Messages from the underworld

To keep virus miscellaneous and credible, I limit myself as much as possible to widely accepted sources or sources that I can determine - with or without external help - that they can be taken seriously. In general, this has proven to be a safe strategy; Browsing back in the last two years of blog articles, there is no nonsense anywhere and we were early in everything. I sometimes get out of my mind, but I allow myself that, on my own blog. In any case, I did not always wait for the peer reviewed RCT to arrive. This entails risks.

Aware of that risk, I paid little or no attention to certain studies or subjects because I found them too unlikely and recognized too high a 'conspiracy' or 'wappie' content in them. Last night I was sent one of those that I am now going to post anyway. First, a few of those earlier 'dubious' findings, usually in videos. If you know the stories, you can scroll directly past the Bath Batches | to Pathologenconferentie or click to Erik Boomsma about side effects in Europe, Claims filed with German insurers, US Army Side Effects of My conclusion.

Bad batches

Another message that I ignored was a video, again strangely filmed: while browsing through a PDF. That was at the beginning of December 2021. The PDF itself could not be found. Craig Paardekooper had sorted all reports of side effects by batch number (vaccinations are delivered in batches or 'lots'). It turned out that only 5% of all batches were responsible for almost all serious side effects and deaths. Most batches had acceptable side effects.

When this was interpreted as a deliberate plan to test the lethality of vaccines, I dropped out. That catastrophic production errors have occurred or that certain batches have been stored too hot, that is all possible, but that immediate intent is assumed is a red flag for me and makes me doubt the integrity of the data presented.

Meanwhile, Bitchute and Rumble are full of videos on this subject, including more moderately toned videos. They all tell the same story. Several parties have done the same analysis and come to the same conclusion. There is a website https://howbadismybatch.com/ (which again does not inspire much confidence due to the amateurish design) in which you can look up your own batch number.

Most batches ("lots") have ZERO or virtually no side effects.

Virtually all side effects, including deaths, can be attributed to a limited number of lots.

The multiplication factor is always discussed because not all side effects are reported. How many are there in reality: 3x as many? 10x as much? 100x?

Assuming that not everyone calculates in the same way, the distribution of reports of side effects is very different from a normal distribution and also from the distributions of older vaccines.

Now that I look at it again, I also see a video with, among others, Wolfgang Wodarg, formerly a highly respected scientist (now discredited because of his vaccine criticism) and Reiner Fuellmich, the lawyer who increasingly sees malicious intent but apparently still has legal doubts about the evidence.

Apart from all speculation, the varying quality of the batches is undeniable. Only one vaccine composition has been approved. These data indicate that there are varying compositions between different batches. At the very least, the quality control is not in order.

Pathologenconferentie

Six months ago, I was handed a video that I could not assess: the findings of pathologist Professor Dr. Arne Burkhardt. He found severe vaccine damage in bodies of people who were not registered as vaccine deaths, see the video from 13:00.

(Later, Burkhardt's research was supported by Professor Bhakdi, which was a reason for me to pay attention to.)

When the Second video of these pathologists I wrote it off. In it, they also looked at the vaccine liquid (from 5:40 approximately). I saw a submarine in it.

I also saw Elon Musk's space Tesla floating by in the vaccine liquid, that went too far for me:

And below the same space car, but three months later... Then it was over for me. Let them stick to the denominations.

Erik Boomsma's analysis on the European situation

Erik Boomsma makes some assumptions in Café Weltschmerz that I don't adopt. The most important is that he assumes that only 6% of all side effects are reported. This is shown by scientific studies, this and this one from 2010 . I wonder if that ratio also applies now.

First, deaths are not just side effects. You would have to prove that deaths have the same reporting rate as pain at the injection site or a slight increase in temperature. (Maybe those dates are there, then I'd like to hear it).

My second objection is that the reporting behavior of side effects during the corona crisis may well have been different. There was a lot of attention for side effects and in the Netherlands, an institute like Lareb with Agnes Kant became more well known. This may have had a major impact.

There is no doubt that there is a huge underreporting. It has never been considered to introduce a reporting obligation for, for example, death after vaccination. On the other hand, the state has that data. They know the vaccination status (including dates) and the date of death of each individual, so they would be very easy to compare each other. A piece of cake for someone like Ronald Meester and his students. Any correlations should require further investigation to rule out causality, for example by pathological examination.

