In the absence of data, we make data

Factual data are kept away from us like hydrochloric acid in toddlers. Without transparency there is no science, it has had its day now: other things are more important. But numbers matter, so corona activist Steve Kirsch decided to send his followers a small poll with two questions:

1. If you know someone who died in 2021 or 2022 from ANY CAUSE, please tell us their age, date of death, and whether the person has had a COVID vaccine or not.
2. If you know more than one person, choose the person whose death details you know best.

How reliable will that be, such a poll, can it be taken seriously? The bias is there for the taking: will entrants report vaccinated deaths that were not vaccinated in reality or perhaps the other way around?

Joel Smalley analyzed the data (2,000 submissions so far), did some sanity checks and came to remarkable conclusions. I highlight the most important line.

The answers submitted to the poll show a clear similarity with the CDC's Covid mortality. There seems to be a pretty truthful answer.

(Deviations explained by Joel in the video, link at the bottom)

The vax vs non-vax graph shows that many more unvaccinated people (green line) died than vaccinated people during Covid waves. Seen in this way, the vaccines are therefore very effective. Actually much more effective than we thought: according to this graph, 60% more unvaccinated people have died. This is remarkable because such figures have never been reported anywhere before. So Smalley dived a little deeper.

In the notes, he notices something else: the unvaccinated have undergone different treatments than the vaccinated. The unvaccinated were administered Remdesivir and put on a ventilator in accordance with the so-called "Fauci protocol".

After correction for this, the difference has disappeared: whether or not to administer Remdesivir and the way of giving extra oxygen appears to be the distinguishing factor.

Two possible explanations

Option 1: Remdesivir was considered useless in vaccinated people, because their immune system was already sufficiently armed with the vaccine. Maybe it could even disrupt some of that effect. So people relied on the boost of the vaccines. That is why only unvaccinated people received the 'extra' Remdesivir.

The fact that more unvaccinated people died would then be due to the harmful, actually deadly, treatment. That is bycatch that is gladly picked up by this and that (Kirsch himself) and that fits into many a reset and depopulation theory. Enforcing such treatment and encouraging it with a higher reimbursement could indeed indicate malicious intent. But there is also another possibility that I would like to argue against:

Option 2: The unvaccinated deteriorated faster and therefore it was more often necessary in that group to use horse remedies, which ultimately did not help anyway. The vaccinated, on the other hand, died 'on their own'.

Remdesivir and intubation: you have to be a good person to survive that in a weakened state. Where Fauci holds sway, it still happens, because he says that Remdesivir works.

Remdesivir

According to this meta-study, it is between Vitamin C and Paracetamol in terms of effectiveness. See also this study with 11,000 patients.

Other drugs were not allowed, only this newly developed, Fauci-praised Remdesivir (and Molnupiravir that is similar to ivermectin but just enough different from it for a new patent). Early treatment was out of the question. The 80-year-old protocol to administer antibiotics for lung infections was 'discouraged', see the 2019 protocol:

More info: the tweets of @TheJikky). Azithromycin was also not allowed; Google is still a bit confused about it.

ICU/intubation

In the first months of 2020, it was a hard school: intubation in the Netherlands turned out to be far from the panacea that the Chinese had promised. The chance that you would come out of the ICU alive was smaller than that you would die there. Compare the orange and red lines. (Part of that orange line had also gone home: the blue line.)

The figures from then do not correspond to what is shown now. Maybe the shame was too great. Adjusting these historical figures stood out before. The current situation:

On 20 April 2020, there were 395 former ICU patients who had left the hospital alive in total, Reported early May 2020.

On 20 April 2020, there were 617 ex-ICU patients who had left the hospital alive in total, Reported on December 20, 2022. (see the Current page)

The success rate up to and including April is now 56% higher than then.

Medical logbook: IC 20-04-2020	Red	Orange	Blue
when (24-4-’20)	590	550	395
Right away (20-12-’22)	537	336	617

All highly interesting, but on both safety and effectiveness, the vaccines score a big fat zero in this analysis. And then we don't give negative figures.

Watch the video with explanation on the substack by Joel Smalley.