The article about Deltavax and its English variant1Data camouflage in NL and UK: Deltavax in two languages was not widely read and responses were not forthcoming. It may be a bad or unappealing article, or it may have been too early. Hence this afterburner. If you do not see the parallel with the Deltavax case, I strongly advise you to also read yesterday's article.
Last night The Telegraph published a piece about the same news item with the title:
Government 'withholds data that could link Covid vaccination to excess deaths'
UKHSA argued that releasing figures would cause 'distress or anger' to relatives if a link were discovered.The Telegraph, 15 nov. 20252Artikel in The Daily Telegraph https://archive.is/I7WXq
The Dutch sometimes confuse The Telegraph with our own De Telegraaf. That is easily put away because of course it is stupid right. The Telegraph, however, has a very different status. Grok describes the newspaper as “one of the pillars of British quality journalism.”3Grok over The Telegraph: https://x.com/i/grok/share/xKrI54YC8MLwGWtmJ85XXuZQV.
However, left-leaning Guardian readers speak of the paper in terms of “disinformation and right-wing propaganda with biased headlines”, “The Telegraph is in fact Der Stürmer” (referring to Nazi propaganda) and “The newspaper with Neo-Nazi conspiracy theories”. But we know the left-wing method with which uncomfortable questions are dismissed.
It's not a small newspaper either:
| Newspaper | Type | Daily circulation (ca. 2025) | Political color | Quality (reputation) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Guardian | Broadsheet | 100–150k | Left | High |
| The Telegraph | Broadsheet | 250–300k | Centre-right | High |
| The Times | Broadsheet | 300–350k | Centre-right | High |
| Daily Mail | Tabloid | 700–800k | Right | Middle |
| The Sun | Tabloid | 1.2–1.4M | Right | Low |
It once again raises the question of what the Dutch media are doing. No 'science journalist' has paid serious attention to the almost identical Deltavax dossier. This underlines the contemporary function of our media. They should be the watchdogs of the citizens, but they act as watchdogs of the government. Counter-narratives are avoided by these 'questioners of power'.
The explanation of the Kloks, Keulemansen and Nikkis of this world could of course be based on a kind of Tijs-van-den-Brink silliness. I gave them the benefit of the doubt for a long time. But the appearance of ignorance is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain, no matter how hard they try to appear uninformed. It is gradually becoming a truly scandalous display that borders on popular treason. Society is misled by omitting relevant facts, questions and developments. A cowardly form of disinformation, the worst kind of 'gaslighting'.
Below is the translation of the article in The Daily Telegraph.
Government 'withholds data that could link Covid vaccination to excess deaths'
UKHSA argued that releasing figures would cause 'distress or anger' to relatives if a link were discovered.
Camilla Turner – Political editor Sunday
November 15, 2025 6:35 PM GMT
Health regulator accused of “cover-up” after refusing to publish data that could link Covid vaccine with additional deaths.
The British Health Service (UKHSA) argued that releasing the data would lead to “suffering or anger” among relatives if a connection were discovered. Public health officials also argued that publishing the data the well-being and mental health of the families and friends of deceased persons would endanger.
Last year, a cross-party group expressed concern about “growing public and professional concern” about the number of additional deaths in the UK since 2020. In a letter to the UKHSA and the Department of Health, the MPs and peers wrote that potentially crucial data – which links the date of people's Covid vaccinations to the date of their death – although they had been released to pharmaceutical companies, they had not been made public. They argued that the data “on the same anonymized basis as they were shared with the pharmaceutical groups” should be made public and that there seemed to be no credible reason why this should not be done immediately.
UsForThem, a campaign group, asked UKHSA to release the data under freedom of information legislation. However, the agency refused and argued a number of different arguments including publishing the data “could lead to wrong information” that “a negative effect would have on the vaccination rate” among the population.
UKHSA also claimed that there would be a risk that individuals identified despite the request for an anonymized dataset. After a two-year battle, the Information Commissioner ruled in favor of the UKHSA and supported the refusal to make the data public.
