What do sentences 1 and 2 have to do with each other? Sentence 1: "The Minister of Health, Welfare and Sport has stated that there will be no investigation into possible vaccine damage; It keeps that information secret." Sentence 2: "Mark Rutte has earned his new position as Secretary General of NATO by making the Netherlands the most well-behaved child in the class."
The connection between sentences 1 and 2: Minister Fleur Agema has been saddled with international obligations thanks to the commitments made by ex-MP Mark Rutte to... na yes we know why. So keep your mouth shut! We'll chew on that for a while. A conspiracy theory.
Minister Agema, shortly after her statement on the fulfilment of NATO obligations, indicated that there is no place for people with vaccination damage in the facilities for Post-Covid patients. There is no need to pay special attention to vaccine damage – let alone research into vaccine mortality.
The reason: there is insufficient evidence for the relationship between Covid vaccines and disease, even if it has Post-Covid-like symptoms.
Literally, she writes:
'On 23 January 2024, Lareb published a report concluding that there is insufficient evidence to establish a link between corona vaccinations and symptoms that resemble post-COVID, such as PVS [Post Vaccination Syndrome].‘
The minister says here in so many words that no research has yet been done into the relationship between vaccinations and Post-Covid symptoms. The superlative of this is even further out of the picture: vaccinations and excess mortality. The argument that ZonMW has already researched everything is thus dropped, that is.
All in all, outrageous. There are too many correlations to dismiss plausible hypotheses about the vaccine damage in advance.
Now, such circular reasoning "We don't want that to be properly researched because it has never been properly researched" cannot be the reason to reject research. Maybe for pricked House of Representatives chickens, but everyone with a healthy set of brains will look at it differently. But what could be the reason?
If that research were to be done, it would undoubtedly put a bomb under the entire healthcare sector, which is largely driven by pharmaceutical companies. Then you're going to do something, if you just had plans to cut some costs in that trillion industry with efficiency gains. But don't despair: if Kennedy stays alive, he will put that bomb in the US. The Netherlands will soon follow suit, just like now. After all, they are our "allies". But yes, not to take vaccine damage seriously because of that...
Another consideration is the government's shame. That in itself could be reason enough to want to sweep under the carpet the possible death and illness of many tens of thousands of Dutch people, (partly) due to the vaccine. Legal threats of claims and criminal cases are added to this. Well, Fleur was on the right side, so it would be more of a reason to finally get to the bottom of that vaccine damage.
Whether the government will care about a popular anger – I don't think so, because once in The Hague, people mainly look at each other and upwards: an international step in their careers. At least, the born politicians, the real talents, say the Rutte school. So politicians act as if their noses bleed and are only too happy to please the higher powers. Before you know it, you'll have an international world job as secretary general somewhere! And you don't even need to be able to speak decent English.
Are they all like that? Also Mona Keijzer, for example? He has already left a cabinet before, and for much less. Maybe she doesn't see it, she doesn't have time for it or the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport has a protected line that Mona doesn't see.
In short, the reasons for not taking vaccine injury seriously are not valid. So what could it be?
Fleur
Minister Agema has, in his own words, tasks to be carried out at the behest of NATO. The mission of the 'military-industrial complex' is to protect us and therefore invests in advanced defensive and offensive tactics, which of course include bioweapons. You can't have the defense against bioweapons ready if you can't test them, so you'll have to steal or develop bioweapons somewhere. Secretly, of course, because bioweapons are actually not done for a civilized, peace-loving culture that is out for connection and peace on earth.
If an accident happens in this very way, it is not convenient if outsiders, who cannot properly oversee the broader interest, want to poke their noses into what exactly happened. This is, of course, a state secret. State interest. So the instruction is: don't pay attention, immediately kick out where there are hairs. And certainly not allow an investigation into the circumstances or the consequences of the accident in something that never happened. Not the intention.
Poor once combative, courageous Fleur... Even the cases against the doctors who prescribed alternatives to the vaccines are still ongoing. They had already been tightened before the vaccines themselves were available. I have the silent hope that those rascals at her Ministry have not informed her about the fact that she is now the one who brought the cases herself (after all, Minister of Health, Welfare and Sport) – and that she can therefore also withdraw them. Those things only attract attention, so maybe that's also an argument towards NATO.
The only remedy could be critical journalism, but it is as dead as science.
Let's see what the Americans under Trump are going to do with NATO, praying that Trump will have the opportunity to make his plans concrete, expose pharma and make NATO sing a lower tune.
Perhaps Minister Fleur Agema will then receive permission to have the relationship between excess mortality and vaccinations investigated.
Otherwise, we'll have to wait until she retires. Look at Robert Redfield. While he was still in office as director of the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, say the American RIVM), he behaved neatly like a bureaucrat. He told us in 2021 that the virus came from the Wuhan lab, but Fauci explained No obstacle in the way when it came to the vaccinations.
