic] as propaganda.”
Good overview, room for improvement in a number of places, but it gives the essence of how things are/were going. It's actually unbelievable what happens...
But you also see it happen, for example, with JD Vance's speech in Munich 2025 and around the Ukraine war and its history: self-reflection is replaced by denunciation in a similar manner as described in the article above.
At the risk of provoking a new discussion: Attn. Ukr. Lies are spread en masse in both the MSM and alternative media.
And of course this in Belgium: https://www.hln.be/binnenland/zorgpersoneel-dat-zich-op-1-april-nog-niet-liet-vaccineren-wordt-ontslagen~ab4a918e/?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
A good story, what is told here is of course just the tip of the iceberg of courageous people who dare to express their opinions. But these people are silenced or even arrested and thrown in prison. But the real criminals who are behind the dirty corona war are rewarded with a well-paid top job at one or another government institutions, and they go to all kinds of bends to escape LEGAL PROSECUTION, but I hope that justice will prevail and these criminals will still have to serve a life sentence.
Fortunately, I myself did not become a victim of a "vaccination" because I did NOT get vaccinated, unfortunately I did lose my wife, she did get vaccinated, 9 months after she was vaccinated she died from blood vessel infections that spread throughout her body, even to her brain. She died in a hospital after having undergone two previous operations in the ICU. The corona vaccination is a deadly vaccine that has been promoted by the government, but the government has not yet taken responsibility for this.
I have been litigating against these criminals for four years, they continue to point responsibility to the pharmaceutical industry, and the pharmaceutical industry continues to point to the government.
And so you are treated as a citizen who is trying to obtain his rights.
My condolences. Here is an article about a man with alleged corona vaccination damage who also does not know who to hold liable:
https://nos.nl/nieuwsuur/artikel/2474491-man-wil-claim-indienen-na-bijwerkingen-coronaprik-maar-bij-wie
His lawyer “emphasizes that her client is not an anti-vaxer.” If he were an anti-vaxer, I don't think he would have gotten vaccinated. Besides, it doesn't matter, but maybe she knows better than I do what people want to hear.
Are Engel & Pols Belgians these days? At Peter Pauwels the layout is confused. What is the 'matare line' behind Ronald Plasterk?
Thanks for proofreading! Corrected.
“Vaccines, see RS virus, are great”
If I understand correctly, babies are not injected with a vaccine, but with antibodies. Expectant mothers can receive a vaccine that causes them to produce antibodies that they normally pass on to the baby (in the event of a premature birth, this may not go well).
According to the theory, a pregnant woman simply produces antibodies when infected with RS. Due to lockdowns, fewer pregnant women may be infected (or perhaps better: generally weakened through fear) and therefore their future babies less protected (or perhaps better: more vulnerable). With a possible increase in babies infected with RS 'virus' (perhaps better: babies in which fragments of RNA can be found that are related to an RS virus) during lockdowns. (And indeed, testing for antibodies is pointless. Detecting antibodies, the ultimate test, is demonstrable but also injected and therefore says nothing.)
And when it is lifted, there will be a decrease again (reducing vulnerability) and therefore fewer babies in ICU with the virus.
This is not necessarily due to the vaccination of the expectant mother and the antibodies injected into the babies.
Well, Googling RS virus yields a bulk of 'promotional' material for both the vaccine and the injection with antibodies.
“See, it works. Viruses exist, vaccines work.”
Generated fear (increased, thus generated vulnerability): your baby will end up in the ICU, which can be reduced and bought off with a vaccine and injection inside.
In short, medicalization in action.
The RIVM article does not make it clear (it is even confusing) whether the total number of children in the ICU this year is less than in previous years. According to Pediatrician Valerie Sloof, the Children's ICU is less busy in her hospital, but it may be busier in other hospitals.
There are 75% fewer babies tested positive for RS virus in the ICU than last year. And 75% of babies have had an injection in recent months.
