A ruling by the European Court of Justice (CJEU) offers people with vaccination regret or vaccine damage an opening. You no longer have to litigate against unapproachable institutions that pass the ball to each other. Thanks to this decision, you can now sue the person who gave the shot and/or the doctor who prescribed the prescription. The 400,000 Dutch people with prick regrets can take action about inadequate information, lack of informed consent, deception, injury, compensation, etc. Simply, at their doctor, jab or regional GGD. No escape. The EU has arranged it that way. Former lawyer Frank Stadermann warned here in 2021 Already before and now the monkey actually seems to be coming out of the sleeve. Doctors and prickers, get ready! You guys get the blame!
No one was allowed to prick without a doctor's prescription
In Frajese v. Commission (C-586/23 P, 30 January 2025) the Court states: 'It follows from the annexes to the decrees that a medical prescription is required for the administration of the vaccines in question.' Elk COVID-vaccin, ook Pfizer/Comirnaty, had een individueel doktersrecept nodig. Althans: volgens het Europese Hof - en we weten allemaal hoe belangrijk het is dat de EU-jurisdictie strikt wordt nageleefd! Dat belooft wat, want in Nederland reden prikbussen naar scholen en verrezen tenten in winkelcentra, zonder dat iemand ooit een recept hoefde te laten zien. Razzia's van deur tot deur, van arm tot arm werden aangekondigd. Dat was natuurlijk een schandalige absurditeit, een juridische tijdbom en met deze uitspraak begint de klok luider te tikken.
The Court further notes: "In principle, the granting of a marketing authorisation does not impose any obligation on patients or vaccinating doctors.” De EU dwong niemand en ontsloeg zichzelf daarmee van elke verantwoordelijkheid door het aan de overheden over te laten hoe ze de vergunning nationaal al dan niet gebruikten. Het was toegestaan, het hoefde niet, net zo min als dat ook die nationale overheden de vaccinatie niet expliciet verplichtten. Maar dat kwam niet uit respect voor jouw keuzevrijheid. Ook zij wilden die verantwoordelijkheid niet dragen voor een product dat kon leiden tot sterfgevallen, schadeclaims en juridische ellende, zoals in het contract ondubbelzinnig stond weergegeven als "bijwerkingen onbekend" (de exacte formulering can be found here). They preferred to shift that responsibility to a lower level: the executors – ultimately often silly, unsuspecting prickers who had no idea what they were bringing upon themselves. Otherwise you won't prick this.
You have been vaccinated illegally without a doctor's prescription and without informed consent. Go get your rights! 'Justice' is a very big word these days. No matter how powerful an industry is, they can't just inject anything into you, right?
The pattern: passing the buck and imposing duties
How did that shot end up in an arm? Each layer shifts responsibility and imposes duties, often without the next one noticing. Because then they can always say: if only you had fulfilled your duty.
- Pharma: Delivers a slick brochure and their duty ends with delivery; Any liability is contractually passed on. Strict monitoring is mandatory. This means that governments, agencies and doctors should have sounded the alarm immediately when it turned out that they had made a wrong decision.
- FDA: Looks at the brochure, approves it through pharma revolving door officials and doctors, and issues a conditional authorization: again "conditions." But they do not check whether those conditions are met – that is for the next link.
- CDC: Advises, bans drugs that could violate the terms and urges the heart: "Provide informed consent." They don't give any details, just a guideline. But for the necessary information in case of thorough consent, they refer to the product flyer.
- EMA: Stempelt af en stelt: “Dit is geen over-the-counter pilletje, dit moet echt op doktersrecept, maar jullie regelen het zelf.” De EU regelt de toegang, maar laat de uitvoering aan de lidstaten. En daarmee ook de verantwoordelijkheid voor het daadwerkelijk injecteren. "We hadden nog zó gezegd: alleen op recept! Als je dat in wind slaat trekken wij onze handen ervan af."
- National governments: Organize message boards, media and a real Disinformation Think Tank to hammer in 'informed consent'. A slightly different view: if you scare people so much that they beg for a medicine, then they have done everything they can, with a few showers for the media here and there. It is then up to the CBG, IGJ and RIVM to have injectors arrange 'informed consent', without requiring proof or providing resources, other than vaccine promotions. In fact, doctors who signed consent were hunted down by the IGJ.
