Het begon in 1990 met U.S. patent 5.580.859: "expressie van polypeptide d.m.v. DNA- en RNA-sequenties." Aan die (m)RNA vondst is sindsdien flink geklust, met als belangrijkste tussenresultaat: een heuse Nobelprijs. Heel knap! Maar ook een beetje sneu.
This Nobel Prize fits into the list of 'journalist of the year' prizes for Geertjan Lassche (Covid threat), Maarten Keulemans (Vaccine promotion), the Macchiavelli Prize for Gommers and Koopmans, the KNAW Prize for van Dissel, various distasteful honorary doctorates and I am probably forgetting some other public praise. That takes the shine off. There is no end to the elitist prize festival: the mRNA vaccines will and must be a gift from God.
Let them give Tijs van den Brink a quick prize because he has already threatened to sit down with Maurice de Hond and Ronald Meester.
Excessive? This has nothing to do with science at all. Whether the motivation is politically, financially or ideologically driven, it is a disgrace anyway. A black milestone in Western scientific thinking.
As can be seen in this photo (from 2022 at a previous award ceremony) the laureates themselves have not been pricked. No plastered upper arms but face masks. Although they indicate that they are not experts in the field of face masks, the choice is understandable. Not so much to maintain the fear of Covid (that's a bonus) but mainly because of some loose ends, which they have appointed themselves. Uncertainties, which she herself haven't been able to cover yet:
"Potentiële veiligheidsproblemen die waarschijnlijk in toekomstige preklinische en klinische studies zullen worden geëvalueerd, zijn onder andere lokale en systemische ontsteking, de biodistributie en persistentie van tot expressie gebracht immunogeen, stimulatie van antilichamen die auto-reactief zijn en potentiële toxische effecten van niet-natieve nucleotiden en componenten van het toedieningssysteem."
mRNA Nobel Laureate Drew Weissman in Nature, 2018.
Biodistribution and persistence: where exactly does it end up in the body and how long does it stay there? They don't know. Auto-reactive: attacking one's own cells. Also questionable about 'potential toxicity': unknown side effects.
"Een mogelijk punt van zorg zou kunnen zijn dat sommige op mRNA gebaseerde vaccinplatforms krachtige type I interferonresponsen induceren, die niet alleen in verband worden gebracht met ontsteking maar mogelijk ook met auto-immuniteit."
mRNA Nobel Laureate Drew Weissman in Nature, 2018.
Permanent damage to the immune system is quite conceivable.
"De identificatie van personen bij wie een verhoogd risico op ontstekingsreacties bestaat, moet dus worden uitgevoerd. Daarom kan de identificatie van personen met een verhoogd risico op autoimmuunreacties vóór de mRNA-vaccinatie het mogelijk maken om voorzorgsmaatregelen te nemen."
mRNA Nobel Laureate Drew Weissman in Nature, 2018.
These mRNA injections are not suitable for everyone. Individual selection is necessary based on susceptibility to autoimmune reactions. (Never noticed anything about such a selection. Is there even a test for that?)
"Een ander potentieel veiligheidsprobleem zou kunnen voortvloeien uit de aanwezigheid van extracellulair RNA tijdens mRNA-vaccinatie. Extracellulair naakt RNA blijkt de permeabiliteit van dicht opeengepakte endotheelcellen te verhogen en kan zo bijdragen aan oedeem."
mRNA Nobel Laureate Drew Weissman in Nature, 2018.
Twitteraars met 'Dokter' in hun Twitter-handle schermen met "Extracellulair kan er niets gebeuren". Deze Nobelprijswinnaar echter noemt vochtophoping door extracellulair RNA. En dat is niet het enige: ook bloedstollingsproblemen en bloedklontering zijn redenen voor strikte monitoring - die nooit heeft plaatsgevonden. Zelfs evaluatie wordt ontlopen. De Tweede Kamer komt ermee weg als een rechter die een zaak tegen zichzelf niet ontvankelijk verklaart.
"Een ander onderzoek toonde aan dat extracellulair RNA bloedstolling en pathologische trombosevorming bewerkstelligt. De veiligheid moet daarom voortdurend worden geëvalueerd wanneer verschillende mRNA-modaliteiten en toedieningsmethodes voor het eerst bij mensen worden gebruikt en worden getest bij grotere patiëntenpopulaties."
mRNA Nobel Laureate Drew Weissman in Nature, 2018.
'...when they are first used in humans' - then, in 2018, so not yet used in humans and doubts about the administration method. You really can't solve these issues in two years. So, these two think, it would be better to wear face masks.
Parallel to the prize festival is also a patent war. Manufacturers roll down the street to fight over who is entitled to benefit from the billions in profits of the other. It cannot be a coincidence that different pharmaceutical companies came up with the exact same idea with the same delivery method at exactly the same time. So who picked the other person's idea?
Amusing detail is that Pfizer is now arguing in the patent battle with Moderna that Moderna cannot claim the invention. Pfizer has submitted evidence that the first RNA patent on which it has been built was granted to an academic research team as early as 1990.
Read more about it on the substack by Robert Malone, member of that very first group of mRNA pioneers. As he himself says, he is not 'the' inventor. But what a hero.
Again, the nail on the head, Anton!
It is trivial and almost criminal that the serious and dangerous side effects of mRNA injections have been treated so casually. And the chamber (the cartel; barring people like Omtzigt)? He turns his back on the many victims.
By the way, nothing to the detriment of Kariko and Weissman, who acted in good faith. It is – as unfortunately so often – the indiscretions who rule us (you can fill in the names yourself) who have made a mess of it.
With the following caveat: the photo shown with the laureates dates from 13 April 2022 at the presentation of ? awards/trophies in Tokyo, Japan. (Eugene Hoshiko – pool, ASSOCIATED PRESS)
https://archive.ph/KcK6E
https://www.voanews.com/a/nobel-in-medicine-goes-to-2-scientists-whose-work-enabled-creation-of-covid-19-vaccines/7292998.html
Aha, thanks for this addition. Even then, they preferred face masks or the protection of a vaccination was not sufficient.
Presumably an obligation at the time 🙂 (at a formal event such as the award ceremony by the Japan Prize Foundation).
That will indeed be the case. And that despite the vaccinations, they were not the only ones with doubts about their effectiveness.
Awards by the Japan Prize Foundation: https://www.japanprize.jp/en/index.html
The photo in question was found here:
https://www.japanprize.jp/data/photos2022/20220413_presentation_ceremony/images/182A0877.jpg
All those side effects are enough to run away from those 'vaccines'. But they are still based on a decent production process.
Unfortunately, it now appears that DNA residues remain during mass production (Mc Kernan/Boecholtz). Buckhaultz). So it's even worse than we thought.
Nothing new for this site. I know it's familiar, but I thought it would be a meaningful addition.
COVID-19 vaccine-associated mortality in the
Southern Hemisphere
Denis G. Rancourt,1, * PhD ; Marine Baudin,2 PhD ; Joseph Hickey,1 PhD ;
Jérémie Mercier,2 Ph
Via McCullough's substack.
Study in 17 countries across four continents and covering more than 10 percent of the world's population. No demonstrable evidence of beneficial effect of vaccines On the contrary
Estimated number of deaths from vaccination is 17 million.
Document is 24 MB. Dated September 23, 2023.