After his retirement, Robert Redfield voiced scathing criticism of the vaccinations and of the policies he himself had helped to create.
How vulnerable people are becomes clear when they come under the forces of a system. We can be angry at Robert Redfield, Jaap van Dissel, Hugo de Jonge, Mark Rutte, Collins, Fauci, Koopmans and who not, but the fact that they were not corrected is the real weakness. That weakness has a name, as I've argued before: "Trust." The proofreaders (read: the media) are also caught up in this.
Don't be afraid to trust the people but never, ever the institutions where they work. Not even if the officials have the best intentions and have proven to have integrity. Not even the Minister of Health, Welfare and Sport, although it is Fleur Agema herself.
Why NATO has taken care of your health and mine You can read about it here.
Dear Anton,
What a special piece you write again. Especially because you write with so much understanding and love about the people who can do little else than succumb to the pressure. Like Fleur Agema has clearly succumbed to the pressure in recent weeks. You don't blame her for cowardice, but you have compassion because the pressure is so inhuman. And I think you're absolutely right. But at the same time, it also makes me despondent that the previously critical Fleur Agema has suddenly started speaking a different language. Earlier tonight I wondered whether Pepijn van Houwelingen would survive in a role within a ministerial team?
Thank you for your many valuable and special articles and warm regards,
Elisabeth
Ik heb heel sterk het vermoeden dat Pepijn van Houwelingen en ook de andere FVD-parlementsleden hun standpunten niet of nauwelijks aan zullen passen in een eventuele toekomstige deelname aan de kabinetsbesprekingen. Dat zal resulteren in het niet deelnemen in een kabinet die voor een groot deel links ingevuld gaat worden (want dan moet de wijn te veel verdund worden). Zodoende is het kiezen uit een plaats in de oppositie of als het onmogelijke mogelijk blijkt te gaan worden, ze als grootste partij na verkiezingen een dominante plaats in gaan nemen in een te vormen kabinet maar dan moet slapend Nederland eerst de negatief dominante positie van de reguliere media doorzien.
Die gaan niet uitgenodigd worden hoor. Dat zou vragen zijn om problemen voor de D66/VVD/CDA-agenda 2030 (of welk jaartal je er ook aan wil hangen).
Robert Redford?
oops!
May I recommend the Wuhan trilogy by Jan Bonte here (unread)? Is there anything else we don't know? If we do know almost everything, it is still a fantastic reference work. Thanks for everything I read here!
I understand that, according to the leaders of this world, everything has to be interpreted politically. Well, then I don't understand why there is so much resistance from politics to current events in the Netherlands. For the most part, the Dutch react in a very political way.
Here are a few examples. Loads of Moroccans came to the Netherlands and they shouted: Dutch mothers and other women are cancer whores.
So we thought, they think that's part of integration and so our answer was: shitty Moroccans. Isn't that great? I'm sure they'll like that very much...
Another example. Black Pete is a false memory of Affry's grandfather (or something like that), who was a slave driver. Slaughter anyone who falsifies that image, he argued to Rutte.
So he meant: not lipstick, but a smashed red mouth.
No brightly coloured suits, but with coloured blue backs on display. Not with a rod, but with a whip. Just like his grandfather did. Our children got a kick out of the fact that you couldn't see Zwarte Piet in the dark. Can't do it anymore. Kick out with that black color. Show your true face, so you can get trimmed up just like Grandpa did...
And we obeyed very sweetly under the leadership of a garden gnome in politics, who is whispered by a green-left curly head what to say.
And it's still not good...
Why is it that the minds of many are so darkened?
Anton, it's not clear to me what you see as a bioweapon now. Is it the coronavirus co-produced and escaped in a lab by the US and perhaps China, or is it the vaccines that are supposed to offer protection against this in the West?
It's good to speculate about what might have been/is going on. A good conspiracy theory never goes away. And the pressure of the narrative kills all imagination of what can really be going on here
Or would it evoke the constellation of fear through a (supposedly) dangerous virus from a foreign eastern country that could only be combated with drastic control measures (lockdowns, face masks, social distancing and jabbing everyone) that was previously considered impossible. And so, for both the Chinese government and Western power, natrevers has brought a great means of control/power into the world.
Or has there been a murky threat (possibly multiple impacts of space debris and/or a quiet outbreak of an easily aerogeneously spreading, mutually transmissible bird virus N7H9 with high IFR) that has been combated to prevent panic and global economic collapse by distracting with the coronavirus story with the necessary collateral damage. Let's call it the John Cullen hypothesis (see I am John Cullen on X).
A collateral damage that, by the way, has resulted in 20,000 extra deaths per year in the Netherlands alone since the start. And in doing so, surpasses the number of deaths in Gaza and probably equals the number of deaths on each of the sides of the war in Ukraine (in the Netherlands alone!). Hope I'm making a miscalculation here. Correct me...
