The AD is sounding the corona alarm, anyway. As an example, a jockeyed sentence I came across on Google: "infections are rising sharply" (October 12). The numbers had already started to level off earlier. I know that because I wrote a good news post about it a week later (October 20). when that trend really turned out to be continuing.
That frightening factual inaccuracy in the AD has now been removed from the article. In this way, deliberate misinformation is retroactively obscured.
The current article no longer says anything about sharp increases in October. That was simply not true, the news should have been that things were going a bit better, the exponential growth had stopped. Deliberately lied? Written against my better judgment? Poorly researched? Bad information has become a pattern. That erasing afterwards shouldn't be either.
Take a look for yourself and compare with what was there before, shown in the google snippet above.
https://www.ad.nl/economie/horeca-woest-als-dit-doorgaat-dient-kabinet-de-genadeslag-toe~af680605/
And if you want to read it: my FB post of October 20. I have it here also put on the site, for the non-Facebookers.
And aerosols are taboo, Angela! Fie!
I wonder if Angela rewrote the headline of her column on her own initiative. It may also have been at the insistence of the editors, the management or after a phone call from the Government Information Service: "No, no, we had agreed that you would not mention the word aerosols, after all, they are not included in the measures. Please reformulate immediately."
Overwrought hassle there at the AD..
