...or pay via paypal

cards

Reactions

Comments that are not related to the topic of discussion will be deleted. Always keep comments respectful and substantive.

12 Comments
  1. Jos Ouwehand

    There could be another storyline, which is the enormous money flows and the imminent (?) collapse of the financial fiat system. September 2019 initially produced a new banking crisis that announced itself with a sharp rise in interest rates on the repo market. The European central bank immediately switches the money press to full speed, which has caused today's mega inflation. All banks can get rid of their loss-making loans with the ECB and since then have tens of printed billions more on their balance sheets. The EU itself has also started borrowing (the Eurobonds) and those hundreds of billions go everywhere, without democratic control. Everything silently under the flag of 'Corona'.

    Reply
    1. Anton

      I'll definitely take it with me. I don't know if there has been direct pressure from that angle, but even there they have used crisis chaos as an excuse to move their problems forward instead of solving them.
      Regulators should put a stop to "solutions" that shift short-term problems to future generations.

      Reply
        1. Titus

          By the way, here is a follow-up to this story, including the role of Blackrock:
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_RA23LDiuA
          If there is a need for a less technical explanation, please respond here, then I will make for a more accessible story

          Reply
  2. John

    BioNTech's 2019 annual report was not published until May 2020.
    https://investors.biontech.de/financials/annual-reports-ger/
    page 197
    Jahresabschluss
    Der vom Vorstand am 14. May 2020 aufgestellte
    Jahresabschluss für das Geschäftsjahr 2019, der
    am 14. May 2020 aufgestellte Konzernabschluss
    2019 sowie der Lagebericht und der Konzernlage-
    message haben allen Mitgliedern des Aufsichtsrats
    foreclosed.
    Whatever else you may think of vector vaccines (time will tell, if we're lucky). .. they had been developing for years because of cancer. Perhaps opportunism rather than conspiracy?
    Thanks for all the much appreciated articles.

    Reply
    1. Anton

      Even if it was published in 2022: in 2019 work has been done on Covid-19 vaccines, that is what it says and that is quite specific, especially if jet pre-clinical research has already been completed. Then you must already have the corresponding virus. It is not "general mRNA research". Or it was and the annual report was falsified so that they could a) stretch the far too short development period a bit and b) declare everything that was even remotely related to the governments in one fell swoop.
      For cancer, mRNA vaccines seem to be better suited because they first whirl around the body before they actually get to work and cause inflammation and other immune reactions in the body's own cells. That could mean a promise for metastases, because it concerns the body's own cells in different places in the body.
      But from what I have heard from a doctor: even there there is still too much collateral damage, it is only applied to hopeless patients. A "hope of blessing" treatment.

      Reply
  3. Jacque

    Thought he had read something strange, in which the USA would have wanted to sue Pfizer & Moderna, among others, on the basis of unfinished studies and incomplete information in order to provide an earlier admission and approval. From then on, people started to focus on wanting to vaccinate toddlers as well, so that they can get away with it in this way, because it would fall under a different heading??? It was not entirely clear to me and thought it was a strange story, can't find the article anymore, but had hoped that it would say something to 😉 you anyway
    Don't understand why you could not claim compensation on the basis of given misleading information (falls under the door-to-door law) and manipulation by imposed sanctions (such as loss of work otherwise) that led to taking this vaccine, causing serious side effects and deterioration of health due to the vaccinations?!
    The QR code is nothing new that has existed since 1994 and is widely used by companies and for products, was already known that this would ever appear on our passport, it has only now been misused for booster sales to bring about a social extortion.

    Reply
    1. Anton

      I don't think the USA wants to sue pharma. The USA itself is at risk of claims due to the vaccination compulsion/obligation. Pharmaceutical companies want to be protected against all claims, read what lawyer Robert Kennedy Jr. says about this: https://yournews.com/2021/12/29/2272966/robert-f-kennedy-jr-vaccines-that-are-recommended-for-children/

      All kinds of norms and rules apparently lapse when it comes to vaccinations. For example, I have never heard the Advertising Code Committee complain about promotional "product placing" of vaccines in talk shows, newsreels, current affairs programs, you name it.

      Reply
      1. Jacque

        Thank you for the answer with the provided information, thought it was already a strange story.. yet it remains special that one can seemingly circumvent the law so easily and no one wants /dares to make a comment?!

        Reply
  4. Jacque

    It is high time that independent checks are carried out on companies, products and, among other things, managers, who are often simply employed in the Netherlands by the person who has to check them; that is why this type of practice is more commonplace than an exception. In addition, independent scientific research must play an important role in decision-making if it is shown that they are incorrect.
    In addition, it is scandalous that many managers who leave due to damage caused / own failure with a forced dismissal and a fat rot bonus in hand, can take a seat in the next position, without any account being taken?!.. such a person should be suspended and relieved of responsible positions, it seems to me.

    Reply
    1. Anton

      As for "independent scientific research": that has to do with "Guidelines for Scientific Integrity", see https://virusvaria.nl/knaw/ There are holes to be shot in there. Or somehow it doesn't seem to really interest anyone.

      Regarding your other objections: agree. My esteemed companions of the Eucalyptic Society often write critically about this. See:
      https://eucalyptischgenootschap.nl/waarom-wordt-de-fda-bijna-voor-de-helft-gefinancierd-door-bedrijven-die-het-controleert/

      Reply
      1. Jacque

        Nice to know that there are still a few attentive / critical, although something really needs to change in this, this can no longer be done.

        Reply

Post a Comment

Je e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Required fields are marked with *