Photo caption: Campaigners want data that could show a link between mass vaccination against Covid and the number of excess deaths in the UK to be made public.
Reform UK is calling for one public inquiry into the number of additional deaths and alleged harm from the Covid vaccine.
Richard Tice, the party's vice chairman: “We knew there was concern about the number of excess deaths, which is why we called for an investigation. Instead, the unelected quango4Quango: Whatbut Autonomous Non-Governmental Ohrganisation UKHSA involved in a scandalous cover-up about how and why people die.“
"This is completely unacceptable, and the Health Minister must overrule them. If we are not prepared to learn the lessons of why people die, what kind of society are we?"
Ben Kingsley, legal director of UsForThem, said the way the UKHSA handled the case “shows a desperation that this data should not come to light in any form”.
“It is perverse for the UKHSA to claim that this data should not be released because the public might feel sad or angry if patterns or correlations were identified.”
Ben Kingsley, Legal Director of UsForThem
“You have to wonder why the public is deemed incapable of dealing with this data. It reveals a condescending mentality that has also characterized the response to the pandemic: 'do as we say, don't ask questions, we know what's best for you'.”
Kingsley compared the government's approach to the response to the contaminated blood scandal, in which thousands of people contracted HIV and hepatitis C from contaminated blood products.
“The Commission of Inquiry into Contaminated Blood published its report while this case was still ongoing”, he said. “We learned that for years the government thought the public couldn't handle the truth, so they hid it from us.”
“Now we're seeing very similar behavior from the UKHSA – we don't know if the data would reveal any evidence of correlation, let alone causation, but we see them desperately trying to avoid having to answer that question in public.”
A spokesperson for the UKHSA reiterated: “Protecting patient confidentiality is critical. Releasing this data posed a real risk that it could be used to identify individuals, which could lead to significant distress.”
“The UKHSA provided a carefully anonymised version of the dataset, which removed the risk of identification. We welcome the tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeal.”
The last quote may give the impression that the requested data has indeed been provided. That's a lie.
What did/didn't the applicants receive?
- Before the hearing: UKHSA released a “small, low-resolution dataset” but it was not useful for analysis (e.g. correlations between vaccine date and mortality). Dr. Craig: “This did not allow for meaningful analysis.”
- After the hearing: No additional information was provided. So there was no complete, anonymized dataset as requested (age in 10-year groups, vaccine and death dates with slight random adjustments of 1-3 days). The applicants argue that this is a matter of principle: UKHSA protects the public from “understanding the information”, contrary to the spirit of FOI (FOI = WOO in NL).
- In summary: The applicants' proposal was: Simple anonymization (randomly shifting days), and with 50-60 deaths per week per age group, identification of individuals is therefore excluded.
The tribunal accepted UKHSA's claim that this anonymisation is inadequate, which is belied by daily practice: it is a widely recommended method.
References
- 1
- 2Artikel in The Daily Telegraph https://archive.is/I7WXq
- 3Grok over The Telegraph: https://x.com/i/grok/share/xKrI54YC8MLwGWtmJ85XXuZQV
- 4Quango: Whatbut Autonomous Non-Governmental Ohrganisation
Coincidentally, I was just responding to your previous article when I saw it. Telegraph has indeed sounded the alarm before. And yes, very different from 'our' Telegraaf, but I currently see the latter as the only mainstream newspaper that is willing to publish opposing views. The reporting on BBC propaganda is 180 degrees different from Volkskrant and NRC. There is something structurally wrong in the BBC reporting, just like with our NOS. I don't think we need to explain that here.
Columnists such as Plasterk, Wierd Duk, Leon de Winter, etc. express a counter-narrative that I do not see anywhere else in MSM. Maybe they are reading along? It would be nice if the Telegraaf would pick this up. I am now a subscriber. NRC thrown out after years of being a subscriber. Just send an email to the editor. Who knows.
