It sounds like a new Suske and Wiske but the reason is something completely different: the recent update of the High Health Council in Belgium. Including amazing achievements (Jerommeke is nothing there) on the field of attention that we all find important: pregnancy. In the framework below some literal texts (I have some words myself fatcursive made)
The High Health Council in Belgium advises1Advice HGB: https://www.hgr-css.be/nl/advies/9879/vaccinatie-tegen-seizoensgebonden-griep-winterseizoen-2025-2026 Vaccination against seasonal flu for the winter season 2025-2026. Only trivalent vaccines will be available in Belgium: standard dose vaccines (Alpharix®, Influvac®, Vaxigrip®), vaccines with adjuvans (Fluad®) and high -dose vaccines (Efluelda®). Simultaneous administration with the COVID-19 vaccine is safe and effective. Vaccination starts in the ideal case in mid -October.
For whom is vaccination recommended?
- People with the risk of flu -related complications, such as 65+ers (preferably a reinforced vaccine), pregnant women, …
- Persons working in the health sector
- Persons who live under the same roof as risk personers from group 1 or children younger than 6 months whose mother did not receive a flu vaccine during pregnancy
How is this possible. We now know about vaccination damage and mortality. We know about the problems with menstrual cycles and the possible impact on reproduction systems. We know that the vast majority of the population had no advantage of those injections, only the risk of disadvantages and that it was already known in advance. It is not for nothing that that data is kept secret. But if they don't pay attention to that, what do they pay attention to? The Belgians explain it.
They give in the Belgian vaccination strategy against Covid-192Belgian vaccination strategy https://www.hgr-css.be/file/download/ab98f0f9-954b-4fda-8090-85b1fc801f8a/72ZqVa2jYMBjIVsbJKwHX0a5pLy0Yl4l6yVzYTkRW03d.pdf That the recommendations for 2024-2025 can be maintained, with special attention to pregnant women this year. As factors that could be a reason to adjust these recommendations, they call (I quote):
The elements that may require a rapid and urgent adjustment of these recommendations and the vaccination campaign in Belgium before 2025-2026 are:
- New custom vaccines with longer or wider protection;
- the arrival of a new VOC with massive immune disease;
- a drastic loss of the efficacy of the vaccine (VE) on hospital admissions and deaths;
- It remains important to regularly continue to monitor the profiles of patients who die or are admitted to hospital with COVID-19, based on their vaccination status, comorbidities, immunosuppressive treatments, etc. in Belgium, abroad and on the basis of any new variants;
- A global shift in international recommendations to more frequent and more regular boosters;
Vaccination against COVID-19 and seasonal flu are preferably offered together for operational considerations (WHO 2022, ECDC 2023).
Vaccination damage is not included. It is not taken into account, possibly because vaccines are considered safe and effective. The "shift in international recommendations to more frequent and more regular boosters" is also significant. Shift towards less frequent boosters does not participate in the considerations. How do they get it out of their pen; As if they want to show their contempt.
Positive side effects festival
If you look through the report, it is actually incomprehensible that this vaccination is not made mandatory for pregnant women. The recommendations must be expanded: not smoking, no alcohol, preferably no medicines and immediately get an mrna prick! After all, vaccinated pregnant women only have advantages of the injections. All unexpected positive effects.
After mrna vaccination we see:
- 14% less chance of a premature birth
- Better Apgar scores
- 10% Less Intensive Care (NICU) Recordings
- 12% less hypertensive disorders
- 9% fewer caesarers needed
That is after two doses. But we see after one dose
- 17% fewer miscarriages
- 10% less chance of a premature birth
- 14% Less Intensive Care (NICU) Recordings
Robbert Dijkgraaf was therefore again right: the vaccine also works in this respect "much better than we ever had to dream" (we Knew so not, we hoped). A medical miracle. Consultation agencies must hit a stock of mrna vaccines! Pandemie or no pandemic: Family expansion planned? First get a mrna prick!
Yet healthy pregnant women are free to reject vaccination - at least if they have already been vaccinated or infected. Infection therefore counts. But if they are not yet, they must still receive a COVID-19 vaccination with high priority. Is literally in the advice, in capital letters.
