Op Facebook post ik wel eens berichten waar ik niet zo veel aan toe te voegen heb of waarvoor ik nog wat weinig ondersteunend bewijs zie van andere kanten. Een bericht van gisteren over een schrikbarend pathologisch onderzoek is tegen de richtlijnen van FB. Kennelijk is die Taiwanees ogende Duitse emeritus professor Dr. Bhakdi al net zo doorgedraaid als die Nederlandse gepensioneerde microbioloog die nu op bitchute zit, Dr. Pierre Capel. Beiden zijn radeloos en worden zwaar gecensureerd. Geert Vandenbossche is ook zo iemand, net als Robert Malone. Heeft die Duitser nou cijfers vervalst om zijn gelijk te halen? De gelauwerde Duitse patholoog-anatoom moet dan in een of ander complot zitten. Ik kan het mij niet voorstellen.
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is a Thai-German microbiologist who has been speaking out against the COVID-19 hysteria since the beginning of the crisis.
He was a postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics in Freiburg and at The Protein Laboratory in Copenhagen. He joined the Institute of Medical Microbiology at the University of Giessen and became President of Medical Microbiology at the University of Mainz. Dr. Bhakdi has published more than three hundred articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology and parasitology, for which he has received numerous awards and the Order of Merit of Rhineland-Palatinate.
Experts generally show little evidence of advancing insight in the corona crisis, as we see in the legacy media. On the other hand, there are the censored dissidents. Bhakdi is in the corner of Robert Malone, Geert Vandenbossche, Pierre Capel: retired and therefore independent scientists, without obligations to their employer – at least until an emergency law is passed to cut back on the pensions of spreaders of disinformation.
In any case, according to the fact-checkers, this man doesn't understand it at all.
Of 17 autopsies, on vaccinated non-covid cases, died naturally but still requested an autopsy by the family, 90% appear to have died due to the vaccination.
Dr. S. Bhakdi, Dr. Anne Burkhardt
These are deaths registered as natural causes, while the family apparently did not agree and went through with an autopsy, probably because they had a vaccine suspicion. According to this research, this is largely justified.
Criticism
n=17 is certainly not representative. Still a signal and in the absence of transparent data, we have to pick up signals.
There is no peer review. That seems to me to be essential, especially with something like autopsies. However, in the absence of higher-quality data, we will have to make do with this. This is a direct result of the surreptitious, sneaky and partly because of this unscientific behavior of RIVM and VWS.
I say this as a concerned layman. This is a task for science journalists.
Het ging om de links in dit blog-artikel: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/bhakdiburkhardt-pathology-results
Directe link naar de studie :
https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/end-covax.pdf
De link naar de video.
Burkhardt begint 9:35, presentatie rond 16:00. https://odysee.com/@de:d/Pressekonferenz–Tod-durch-Impfung-Undeklarierte-Bestandteile-der-COVID-19-Impfstoffe:b
of https://www.bitchute.com/embed/hEzDeDUSnKfM (beter beeld, slecht geluid)
Persconferentie: https://odysee.com/@de:d/Pathologie-Konferenz-2-de:d