I canceled VK, NRC and AD in 2021 or 2022 (I wanted multiple perspectives) and took De Telegraaf because of the columnists. Many people read along, but mainly secretly 😉 Let alone respond here. That would be fun and maybe generate some prestige. But just reading along is already a win.
Email sent to the editor. Small effort, and you never know.
Cees, net als jij, en velen met ons, maak ik mij al langer zorgen over de zeer slechte weergave van de feiten door onze zogenaamde kwaliteitsmedia NRC, VK en NOS. Beschamend! Nu weer dit: waar de bevolking ‘schreeuwt’ om duiding/uitleg/onderzoek, worden we eenvoudigweg ‘dom’ gehouden. En dat op alle fronten, of het nu gaat om covid, klimaat, milieu, stikstof of Oekraine. Wat een land en wat een censuur….. pffff. Wanneer komt de opstand? Goed dat er nog mensen zijn zoals jij, Anton, en nog wat anderen, die zich WEL uiten en de waarheid durven uitspreken. Chapeau. P.S. Mijn ingezonden stukjes naar NRC over deze zaken worden ook consequent geweigerd. Jammer, maar wat verwachten we ook van hoofdredactrice Patricia V?
Protecting patient confidentiality is no longer a tenable argument in any case because this is now a murder investigation. Would be fun: people have been murdered, but for privacy reasons we are not conducting an investigation.
I don't know how that works legally. Moreover, what applies to citizens does not apply to the government. CBS would even be allowed to edit or destroy data (evidence) without having to be publicly accountable for it. If you try to do that as a company or private individual, you are screwed.
As indicated in the first version, it was known that there were risks associated with mass vaccination.
However, I suspect that the decision to roll out the vaccines was not taken at the level of nation states or national health organizations.
This also applies to the measures prior to vaccination to prepare the population for the 'liberating' vaccines.
(Sweden is the only country in Europe that has been able to successfully respond to this. Due to an independent health organization and possibly not (yet) NATO membership?).
Because national institutions are overruled, they will not be inclined to take any blame. Of course it is culpable. (Swedish van Dissel did have a mea culpa)
The fact that they now supposedly want to protect citizens psychologically is the well-known old trick, previously used successfully when selling the measures and vaccines.
The bodies that are overruled are the NSC (National Security Council) in the US and in Europe. Organizations that have Safety in their name. Represented in the Netherlands by the NCTV, possibly on behalf of NATO.
In itself, I suspect that these organizations serve globally operating networks of powerful people who have the idea that the world population must be reduced at all costs. Vaccines have and continue to serve this purpose.
Recognizing the latter is too painful for many, I fear.
Addition
I found the following to be enlightening in this regard
https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/discussing-the-covid-dossier-with?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1lysl7
Hanlon's razor: “Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.” And that they are stupid is evident from all sorts of things.
'It once again raises the question of what the Dutch media are doing.'
With what the media always does: confirming and following the issues of the day.
Change or exhibitions never come from the media, or if they do come from the media, then years after everything had already become clear within the issues of the day. All the President's Men is not based on truth but a film adaptation of what passes for truth = once again a confirmation of the issues of the day.
How you can change the issues of the day is becoming a mystery to me. For me, the trend of the day is a kind of climate model in which a low pressure area causes the wind to come from the west. But how did that low pressure area originate? - delusions of the day repeaters don't know it either, but they are smart enough to go along with the delusions of the day, as long as... the wind comes from the west.
We used to call the trends of the day imitators: wind vane. That term still stands.
You may also wonder what the fads of the day are called by imitators of people who do not go along with the fads of the day. Answer: upwind pissers. Not really useful either...
Fortunately, not everything depends on the direction of the wind.
Those who sail with the wind go the fastest. Which way, that is the question.
Not that I know anything about sailing.
Aan de wind, moet het trouwens zijn, hoorde ik van een zeiler. In elk geval: tegen de wind in gaat altijd langzamer.
