A ruling by the European Court of Justice (CJEU) offers people with vaccination regret or vaccine damage an opening. You no longer have to litigate against unapproachable institutions that pass the ball to each other. Thanks to this decision, you can now sue the person who gave the shot and/or the doctor who prescribed the prescription. The 400,000 Dutch people with prick regrets can take action about inadequate information, lack of informed consent, deception, injury, compensation, etc. Simply, at their doctor, jab or regional GGD. No escape. The EU has arranged it that way. Former lawyer Frank Stadermann warned here in 2021 Already before and now the monkey actually seems to be coming out of the sleeve. Doctors and prickers, get ready! You guys get the blame!
No one was allowed to prick without a doctor's prescription
In Frajese v. Commission (C-586/23 P, 30 January 2025) the Court states: 'It follows from the annexes to the decrees that a medical prescription is required for the administration of the vaccines in question.' Every COVID vaccine, including Pfizer/Comirnaty, required an individual doctor's prescription. At least, according to the European Court – and we all know how important it is that EU jurisdiction is strictly observed! That is promising, because in the Netherlands vaccination buses drove to schools and tents were erected in shopping centers, without anyone ever having to show a prescription. Raids from door to door, from arm to arm were announced. That was of course an outrageous absurdity, a legal time bomb and with this ruling the clock starts ticking louder.
The Court further notes: "In principle, the granting of a marketing authorisation does not impose any obligation on patients or vaccinating doctors." The EU did not force anyone and thus absolved itself of any responsibility by leaving it up to the governments how they used the permit nationally or not. It was allowed, it was not necessary, just as those national governments did not explicitly make vaccination mandatory. But that was not out of respect for your freedom of choice. They also did not want to bear that responsibility for a product that could lead to deaths, claims for damages and legal misery, as the contract unequivocally stated as "adverse events unknown" (the exact wording can be found here). They preferred to shift that responsibility to a lower level: the executors – ultimately often silly, unsuspecting prickers who had no idea what they were bringing upon themselves. Otherwise you won't prick this.
Without a doctor's prescription and without informed consent, you have been illegally vaccinated. Go get justice! 'Justice' is a very big word these days. No matter how powerful an industry is, they can't just inject anything into you, can they?
The pattern: passing the buck and imposing duties
How did that shot end up in an arm? Each layer shifts responsibility and imposes duties, often without the next one noticing. Because then they can always say: if only you had fulfilled your duty.
- Pharma: Delivers a slick brochure and their duty ends with delivery; Any liability is contractually passed on. Strict monitoring is mandatory. This means that governments, agencies and doctors should have sounded the alarm immediately when it turned out that they had made a wrong decision.
- FDA: Looks at the brochure, approves it through pharma revolving door officials and doctors, and issues a conditional authorization: again "conditions." But they do not check whether those conditions are met – that is for the next link.
- CDC: Advises, bans drugs that could violate the terms and urges the heart: "Provide informed consent." They don't give any details, just a guideline. But for the necessary information in case of thorough consent, they refer to the product flyer.
- EMA: Stamps off and states: "This is not an over-the-counter pill, this really has to be on a doctor's prescription, but you arrange it yourself." The EU regulates access, but leaves the implementation to the member states. And with it the responsibility for the actual injection. "We had said like this: only on prescription! If you wind that, we'll pull our hands off it."
- National governments: Organize vaccination lanes, media and a real Disinformation Think Tank to ram in the 'informed consent'. A somewhat different view: if you scare people so much that they beg for a medicine, then they, with a few douceurs for the media here and there, have done everything they can. It is then up to the MEB, IGJ and RIVM to have jabs arrange 'informed consent', without requiring proof or providing resources, other than vaccine promos. In fact, doctors who signed for consent were hunted down by the IGJ.
- The jab must be vaccinated with 'informed consent'. Yes, that goes without saying, otherwise all those people wouldn't have come to the vaccination line, right!? So that is 'informed consent'.
Top-down and bottom-up
There is hope. Top-down, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Jay Bhattacharya can tackle the first links – more transparent data at the CDC, independent research through the NIH. That will certainly have an effect here because everything is always blindly stamped here in accordance with the findings from the US. But bottom-up it starts with ourselves: sue those jabs and doctors. Attack them. "Just do it", to speak with Frans Timmermans.