This could mean that the injection is approximately 100% effective.
However, I suspect that if doctors see that a sick baby has had the shot, they will assume that the RS virus cannot be the cause and will not have it tested for it. Such a baby cannot therefore come to the ICU with a positive RS virus test.
Even if the injection is 0% effective (does not work at all), this explains the figures found
Mistake
Jeroen for my response see under Hendrik Kwindt under Anton.
Off topic but counter to persistent virus/vaccine fairy tale.
Anton, hats off to the work that must have gone into this article, but you forgot Willem! So here is the most important part of his late blog that has fortunately been remembered by the internet:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240329215542/https://maartenleeflang.blogspot.com/2024/02/inhoudsopgave-in-opbouw-profiel_11.html
I had already sent Willem an email; I didn't know exactly what to put in the last column. I have now made some of my own.
Thanks for mentioning! As far as I'm concerned, it looks absolutely fine. Thanks also for finding my epilogue, Jeroen!
One more point about Rogier Louwen. As far as I remember, he was working at Erasmus MC as a chemist or immunologist at the time. Maybe that can still be adjusted?
Nice Geuzenlist!
According to ChatGPT, the judiciary is always right and the Forum for Democracy is a dangerous, anti-democratic party. The AfD politicians have been charged on legally correct grounds and therefore rightly. Welcome Brave New World. Hello “Sharia drone”.
I would like to suggest the cause of the exclusion one level deeper. To me, an analogy is correct with iron filings that align themselves according to a magnetic field as they flutter down. In this analogy, the magnetic field is: money, bonuses, holidays, privileges, etc. The iron filings are the foot soldiers of the 'New World Order', aka bureaucracy, science, politics, levels of government, etc. In short, Hugo de Jonge's Marion Koopmans, Agnes Kant, Maarten Keulemans, etc.
And what is the magnetic field? Blackrock cum sui. (and where is that black rock?)
One hypothesis explains both the Pfizer covid money machine and the otherwise difficult to explain bizarre pro-Islam attitude of many prominent figures.
(As a young adult, I was adamantly against the patriarchal heteronormative excesses of the church. I now have exactly the same opinion about exactly the same excesses based on the belief that you are not allowed to criticize. Then I was left-wing; and now suddenly, with the same opinion, “extreme right-wing”. Bizarre rubbish.)
By the way, science in the 80s was just as flat and fad-prone. You were actually put on the non-existent blacklist for spurious research interests (psychology: gender and orientation in the brain; biology: phenomenology; archaeology: migration replacement). Little has changed, except the scale of the magnetic field from the analogy above.
Anton, I think you are selling yourself short with “shadowbanded scribblers like me, without any quantitative reach, who are hardly shared”. This blog is extremely relevant for the people who regularly post here, and regular journalism is also watching, as we have seen from Maarten Keulemans' reactions. Even though he describes Virusvaria as a site where a group of anti-vaxxers share their conspiracy theories. I don't know many people personally who have the same critical view. So anything helps.
I think most of the people live in ignorant bliss, and I don't know if that will ever change. Del Bigtree seemed very sure of his case last Tuesday in Apeldoorn. How much more evidence do you want, he asked the audience in response to a question I could ask. A bit uncomfortable.
But… I cannot and do not want to become a missionary who tries to convince people that they are wrong. That is not only irritating but also undesirable. If it comes up, I want to have the right logic and arguments available. That is why these types of blogs, but also illuminating pieces on Substack or podcasts, are so relevant. I think that the Covid period cannot be seen separately from previous decades, and even centuries. The censorship that was applied to all those people you name is reminiscent of the Inquisition. Heretics who deviate from the prevailing ideas. Nowadays they are not burned at the stake, but are labeled as anti-vaxxers. Sinners. Everything has turned around, as Alison points out above. The former progressives (left?) defend the status quo and the conservatives (right) want to break the pattern...
