• Excess mortality
  • Trending

In the absence of data, we make data

by Anton Theunissen | 21 Dec 2022, 09:12

← Impffolgen II: Vaccine damage in Germany, an import error...? Oproep van Australische hardliner met vaccinschade: 'Wij zijn geen anti-vaxxers' →
reading time

Factual data are kept away from us like hydrochloric acid in toddlers. Without transparency there is no science, it has had its day now: other things are more important. But numbers matter, so corona activist Steve Kirsch decided to send his followers a small poll with two questions:

  1. If you know someone who died in 2021 or 2022 from ANY CAUSE, please tell us their age, date of death, and whether the person has had a COVID vaccine or not.
  2. If you know more than one person, choose the person whose death details you know best.

How reliable will that be, such a poll, can it be taken seriously? The bias is there for the taking: will entrants report vaccinated deaths that were not vaccinated in reality or perhaps the other way around?

Joel Smalley analyzed the data (2,000 submissions so far), did some sanity checks and came to remarkable conclusions. I highlight the most important line.

The answers submitted to the poll show a clear similarity with the CDC's Covid mortality. There seems to be a pretty truthful answer.

(Deviations explained by Joel in the video, link at the bottom)

The vax vs non-vax graph shows that many more unvaccinated people (green line) died than vaccinated people during Covid waves. Seen in this way, the vaccines are therefore very effective. Actually much more effective than we thought: according to this graph, 60% more unvaccinated people have died. This is remarkable because such figures have never been reported anywhere before. So Smalley dived a little deeper.

In the notes, he notices something else: the unvaccinated have undergone different treatments than the vaccinated. The unvaccinated were administered Remdesivir and put on a ventilator in accordance with the so-called "Fauci protocol".

After correction for this, the difference has disappeared: whether or not to administer Remdesivir and the way of giving extra oxygen appears to be the distinguishing factor.

Two possible explanations

Option 1: Remdesivir was considered useless in vaccinated people, because their immune system was already sufficiently armed with the vaccine. Maybe it could even disrupt some of that effect. So people relied on the boost of the vaccines. That is why only unvaccinated people received the 'extra' Remdesivir.

The fact that more unvaccinated people died would then be due to the harmful, actually deadly, treatment. That is bycatch that is gladly picked up by this and that (Kirsch himself) and that fits into many a reset and depopulation theory. Enforcing such treatment and encouraging it with a higher reimbursement could indeed indicate malicious intent. But there is also another possibility that I would like to argue against:

Option 2: The unvaccinated deteriorated faster and therefore it was more often necessary in that group to use horse remedies, which ultimately did not help anyway. The vaccinated, on the other hand, died 'on their own'.

Remdesivir and intubation: you have to be a good person to survive that in a weakened state. Where Fauci holds sway, it still happens, because he says that Remdesivir works.

Remdesivir

According to this meta-study, it is between Vitamin C and Paracetamol in terms of effectiveness. See also this study with 11,000 patients.

Other drugs were not allowed, only this newly developed, Fauci-praised Remdesivir (and Molnupiravir that is similar to ivermectin but just enough different from it for a new patent). Early treatment was out of the question. The 80-year-old protocol to administer antibiotics for lung infections was 'discouraged', see the 2019 protocol:

More info: the tweets of @TheJikky). Azithromycin was also not allowed; Google is still a bit confused about it.

ICU/intubation

In the first months of 2020, it was a hard school: intubation in the Netherlands turned out to be far from the panacea that the Chinese had promised. The chance that you would come out of the ICU alive was smaller than that you would die there. Compare the orange and red lines. (Part of that orange line had also gone home: the blue line.)

The figures from then do not correspond to what is shown now. Maybe the shame was too great. Adjusting these historical figures stood out before. The current situation:

On 20 April 2020, there were 395 former ICU patients who had left the hospital alive in total, Reported early May 2020.

On 20 April 2020, there were 617 ex-ICU patients who had left the hospital alive in total, Reported on December 20, 2022. (see the Current page)

The success rate up to and including April is now 56% higher than then.

Medical logbook:
IC 20-04-2020
RedOrangeBlue
when (24-4-’20)590550395
Right away (20-12-’22)537336617

In New York State, 26.9% of medicare-aged patients who received Fauci's 5-Day Remdesivir protocol died.

Dr. Bryan Ardis: "Remdesivir actually causes death of heart cells and is cardiotoxic and can lead to cardiac arrest." pic.twitter.com/Aqj0Q4br7k

— stu chua (@stu_chua) December 12, 2022

All highly interesting, but on both safety and effectiveness, the vaccines score a big fat zero in this analysis. And then we don't give negative figures.

Watch the video with explanation on the substack by Joel Smalley.

← previous post Next post →
Related reading pleasure:
Wanneer ben je gevaccineerd volgens CIMS? Predicting vaccination mortality: a first model Safe, working? Mortality per 100,000 by age and vaccination status 2021 in England, UK
7 Comments
  1. Ward
    Ward the 21 / 12 / 2022 to the 13: 29

    Link to poll results of Steve Kirsch:

    https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/my-latest-all-cause-mortality-survey

    1
    Answer
    • Anton (@infopinie)
      Anton (@infopinie) the 21 / 12 / 2022 to the 13: 58

      Yes, that link is also in Smalley's article but it can't hurt.