- The needle must puncture with 'informed consent'. Yes, that goes without saying, otherwise all those people wouldn't have come to the puncture street, right!? So that is 'informed consent'.
Top-down and bottom-up
Er gloort wel hoop. Top-down kunnen Robert F. Kennedy Jr. en Jay Bhattacharya de eerste schakels aanpakken – transparantere data bij de CDC, onafhankelijk onderzoek via de NIH. Dat zal hier zeker effect hebben want alles wordt hier altijd blind afgestempeld conform de bevindingen uit de VS. Waarom al die instituten ertussen zitten mogen ze weleens uitleggen. Maar bottom-up begint het bij onszelf: klaag die prikkers en artsen nou maar aan. Belaag ze maar. "Doe het nou maar gewoon", om met Frans Timmermans te spreken.
Laat die geschrokken prikkers dan maar naar hun bazen wijzen, die dan ook weer niet-begrijpend omhoog kijken met duizenden dagvaardingen aan hun broek. Stuur er advocaten op af. Je moet moedige advocaten met een lampje zoeken maar die krijgen nu wel iets in handen: ze hoeven het niet meer tegen de Staat op te nemen ('kansloos', zo werd mij ooit verzekerd). Ik zou zo graag zien dat die 400.000 Nederlanders iets doen aan de keten van zakkenvullende experts die hen misleid hebben.
Tegelijkertijd zullen we ons erop moeten voorbereiden dat de rechtspraak de Staat beschermt en dat ook de zwaarst beschadigde spijtoptanten zeer waarschijnlijk met lege handen worden achtergelaten, waarschijnlijk weggezet als 'anti-vaxxers' en juridisch afgewezen wegens protocollaire fouten of niet-ontvankelijk verklaard vanwege een ander technisch detail. Dat gebeurde ook met de Italiaanse arts dr. Frajese, de zaak waar dit arrest uit voortkomt. Het is ten hemel schreiend en de schande wordt er nog groter van.
Vaccination regret: side effect of the corona vaccine
About four hundred thousand Dutch people therefore have 'bit regret'. 400,000 think afterwards that they should not have done it. How many of these have not been properly informed? Almost all of them have to be, otherwise you won't have that injection done. But how many have the courage to take action or find it worth it?
If it doesn't help, it won't hurt - except for 400,000 Dutch people.
"Tja, pech gehad, er is toch niets meer aan te doen" hoorde ik twee prikbeschadigde ex-collega's tegen elkaar zeggen, beide getroffen door een uiterst, uiterst zeldzame bijwerking. Misschien wel dezelfde, dat weet ik niet. En het is inderdaad begrijpelijk dat iemand geen energie wil verspillen aan een voldongen feit. Je wordt er immers niet meer beter van. Maar ik had de dames graag de historische woorden van Karóly Illy toe willen schreeuwen: "Als je het niet voor jezelf doet, doe het dan VOOR EEN ANDER!!!"
Little chance. I don't see those sheep digging up the hatchet. In fact, they would probably roll up another sleeve if it is said everywhere in the newspaper that it is safe and the TV experts are incessantly blackmailing the population with its vulnerable family members. Those ex-colleagues believe that. Nor can they be blamed: they are real treasures, both of them.
Hopefully everyone will be a little wiser by this damage and shame. Every link in the chain, from the approval authority to the sleeve-roller, must see that the quality media certainly do not have a monopoly on the truth. If only they had been a little more awake, sweet, cooperative, social, altruistic citizens would also have been better protected against the drug pushers. In this way we are only left with suspicious selfish know-it-alls, you don't keep society running with that. Without sheep there is no wool.
A heavy subject again. To end lightly, I share a fictitious customer satisfaction survey:
Dear Customer,
You have chosen one or more of our corona vaccinations. How satisfied are you with this decision afterwards?
(Tick the answer that works best for you.)
- Very satisfied, otherwise everything would have been much worse, especially my Covid!
- Satisfied, yes, I could just go on holiday hahahaha! Had Covid 3 times by the way, well.
- Neutral: Fortunately no permanent side effects, I still had Covid and often had a cold and tired, but that is not because of the jab, says the doctor.
- Dissatisfied: With the knowledge of now, I would certainly not do it again. I also got Covid and Long Covid too, according to the doctor himself.
- Very dissatisfied: I regret it every day, the quality of my life has deteriorated.