Let those startled jabs point at their bosses, who then also look up with thousands of summonses on their pants. Send lawyers to it. You have to look for courageous lawyers with a light, but they now get their hands on something: they no longer have to take on the State ('no chance', I was once assured). I would love to see those 400,000 Dutch people do something about the chain of pocket-filling experts who have misled them.
At the same time, we will have to prepare for the fact that the judiciary protects the State and that even the most severely damaged regretters are very likely to be left empty-handed, probably dismissed as 'anti-vaxxers' and legally rejected due to protocol errors or declared inadmissible due to some other technical detail. This also happened with the Italian doctor dr. Frajese, the case from which this judgment arises. It is crying to heaven and it makes the shame even greater.
Vaccination regret: side effect of the corona vaccine
So about four hundred thousand Dutch people have 'prick regret'. 400,000 think afterwards that they should not have done it. How many of them have not been properly informed? Almost all of them have to be, otherwise you don't have that syringe done. But how many have the energy to take action or think it's worth it?
If it doesn't help, it doesn't hurt – except for 400,000 Dutch people.
"Well, bad luck, there's nothing more to be done about it anyway" I heard two puncture-damaged ex-colleagues say to each other, both affected by an extreme, extremely rare side effect. Maybe the same one, I don't know. And it is indeed understandable that someone does not want to waste energy on a fait accompli. After all, it doesn't make you better anymore. But I would have liked to shout out the historic words of Karóly Illy to the ladies: "If you don't do it for yourself, do it FOR SOMEONE ELSE!!"
Little chance. I don't see those sheep digging up the hatchet. In fact, they would probably roll up another sleeve if it is said everywhere in the newspaper that it is safe and the TV experts are incessantly blackmailing the population with its vulnerable family members. Those ex-colleagues believe that. Nor can they be blamed: they are real treasures, both of them.
Hopefully everyone will be a little wiser by this damage and shame. Every link in the chain, from the approval authority to the sleeve-roller, must see that the quality media certainly do not have a monopoly on the truth. If only they had been a little more awake, sweet, cooperative, social, altruistic citizens would also have been better protected against the drug pushers. In this way we are only left with suspicious selfish know-it-alls, you don't keep society running with that. Without sheep there is no wool.
A heavy subject again. To end lightly, I share a fictitious customer satisfaction survey:
Dear Customer,
You have chosen one or more of our corona vaccinations. How satisfied are you with this decision afterwards?
(Tick the answer that works best for you.)
- Very satisfied, otherwise everything would have been much worse, especially my Covid!
- Satisfied, yes, I could just go on holiday hahahaha! Had Covid 3 times by the way, well.
- Neutral: Fortunately no permanent side effects, I still had Covid and often had a cold and tired, but that is not because of the jab, says the doctor.
- Dissatisfied: With the knowledge of now, I would certainly not do it again. I also got Covid and Long Covid too, according to the doctor himself.
- Very dissatisfied: I regret it every day, the quality of my life has deteriorated.
I couldn't think of anything nice with the latter, sorry.
400,000 people in the newspaper as a paltry 3% with partly unjustified regret: 'people generally regret decisions made freely afterwards' said a professor of psychology. Oh yes? Also from the smallpox shot? The measles shot? Another academic bag of hay. Those are the hotemets who have allowed a disaster to happen. And they keep getting away with it.
Data that could harm vaccination readiness are deliberately withheld. And then there are people who keep nagging for proof that the vaccines were harmful.
The most sophisticated scam ever, carried out by people who had everyone's best interests at heart. You can't think of much dirtier than that.
Anton what a great and well-written piece again. So sharp and so painfully true. Perhaps an important development to make doctors a bit more critical of the next 'vaccine'.
Thank you Elisabeth. It's also painful – but only if you know it. Three-quarters of the people have to rely on the media for this kind of knowledge. Those people are not bothered by anything. They allow themselves to be injected in good spirits and unsuspectingly rumble into a war. Under the guise of "doing the right thing".
So the picker is the "bagman"?
(He who is left behind with the bag of stolen goods when the police come and are caught/ the sucker scapegoat.)
Own fault big bump. Hitmen are supposed to answer to the courts.
No, not ours. Our judges must stay out of it because of demonstrable membership of the white coat prick church, and therefore partiality. That or career blackmail by the Dutch state. 'Nudging', as Hugo likes to call it.
It would be nice if the lower suckers could testify against the higher bosses in exchange for a reduced sentence. This is the only way the house of cards will fall.