Certainly Cees, I certainly appreciate that! I don't know if I would continue with it otherwise because it costs a lot of time and money.
I also receive compliments from 'important people' by DM or email. But it remains a select handful and we just have to recognize that. And sharing actions remain very limited.
I hope that at some point people can get over their (understandable) trepidation.
Too bad you didn't ask that scammer Bigtree, for example, about his lies about the "clear" effectiveness of the DTP vaccine in "an inconvenient study". Despite the horrifying and heartbreaking vaccine injury stories from “Vaxxed II,” Bigtree tries to convince us that vaccines only need to be made(er) safe.
The RIVM writes today ( https://www.rivm.nl/nieuws/fors-minder-babys-op-ics-dankzij-prik-tegen-rs-virus ): "In recent months, approximately three-quarters of the babies have had a shot against the RS virus (Respiratory Syncytial Virus). As a result, there are significantly fewer babies in the children's ICUs this autumn and winter. Last season, 178 babies were admitted due to the RS virus until February. This season there are 43 so far."
Pediatrician Valerie Sloof is quoted: “The enormous pressure that we normally experience in the winter on the number of available children's ICU beds has also decreased.”
There is therefore a modest decrease in the total number of ICU admissions of children in whom no less than 75% fewer RS virus infections have been diagnosed.
The immunized children are probably no longer tested for the RS virus. Then “thanks to [the] injection” there will indeed be “significantly fewer babies [with confirmed RS virus infection] in the children's ICUs this autumn and winter.”
To me, Del Bigtree's position is a smart move. The injections in question cannot be made safely and he and RFK quietly know that very well. This way they are not dismissed as so-called anti-vaxxers, meaning that a larger group is willing to listen to them. A general who walks too far ahead of the troops loses his army. It's a strategically smart move.
I think you're absolutely right, Alison. I noticed that the panel members in Apeldoorn made more extreme statements than normal in the media or documentaries. Andrew Bridgen (also heavily cancelled) and Del Bigtree, but others were much more outspoken. They were able to express their real opinions because it doesn't scare anyone in this context. I think it's a bit of a stretch to immediately call Del Bigtree a scammer.
Lying (see my response to https://virusvaria.nl/vrijkaartje-voor-battle-for-science/ ) is not a smart move, but reprehensible and unnecessary. Bigtree could simply have remained silent about the effectiveness of the DTP vaccine.
Of course, injections can be made safely; a physiological saline solution, for example, cannot do any harm. The question is whether vaccinations can be made effective and that is what Bigtree is lying about.
RFK Jr. is minister of health, could really make a difference and doesn't have to worry about what people say about him. I suspect that the call for safer vaccines serves to restore public confidence in vaccinations and/or reduce the damage caused to society.
Politics is a different subject. I don't know how to lie effectively. I especially know that by being too blunt I alienate doubters and that is undesirable. But, you're right: lying is not the best way to go. I haven't seen the conference in question. Link anyone?
When I say injection I mean vaccination here. A vaccine is supposed to protect health, so I often don't get that word out of my mouth.
RFK has had very tough sessions during which he was at best able to identify the low-hanging fruit step by step. Any more and he would already have been deposed by hysterical social consternation.
Bigtree's unnecessary lies can be seen in his documentary in https://virusvaria.nl/vrijkaartje-voor-battle-for-science/ can be viewed. At least, I assume (and hope) that's what you want to see.
I understand that you mean vaccination by injection. If it is possible to safely feed someone intravenously (for a short period of time), it may also be possible to make safe vaccines.
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/battle-for-science-takes-the-international?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Peter McCulough put it on his substack.
RFK Jr. was dealt with harshly by the Democratic senators. Of course you can criticize him, but I think it's admirable what these people endure.
Can also be seen via Lighthouse TV, but I think you have to pay. Not a bad idea either. People like Flavio are extremely valuable.
