A single severe Covid patient can produce more viruses than all the children in America.
Children were never a danger to society. In his first post on Substack, Marc Girardot set out to debunk one of Team Apocalypse's most ridiculous claims: the misconception that children are a danger to society and to grandma. In it, he shows that it is just the opposite.
Another one translation, this time of Covid Myth Buster, written by Marc Girardot, posted on January 4
I will not go into the basic idea of the intolerable crime against humanity that has been committed against our children around the world over the past two years. Are they elderly leaders who were afraid of dying, who were ready to throw our children under the bus? Is it just a smokescreen because children are defenseless? Is it an extra way to create panic among parents?
The fact is that children are accused of being the main source of SARS-COV-2 and are therefore scandalously harassed. It is ironic that those who are at peace with this bullying of our children are often the same virtuous people who tutored against bullying practices in school a few years ago.
The reality is that children are collectively the least susceptible to spreading a toxic dose of SARS-COV-2: they carry the smallest viral load for the shortest duration. In fact, healthy children produce exponentially less virus than very old/sick individuals with a delayed immune response.
Ik heb dit uitgebreid behandeld in mijn artikel van augustus: "A new perspective on a not-so-new virus", waarbij ik de nadruk legde op de vele verschillen in transmissiedynamiek tussen kinderen en volwassenen, samengevat in het onderstaande schema, en uitlegde waarom kinderen eerder natuurlijke vaccins zijn dan iets anders.
I didn't take the time to prove it then how big the difference was between a child who was slightly ill for a few days and an elderly person who carried the virus for weeks.
In fact, a simple mathematical calculation using this duration and the propagation rate of SC2 is enough to show the reality of who is toxic to whom. And spoiler alert: it's not the children.
The reality is that a single severe Covid patient can produce more virus than all the children in America. That is factual.
Zelfs als we bedenken dat de infecterende doses hetzelfde zijn - waarvan we weten dat ze dat niet zijn omdat patiënten in verzorgingstehuizen (LTCF-patiënten) elkaar kruisbesmetten met zeer zware virale doses - is er een enorm verschil in de exponentiële verspreiding. Het immuunsysteem van ouder wordende of zieke patiënten kan die niet inperken.
One recent study schatte dat de reproductieopbrengst van SARS-COV-2 in het lichaam 10x per 36-48 uur is. Met andere woorden, een vertraging van 12 dagen in de immuunreactie versus kinderen zou de expansie - gecorrigeerd voor obesitasversnelling en voor ACE2-differentieel - van bijna 100 miljoen keer kunnen verklaren. En dat is niet aangepast voor hogere en herhaalde doses bij 100-1000x besmettingen…
In other words, all of the healthy children in America – spread across the country – can never collectively produce the amount of a single serious patient dying from COVID, let alone LTCF patients, surrounded by hundreds of elderly people who each produce high viral amounts.
Not only do children fall far short of producing what a sick elderly person produces, but also because of their behavioral patterns, the toxic consequences for the community cannot be compared.
To give a comparison of how ridiculous the policy against children is:
Going after children because of Covid is like deciding to confiscate all firecrackers out of fear of a 5-kiloton bomb. It is both ineffective, very stupid and... dangerous.
Dit is helemaal hemeltergend wanneer je foto's ziet van oudere politici - allemaal met een afnemende gezondheid dus kant-en-klare virusmassaproductiemachines - die zonder maskers feestvieren terwijl ze kinderen maatregelen opleggen die ze niet eens op zichzelf toepassen.
The focus should always have been on limiting viral expansion, both on an individual level -via protocols to reduce the spread - as well as at the community level - by Targeted protection- met name binnen de bejaardentehuizen en ziekenhuizen. Er was nooit een reden om het dagelijkse leven van kinderen te beperken, ze de mond te snoeren, scholen te sluiten, ze in glazen kooien te laten zitten of buiten in de kou te zitten om hun lunch op te eten.
It all seems to have sprung from the dark minds of seriously disturbed individuals with a lot of hatred or fear in them. We may have to reconsider who will take care of our children in the coming years... Mass hysteria cannot justify this level of inhumanity.
In the USA, in Germany and in Sweden, no healthy child died of Covid in 2 years: zero !!
There was never an ethical or moral justification for imposing anything on children. Children were never at risk with Covid. It was not only reckless to impose hardships on them, but also morally completely wrong, as they have no ability to consent to these nightmarish measures. The idea that children have to sacrifice their lives or their health to bring peace of mind to a dying generation is a huge cognitive dissonance that comes from a civilization that has lost its way. Grandparents and parents are here to protect children. That's how it goes in the world, not the other way around.
I would encourage many to Justice-video's van professor Michael Sandel van Harvard te bekijken. Wij, als beschaving, hebben de lakmoesproef op een grandioze manier gefaald en hebben een ernstige behoefte aan een morele herijking.