Employees in the Netherlands are never liable for mistakes made by an employer. In fact, even if an employee makes mistakes, the employer remains liable.
That offers hope...
That's a bad thing
Even less light-hearted would be point 6 of the customer satisfaction survey. To be completed by next of kin. Thank you for this piece, you describe the atmosphere around this serious subject in such a way that I am chuckling about it and that is a relief.
Yes, or a checkbox "Completed by next of kin" 🙂
On the one hand, it is hopeful that there is at least the possibility of doing something against injustice done (which includes puncture damage, but in my opinion also all those anti-social measures that we all [vaccinated and unvaccinated] had to undergo in the years 20-22) through legal proceedings.
On the other hand, I wonder if legal proceedings lead to JUSTICE. Not so much because the judiciary is 'inclined' (a euphemism) to confirm the delusion of the day, which is/was implemented by the government, at all costs, but because I expect that the perpetrators (the perpetrators of all these horrible things: these are academics, doctors, nursing staff and other experts/soldiers) have no idea of what they have done, They don't want to know that either and will deny at the cost of literally everything to their grave that they (should) have known better.
Seen in this way, a lawsuit can only lead to frustration, even if the judge objectively assesses the case and finds in favor of the injured party (e.g. someone with prick remorse) compared to the perpetrator (e.g. someone who gave the shot).
In my open letter to IGJ (to be found via the BVNL site) I make, in my firm opinion, a correct conclusion by saying that the covid time was a sex crime.
-Why a sex crime?
-Because people we have learned that we can/should trust have abused their power and instead of helping us have humiliated us.
-What to do about it?
If I may use my John Grisham's/ Roman Polanski's/ Thomas Vinterberg's/Hannah Arendt's and Bram Bakker's examples (thank God I don't have any direct examples of sex crimes lawsuits of my own) then it always ends the same in lawsuits with these kinds of assholes: They are honored to be allowed to go to court and explain that they have done nothing wrong, with which they manage to tarnish the victim even more. Arendt called this 'the banality of evil' and that's how it is.
What is my solution then, if I may call it that in all my pride.
-Convict those people without a judge. Even without a judge, a victim knows what has been done to him or her by an offender. No judge is needed for that. Talk about it openly and let those bastards get the shit. I would hope that this will happen more often and I honestly expect that this will happen more in the coming years.
I wanted to set a good example myself by telling my story to Wybren van Haga. Here is my latest attempt (shameless advertising, I know) which, for what it's worth, has given me some comfort (because talking about your problems in front of a benevolent person is a relief) and hopefully also offers some comfort to the viewer/listener since insight (which I am trying to give) offers comfort.
Big words, but sometimes they may well be said, see:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ytOUi6fWzLo
Great that you are looking for publicity. Good luck!
By the way: "Because people we have learned that we can/should trust have abused their power and instead of helping us have humiliated us"
– that's called domestication.
At the time, actors and extras were also used to stick test sticks in people's noses and put needles in their arms. I know that as a fait accompli because they were proud of it and just told it or shared it on social media. Actors and extras without any medical background or experience. Are these disgusting people also held accountable? I hope so because it still bothers me.
The only real solution is for people, victims, to put their own house in order. Take responsibility for their own action, and don't keep pointing the finger at possible perpetrators. It is not the case that repetition of these kinds of situations is prevented if people are punished (so that they would no longer do it), but if people become more autonomous in their actions so that they are no longer so susceptible to manipulation and mass hypnosis.
When I reason what kind of people are actually in the 2nd and 1st chamber, I come to the conclusion that they are murderers or at least fully liable for murder. What I call murder are the many deaths caused by their policies, the effect of which is that many people have committed suicide or at least lost many, many years of life. During Covid, thousands of years of life were lost, to name but a few, but the high cost of living and energy is also making people further desperate. People get sick from the stress, you see it all around you. And so I can only conclude that our government is full of unscrupulous murderers. And they are also proud of it and would prefer a long-term war with Russia in order to further increase their sick power. I see no difference between the majority of the government and the German leaders and fanatics from the Second World War, the only difference is that they blindly deafened and dumbed the citizen so that there is hardly any resistance now.
Rather manslaughter, I think. With the best intentions. Some may not, but you can only make that distinction by looking inside their heads.
