Jan Bonte expertly lists the problems with the vaccines in the form of a question, often accompanied by a reading suggestion. He asks to share the thread. Hereby. It is an impressive series of red flags, although I have to admit that as a layman it is not always immediately clear to me in what percentage of the cases a described reaction actually occurs. You sometimes read the most horrible things and they turn out to be a high rarity or even unique. That does not alter the fact that the corona vaccines are breaking all records. And to think: globally rolled out integrally to entire populations – while preparations are being made for the child murder campaign. Because it is certain that more children will die prematurely from the vaccinations than Covid could have brought about, especially the Omicron variant. "They do it for someone else".
The Stinging Bumblebee
Unfortunately,@huisdoktertimnot on my comments. That's a shame, because I want to start the substantive discussion. So I ask Tim a number of questions. #lockdown#persconferentie#vaccinatieplicht

This is a very good article that I read several months ago.
We agree that you can be assisted by whoever you want. Whether that is@MarionKoopmansor@NickiVerweij.
Also@shossontwitsand@martijnmollersare welcome.
Fair is fair, isn't it?
Question 1: That's a no-brainer. I have already given the answer: how long is the follow-up in the only study into the efficacy of the booster?
Question 2: Again, I have already given the answer: which variant was dominant in this study?nejm.org/doi/full/10.10...
Question 3: What does the term 'antigenic sin' mean?
Question 4: is this a hypothetical concept or are there already strong indications of its existence, for example in influenza or dengue?

Question 5: what does the term 'titer' mean, which is generally the measure used for antibodies?
Question 6: if the titer of antibodies rises, does the amount increase, or do they bind more strongly to the target?
Or perhaps both?
Question 7: in the case of a booster – the third dose – which leads to a higher titer of the antibodies, what increases the most?
The amount of antibodies or the affinity – or the strength of the bond?

Question 8: I forgot for a moment: what do we know about the safety of giving the booster? Do you have relevant scientific literature that answers that?
I would sincerely like to receive it from you.
Question 9: there are neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies. When it comes to neutralizing antibodies, which property is the most important: affinity or quantity?
Question 10: in the sequel: after a primary infection with a pathogen... ... B cells – the producers of the antibodies – undergo a process of maturation in the 'germinal center' of the lymph nodes.
What is this process called and how does it work?

Question 11: is this process the same in the case of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 virus compared to the primary infection of the virus?
And suppose the immune system does manage to adapt its response to the #omikronvariant. What are the chances that the old variants will become dominant again? So the alpha, the beta and the delta variant? And what are the chances that new variants will emerge that also avoid the changed vaccines?
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmc2031364
Question 12: To what extent is this process important in forming the immune system's "memory"?
Question 13: Now suppose that when giving the booster the amount of the antibodies does increase but not the affinity?
How long does it take for the amount of antibodies to drop so much that the amount is too little again?
Question 14: We know from the first laboratory studies that antibodies bind less well to the#Omikronvariant.
What consequences does that have for the duration of the protection provided by the booster?
Question 15: If#PfizerBioNtechmodifying their mRNA so that they look more like the spike protein of the#OmikronVariant, does the immune system also manage to adapt its response to this variant?

Question 16: Suppose that doesn't work.
The immune system continues as before, producing the same antibodies that were optimal for the D614G variant and the alpha variant but not for the delta and omicron variants?What does that mean for the ratio of neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies?
Question 17: what could this change in the relationship lead to?
Question 18: hoe denken jullie over deze studie?
Deze laat een correlatie zien tussen ‘antibody resistence’ en ‘vaccine resistence’ enerzijds, en de vaccinatiegraad anderzijds.
The National Immunisation Programme is carried out on people with a perfectly functioning immune system, by means of (almost entirely) sterilising vaccines and in times of low infection pressure. Once? Now we give 'leaky' vaccines, to people with largely poorly functioning immune systems, in a period of high infection pressure.
Question 19: does that make a difference? Or does it not matter?
Question 20: is there a risk in the possibility that people will run into the actual infection after the first shot, when immunity has not yet been fully built up? In the period when they have a relative suppression of the immune system?
Question 21: Are you familiar with the possible dangers of 'leaky vaccines'?
I know, people are not chickens, although I have had some doubts about that lately: head, without and clucking.
Question 22: Could this process also occur in humans as a result of the use of leaky vaccines?
Or do you think this is impossible?
Question 23: Since we know that the risk of myocarditis in boys and young men increases significantly with the second dose compared to the first dose.
How many boosters do you dare to give your own children?
academic.oup.com/cid/advance-ar...
Question 24: When will this pandemic end?

Question 25, the last question:
Given the situation we have ended up in, could we have been warned about this? Or should be?

Life is simple. But not that simple. The story of the 'antigenic sin' beautifully summarized in a diagram:
And here again when presenting the original pathogen to the immune system compared to presenting it to the immune system, the same pathogen with a slightly different coat on.
It's playing with fire. But people prefer to close their eyes.