Cees, what you write triggers a feeling in me that I have had for some time: the left is the old right (being on the defensive, being conservative with regard to the narrative, kicking away towards what they call wappies; think of Keulemans et al.). As a moderate leftist, I have not felt at home with these types of people for some time now. For me, the left is still: being critical, questioning, not going along with everything that is presented to you... How I missed that during corona... and long afterwards, like now in the time of climate fuss, nitrogen madness and warmongering... isn't it time for a new movement, free from all this madness? Also consider increasing restrictions on freedoms through financial and street control/surveillance.
By the way, Anton: congratulations for your continued efforts to uncover the corona truth. And, Maarten K., if you are following this, have a REAL discussion with one of us; I would like to see that again (how you get out of there).
Bhattacharya can be an example of how the position of a scientist can also become a positive change (although I do doubt the deal that his politically unpredictable boss may have had in mind with that appointment; not me first)
Lawsuit over mass manipulation by virologist Drosten in Germany.
After 14 minutes, “Ron” will be notified in an email.
https://youtu.be/HB09BIwlnDc
Yes, that is almost certainly an email from Marion Koopmans.
Behind Reiner Fuelmich is a British flag; I suspect that a German flag would be more appropriate.
“Academic courage will only return when the mediacracy loses its grip.” – Academic courage? Forget it: something like this will remain a very scarce article for the time being, and this is because 'scientist' has become a profession like any other, accessible to hordes of moderately gifted people without any originality or capacity for independent thinking, who can 'learn well', become 'higher educated', get an academic title and then manage to get a job, and a family, and a mortgage, and other things, causing them to cling to their status at all costs, because they usually can't do anything else. It is therefore striking how many of the people who do sound the alarm are retirees - not only among doctors and professors, but also, for example, generals and even secret agents... The time when scientists were prepared to forego every conventional comfort and often risked their health and sometimes their lives in order to pursue their quest for knowledge is far behind us.
That's how I see it too.
in GB => DE
Aya Velázquez, the German journalist who received the RKI files (minutes of the German OMT) in uncensored form from an unknown RKI employee in 2024 and subsequently published them for the general public, certainly also belongs to the group of COVID dissidents who were/are being dealt with harshly. She was recently 'debanked' and officially designated as a potential traitor in 2025 by the German NCTV ('Suspicion' of the 'Verfassungsschutz').
The publication of the RKI files has caused a stir in Germany and led to changes in the media and politics.
For example, a group of investigative journalists has become active (the 'liber net' initiative) and has focused on mapping censorship in Germany. After six months of work, this resulted in a report, in German and English, of approximately 70 pages. Check the following site for information about the 'Censorship complex' in Germany. https://liber-net.org/germany/
This report may have already been sent or discussed in previous blogs, but I was unable to find anything quickly.
The report was presented in Berlin and Brussels in November 2025. At the introduction in Brussels (organized by a left-wing German splinter party (BSW) in the EP offices), Aya Velázquez gave a lecture (English with subtitles in German), in which she first discussed censorship in Germany in general and then discussed censorship in connection with COVID-19 and the RKI traffic jams. See: https://www.velazquez.press/p/mein-rede-in-brussel-video-und-reisebericht
Here is a video about the suppression of the discussion about the origins of Covid 19
https://youtu.be/_CdjhsmqX7Y
Epstein involvement and the result of dishonest science.
https://youtu.be/mElVGwXLnXw
Also added Aseem Malhotra. Read https://dailysceptic.org/2026/03/12/dr-aseem-malhotra-im-fighting-for-my-medical-licence-after-blowing-the-whistle-on-covid-vaccines/
Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk? For me, 'Dissolving illusions' is now standard work on vaccines. Aron Siri? Vaccines, Amen. Both can also be seen at Joe Rogan.
All valuable people, but have they also been fired, demoted/transferred or debanked or something like that? Would like some more information.
Bob Moran added to journalists.