Nor understood
So there is an intervention with unexpected, broad, and systemic effect. An injection with this impact does things with the body that we did not provide and do not understand. Just explain how a locally injected spiking -coded sequence causes this broad systemic and neonatal effects through immunological routes. This requires fundamental biological research and great caution, precisely because of the obvious unintended effects. And here only pregnancy has been looked at. What about other organs and systems? What does it do in the long term? More twins? Better school results? What does it do with men, nothing at all ...?
Another possibility-but then of course I say something crazy is that it is all the result of selection bias, healthy vaccinee effect (HVE), confounding, and time-related bias (such as Immortal Time Bias of Time-Window Bias). Statistical and methodological artifacts can be used as a puncture promotion, where we know that from ... In that case we have again presented an example of scientific deception with epidemiological noise, as a policy substitution.
Below a few more fragments literally text (translated) from the report, for those who can't believe it all.
“In gecorrigeerde cohortstudies was het risico op hypertensieve aandoeningen tijdens de zwangerschap met 12% verminderd (RR 0,88, 95% BI 0,82 tot 0,92; 2 studies; 115 085 vrouwen), terwijl het aantal keizersneden met 9% daalde (OR 0,91, 95% BI 0,85 tot 0,98; 6 studies; 30 192 vrouwen). Ze constateerden een vermindering van 8% In the risk of admission to the Nicu (RR 0.92, 95% BI 0.87 to 0.97; 2 studies; 54 569 women) in babies of vaccinated women, vaccinating during pregnancy was not associated with an increased pregnancy place. (77%, 95% BI 52% to 94%; 11 studies; 27.195 women) they have concluded that COVID-19 vaccines are effective in the prevention of SARS-COV-2 infection and related complications in pregnant women (Fernández-García et., 2024).
“COVID19 vaccination in the third trimester was accompanied by a reduced risk of premature birth (<37 weeks) (RR 0.85 [95% bi 0.74 to 0.98]), an APgar score of <7 after 5 minutes (RR 0.87 [95% BI 0.78 to 0.97])) 0.95]). The reverse relationships were also found in the analysis of vaccination during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage (95% bi 0.72 to 0.96]) and premature birth (RR 0.90 [95% bi 0.80 to 1.00) and rose with two doses 0.86 [95% BI 0.76 to 0.96]). "
“The Belgian Nitag recommends the following for pregnant women in Belgium:
- Pregnant women, at every stage of pregnancy, with comorbidities or women for whom a risky pregnancy is expected or Women who have not yet been infected/vaccinated must receive a COVID-19 vaccination with high priority.
- Healthy pregnant women Without comorbidities or an expected risky pregnancy BE ABLE TO on an individual basis TO ELECT for COVID-19 vaccination. This decision must be taken in consultation with a healthcare provider, taking into account the priorities and risk factors for all vaccinations recommended by Nitag (SHC 8754, 2020; SHC 9760, 2023; SHC 9831, 2024). "
Assignment 1: Explain how these two Nitag recommendations are logically compatible.
Note 2: To what extent does "have to get" that women can no longer "choose"?
Read the answers
Answer 1: The points are only logically compatible if "healthy pregnant women" is read in the second point as: "healthy pregnant women who have already been infected/vaccinated".
Answer 2: This requires vaccination obligation, coercion or blackmail.
It all seems so hopeless. The constant crash against a totalitarian wall is debilitating. I have to deal with the relatives of Michel Reijinga. Heartbreaking - and so tangible.
Compliance: Mortality among 0-5 year olds, from 2018-2025
References
- 1
- 2
Dit is krankzinnig. The lunatics are taking over the asylum.
Must let it sink in for a longer response.
This is a big lie and pure attempted manslaughter but these poison spraying that do not contribute to good health at all. Not safe at all ...
It seems that the Belgians still have a ground of truth.
This stupidity will turn out disastrous. Incredible.
Especially the latter: it all seems so hopeless.
Although I tend more and more towards "is" instead of "seems" ...
The MRNA injection makes short work of the weaker fetuses in the womb. Just Survival of the Fittest!
Unfortunately, that mess is also in a different product for pregnant women, namely the anti d injection as a mother Rhesus is negative and the baby Rhesus is positive. Do not take Coronaprik and then have this dilemma just as well ... the consequences for the next pregnancy with nasty antibodies that endanger your child. How long will "they" continue to do it? It seems hopeless but not giving up. Michel Reijinga also did not give up with his opposition to policy and the like, but his health abandoned him, that's how I heard. What a big loss for his family and friends. Would have liked to give him a last greeting, but just like many we were not able to go to Amsterdam last Sunday i.v.m. vacation. I hope people realize that. He was their thoughts in many and still!
