First some current events. I was already thinking: where are they, the rollebollers? On Twitter, of course. I always wait for something to bubble up on Facebook or other media. For the rest they are having fun but there in that sewer with their stupid 'wires'😂.
Engel is really doing this kind of thing wrong in my opinion. Of course, no link has (yet) been shown between the supposed vaccination and the heart failure of Christian Eriksen, the footballer who suddenly had to be resuscitated yesterday, despite a pile of impeccable heart scans in his file. I now understand that Willem has also deleted the tweet.
But Frummel knows how to jump on top of that immediately in a sewer. I don't, I even understand Engel. We have aerosol denial, we have had thrombosis denial, and heart failure and cerebral infarctions and bleeding are all not that bad, everything is safe and vaccines are the only way out because ivermectin does not work, mouth masks, hand washing and one and a half meters do work, the virus comes from a bat and there is a row of disastrous variants on hold while we have barely escaped 3000 new ICU admissions per day at the moment. So babies, toddlers, preschoolers – everyone needs a shot or two. Three. Maybe. Possibly every 9 months I read, logistically smart because that way you immediately take all the newborns with you.
It is entirely questionable whether the link between this cardiac arrest incident and vaccination will ever come to light – if there is one. If the truth comes to light at all about whether or not Kristensen is indeed vaccinated. After all, it could seriously damage the willingness to vaccinate. So in any case (à la Fauci) it will initially be stubbornly maintained that nothing can be wrong. Everything for the willingness to vaccinate.
Harming the willingness to vaccinate is undesirable
There are stories of doctors who also do not report 'death after vaccination' for this reason. Jan Bonte also told it the other day at Weltschmerz (blog n.a.v. dat conversation is coming soon). Well-meaning GPs think, for example, when an 82-year-old dies: "Imagine that there happens to be a connection, that would not do the vaccination campaign any good and then we would be even further from home – and it happens so rarely... and then at this age and then also all that fuss before you have entered such a report... Never mind. “
With regular vaccines, a suspected link is reported if a cause of death after vaccination is described in the side effects. That guideline is now also being followed while it is almost inevitable that side effects still have to be mapped out, the list is simply not complete yet, the last trials will not be completed for another two years. The thrombosis side effect came to light, for example, because a persistent general practitioner and a pathologist continued their search, despite the fact that it was not an official side effect and agencies such as Lareb and the EMA invariably maintained that there was no no known link with vaccination.
Even in the case of now really suspicious heart failure, cerebral hemorrhage or infarction, where it should be excluded per death that it is vaccine-related, death after vaccination is not always reported. That should happen, simply because it has never been investigated and there are unrest and indications that it may be related. But alas: death after vaccination is not consistently reported. Thousands of people over 60 die every week in the Netherlands, Lareb has a total of about 400 reports. If death after vaccination were consistently reported, we would have a database of between 3000 and 5000 reports. Then you can analyze the cause of death and time after vaccination to discover possible connections.
Hopefully, we will not have to learn from the statistics afterwards that a striking number of people died of blood defects during the vaccination campaign, even if they are elderly people who would otherwise only have had a year or two or three. That also plays a role in whether or not to report. "82 years, well, that doesn't have to be because of the vaccine". Perhaps the latter explains why it seems that it is mainly young people who get it. They are reported, because that is abnormal. I have not heard any other explanation for it. Nothing human is strange to a doctor, especially if he wants the best for his patients.
Death with blood problems seems to be more common among young people. This could be because it is hardly reported in the elderly because it is less deviating from the expectation at that age. A doctor then has less reason to think about the vaccine.
I agree with Willem Engel that it is irresponsible to inject proteins that affect blood clotting in these uncertainties. Also remember that it is now a disease that is no longer a shadow of the monster killer we were presented with in March 2020. From the outset, there has been warned about those spike proteins, just as there is about aerosols The alarm was sounded – but that all got in the way of the vaccines. Wappietalk, just like the origin in the Chinese lab and the lines of WHO/Fauci to China, conflicts of interest of the OMT, scientific fraud by RIVM etc. If, being Willem Engel, you think you see one of those things happening before your eyes, you may blurt something out too quickly. So "unbelievable piece of shit", well, as a vaccine hesitant you tend to see it as exemplary of the discussion level of the pro-vaxxers. You can't think much further than "The EMA says it's good so I'll take it", because then you start doubting. If you have to cross that line and you still want to stick to your point of view, then you are going to play the man.
Non-vaccinado you are for someone else
The non-vaccinados are starting to stir more and more. A point that often arises is that it is precisely the vaccinated who are at risk of becoming an important source of infection. Going through the disease itself offers broad and long protection, while the vaccine offers narrower protection and presumably shorter protection. That too has not really been 'substantiated' yet, although it seems like it and it would also be in line with existing scientific insights.
The reasoning goes as follows:
- The vaccines do not offer 100% protection.
- This leads to "immune escape" (Vandenbossche, Schetters, Capel etc) in which variants escape that do not or hardly bother with vaccine immunity.
- For example, the more contagious variants are spread by vaccinated people and passed on further.
- Non-vaccinados feel not only threatened but also unjustly stigmatized as the only virus spreaders while...
- They spread the still dominant, less contagious and now reasonably treatable 'mainstream' virus and thus contribute to herd immunity
- Non-vaccinados are more likely to stay at home because of more obvious symptoms and thus pose a lower risk
It remains speculation, that is the bad thing about the vaccines.
Now, non-vaccinados sometimes seem to forget that they are not the only ones at risk of infection from escaped mutants. After all, vaccinated people also run that risk, but they don't realize it. For the time being, they are holding on to making them less ill, but that is also one of the many uncertainties that should not play a role around a vaccine.
For example, vaccinated people also seem to spread less 'mainstream' virus when infected, but what about infection by variants? And we are waiting for escapers who no longer care about the current vaccine. In addition, we have the phenomenon of ADE: counterproductive immune reaction when infected. We will have to wait and see, the chance seems small to me that it will go wrong right now, now that such a risk is being taken for the very first time. But how often will you take this risk in the future? Until it really goes completely wrong and 20% of the vaccinated population becomes (seriously) ill due to uncontrollable immune reactions? Unlikely, certainly, but not out of the question. Then we will probably become a bit stricter in our doctrine again.
Last prick then
I do think a fallacy of the vaccine hesitants is the assumption that they stay at home if they experience symptoms. That this is not the case was shown by the disease explosions when no one had been vaccinated yet. The situation may be different now, but anyone who has ever really celebrated carnival knows that it doesn't work that way. You continue to party until you all drop. If people have to skip their holiday because of a cough, I still have to see if they stay at home. They even give up the inviolability of their bodies for it. A holiday turns out to weigh much more heavily.