It is right that the jabbers are jointly and severally responsible for the damage caused by their actions. Of course, in the end, the people who took the jab are responsible, but doctors should have at least informed and of course should have assessed the risks themselves and whether or not to vaccinate them. By the way, I have indicated this from the beginning, when a number of people, especially the wappies, pointed to the government and related agencies as responsible. By the way, I don't think the jabs need worry too much about the outcome of possible lawsuits because the causal link will be very difficult to prove.
I also think that there are indeed still people who are whining for proof that the vaccines were harmful. I mean, so much has already been published about it, the evidence has been provided for a long time, in fact, a lot had already been published about it before the first shot was taken. What do they still want to prove?
There is a war industry that has to make money. A wife of Zelensky who has to pay off her exclusive Bugatti. There is an oligarchy that deserves a holiday. All important needs.
Almost all of us have been brainwashed by the Nazi clown. And when we say that, we are called Nazis ourselves.
does she have a Bugatti?
Don't ask me about the source anymore, because I forgot it. A critically informed journalist. That much I remember.
Yes, she reported that a new exclusive line of Bugattis was being produced and that the wife of the man who has American journalists murdered had signed up for the very first copy. Because all their money went to the war, of course.... So they urgently need more money from us.
I don't have the impression that Zelensky's wife needs to buy a car on installment
In the first year alone, the injections have already cost ten thousand healthy years of life. With around 30 million shots in 2021, millions sometimes had to travel for one to one and a half hours. They lost an average of almost half a day and an average of a day miserable.
Rounded 36.5 million lost healthy days divided by 365 is ten thousand years of life. The average age of the approximately 10,000 people 'killed with and by corona' was slightly higher than the average life expectancy in July 2020. These people had therefore died on average within a year and usually did not have a healthy life during the last year of life. Other measures have also caused people to deteriorate mentally, become fatter, use more drugs, alcohol and tobacco and exercise less. Anyway; Even if the shots would not directly increase excess mortality, the vaccination in itself is counterproductive.
Anyway; Even if the shots did not directly increase excess mortality, the vaccination in itself is counterproductive.'
If you think like that (I think so too), how many years are lost standing in line, standing in traffic jams, staring aimlessly at the teevee or eye-phone on the couch, the social chat shit in the workplace, the (video) meeting, the (self) evaluation with your manager, to doing your bullshit work behind your table, that is not yours, in an 'open-plan office' that most resembles a battery cages, including the clucking, with an average of three supervisors (your bosses) who keep a close eye on you to make sure you lay an egg in time.
All things that I try to participate in as little as possible, but which is a lot more difficult / requires more heroism + skill than refusing one shot...
Nice conversation this but I see it differently. All those things you mention as lost life time, you really choose that yourself, probably because there is something in return.
In addition, what you think is a waste of time may bring pleasure to someone else. You can't qualify that as a lost year of life.
My work is fun, my video meetings are entertaining, small talk I understand but I keep short. I also have to try on clothes or shoes sometimes, I hate that, but those are not lost years of life. That is life. To the dentist, to the garage with your car... only costs money.
I know people who spend their entire lives making (in my eyes for understandable reasons) completely unnoticed art. Yet those are not lost years of life. So if someone goes somewhere in a car because they want to, that's not a lost year of life.
And life kills you.
Best upskilling course ever: the three things that make you happy:
1. Buy something (expensive) (rockstar high). Unfortunately, it only lasts for a short time.
2. Getting into a flow so that hours seem like minutes.
3. Mean something to others.
And for God's sake be glad that life has no meaning (Jaap van Heerden)
That way you can also justify the shot. Yes, it's not the nicest thing to do, but you can go on holiday. And yes, there are side effects, but there is also something heroic about that. You think you are doing it for someone else and can certainly share it with each other as if you are doing it for each other.
The dentist, who has to repair a tooth or tooth, has nothing to do with it. Although repairing a tooth is not fun (for the person with a toothache), the toothache is real and being helped by the dentist is real. So is the garage, the shoe store, the clothing store where you sometimes have to go because someone has to wear clothes or shoes or (if his car is broken) go to the garage.
A shot against the virus is not real. A shot against the virus is a ritual against something that does not exist. Well, if you can get your satisfaction from that... Then you have to do that. The same goes for the traffic jam, the video meeting, the morning talk, etc.
The fact is that we do a lot of things that, on closer inspection, make no sense at best, and are deadly at worst.
