Things are rumbling in Coronia. The data dam is about to burst and when that happens, the Dutch gossip stories will be washed into the sewer. The self-examination of Tijs van den Brink (see previous article) will play no role in this because it only strengthens the misled in their misconceptions: "You see, even after self-examination there is nothing wrong. Or do you not trust Tijs either? And the inventors of the vaccines get the Nobel Prize - but you certainly know better?" The Netherlands is hopelessly at the mercy of distrust abroad. Fortunately, something is happening there: Texas, Colombia, the Philippines, New Zealand, a fierce opinion piece in Germany (Berliner Zeitung), to name a few. And of course you don't read anything about it in the Netherlands. See for yourself.
Government 1: The Philippines starts investigation into unexplained excess mortality
In the Philippines, people are concerned about the unexplained excess mortality of 329,000 compatriots in 2021 and 2022. That is 0.28% of the population, with a pyramid that does not look top-heavy. 0.28% “unexplained excess deaths†is many times worse than a severe flu. No flu, no corona, no diagnosed other disease or epidemic. What could it have been? It will be investigated. But we don't know who will do that and how, and what data will be made available to the researchers.
Government 2: Colombia
Colombia's Minister Kuipers is angry:
“We are playing with the lives of Colombians, we cannot be an experimental factor. Everyone who has been vaccinated today, today, with the exception of those who have taken Sinovac -I have three from Sinovac- in short, all the new technology has entered here without consent, we have become an experiment.
All Colombians who were vaccinated served the largest experiment conducted in the entire history of humanity. We cannot continue to experiment with the Colombian community, let alone with the indigenous population, with the blacks and with the poorest of this country, with the peasants.â€
Government 3: Texas
The Texas Department of Justice is taking Pfizer to court for, in short, deception and conspiracy. Below is the press release and the Dutch translation.
Has Pfizer told different stories in the Netherlands than in Texas or are the laws so different that there is peace and quiet here?
Where is our own Minister of Justice? Or perhaps the Texan Minister of Justice is not interested in career prospects at the EU, does that make a difference?
And what about the Dutch press?
Translation of press release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PRESS OFFICE: (512) 463-2050
30 november 2023 Communications @ oag.texas.gov
https://texasattorneygeneral.gov
Attorney General Ken Paxton sues Pfizer for misrepresenting COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and conspiring to censor public discussion
AUSTIN – Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has charged Pfizer, Inc. sued for unlawfully misrepresenting the efficacy of the company's COVID-19 vaccine and attempting to censor public discussions about the product.
Pfizer has engaged in false, misleading and deceptive acts and practices by making unsubstantiated claims about COVID-19 vaccine in violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
The pharmaceutical company's widely reported claim that its vaccine had 95% efficacy against infections was highly misleading. That metric represented a calculation of the so-called “relative risk reduction†for vaccinated people in Pfizer's initial two-month clinical trial results. FDA publications indicate that “relative risk reduction†is a misleading statistic that “unduly influences†consumer choice. Pfizer was also informed at that time that the protection of the vaccine could not be accurately predicted for a period longer than two months. Despite this, Pfizer gave the misleading impression that the vaccine's protection was durable and withheld information from the public that undermined its claims about the duration of protection. And despite the fact that the clinical trial could not measure whether the vaccine protects against transmission, Pfizer began a campaign to intimidate the public into getting the vaccine as a necessary measure to protect their loved ones.
In fact, Pfizer's product fell short of the company's promises. COVID-19 cases increased after the vaccine was widely administered, and in some areas the rate of COVID-19 deaths among the vaccinated population was higher than among the unvaccinated population. When the failure of its product became clear, Pfizer turned to silencing truth-mongers. The lawsuit notes: "How did Pfizer respond when it became clear that its vaccine was failing and the viability of its cash cow was at risk? By intimidating those spreading the truth and conspiring to censor critics. Pfizer labeled those spreading facts about the vaccine as 'criminals'. It accused them of spreading 'misinformation'. And it forced social media platforms to silence prominent truth-mongers."
