Bayesian global big data study: vaccinations exacerbate the matter

Another translation. There is now so much talk about excess mortality that I am happy to make room for a good piece with my own contributions, especially if there is better research behind it than I can do myself. I then let Google do the heavy translation work and screen the machine translation for obvious misses. I have converted names of American institutes below to the NL equivalents where applicable. If you prefer to read English: go to the original article from Steve Kirsch.

I missed this study, as did the mainstream media. It is yet another independent analysis that is difficult to refute. According to this study, we have been misled by the EMA, the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, RIVM and CBS.

The next time you speak to someone who has something to do with public health - suppose you bump into Jaap van Dissel or Hugo de Jonge - ask if they can find a fault in this study by Kyle A. Beattie, entitledWorldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID -19: A BigData Analysis of 145 Countries(thepdf version can be found here).

The study shows that the COVID vaccines cause more COVID infections per million (+38% in the US) and more deaths per million related to COVID (+31% in the US). [For the Netherlands, the result was: +31% more infections. There was no significant result in terms of mortality. See the more detailed Bayesian analysis of Ronald Meester, where the correlation is demonstrated.]

In summary we read the following:

The statistically significant and overwhelmingly positive causal impact following vaccine adoption on the dependent variables of total deaths and total infections per millionshould be of great concern to policymakers.They indicate a marked increase in COVID-19-related admissions and deaths as a direct result of the deployment of a vaccine that was originally sold to the public as the "key to regaining our freedoms".The impact of vaccines on thetotal number of infections per millionand the low positive association with thetotal number of vaccinations per hundredmeans a limited impact of vaccines on lowering COVID-19-related cases.

These results wouldmotivate local policymakers to make policy decisions based on data, not based on a narrative, and based on local circumstances, not on global or national mandates. These results would also require policymakers to take other paths out of the pandemic than just mass vaccination campaigns.

Kyle A. Beattie, Global Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A BigData Analysis of 145 Countries

In short: we were lied to a lot

The vaccines make it worse, not better. This is why we can't get ourselves out of the hole. Making vaccines mandatory makes it even worse.

Now this is not the first study to come to these conclusions. These studies, all conducted independently, have all found the same thing: the more you vaccinate, the worse it gets.

1. The Lyons-Weiler paper
2. The Harvard study
3. The German study
4. The study in Denmark(which shows that Dr. James was right; you have to boost every 30 days to maintain protection.
5. Data from the German government(this comes fromThe Expose)
6. 80% of COVID deaths in the UK have been vaccinated
7. Lancet: 89% of New COVID Cases in the UK Among Fully Vaxxed

The response to this new study by health authorities is predictable

I think I have discovered the pattern and can now confidently predict how health authorities worldwide will respond to this stunning result: they will ignore it. Instead, they will mandate vaccines for everyone of any age as soon as possible. Am I right or am I right?

So much for Steve Kirsch.

EPILOGUE
Unfortunately, there are no reliable and therefore independent studies on the Netherlands. The data required for this is withheld by the government. That these data could show unfavorable effects is in line with expectations, given the countries for which we do have the data. Adherence to wrong decision-making can be regarded as mismanagement. This could be a plausible explanation for the fact that FOI requests are thwarted, court orders to release the data are ignored by the government and de Jonge wipes his ass with the unanimously adopted motion Omtzigt, which demands independent assessment of the data.