Maybe the twittering of eea is useful for people, like twittering is useful for sparrows and sounds so cozy. Or as someone below says: because of the fun and humor you can share with each other. I couldn't agree more. That's a nice bonus in a job, even if the job is actually a BS job.
But when I look at traffic jams, video conferencing users and open-plan office workers, there is little (and less and less) twittering. But a lot of (unnecessarily) suffering. Joining the traffic jam before dawn, is that humor? Video conferencing after dinner until about 11 o'clock, is that twittering? Having to assess yourself every so often (is 'professional') compared to a 'superior' you only know from an employment relationship, is that fun?
-Maybe that IS lol. But only for someone who has all the time in the world. But time is precious, so....
You can't justify the shot like this because it turns out to have unexpected consequences that can cost you years of life. That is the difference with an action or activity of which you can estimate in advance how much time it will take you and what is in return.
And all those other things, well, salaries are generally meant to make people do things that they wouldn't do for fun. They even pay for pleasures (sports, hobbies, etc.)
People have also chosen to take a vaccine themselves; Only they blame it on the suppliers, media, science and politicians.
Maybe I misunderstand but there was and is a lot of heroism + art and skill and extremely difficult to refuse shots. To this day. Small talk nowadays is dominated by hospital stories and other abuses in healthcare. Sometimes some football and/or climate with a sauce of anti-Trump. Until one has to take responsibility for one's own health or that of one's loved ones, then one runs (if one can still run) to the white coats. Incomprehensible and unimaginable in my critical eyes. Where has the humor gone? I used to talk to friends about funny incidents and stupid actions, nowadays I listen to yet another serious miscarriage story, TIAs, chronic shingles and a lot of injuries also among young people, etc. I wonder where it goes. We have mastered 😎 the art and tricks
ik denk dat je het inderdaad verkeerd begrijpt; ten eerste “weiger” je geen prik, dat impliceert een actie. Als ik niet naar de snackbar ga om een frietje te eten, dan weiger ik geen frietje, ik heb misschien helemaal nooit overwogen om een frietje te eten (of om meer in jargon te blijven, ik heb nooit het idee gehad om een frikandel te eten). Ten tweede, er is ook helemaal niets heldhaftigs aan. Je hebt de afgelopen 10 jaar waarschijnlijk geen vaccin genomen, dat maakte je geen held. Ik vind het veel heldhaftiger om een onbekend vaccin met onbekende bijwerkingen te nemen. Daar is moed voor nodig. En dat blijkt wel want veel mensen zitten nu met de gebakken peren. Die gevolgen zijn veel ingrijpender dan een paar maanden niet uit eten of ruzie met je collega’s.
Stel dat je een onbekend persoon ontmoet waarmee je meteen onbeschermde seks hebt.
Dit is heel erg onverstandig. Als daarna blijkt dat die persoon (ook) anderen ernstig ziek heeft gemaakt, dan is dit ook achteraf niet heldhaftiger.
Het gaat erom dat men de keuze maakte gemiddeld een paar gezonde uren te besteden aan een (ineffective) activiteit en er gemiddeld een aantal uren beroerd van werd om te voorkomen dat je een paar uur gemiddeld ongezond minder lang leeft (ouderen en zwakkeren) en gezonde mensen wat minder ziek zouden worden. Dit alles volgens de vaccinproducenten en de door hen en de overheid ingezette ‘experts’. Kort daarna bleek dat de toentertijd berekende gezondheidswinst van de shots veel te optimistisch was ook volgens de msmexperts. Na enkele maanden was de beschermingsfactor een stuk lager dan verwacht, het voorkomen of verminderen van longcovid was niet aan te tonen (RIVM mei 2021) en ingeënte mensen besmetten minstens net zoveel anderen als ongeënten. Denk aan ‘Dansen met Jansen’.
De discussie over corona, de shots en andere maatregelen en het opnemen van het (bangmakerij nieuws erover heeft de Nederlander een paar maanden tijd gekost in vooral de eerste twee jaar. Die tel ik niet mee, al is dat wel meestal ook verloren tijd geweest. Ook telde ik de vele doden niet mee door uitgestelde zorg omdat ik alleen een het effect van wel of niet inenten behandelde.