I couldn't think of anything nice with the latter, sorry.
400,000 people depicted in the newspaper as a paltry 3% with partly unjustified regret: 'people generally regret decisions made freely afterwards' said a psychology professor. Oh yeah? Also from the smallpox shot? The measles shot? Another academic bag of hay. These are the hotemetots who allowed a disaster to happen. And they keep getting away with it.
Data that could harm vaccination readiness are deliberately withheld. And then there are people who keep nagging for proof that the vaccines were harmful.
The most sophisticated scam ever, carried out by people who had everyone's best interests at heart. You can't think of much dirtier than that.
Anton what a great and well-written piece again. So sharp and so painfully true. Perhaps an important development to make doctors a bit more critical of the next 'vaccine'.
Thank you Elisabeth. It's also painful – but only if you know it. Three-quarters of the people have to rely on the media for this kind of knowledge. Those people are not bothered by anything. They allow themselves to be injected in good spirits and unsuspectingly rumble into a war. Under the guise of "doing the right thing".
So the picker is the "bagman"?
(He who is left behind with the bag of stolen goods when the police come and are caught/ the sucker scapegoat.)
Own fault big bump. Hitmen are supposed to answer to the courts.
No, not ours. Our judges must stay out of it because of demonstrable membership of the white coat prick church, and therefore partiality. That or career blackmail by the Dutch state. 'Nudging', as Hugo likes to call it.
It would be nice if the lower suckers could testify against the higher bosses in exchange for a reduced sentence. This is the only way the house of cards will fall.
Employees in the Netherlands are never liable for mistakes made by an employer. In fact, even if an employee makes mistakes, the employer remains liable.
That offers hope...
That's a bad thing
Even less light-hearted would be point 6 of the customer satisfaction survey. To be completed by next of kin. Thank you for this piece, you describe the atmosphere around this serious subject in such a way that I am chuckling about it and that is a relief.
Yes, or a checkbox "Completed by next of kin" 🙂
On the one hand, it is hopeful that there is at least the possibility of doing something against injustice done (which includes puncture damage, but in my opinion also all those anti-social measures that we all [vaccinated and unvaccinated] had to undergo in the years 20-22) through legal proceedings.
On the other hand, I wonder if legal proceedings lead to JUSTICE. Not so much because the judiciary is 'inclined' (a euphemism) to confirm the delusion of the day, which is/was implemented by the government, at all costs, but because I expect that the perpetrators (the perpetrators of all these horrible things: these are academics, doctors, nursing staff and other experts/soldiers) have no idea of what they have done, They don't want to know that either and will deny at the cost of literally everything to their grave that they (should) have known better.
Seen in this way, a lawsuit can only lead to frustration, even if the judge objectively assesses the case and finds in favor of the injured party (e.g. someone with prick remorse) compared to the perpetrator (e.g. someone who gave the shot).
In my open letter to IGJ (to be found via the BVNL site) I make, in my firm opinion, a correct conclusion by saying that the covid time was a sex crime.
-Why a sex crime?
-Because people we have learned that we can/should trust have abused their power and instead of helping us have humiliated us.
-What to do about it?
If I may use my John Grisham's/ Roman Polanski's/ Thomas Vinterberg's/Hannah Arendt's and Bram Bakker's examples (thank God I don't have any direct examples of sex crimes lawsuits of my own) then it always ends the same in lawsuits with these kinds of assholes: They are honored to be allowed to go to court and explain that they have done nothing wrong, with which they manage to tarnish the victim even more. Arendt called this 'the banality of evil' and that's how it is.
What is my solution then, if I may call it that in all my pride.
-Convict those people without a judge. Even without a judge, a victim knows what has been done to him or her by an offender. No judge is needed for that. Talk about it openly and let those bastards get the shit. I would hope that this will happen more often and I honestly expect that this will happen more in the coming years.
I wanted to set a good example myself by telling my story to Wybren van Haga. Here is my latest attempt (shameless advertising, I know) which, for what it's worth, has given me some comfort (because talking about your problems in front of a benevolent person is a relief) and hopefully also offers some comfort to the viewer/listener since insight (which I am trying to give) offers comfort.
Big words, but sometimes they may well be said, see:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ytOUi6fWzLo
Great that you are looking for publicity. Good luck!