Good that you continue to write about the biggest scandal of this century, Anton. We must never give up on uncovering the truth. You get 5 stars from me!![]()
Great, it goes on. I'll add them!
Zeg maar rustig de grootste misdaad tegen de mensheid in de hele geschiedenis waarbij de internationale overheden in samenwerking met de opgekochte globalistische linkse media de belangrijkste rol hadden.
It always takes some getting used to, but that's how people are. They conceal criminal behavior, or actively participate in it, for a living and/or because of fear.
If I later reach hell and meet Keulemans and his supporters there - the chance is small - I will bring this article to their attention. Better late than never.
To survive in our world full of criminals of all kinds, misanthropy is recommended.
You don't have to wait that long 😉
We're here now, so...
Divide and multiply, I say!
“Protecting” the population from intense information does not seem necessary to me at all. The most terrible medical events are recounted at a children's birthday with the greatest ease and without shame. The group was not large but consisted of different families and friends, so it was a “reflection of the population” 😉. No fewer than 4 children died during pregnancy, two of which just before delivery (do these children count in the figures?) and several miscarriages with previously rarely occurring causes. Things are also strange during deliveries. I will spare you the details, but it mainly concerns clots and foreign tissue, which are in any case unsuitable stories for a children's birthday. It seems as if people can cope with suffering much better. Of course, these are also fallacies to withhold information, but the fact that the pricking continues is really next level.
I count from 1 year onwards, precisely because 0-year-olds and pregnancies are so complex. For example, you would have to compare the number of successful fertilizations with the number of terminated pregnancies and 0-year mortality. But when is fertilization successful? After a positive pregnancy test? Will they be registered at all (I don't think so). Or after 3 months of pregnancy…? It's all thin ice.
Yes, I understand that and certainly not your job either. You (and others too) already do so much good math! I have a retracted article (large hospital in the Netherlands) from the departments involved in the birth of children and before. That was alarmist and the corona shots were implicated as the cause. Unfortunately I can't find it anymore so apparently I didn't save it properly... Fortunately it doesn't depend on me and others are constantly rattling the doors of the cesspool.
This is where Anne Laning appears in the pension file. So he is apparently a very popular figure in that world...... https://www.binnenlandsbestuur.nl/financien/voorlopig-nog-geen-btw-over-pensioenpremie
Certainly. He is committed to sewage water measurements. From this he reads that it is still Covid that causes excess mortality. Despite the fact that it is hardly, if ever, identified as a disease.
I just responded to the previous post, which was extremely difficult! Thumbs up went well, but my response... I received a message that my response could not be shared because the website has moved or something like that. My response under the copy button, via the 3 dots to the desktop version, then back again, only then could I edit my response. Maybe that has something to do with the fact that there were few readers?
No, there were internet problems today. Cloudflare had an outage, I was able to work around it, but that caused other problems later because I restored everything incorrectly. Should be going well again now!
In 2009, millions of people in the Netherlands received the vaccine against Mexican flu. In 2010, Sweden and Finland saw a marked increase in narcolepsy in vaccinated children. In 2011, the EMA confirmed the link with the vaccine that was also used in the Netherlands (Pandremix). 20 cases of narcolepsy after vaccination were reported to the LAREB.
In 2018, the government released 5 million in compensation for the victims of this affair. In 2023, a settlement was reached with an unknown number of people (< 20), with the government not admitting that there is a causal link between the vaccines given and narcolepsy...
Just in case you still have any illusion that our government will be honest about the problems with the Corona vaccinations and will start paying compensation.
En eerlijk gezegd, ik snap het nog ook. Als je ziet dat de Pandremixslachtoffers waarschijnlijk zo'n 300.000 tot 500.000 hebben ontvangen, hebben we het voor de Coronavaccinslachtoffers over tientallen tot honderden miljarden…
Yes, I understand it all too. But it would be nice if we could prevent it in the future. I don't think that will work without guilt and punishment.