“We pursue justice for the people of Texas, many of whom were forced by tyrannical vaccine mandates to take a defective product sold through lies,†said Attorney General Paxton. "The facts are clear. Pfizer did not tell the truth about their COVID-19 vaccines. While the Biden administration weaponized the pandemic to impose illegal public health orders on the public and enrich pharmaceutical companies, I will use every tool I have to protect our citizens who were misled and harmed by Pfizer's actions."
The lawsuit follows Attorney General Paxton's investigation into Pfizer and other vaccine manufacturers announced earlier this year.
Government 4: Whistleblower United States
Kadlec's 'conscientiousness' (see article from last week), the silence surrounding Peter Daszak's statement and the summons of Tony Fauci in the ongoing federal investigation unfolds like a thriller in which you cannot help but speculate about the outcome. That's why they don't broadcast it all at once 😉
I personally fantasize that Daszak's interrogation (which has not been made public like previous interrogations) has revealed things that will cost Fauci his head. As an investigative committee you are not going to let your trump cards be looked at, which is why you are not publishing it. When the capo comes within reach, that becomes your goal and from there you move back to the lower levels of the hierarchy. And perhaps also the higher one, although I already know that at least one person there will be declared unreasonable. Rightly so, by the way. And Kadlec is already trying to soften public opinion with his 'conscientiousness'. And perhaps also gain favor with a possible judge or jury.
Whistleblowers usually come from the lower levels. If a top official takes that path, I suspect it is more likely a strategic consideration. More about that below Jan Bonte on Twitter
Government 5: Whistleblower New Zealand
The article I actually wanted to write was about another bombastic announcement from Steve Kirsch. This turned out to be New Zealand data, from a data system operator operating under a pseudonym, who implemented the pay-per-dose system in New Zealand for the government. So no official government communication, but data from those regions.
Winston Smith (pseudonym): "I was involved in setting up a project, implementing and managing a payment system for vaccines for our healthcare providers. Because we are a small country, it didn't require a team like in America or England, I'm just the system administrator. It's a pay-per-dose system. So that means that every time someone gets vaccinated, they get paid as a healthcare provider. When I looked at the data, which is part of my job, I saw some discrepancies in the dates of death, people who died within a died a week after vaccination.â€
“The chances of this happening naturally are almost impossible.â€
"As soon as the system went live, we saw that people were dying almost immediately after the injection. So that piqued my curiosity a little bit and so I started digging a little deeper. And I'm a scientist by nature. I love science. It's my favorite thing to do. I have a master's degree in science."
“I have a masters in scienceâ€â€¦?! That's a really weird, non-academic sounding statement. Who knows, it might be different in New Zealand, but still. The man indeed presents striking data, but how reliable are they? He is not called by his real name, but he is recognizable in the picture.
The lady interviewing him, Liz Gunn, who is that? On Wikipedia she is immediately dismissed as a conspiracy theorist, at least if you can't read Wikipedians. What it says there means something like: “She publicly agitated against the corona vaccine terror at an early stage.†So look further for sources from before 2020.
Liz Gunn has more than 30 years of presenting and interviewing experience. After working as a lawyer, Gunn started presenting the magazine program Sunday for TVNZ in the early 1990s, before joining Radio New Zealand and becoming a familiar face on Kiwi TV. She launched the long-running magazine program Good Morning and was a newsreader in the weekend bulletins. In 2001, she surprised the audience in Breakfast with Mike Hosking when she suddenly announced that she was quitting live on air.
She disappeared from view until she resurfaced in 2021 with a video in which she spoke out against the Covid-19 vaccination requirement, which she compared to rape. She has since become a prominent figure in New Zealand's online 'conspiracy theory community'.
At the same time she gives (in a previous video, at 1:50) as an example, clusters of 30 people who were vaccinated on the same day, in the same place, close to each other and have now all died. She does not say that those injections were given in hospices. And that may not have been the case – but it could explain such a phenomenon.
In any case, Liz Gunn is someone who is legally informed and has a lot of media experience. And she takes “Winston Smith†seriously.