By the way: "Because people we have learned that we can/should trust have abused their power and instead of helping us have humiliated us"
– that's called domestication.
At the time, actors and extras were also used to stick test sticks in people's noses and put needles in their arms. I know that as a fait accompli because they were proud of it and just told it or shared it on social media. Actors and extras without any medical background or experience. Are these disgusting people also held accountable? I hope so because it still bothers me.
The only real solution is for people, victims, to put their own house in order. Take responsibility for their own action, and don't keep pointing the finger at possible perpetrators. It is not the case that repetition of these kinds of situations is prevented if people are punished (so that they would no longer do it), but if people become more autonomous in their actions so that they are no longer so susceptible to manipulation and mass hypnosis.
When I reason what kind of people are actually in the 2nd and 1st chamber, I come to the conclusion that they are murderers or at least fully liable for murder. What I call murder are the many deaths caused by their policies, the effect of which is that many people have committed suicide or at least lost many, many years of life. During Covid, thousands of years of life were lost, to name but a few, but the high cost of living and energy is also making people further desperate. People get sick from the stress, you see it all around you. And so I can only conclude that our government is full of unscrupulous murderers. And they are also proud of it and would prefer a long-term war with Russia in order to further increase their sick power. I see no difference between the majority of the government and the German leaders and fanatics from the Second World War, the only difference is that they blindly deafened and dumbed the citizen so that there is hardly any resistance now.
Rather manslaughter, I think. With the best intentions. Some may not, but you can only make that distinction by looking inside their heads.
It is right that the jabbers are jointly and severally responsible for the damage caused by their actions. Of course, in the end, the people who took the jab are responsible, but doctors should have at least informed and of course should have assessed the risks themselves and whether or not to vaccinate them. By the way, I have indicated this from the beginning, when a number of people, especially the wappies, pointed to the government and related agencies as responsible. By the way, I don't think the jabs need worry too much about the outcome of possible lawsuits because the causal link will be very difficult to prove.
I also think that there are indeed still people who are whining for proof that the vaccines were harmful. I mean, so much has already been published about it, the evidence has been provided for a long time, in fact, a lot had already been published about it before the first shot was taken. What do they still want to prove?
There is a war industry that has to make money. A wife of Zelensky who has to pay off her exclusive Bugatti. There is an oligarchy that deserves a holiday. All important needs.
Almost all of us have been brainwashed by the Nazi clown. And when we say that, we are called Nazis ourselves.
does she have a Bugatti?
Don't ask me about the source anymore, because I forgot it. A critically informed journalist. That much I remember.
Yes, she reported that a new exclusive line of Bugattis was being produced and that the wife of the man who has American journalists murdered had signed up for the very first copy. Because all their money went to the war, of course.... So they urgently need more money from us.
I don't have the impression that Zelensky's wife needs to buy a car on installment
In the first year alone, the injections have already cost ten thousand healthy years of life. With around 30 million shots in 2021, millions sometimes had to travel for one to one and a half hours. They lost an average of almost half a day and an average of a day miserable.
Rounded 36.5 million lost healthy days divided by 365 is ten thousand years of life. The average age of the approximately 10,000 people 'killed with and by corona' was slightly higher than the average life expectancy in July 2020. These people had therefore died on average within a year and usually did not have a healthy life during the last year of life. Other measures have also caused people to deteriorate mentally, become fatter, use more drugs, alcohol and tobacco and exercise less. Anyway; Even if the shots would not directly increase excess mortality, the vaccination in itself is counterproductive.
Anyway; Even if the shots did not directly increase excess mortality, the vaccination in itself is counterproductive.'
If you think like that (I think so too), how many years are lost standing in line, standing in traffic jams, staring aimlessly at the teevee or eye-phone on the couch, the social chat shit in the workplace, the (video) meeting, the (self) evaluation with your manager, to doing your bullshit work behind your table, that is not yours, in an 'open-plan office' that most resembles a battery cages, including the clucking, with an average of three supervisors (your bosses) who keep a close eye on you to make sure you lay an egg in time.
All things that I try to participate in as little as possible, but which is a lot more difficult / requires more heroism + skill than refusing one shot...
Nice conversation this but I see it differently. All those things you mention as lost life time, you really choose that yourself, probably because there is something in return.
In addition, what you think is a waste of time may bring pleasure to someone else. You can't qualify that as a lost year of life.