Then I have to assume that his mental health abandoned him. Otherwise you will not leave your child in a future that you do not like.
His health in several areas. A lot of pain too. I understand that they think of their daughters, but you don't just make such a choice. When are your children old enough to continue without you ... Last week we saw a total of aids dependent man and my adult child with small children said "you know I would never want that,"
While media report about “hundreds” of attendees, I heard from a reliable source that there were more. Very nice! The police weren't there to lay roses either...
As far as I understand it, this product has not been tested for pregnant women.
Apparently, fetuses are undesirable as they fall prey to experiments.
Knows who experimented on that?
Certainly not tested in advance no. But then I am reassured that a lot of research has been done about it in the meantime, with positive results! And then everything is fine ... until you look at those studies.
So what those Belgians write is not the bias of the researchers, but indicates how those studies are assessed by supervisors: the health councils, the EMAs and FDAs of this world ... How does it exist.
"Spurious Correlation": Potential appearance detect connections based on just data correlation. Wow!
Yes then it is often suddenly allowed.
Because the sales in the USA are disappointing, the Europeans must believe it. Everything for the shareholders.
In France (and we have been traveling throughout the country for years) almost everything closed, demolished and perished in the villages, but the pharmacies are open all day every day. Building buildings with medical terms everywhere. Incomprehensible! You can also see signs with "Macron is a dic ta tor".
Of course, the large amount of Moderna shots (for 4 years) that Ursula purchased at the beginning of this year should not all be thrown away. The Belgians will probably continue with this for the next four years. And perhaps the Netherlands too, if GroenLinks-PvdA wins the elections.
https://www.frontnieuws.com/nieuwe-miljoenendeal-voor-coronavaccins-von-der-leyens-dubieuze-farmaceutische-beleid-gaat-door/
The behavior you describe in this article, Anton, reminds me of what is called 'doubling down' in English. A term from game theory.
If you double the bet, you take even more risk in a certain situation. You then once again passionately commit yourself to a particular cause or course of action.
Originally from the card game Blackjack, it first described a strategy in which a player who is confident in his hand chooses to double his bet. Doubling started to evolve from “risk taking” to “passionate dedication to a cause” in the years 2000-2010. Today, outside of gambling, doubling down is often used by politicians, business leaders and media to describe tackling a problem with more focus, energy and resources, especially when that tactic is considered unwise.
This may have the effect of increasing trust on the other participants in the 'game'. At least, that's the intention...
It is often also a bluff. Double your bet in the hope that the other person will think “He must have a very strong hand!”
Completely logical and unstoppable with these types of injection/booster rounds. There is only 1 way to stop this and all other misery. Just saying, thank you, but I'm not participating. I don't need your pricks. Take them yourself. I'm not going to play soldier. Go into the trenches yourself. Eat healthy, live healthy, trust yourself and don't buy products from big companies. Go to the organic farmer and get your meat and vegetables there. And maybe you should stop voting for one party or another. Serious. What do you still have to vote for? It is the first time in my life that I am considering not voting at all. Leave them alone, it doesn't matter anyway. Wasted energy and time. The Netherlands is still a beautiful country. (Belgium also:-)
If you think that voting will not help, it is always better to vote for a small 'opposing party'. If you don't vote, you agree to power. As a result, power will behave even more supremely.
On the one hand you may be right, but it probably doesn't change the political situation. Even if PVV, for example, gets 50 seats, nothing will change. Does not provide a prime minister and is being held back internally. The problem is the system. If 90% drop out (not going to happen) then perhaps a different system will be introduced. I haven't figured it out yet.
I've made up my mind and I'm voting these days. On “the court jesters” as W E aptly explained it at a table near new media. Court jesters can speak and question those in power and so many hear their voice. They are seeds that are planted in the numbed brain, so there is always a chance that they will germinate. Just like the articles here. Suddenly we heard the information from this site in the second room from an unexpected source.
If 90% don't vote, the globalists will get their way.
According to the WEF, voting will no longer be necessary in the future. Then AI will take care of all that for us.
So please vote against!!!!
At least if you are against globalization.
Yes, sorry Miranda, but I am convinced that those globalists (elite you name it) actually got their way a long time ago. We have no influence in any way.