Twitterer @_aussie17 made it an hour of video (in which Liz Gunn introduces herself in the first 2 minutes, take a look) a ten-minute summary on Twitter.
These appear to be the dates that Steve Kirsch has been banging the drum about for a month now, he had received the data under embargo. After he made this data publicly available (the embargo lasted until November 30), his provider closed the account where he had stored that data. I suspect because he shared the secret keys that gave everyone access. That is not the purpose of secret keys.
But he put it online elsewhere and for good reason, see box.
The 10 minute summary
Still strong data? That's what it looks like!
The data is now online again and many comments have already been made: incomplete and therefore unusable, because it is not representative. There are anomalies, duplications, in short, a lot of it sounds like an authentic raw data dump, including all the import and export errors that are normally made. So not neatly plausibilized in accordance with current insights. Twitterer @dimgrr produced a thought-provoking graph, see below.
Each bar represents a block of 25 days after the injection: 0-25, 25-50, 50-75 days, etc. In all age groups there is increased mortality within a few months after the first injection. How on earth can this be explained and is it not yet another reason for in-depth research that also includes the vaccines, such as we have often argued? (Or have they forgotten that after a few weeks there are almost no more first shots because almost all of them have received the second dose of the basic series? That can't be the case, can it!?)
And another German opinion piece that doesn't lie
From the Berliner Zeitung (paywall).
'The rule of law has completely failed during corona. There were no red lines. The judiciary should at least have asked the executive about the suitability of the measures, i.e. to continually evaluate the measures.'
- The judiciary has failed to fulfill its responsibilities. Effective legal protection was an illusion.
- Most media have not fulfilled their control function and have become spokespersons for the federal government.
- To break through the perceived groupthink and enable an open discourse, it is necessary to set up an institutionalized 'devil's advocate', including in the judiciary.
It is a lie unless, is the new truth.
This video on YouTube, which I watched carefully with some reservations.
It is a bit more extreme than I think, but I also think what would those people gain from such a video and they also run a great risk. Or not and is it made to make us even more anxious? Still, I would check it out: https://youtu.be/ZSyH26cl9AQ
Er zit een zekere verklaring in waarom het zo hardnekkig mogelijk blijft dat er een miljarden industrie is in het verhandelen van mensen en het steeds opnieuw uitbreken van oorlogen die makkelijk voorkomen hadden kunnen worden, en dat de extreem rijken alleen nog maar rijker kunnen worden.
Ook besef ik nu steeds meer dat alles wat je op school heb gehad met een reden zo onzinnig was. Ik heb zelf nooit tafels uit het hoofd geleerd of als die staatjes en lijstjes die je voorgekauwd werden. Ik ben en was altijd al autodidact en daar kon ik met enig gemak mee door het onderwijs komen.
Wat ik nu pas goed begrijp, is dat de geschiedenisboekjes half waar zijn, ik vermoede het wel altijd al en nam alles met een korrel zout, voor christus waren er al duizenden jaren hoogwaardige beschavingen, in de Bijbel staat echt dat homo’s dood moeten, de piramides zijn geen graven, aardolie is niet fossiel enz. enz. Alles valt op zijn plaats als je los laat wat je allemaal op school geleerd hebt.
Meester in de wetenschap is een belabberde letterlijke vertaling van ‘ Master of Science (MSc)’ – afgestudeerd dus in een exact vak. Hele gewone terminologie daar.
Jawel. Maar hij zegt niet “I’m a Master of Science.” Hij zegt “I’ve got a Master’s degree in science”. Dat vind ik gek klinken.
Inmiddels zit hij trouwens in de gevangenis. Het zal dus wel waar zijn allemaal.
FilmPJE van ruim twee uur… Ik ben er doorheen geskipt maar het is niet zo aan mij besteed, sorry.