My work is fun, my video meetings are entertaining, small talk I understand but I keep short. I also have to try on clothes or shoes sometimes, I hate that, but those are not lost years of life. That is life. To the dentist, to the garage with your car... only costs money.
I know people who spend their entire lives making (in my eyes for understandable reasons) completely unnoticed art. Yet those are not lost years of life. So if someone goes somewhere in a car because they want to, that's not a lost year of life.
And life kills you.
Best upskilling course ever: the three things that make you happy:
1. Buy something (expensive) (rockstar high). Unfortunately, it only lasts for a short time.
2. Getting into a flow so that hours seem like minutes.
3. Mean something to others.
And for God's sake be glad that life has no meaning (Jaap van Heerden)
That way you can also justify the shot. Yes, it's not the nicest thing to do, but you can go on holiday. And yes, there are side effects, but there is also something heroic about that. You think you are doing it for someone else and can certainly share it with each other as if you are doing it for each other.
The dentist, who has to repair a tooth or tooth, has nothing to do with it. Although repairing a tooth is not fun (for the person with a toothache), the toothache is real and being helped by the dentist is real. So is the garage, the shoe store, the clothing store where you sometimes have to go because someone has to wear clothes or shoes or (if his car is broken) go to the garage.
A shot against the virus is not real. A shot against the virus is a ritual against something that does not exist. Well, if you can get your satisfaction from that... Then you have to do that. The same goes for the traffic jam, the video meeting, the morning talk, etc.
The fact is that we do a lot of things that, on closer inspection, make no sense at best, and are deadly at worst.
Maybe the twittering of eea is useful for people, like twittering is useful for sparrows and sounds so cozy. Or as someone below says: because of the fun and humor you can share with each other. I couldn't agree more. That's a nice bonus in a job, even if the job is actually a BS job.
But when I look at traffic jams, video conferencing users and open-plan office workers, there is little (and less and less) twittering. But a lot of (unnecessarily) suffering. Joining the traffic jam before dawn, is that humor? Video conferencing after dinner until about 11 o'clock, is that twittering? Having to assess yourself every so often (is 'professional') compared to a 'superior' you only know from an employment relationship, is that fun?
-Maybe that IS lol. But only for someone who has all the time in the world. But time is precious, so....
You can't justify the shot like this because it turns out to have unexpected consequences that can cost you years of life. That is the difference with an action or activity of which you can estimate in advance how much time it will take you and what is in return.
And all those other things, well, salaries are generally meant to make people do things that they wouldn't do for fun. They even pay for pleasures (sports, hobbies, etc.)
People have also chosen to take a vaccine themselves; Only they blame it on the suppliers, media, science and politicians.
Maybe I misunderstand but there was and is a lot of heroism + art and skill and extremely difficult to refuse shots. To this day. Small talk nowadays is dominated by hospital stories and other abuses in healthcare. Sometimes some football and/or climate with a sauce of anti-Trump. Until one has to take responsibility for one's own health or that of one's loved ones, then one runs (if one can still run) to the white coats. Incomprehensible and unimaginable in my critical eyes. Where has the humor gone? I used to talk to friends about funny incidents and stupid actions, nowadays I listen to yet another serious miscarriage story, TIAs, chronic shingles and a lot of injuries also among young people, etc. I wonder where it goes. We have mastered 😎 the art and tricks
ik denk dat je het inderdaad verkeerd begrijpt; ten eerste “weiger” je geen prik, dat impliceert een actie. Als ik niet naar de snackbar ga om een frietje te eten, dan weiger ik geen frietje, ik heb misschien helemaal nooit overwogen om een frietje te eten (of om meer in jargon te blijven, ik heb nooit het idee gehad om een frikandel te eten). Ten tweede, er is ook helemaal niets heldhaftigs aan. Je hebt de afgelopen 10 jaar waarschijnlijk geen vaccin genomen, dat maakte je geen held. Ik vind het veel heldhaftiger om een onbekend vaccin met onbekende bijwerkingen te nemen. Daar is moed voor nodig. En dat blijkt wel want veel mensen zitten nu met de gebakken peren. Die gevolgen zijn veel ingrijpender dan een paar maanden niet uit eten of ruzie met je collega’s.
Stel dat je een onbekend persoon ontmoet waarmee je meteen onbeschermde seks hebt.