      1
      Answer
  2. Chris
    Chris the 21 / 12 / 2022 to the 19: 44

    In my opinion, the answer can only be found by having an autopsy performed in all cases of an unknown cause of death.

    Maybe set up a croudfunding to collect the necessary funds for this...

    4
    Answer
    • Anton (@infopinie)
      Anton (@infopinie) the 21 / 12 / 2022 to the 21: 35

      Yes or at least randomly. But that sample must be determined by an independent party.

      2
      Answer
  3. Arnoud
    Arnoud the 22 / 12 / 2022 to the 03: 42

    Thanks again Anton. I only understand that comparison between the different measurement moments(?) of leaving the ICU alive in (both cases?) April 2020.

    Is that date correct or am I missing something?

    Bvd again.

    1
    Answer
    • Anton (@infopinie)
      Anton (@infopinie) the 22 / 12 / 2022 to the 12: 25

      Report 2020:
      – On 24-4-2020, a total of 395 ICU patients had left the hospital alive
      Report 2022:
      – On 24-4-2020, a total of 617 ICU patients had left the hospital alive

      That is an improvement of 56%. How is that possible?
      1. The registration at the time was not valid and has been corrected with retroactive effect. What does that say about the current reports? Will they also turn out to be 50% higher or lower next year?
      2. Should the success rate be increased? After all, everything was dominated by the ICUs, people had to be able to go there. Is that justifiable if 2/3 dies? (I also wrote an article about it at the time, see here)
      3. Who checks whether these adjustments are correct, whether the reporting figures are correct at all? Every receipt of my silly little bookkeeping is checked, but reports on which million-devouring policy decisions are based, who watches over that? What does internal quality control look like? Just had an interesting comment from an insider, see here

      In short, it raised questions for me.

      2
      Answer
    • Arnoud
      Arnoud the 22 / 12 / 2022 to the 20: 08

      Completely clear now Anton. Thank you. Very valid questions. Top.

      Answer

Send a comment Cancel reply

Je e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Required fields are marked with *

amnesty Anne Frank antibiotics Babies Bioweapons conspiracy theory

fraud ionization Mass formation Un Lawsuits thrombosis

safety Bulgaria Japan Koopmans Repopulation privacy

Mortality Monitor vitaminD cardiovascular ChatGPT Germany filosofie

obfuscation Parliamentary inquiry sociology Wob foreign country journalism

nocebo opinion alijst IC NRC Government information

responsibility narrative praise women Wynia hve

Level Children Public health Side effects infection scientific integrity

keulemans vaccine communication science vaccination excess mortality

statistics media science corruption aerosols lableak CBS

politics research mdhaero ivermectin Measures disinformation

Wuhan Vaccination readiness paradogma Australia Pfizer OUR

Badbatches Fauci Post-Covid norm mortality lockdowns Burkhardt

Baseline UK rivm Excess mortality debate Gupta effectiveness

data censorship asmr deferred care RKI PeterSweden

Ukraine John Causes WOO VE Spike

qaly motive Lareb Hotels heart failure ethics variegated

bhakdi monkeypox Anti-VAX fear

Views (inst:8-10-'21): 598
← Impffolgen II: Vaccine damage in Germany, an import error...? Oproep van Australische hardliner met vaccinschade: 'Wij zijn geen anti-vaxxers' →

Would you like a notification e-mail with each new article?

Thanks for your interest!
Some fields are missing or incorrect!
Bijdragen aan virusvaria mag. Klik en vul zelf het bedrag in
👇
Contribute something? Please! Click here.
👍

Out mortality is with vaccinates!

jul 20, 2025

Causes of death behind the excess of women between 40 and 50 years old

jul 20, 2025

Vaccination Effectiveness Negative says Grok

jul 14, 2025

Pregnancy and vaccinations: 45% more miscarriages in week 8-13 (IL), 30% fewer delivery (CZ)

jul 2, 2025

Plottwist: educational levels, vaccination willingness and data silence with Wouter Aukema

jun 29, 2025

Deferred care and excess mortality

jun 22, 2025

Flawed researchers brush up their act with a novelty: the ‘Healthy Vaccinee Effect’

jun 14, 2025

Mortality by cause of death: New (cancer)

jun 12, 2025

And the winner is indeed: Bulgaria!

jun 8, 2025

Mortality by cause of death: cardiovascular disease

mei 30, 2025

And the winner will be...

mei 27, 2025

Cracked Counter Noise Bell

May 24, 2025

« Previous Page

Contribute something? Please! Click here.

Translation


© Contact Anton Theunissen
We use a cookie bar on our website to inform you that we analyze the use. We do not use cookies for marketing purposes. (Google respects the privacy laws.)
OK
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDuurBeschrijving
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
OPSLAAN & ACCEPTEREN
Aangedreven door CookieYes Logo