Ha Anton, Ik begrijp je helemaal want zo reageerde ik bij de eerste filmpjes rond deze thema’s ook. Waar ik moeite mee heb bij de huidige bewezen complotten is wat de motivatie moet zijn van al deze duizenden hooggeplaatsten, maar vooral ook degene die met hen meeliften. Waarom doet niemand zijn mond open en “bekeerd” er amper zich iemand? Hoe hebben ze al die mensen in hun macht? Dat kan alleen als men over een bepaalde macht of informatie beschikt of beiden. En dat geeft mij te denken dus ik kijk nu alle “speculaties”. Met grote korrels zout, dat zeker. Maar tussen de regels door krijg ik steeds meer het idee dat we nu nog amper weten wat er echt speelt. We zijn volgens mij nog als kinderen in een volwassen omgeving en reageren slechts nog instinctief volgens mij. Ik kan bijv. onmogelijk accepteren dat al die Covid betrokkenen dat zomaar gewetenloos kunnen doen. Ook zij hebben kinderen, familie en vrienden enz. En laten we wel wezen. Niemand van ons argelozen hadden in 2010 ooit voor waar genomen wat ons nu de laatste 3 jaar is overkomen, en we staan nu nog aan het begin van de plannen. CBDC, digitale ID, Pandemiewet, WHO, enz. enz.
Ik heb een tijdje geleden een video gezien over “swarm intelligence”. Dat sprak mij meer aan. Een man voor een whiteboard die uitlegde hoe bepaalde krachten, die voortkomen uit situaties (‘kansen’) het voor elkaar krijgen om ‘onafhankelijke’ instituten en personen allemaal dezelfde richting op te trekken. Natuurlijk met alle belangenverstrengelingen en onderlinge verbindingen die daarbij horen. Ik kan alleen de video niet meer vinden, sorry ðŸ™
Toch gevonden: https://youtu.be/1lFzY0xX9A8?si=r2uHFyXxgukb7NMy
Loopt uit de hand nu in Nieuw Zeeland.
Hij heeft dus informatie gepubliceerd die in feite inzichtelijk zou moeten zijn voor het publiek. Maar het wordt verborgen. De autoriteiten verzekeren het volk dat de vaccins veilig zijn. De oversterfte wordt niet veroorzaakt door de vaccinaties. Puur toeval. Waardoor dan wel? Dat staat er niet bij, omdat het niet onderzocht is.
En dan wordt iemand die de moed heeft om in te grijpen gearresteerd? Het lijkt China wel. Gij zult het overheids narratief volgen. Of anders.
Als die prikkies echt zo veilig zouden zijn, waarom geven de overheden dan geen inzicht, dan zijn we er in een keer klaar mee.
Schandelijk weer.
In ons land werd Willem Engel gearresteerd omdat…hij een mening over Corona had. Werd vrijgelaten onder voorwaarde…je mag niet twitteren… Toen hij via een tweet vroeg hoe laat de trein ging, volgde direct weer aanhouding. Kafka is er niets bij!
Ja, bizar. Niet alleen werd hij gearresteerd, maar hij werd klem gereden op de snelweg. Alsof hij staatsvijand #1 is. De echte staatsvijand nummer 1 stond op dat moment zijn angst porno te verspreiden, en poseerde stoer op allerlei foto’s met opgerolde mouw.
Dat laatste, ja. Gewoon eindelijk ’s anonimiseren die handel en dan een grote random analyse* doen van sterfgevallen met alleen maar leeftijd bij overlijden en prikstatus (of zelfs alleen maar wel/niet geprikt) en evt. doodsoorzaak erbij (altijd interessant, want veel mensen waren geprikt en 20.000 mensen overleden aan Covid-19 …).
Maar de overheden zijn er zo van overtuigd dat “de prik” veilig and effectief was en is en maken zich zo weinig zorgen over oversterfte (en het wegzakkende vertrouwen in vaccinatie in het algemeen en in de overheid), dat de kans op zo’n onderzoek steeds kleiner wordt.
Aan de andere kant, het feit DAT het er niet is spreekt wel boekdelen voor de goede verstaander.
* Niks moeilijks, want het valt op dat de critici van “Winston” en Kirsch totaal losgaan op de kwaliteit van de data en de kwaliteit van de statische analyse, maar het hoeft helemaal niet moeilijk te zijn.