Dit is heel erg onverstandig. Als daarna blijkt dat die persoon (ook) anderen ernstig ziek heeft gemaakt, dan is dit ook achteraf niet heldhaftiger.
What matters is that people made the choice to spend an average of a few healthy hours on an (ineffective) activity and suffered an average of a number of hours from it in order to prevent a few hours of shorter average unhealthy lifespan (older and weaker people) and healthy people from becoming less ill. All this according to the vaccine manufacturers and the 'experts' deployed by them and the government. Shortly afterwards it turned out that the health benefits of the shots calculated at the time were far too optimistic, even according to the MSM experts. After a few months, the protection factor was much lower than expected, the prevention or reduction of long Covid could not be demonstrated (RIVM May 2021) and vaccinated people infect at least as many others as unvaccinated people. Think of 'Dancing with Jansen'.
The discussion about corona, the shots and other measures and the recording of the (scare-mongering) news about it cost the Dutch a few months of time, especially in the first two years. I do not count that, although it was usually wasted time. I also did not count the many deaths due to delayed care because I only dealt with the effect of vaccination or not.
Goed stuk Anton! Ik zou ook niets liever willen dat de “schuldigen” gestraft worden. Maar de praktijk is helaas anders, de soldaten sneuvelen, de politici die ze sturen blijven buiten schot. De uithalers en kleine dealertjes worden regelmatig gepakt, de drugsbaronnen regelen hun zaakjes vanuit Dubai (of in een enkel geval vanuit de EBI in Vucht). Rosenmöller mag 96G€ kwijtspelen, wat er over is van onze pensioengelden wordt straks ingevaren in de Europese oorlogskas. De lijst is lang.
En of het nu zin heeft om het medische voetvolk verantwoordelijk te stellen? Ze zijn al zo bang een foute diagnose te stellen of iets off label voor te schrijven. Straks volgen ze alleen nog maar protocollen als dat nu al niet het geval is.
Ondanks mijn al bijna vijf jaar durende boosheid heb ik mijn doelen bijgesteld. Ik zou al blij zijn als (een paar van) de verspreiders van desinformatie aan de wetenschappelijke schandpaal genageld zouden worden. Maar misschien heeft Anton gelijk en geeft dit de mogelijkheid om een gaatje te prikken in de tamelijk gesloten gelederen van de medici. (Jij niet, Willem!)
Tamelijk voorspelbaar hoe dit gaat aflopen.
By putting the ball down at a low level, this will take years and there will undoubtedly be rulings from judges that point out the citizen's own responsibility. Don't forget that the post-war resistance is already busy sweeping the streets clean. You brought all this on yourself. You felt you had to do something for someone else. Who forced you to do this? Legal expenses insurance will not want to reimburse litigation. All kinds of contradictory statements will also be made.
Je kan dit het beste vergelijken met de restitutie van geroofde joodse bezittingen naar WWII. Wil jij soms de wederopbouw van ons land dwarszitten? Pas na 50 jaar kwam er eindelijk een soort vorm van genoegdoening voor nabestaanden. Voor nabestaanden, niet voor de directe slachtoffers. Denk ook aan vuurwerkramp Enschede, brand in Moerdijk, giftige verf Defensie. Om moedeloos van te worden. Maar een gewaarschuwd man telt voor twee.
Tjee ja, wat erg inderdaad. Ik hoop zo op een rechter die de moed heeft om de bal naar boven te schoppen…
Je gebruikt kromme vergelijkingen. De rampen die jij noemt gebeurden buiten het blikveld van de gedupeerden. In het geval van de vaccinaties hebben mensen zelf om wat voor reden dan ook de beslissing genomen om zich te laten vaccineren. Er waren wel uitzonderingen zoals mensen in een verzorgingstehuis etc, of mensen die een dringende operatie moetsen ondergaan en min of meer zijn geswongen door de ziekenhuizen.
Goed stuk Anton. Ik was een paar dagen ziek (niets met virussen, maar een knullige bacteriële infectie). Was door de koorts totaal niet geïnteresseerd in het nieuws en alle gekte om ons heen. Geeft wel rust, en ik was plan plan om me niet meer op te winden. Maar dit is allemaal zo ongelooflijk onrechtvaardig, om maar niet gewoon het woord ‘slecht’ (evil klinkt beter) te gebruiken dat dit voornemen om dag 1 alweer het raam uitgaat. Ik moet dan toch weer even reageren.