Goed stuk Anton! Ik zou ook niets liever willen dat de “schuldigen†gestraft worden. Maar de praktijk is helaas anders, de soldaten sneuvelen, de politici die ze sturen blijven buiten schot. De uithalers en kleine dealertjes worden regelmatig gepakt, de drugsbaronnen regelen hun zaakjes vanuit Dubai (of in een enkel geval vanuit de EBI in Vucht). Rosenmöller mag 96G€ kwijtspelen, wat er over is van onze pensioengelden wordt straks ingevaren in de Europese oorlogskas. De lijst is lang.
En of het nu zin heeft om het medische voetvolk verantwoordelijk te stellen? Ze zijn al zo bang een foute diagnose te stellen of iets off label voor te schrijven. Straks volgen ze alleen nog maar protocollen als dat nu al niet het geval is.
Ondanks mijn al bijna vijf jaar durende boosheid heb ik mijn doelen bijgesteld. Ik zou al blij zijn als (een paar van) de verspreiders van desinformatie aan de wetenschappelijke schandpaal genageld zouden worden. Maar misschien heeft Anton gelijk en geeft dit de mogelijkheid om een gaatje te prikken in de tamelijk gesloten gelederen van de medici. (Jij niet, Willem!)
Tamelijk voorspelbaar hoe dit gaat aflopen.
Door de bal op een laag niveau neer te leggen gaat dit jaren duren en zullen er ongetwijfeld uitspraken van rechters komen die wijzen op de eigen verantwoordelijkheid van de burger. Vergeet niet dat het na-oorlogseverzet nu al druk bezig om het straatje schoon te vegen. U heeft dit allemaal over u zelf afgeroepen. U vond dat u iets moest doen voor een ander. Wie heeft u daartoe gedwongen? Rechtsbijstandsverzekeringen zullen procederen niet willen vergoeden. Er zullen ook allerlei elkaar tegensprekende uitspraken gedaan worden.
Je kan dit het beste vergelijken met de restitutie van geroofde joodse bezittingen naar WWII. Wil jij soms de wederopbouw van ons land dwarszitten? Pas na 50 jaar kwam er eindelijk een soort vorm van genoegdoening voor nabestaanden. Voor nabestaanden, niet voor de directe slachtoffers. Denk ook aan vuurwerkramp Enschede, brand in Moerdijk, giftige verf Defensie. Om moedeloos van te worden. Maar een gewaarschuwd man telt voor twee.
Tjee ja, wat erg inderdaad. Ik hoop zo op een rechter die de moed heeft om de bal naar boven te schoppen…
Je gebruikt kromme vergelijkingen. De rampen die jij noemt gebeurden buiten het blikveld van de gedupeerden. In het geval van de vaccinaties hebben mensen zelf om wat voor reden dan ook de beslissing genomen om zich te laten vaccineren. Er waren wel uitzonderingen zoals mensen in een verzorgingstehuis etc, of mensen die een dringende operatie moetsen ondergaan en min of meer zijn geswongen door de ziekenhuizen.
Goed stuk Anton. Ik was een paar dagen ziek (niets met virussen, maar een knullige bacteriële infectie). Was door de koorts totaal niet geïnteresseerd in het nieuws en alle gekte om ons heen. Geeft wel rust, en ik was plan plan om me niet meer op te winden. Maar dit is allemaal zo ongelooflijk onrechtvaardig, om maar niet gewoon het woord ‘slecht’ (evil klinkt beter) te gebruiken dat dit voornemen om dag 1 alweer het raam uitgaat. Ik moet dan toch weer even reageren.
Het doet me vooral pijn omdat binnen een week alweer 2 mensen die me redelijk nastaan met hartklachten in het ziekenhuis terecht zijn gekomen. Het is dan ongepast om over de prikken te beginnen, dat begrijp ik, dan lijkt het alsof je ten koste van die mensen je gelijk wilt halen, en uiteraard is er niets bewezen want het wordt niet eens overwogen als oorzaak. Het kan natuurlijk een andere oorzaak hebben, maar als bepaalde incidenten te vaak voorkomen zijn het geen incidenten meer, dan is er een patroon. Die 400.000 is het topje van de ijsberg vrees ik.