Ik zie de tandem virus & vaccin als een biowapen. Je moet je eigen mensen immers kunnen beschermen. Het is als gas en gasmaskers.
Everything is possible, but I still see the most in the scenario that immediately after the realization that it was a self-developed virus, emergency consultations took place in which it was decided: systematically denying one's own involvement, dismissing any dissent as conspiracy/disinformation, immediately eradicating the virus at all costs, 100% commitment from the pharmaceutical companies (and thus promising sales guarantees), Keeping friends with the Chinese who have all the information and therefore (have to) use their methods, such as lockdowns.
See https://virusvaria.nl/the-biggest-cover-up-in-history/
Lab or Market: A False Dichotomy
Prof. Gupta indicates that fears of gain of function and a fear of a new global pandemic (cf. 2018) are exaggerated.
Wouldn't this unjustified fear, evoked by Hollywood with films like Contagion (which, as I understood, is even used in medical education as an example of a real possible course of events) have simply been used by various parties to generate power (WHO, NATO, US, EU, China) and money (virology, EU, US).
And don't both the lab leak (with dangerous gain of function) and the wet market (with dangerous zoonosis) theory as being the supposed source of a pandemic belong to the category of fear-mongers from which this can be drawn at will?
Have said bodies just cleverly taken advantage of this.
And measures (including 'vaccines') have given the appearance that fear was well-founded due to their collateral damage. As a result, the measures in their neighborhood also seemed legitimized.
https://open.substack.com/pub/wherearethenumbers/p/claim-of-function-it-wasnt-a-lab?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1lysl7
Lab or Market: A False Dichotomy
Prof. Gupta indicates that fears of gain of function and a fear of a new global pandemic (cf. 2018) are exaggerated.
Wouldn't this unjustified fear, evoked by Hollywood with films like Contagion (which, as I understood, is even used in medical education as an example of a really possible state of affairs) simply been used by various parties to generate power (WHO, NATO, US, EU, China) and money (virology, pharmacy, EU, US).
And don't both the lab leak (with dangerous gain of function) and the wet market (with dangerous zoonosis) theory as being the supposed source of a pandemic belong to the category of fear-mongers from which this can be drawn at will?
Have said bodies just cleverly taken advantage of this.
And measures (including 'vaccines') have given the appearance that fear was well-founded due to their collateral damage. As a result, the measures in their neighborhood also seemed legitimized.
https://open.substack.com/pub/wherearethenumbers/p/claim-of-function-it-wasnt-a-lab?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1lysl7
Woman in US, who was fired because she did not want a Covid vaccination, will receive millions in damages. Sometimes such a public jury is not so bad after all...
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/jury-awards-12-6-million-to-woman-fired-for-not-receiving-covid-vaccine-5757873?utm_source=brightnoe&src_src=brightnoe&utm_campaign=bright-2024-11-14&src_cmp=bright-2024-11-14&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAdeouel0IzI%2FP6b8Ku3d5CLB7hkICJSUPxtBocDwmBioZ7ChEwapORyur5NXIgd%2B8Q%2BI%3D
Zouden we het dan als een gezamenlijke militaire oefening moeten zien die een beetje uit de hand liep?: WIV en Eco Healt Aliance?
Not '42' is 'the ultimate answer to the universe and everything', but 'Wopke'.
Apparently, politics is an excuse to give citizens the idea that there is something to choose.
Is het niet naïef om nu nog te denken dat covid 19 ontsnapt is, een ongelukje? Hoe is het mogelijk dat een (echte) levensgevaarlijk virus zoals Ebola in Afrika niet op het eerste de beste vliegtuig stapt naar het westen? En als je even Googled lijkt er veel meer in Afrika te oorsprongen, Afrikaanse varkenspest, HIV, Mpox enz. Hoop lekkende labs daar denk ik. Gezien het feit dat alle specialisten weten hoe gevaarlijk gain of function is en dat het niet 100% te beveiligen is en gezien het feit dat de voedselindustrie ons al 50 jaar bezig is met ons te vergiftigen inclusief de voedselindustrie en pesticiden fabrikanten en natuurlijk de beste van allemaal de 100% corrupte farmaceutische industrie. Ik weet 100% zeker dat er kwade opzet is ons ziek of energie arm te maken, mede gevoed door alle informatie die ik vind over bijvoorbeeld holistisch behandelen, de frequenties in ons lichaam en er buiten dat alles met onze gezondheid te maken heeft. De gigantische kennis rond supplementen die levensreddend zijn (zoals in de pandemie die geen pandemie was) en nog veel meer. Kijk o.a. de documentaire maar van https://youtu.be/1-urdTL0N4s, zeer interessant.