One objection from a doctor was: "Do you know what it costs to pathologically examine every death? We don't even have that many pathologist-anatomists!". That's how doctors think. Of course, you don't have to research everyone; You could determine how many autopsies need to be done to be able to compile a representative sample. I estimate that a few dozen will get you a long way, but that is more something for a social geographer with a talent for research and data analysis.

Nevertheless, the video is very worthwhile to watch at your leisure. In the first half hour, all the figures come along. Even if you halve the figures he comes up with or you even divide them by 5, we are still talking about unprecedented amounts of side effects and deaths.

For example, dividing by 5 gives you 110,000 vaccine deaths after eleven months for Europe. That is out of all proportion to what we expect from vaccines.

On my beer mat I end up dividing by three. In the Netherlands, I assume for a moment that we attribute the entire unexplained excess mortality to vaccines. That's around 9,000 vaccine-related deaths. For the population of the Netherlands, this is 0.046%. If I project that to the population of Europe, 234,000 Europeans would have died. Erik Boomsma comes to 544,000. In my opinion, halving or dividing by 3 gives a more realistic impression, it comes closer to our 'unexplained excess mortality'.
Erik Boomsma also calculates that 1 in every 553 vaccinated people has died. If I extend that to the 13.5 million Dutch people who have been vaccinated, it would lead to an unexplained excess mortality of more than 24,000. Dividing by three comes closer. With the note: it remains guesswork on a beer mat because we are not allowed to have the data.

Claims filed with German insurers

The well-known critical-journalistic German website reitschuster.de appeared yesterday in this article in which the vaccination injuries submitted by hospitals are analysed. After all, hospitals pass on to the insurers what they spend their budget on. The specification "Side effects when using Covid-19 vaccines" was added in April 2021.

18,625 cases of adverse reactions to Covid-19 vaccines were recorded. For comparison: in 2019 there were 903 cases of vaccination side effects (all regular vaccines combined), in 2020: 879.

In 2021, hospitals reported 21 times as many side effects as in 2019 and 2020.

Seen in this light, it is surprising that there have been no alarm signals from the hospitals.

A distressing paragraph from the article:

With nearly 18 percent [of all adverse events], 18- to 29-year-olds are the most affected by vaccine injury. In 2021, there were approximately 13.000 cases recorded exclusively with the diagnosis of "adverse events with the use of COVID-19 vaccines". These cases can no longer be judged as "suspicious" cases. They have been charged by the hospitals as vaccination injuries and can therefore be considered "confirmed" cases.

What is striking in combination with the above is that in total it concerns 61% women and 39% men.

And now: vaccine side effects in the US military

I have no additional or supporting evidence for the video below. It could very well be in line with data we have in the Netherlands – but we don't know because there is a reason to withhold that data until CBS has edited it. It is precisely this shadowiness that leads me to place the video here.

The video is about a data breach of DMED, the US military's adverse event reporting system. The video below reports on the most striking figures, comparing the occurrence of certain conditions with the average of 2010-2015. The reports are made exclusively by medical personnel, we can assume with military precision. The percentages reflect the increases in the first 10 months of 2021.

Heart attacks: +269%
Myocarditis: +258%
Pericarditis: +175%
Pulmonary embolism: +476%
Various other conditions, serious and less serious, range from +250% to +350%

Then come the most shocking percentages:

Diffuse intravascular coagulation (DIC): +1.175%
HIV: +590%. [With an increase from 1 case to 6 cases, you are also at that and that could be a coincidence. However, this concerns more than 2,681 cases compared to 444.]
Chest pain: +1.529%
Respiratory complaints: +905%.

The conclusion of the video is that the US military appears to have been used for a medical experiment.

It explains the mysterious 'FDA approval' of Comirnaty, which apparently was never produced, and points out cross-connections that may indicate a conflict of interest.

My conclusion

The unrest that these kinds of findings cause - at least for me - could easily be refuted with reliable, open access and preferably real-time data. We cannot force other countries to do so, but no attempt is made to do so in the Netherlands either. WOB requests are refused, court rulings are set aside, undesirable camouflaging actions are taken on motions, if anything is done at all. The result is time and again that independent parties are not given access. This shady behavior really has to end at some point. Then we no longer have to go into the depths of the Internet to look for explanations of what we see happening around us: inconsistencies, twisting, shifting goals, manipulating data, all traceable to the violation of scientific integrity which means that there is no corrective oversight.

(comments are off)