Call for Federal Inquiry into the Lockdown Scandal

Epidemiologist Professor Gupta wondered where the idea of using lockdowns during an epidemic had suddenly come from, against all consensus. Now there are ideas about that: from China. A blog reader tipped me off to an alarming letter from (former) officials and lawyers, addressed to national security services and Ministries of Justice: FBI, MI5, Australian, German and Canadian security services. Who sends that letter to Grapperhaus?

It is a call for research into the possible criminal aspects surrounding the suddenly deployed lockdown therapy to combat corona in early 2020, initiated by China, propagated by the WHO and therefore distributed to the rest of the world. The damage is unjustifiable and the pretended reasons at least point to mismanagement. At the same time, I recognize what I would have called "American paranoia" in the past – but these are strange times:

Lockdowns as a new weapon in post-nuclear warfare

Stacey Rudin

This group argues that the lockdowns were copied from China, which would have had criminal intentions with them. Michael Senger's pinned Tweet sets a very aggressive tone:

One of the authors, Randy Hillier, summarized their document in a letter to the Australian government as follows:

1. Lockdowns arose on the orders of Xi Jinping, General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, and were disseminated into global policy by the World Health Organization with little analysis or logic
2. The most influential institution for Covid-19 models, described as "China's best academic partner in the West," is by far the most alarming and inaccurate Covid-19 modeler
3. Deadly Recommendations for Early Mechanical Ventilation Came From China
4. The world-dominating, wildly inaccurate PCR testing protocols are based on incomplete, theoretical genome sequences provided by China
5. Excessive PCR testing protocols came from China
6. Studies showing significant asymptomatic transmission, the only scientific basis for lockdown of healthy individuals, came from China
7. The CCP conducted an early, broad, systematic, and global propaganda campaign to promote its lockdown response
8. Many leading pro-lockdown scientists show striking pro-China bias
9. Many other influential Lockdown supporters are utterly unfit to advise world leaders on pandemic policies and often exhibit a conspicuous pro-China bias
10. Several top public health officials among the nations are dramatically un(dis)qualified and show striking pro-China bias
11. Prominent Lockdown supporters have proven to be unusually indifferent to the devastating consequences of their policies

Read the (long) document (with 250 references to external publications) in which they explain how they arrive at these points: Request for accelerated federal investigation into scientific fraud in public health policy

Unscientific decisions? Experts think so

Yesterday I posted the Public Health Roundtable in Florida below. Many essential questions are raised. It is the turn of mouth masks, infection in the open air, immunity, etc. I gave a complete overview in the previous post

In the first 10 minutes of this hearing, the lockdowns are discussed but on 1:19:40 Professor Gupta expresses her astonishment at the nonsensical suggestion to use lockdowns. The authors of the document are not alone in their surprise at the use of lockdowns.

I think the lockdowns are the single biggest public health mistake in history.

Jay Bhattacharya, Professor of Medicine at Stanford, Director Stanford's Center for Demography & Aging

Lockdowns have never been considered before and have even been explicitly discouraged by the WHO. The "Hammer and Dance" story was created on March 19, 2020; Nothing scientific, never researched, validated or anything. If you put everything together like that, you would indeed easily suspect malicious intent behind it. (I'm trusting, so I don't believe that.)

The damage that these suggestions and theories ultimately caused is still incalculable. With a war you can't just get that done. The health gains they have yielded are disputed. The fact that a totalitarian regime effortlessly brings such a thing on its citizens is a reason for us not to embrace totalitarianism. If our own governments do start behaving in this way, we call it 'criminal acts'. There has never been a scientifically substantiated excuse for this, only parroting OMT members.

From this request for accelerated investigation, you can conclude that the excuse of "battle of scientists" put forward by our Dutch judges is in reality a story of conflicts of interest, nepotism and other forms of influence, power politics, China-stroking and possibly -never excluded- evil intentions. Once again, the often-heard accusation is made that false action has been taken in the name of science.

This is the biggest public health fiasco in history, unfortunately.

Martin Kulldorff, Professor Harvard Medical School, Biostatistician and Epidemiologist

The WHO and its intermediaries (RIVM, van Dissel, Voss and all other cronies in the information chain) must feel an increasing responsibility for their collaborationist role in this totalitarianism.

The aspect that is clearly exposed here (for me at least) for the first time, is what Ivor Cummins also said in one of his status updates: "They're turning Europe into China". In the beginning, the public slime of the WHO towards China was noticed, but I didn't get much further with that.

Uncritical copying

It is all the worse when you realize that in the entire further rollout of those horror film scenarios (because that's not much more than what came out of those 'models') in the entire official medical, government and media chain, there was NO ONE who stood up (van Haga did his best but often got no answer or was snapped at).

Every dissenting voice was stifled in the most improper ways. The RIVM, OMT, House of Representatives, 'journalism' (I put it in quotation marks because I actually mean something else by it), the court, in short, too many officials have played an extremely cowardly role. Really horrible to realize that, as if I see my neighbors being taken away in army trucks. Awake Netherlands...

Do I believe it myself?

No, I don't believe it's in China's interest to decimate the world market. Who are they supposed to make money from? So I don't believe it's a form of war. I will hold off on malicious intent for a while, unless we borrow money from them for the reconstruction of the economy.

That everything has been taken over from China indiscriminately because of their power and their money, that seems obvious to me, that is the nature of things. That no thought has been given at all to their transparency, their views on fundamental and human rights, their totalitarianism – that is also evident.

But I don't blame the Chinese for that. It is the government advisors, the cabinet that put the mind to zero, the House of Representatives, journalism and the judges involved. A mistake can be made at the beginning of such a chain. If no mistakes are made, it means that no decisions are made. So I can still somewhat justify that, although it is with difficulty. But every next link that fails to correct, I have no respect for that, on the contrary. That's where incompetence really turns into criminal behavior.

[That those ICU treatments were no good was already abundantly clear in April 2020. And the media just filmed in the ICUs how bad that disease was. I remember that so well because it was the reason for me to my first blog articlesn.]

The biomass fraud, the childcare benefits scandal, the Omtzigt scandal, the corona fiasco... What is the entire House of Representatives actually set up for?