Het doet me vooral pijn omdat binnen een week alweer 2 mensen die me redelijk nastaan met hartklachten in het ziekenhuis terecht zijn gekomen. Het is dan ongepast om over de prikken te beginnen, dat begrijp ik, dan lijkt het alsof je ten koste van die mensen je gelijk wilt halen, en uiteraard is er niets bewezen want het wordt niet eens overwogen als oorzaak. Het kan natuurlijk een andere oorzaak hebben, maar als bepaalde incidenten te vaak voorkomen zijn het geen incidenten meer, dan is er een patroon. Die 400.000 is het topje van de ijsberg vrees ik.
Another great piece, Anton! There is still a lot of unresolved 'suffering', even among people who were not directly affected by needlestick damage. The incredible harshness, bluntness and 'deafness' of those in power, including the OMT, at the time of corona has given me and many others a feeling of a war situation. War? Yes, war, in which all our freedoms were taken away, there was an urge and coercion to have poorly tested gene therapy products injected, and early treatment methods that worked excellently were boycotted and banned. Unheard of, something like that, in a so-called 'free' country like the Netherlands. Unheard of? Wasn't the mentality during the 40-45 occupation also the same? That feeling that one is being lived, is not allowed to say anything, and the official narrative has to continue to chatter... And still: not being 'allowed' to mention the harmfulness of the measures, the mouth patches, the curfew and especially the injections, is shocking. NRC calls on people to report the 'lessons' from the corona period on the AS opinion page. Saturday. Here's a call to all readers to do just that; I am afraid that my submission, which simply states things, will be rejected (for the umpteenth time). During corona, all but 1 of my policy-critical pieces based on scientific facts were rejected by Ronald Leeflang, editor-in-chief of opinions.
I recognize it, zz. Same experience with Leeflang. In the meantime, the once fairly independent, now fully assimilated piece of junk has been canceled. So I can no longer contribute to your justified call. I hope you succeed, but expectations are low
I have the same experience. It's even worse. Since I emailed some critical articles about the corona vaccination policy to NRC, articles on other topics that I subsequently emailed were never published again.
Leeflang or colleagues do not even respond when you ask an open question about it.
interesting link about the German government that already knew about lableak in 2020 and decided to keep it quiet https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/germany-knew-covid-lab-leak-early-2020-hid-evidence-from-public
It is right that the jabbers are jointly and severally responsible for the damage caused by their actions. Of course, in the end, the people who took the jab are responsible, but doctors should have at least informed and of course should have assessed the risks themselves and whether or not to vaccinate them. By the way, I have indicated this from the beginning, when a number of people, especially the wappies, pointed to the government and related agencies as responsible. By the way, I don't think the jabs need worry too much about the outcome of possible lawsuits because the causal link will be very difficult to prove.
I also think that there are indeed still people who are whining for proof that the vaccines were harmful. I mean, so much has already been published about it, the evidence has been provided for a long time, in fact, a lot had already been published about it before the first shot was taken. What do they still want to prove?
NRC vroeg op 11/03/25 om opinies t.a.v. de ‘lessen van corona’. Kritische stemmen die de waarheid op tafel leggen vallen nog steeds onder de censuurbijl van de mainstream media…
LESSEN VAN CORONA – verstuurd aan NRC, 12/03/25. Geweigerd 14/03/25
Een opgelegd narratief – dat nooit meer
What have we actually learned from 3 years of corona measures? That a one-sided story about the virus can be very misleading? That measures that are not based on sound scientific knowledge can turn out disastrously wrong? That hastily deployed measures, such as mandatory distance from other people, locking up and closing off people and mandatory masking, are completely counterproductive? That banning and ultimately banning very effective early treatment methods will lead to many unnecessary deaths? And, ultimately, that the hasty push of poorly tested injections, which were based on an experimental gene therapy, has had no effect whatsoever? What stood out during the corona period, however, was the almost instantaneous censorship of dissenters, which evaporated any hope for a quick solution to the pandemic. After all, finding the best solution together is the quickest way out of a crisis, and suppressing critical voices is, indeed, the best way to maintain a crisis. Government and OMT, thank you!
Je hebt in ieder geval een afwijzing gekregen. Zelfs die krijg ik sinds 2020 niet meer bij het NRC.