A single severe Covid patient can produce more viruses than all the children in America.
Children were never a danger to society. In his first post on Substack, Marc Girardot set out to debunk one of Team Apocalypse's most ridiculous claims: the misconception that children are a danger to society and to grandma. In it, he shows that it is just the opposite.
Another one translation, this time of Covid Myth Buster, written by Marc Girardot, posted on January 4
I will not go into the basic idea of the intolerable crime against humanity that has been committed against our children around the world over the past two years. Are they elderly leaders who were afraid of dying, who were ready to throw our children under the bus? Is it just a smokescreen because children are defenseless? Is it an extra way to create panic among parents?
The fact is that children are accused of being the main source of SARS-COV-2 and are therefore scandalously harassed. It is ironic that those who are at peace with this bullying of our children are often the same virtuous people who tutored against bullying practices in school a few years ago.
The reality is that children are collectively the least susceptible to spreading a toxic dose of SARS-COV-2: they carry the smallest viral load for the shortest duration. In fact, healthy children produce exponentially less virus than very old/sick individuals with a delayed immune response.
I covered this extensively in my August article: "A new perspective on a not-so-new virus", emphasizing the many differences in transmission dynamics between children and adults, summarized in the diagram below, and explaining why children are more likely to be natural vaccines than anything else.
I didn't take the time to prove it then how big the difference was between a child who was slightly ill for a few days and an elderly person who carried the virus for weeks.
In fact, a simple mathematical calculation using this duration and the propagation rate of SC2 is enough to show the reality of who is toxic to whom. And spoiler alert: it's not the children.
The reality is that a single severe Covid patient can produce more virus than all the children in America. That is factual.
Even if we consider that the infecting doses are the same – which we know aren't because patients in care homes (LTCF patients) cross-infect each other with very heavy viral doses – there is a huge difference in the exponential spread. The immune system of aging or sick patients cannot limit it.
One recent study estimated that the reproduction yield of SARS-COV-2 in the body is 10x every 36-48 hours. In other words, a 12-day delay in the immune response versus children could explain the expansion – adjusted for obesity acceleration and for ACE2 differential – of nearly 100 million times. And that is not adapted for higher and repeated doses at 100-1000x infections...
In other words, all of the healthy children in America – spread across the country – can never collectively produce the amount of a single serious patient dying from COVID, let alone LTCF patients, surrounded by hundreds of elderly people who each produce high viral amounts.
Not only do children fall far short of producing what a sick elderly person produces, but also because of their behavioral patterns, the toxic consequences for the community cannot be compared.
To give a comparison of how ridiculous the policy against children is:
Going after children because of Covid is like deciding to confiscate all firecrackers out of fear of a 5-kiloton bomb. It is both ineffective, very stupid and... dangerous.
This is even more outrageous when you see pictures of older politicians – all with declining health, so ready-made virus mass production machines – celebrating without masks while imposing measures on children that they don't even apply to themselves.
The focus should always have been on limiting viral expansion, both on an individual level -via protocols to reduce the spread - as well as at the community level - by Targeted protection– especially within retirement homes and hospitals. There was never a reason to restrict children's daily lives, shut them up, close schools, leave them in glass cages or sit outside in the cold to eat their lunch.
It all seems to have sprung from the dark minds of seriously disturbed individuals with a lot of hatred or fear in them. We may have to reconsider who will take care of our children in the coming years... Mass hysteria cannot justify this level of inhumanity.
In the USA, in Germany and in Sweden, no healthy child died of Covid in 2 years: zero !!
There was never an ethical or moral justification for imposing anything on children. Children were never at risk with Covid. It was not only reckless to impose hardships on them, but also morally completely wrong, as they have no ability to consent to these nightmarish measures. The idea that children have to sacrifice their lives or their health to bring peace of mind to a dying generation is a huge cognitive dissonance that comes from a civilization that has lost its way. Grandparents and parents are here to protect children. That's how it goes in the world, not the other way around.
I would encourage many to Justice Videos van professor Michael Sandel van Harvard te bekijken. Wij, als beschaving, hebben de lakmoesproef op een grandioze manier gefaald en hebben een ernstige behoefte aan een morele herijking.