What you can influence is what you can sit on or hold your hand on.
So, for example, gold in a safe somewhere is third party and therefore worthless.
Lees het anders na in The great Taking..
https://thegreattaking.com/read-online-or-download
Yes in another language so you will have to make some effort.
But then you understand why governments behave the way they do...
Politics exists to give citizens the idea that there is a choice...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7U5JVk_y7U
Globalists or whatever you want to make of them have had everyone in their pocket for a long time.
I'm trying to see (maybe too many) patterns, and that Belgian booster campaign is one of the many symptoms of the madness. I am now convinced that it will only stop when a larger proportion of people see through the madness, something that will probably never happen. Despite the fact that state propaganda is a reasonable copy of Orwell's 1984 and other dystopian books, humanity still falls for it every time. Why? Because a totalitarian system never manifests itself in exactly the same way?
Totalitarian systems are associated with forceful marching boots, camps, crazy dictators. It has become a kind of cliché that also appears in films. The dangerous madman who wants to destroy the world from his fortress in a volcano. In reality, most people don't notice until it's too late. This may also be due to the modern way of reporting and the influence of the government on the major news channels. Most do not realize that they are watching propaganda, which is of course exactly the intention. Below is an example of an RTL news item that caught my eye in May.
https://ceesmul.substack.com/publish/posts/detail/168457811?referrer=%2Fpublish%2Fhome
Back to the Belgian Boosters, a nice Suske en Wiske title indeed. The responses on this site clearly show what 'we' think about it, but what does the pregnant woman (oh no, pregnant person) who does have the injection think about this? Apparently a large part of the population still trusts the government and its agencies. What would happen if trust in government fell below a critical limit? Is that the fear among government agencies? Or do they themselves believe in the usefulness of these types of dangerous measures? Why are these shots still being pushed? Not wanting to admit that they were completely wrong may play a role (doubling down is mentioned by Ed Sonneveld).
Only when the number of skeptics reaches the tipping point will government agencies collapse. Then there is a 'danger' that people will realize that it was not just the Covid narrative that was incorrect, but that almost every file, from climate disaster to the nitrogen crisis, is a lie. And it only consists of fear incited by governments. Too many anti-institutional thinkers, is that the nightmare of the technocrats?
Or do 'we' see ghosts and do we really live in a cool country?
Beste Nothing in Dom Beau,
I understand your frustration, but I'm not a fatalist. I don't accept the idea that the globalists have already won.
We must continue to resist.
I am therefore very happy that people like Anton and Herman, as well as a small number of critical journalists and politicians, do not give up and continue to bring the truth to light, even though they are constantly hitting a wall. You can also resist in other ways: for example by drinking coffee on Museumplein, by casting a protest vote for a politician you trust, but who will never come to power for the time being, or by talking about it over and over again in personal circles.
In the run-up to the House of Representatives elections, it is likely that the trolls of the 'globalist deep state' will also try to influence critical citizens with 'microtargeting'. They know that they cannot be persuaded to vote for a globalist party, but they can actively encourage them not to vote ("because that supposedly makes no sense"). I suspect that is what happened in the European elections, with Ursula as a disastrous result.
It only takes a small hole in the dike for the entire dike to break through. Sometimes it is important to stick your finger in the hole so that the system remains intact. And sometimes you just have to pick the hole a little bit bigger to bring about a system change. Every protest vote makes it harder for the globalists to close the gap.
Dear Miranda,
It's great that you feel that way, but I think that unfortunately history will simply repeat itself.
For my part, I will always continue to repeat my vision and positions in a positive way (although you wouldn't think so). What makes me despondent is that modern technology will make it very simple to realize a digital prison.
In my opinion, that will make it virtually impossible to continue resisting.
“Zombies”? Is that what we see? Is this how (scared) people deal with the sadness of miscarriages, suddenly deceased loved ones, serious diagnoses, etc.? Who else is going to take those boosters? It will surprise me
Dear Anthon, I have been following your posts for years, teaching you how to make mincemeat of scientific publications. That's why I'd like to share this, it just appeared in my mainstream news overview this morning:
https://scientias.nl/georganiseerde-fraude-in-de-wetenschap-neemt-groteske-vormen-aan-complete-netwerken-van-fraudeurs/
I'm very curious to know how many studies there really are.