Wederom een prima stuk, Anton! Er is nog veel onverwerkt ‘leed’, ook bij de mensen die niet direct geraakt zijn door prikschade. De ongelooflijke hardheid, botheid en ‘doofheid’ van de machthebbers, inclusief het OMT, ten tijde van corona heeft aan mij en vele anderen een gevoel van een situatie van oorlog gegeven. Oorlog? Ja, oorlog, waarin ons alle vrijheden afgepakt werden, er drang en dwang ontstond om slecht geteste gentherapeutische producten te laten inspuiten, en vroegbehandelingsmethoden, die uitstekend werkten, geboycot en verboden werden. Ongehoord, zoiets, in een zogenaamd ‘vrij’ land als Nederland. Ongehoord? Was de mentaliteit tijdens de bezetting 40-45 ook niet zo? Dat gevoel, dat men geleefd wordt, niets mag zeggen, en het officiele narratief maar moet nakakelen… En nog steeds: het niet ‘mogen’ benoemen van de schadelijkheid van de maatregelen, de mondlapjes, de avondklok en met name de prikken, is ten hemel schreiend. NRC roept mensen op om de ‘lessen’ uit de coronatijd te melden op de opiniepagina van as. zaterdag. Hier een oproep aan alle lezers om dat dan ook te doen; ik ben bang dat mijn inzending, die zaken gewoon benoemt, (voor de zoveelste keer) geweigerd gaat worden.. Tijdens corona zijn, op 1 na, al mijn op wetenschappelijke feiten gebaseerde beleidskritische stukken geweigerd door Ronald Leeflang, hoofdredacteur opinies.
Ik herken het, zz. Zelfde ervaring met Leeflang. Ondertussen het ooit redelijk onfahankelijk, ondertussen volledig geassimileerd flutblaadje opgezegd. Dus kan niet meer bijdragen aanjouw terechte oproep. Ik hoop dat het je lukt, maar verwachting is laag
Ik heb dezelfde ervaring. Het is nog erger. Sinds ik wat kritische stukken over het corona- inentingsbeleid naar NRC heb gemaild werden artikelen over andere onderwerpen die ik daarna mailde ook nooit meer geplaatst.
Leeflang of collega’s reageren zelfs niet als je daar een open vraag over stelt.
interessante link over duitse overheid die al in 2020 wist dat lableak en besloot dit stil te houden https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/germany-knew-covid-lab-leak-early-2020-hid-evidence-from-public
It is right that the jabbers are jointly and severally responsible for the damage caused by their actions. Of course, in the end, the people who took the jab are responsible, but doctors should have at least informed and of course should have assessed the risks themselves and whether or not to vaccinate them. By the way, I have indicated this from the beginning, when a number of people, especially the wappies, pointed to the government and related agencies as responsible. By the way, I don't think the jabs need worry too much about the outcome of possible lawsuits because the causal link will be very difficult to prove.
I also think that there are indeed still people who are whining for proof that the vaccines were harmful. I mean, so much has already been published about it, the evidence has been provided for a long time, in fact, a lot had already been published about it before the first shot was taken. What do they still want to prove?
NRC vroeg op 11/03/25 om opinies t.a.v. de ‘lessen van corona’. Kritische stemmen die de waarheid op tafel leggen vallen nog steeds onder de censuurbijl van de mainstream media…
LESSEN VAN CORONA – verstuurd aan NRC, 12/03/25. Geweigerd 14/03/25
Een opgelegd narratief – dat nooit meer
Wat hebben we nu eigenlijk geleerd van 3 jaar coronamaatregelen? Dat een eenzijdig verhaal over het virus zeer misleidend kan zijn? Dat maatregelen die niet op gedegen wetenschappelijke kennis berusten faliekant verkeerd kunnen uitpakken? Dat overhaast ingezette middelen, zoals verplichte afstand tot de medemens, op- en afsluitingen van mensen en verplichte maskering, volledig averechts werken? Dat het verbannen en uiteindelijk verbieden van zeer goed werkende vroegbehandelingsmethoden tot veel onnodige doden zullen leiden? En, uiteindelijk, dat het overhaast pushen van slecht geteste injecties, die berustten op een experimentele gentherapie, nul en generlei effect heeft gesorteerd? Wat evenwel eruit sprong tijdens coronatijd, was de vrijwel instantaan aanwezige censuur van andersdenkenden, waardoor elke hoop op snelle oplossing van de pandemie verdampte. Immers, door samen de beste oplossing te zoeken komt men het snelst uit een crisis, en het wegdrukken van kritische geluiden is, inderdaad, het beste middel om een crisis in stand te houden. Regering en OMT, bedankt!
Je hebt in ieder geval een afwijzing gekregen. Zelfs die krijg ik sinds 2020 niet meer bij het NRC.