The article about Deltavax and its English variant1Data camouflage in NL and UK: Deltavax in two languages was not widely read and responses were not forthcoming. It may be a bad or unappealing article, or it may have been too early. Hence this afterburner. If you do not see the parallel with the Deltavax case, I strongly advise you to also read yesterday's article.
Last night The Telegraph published a piece about the same news item with the title:
Government 'withholds data that could link Covid vaccination to excess deaths'
UKHSA argued that releasing figures would cause 'distress or anger' to relatives if a link were discovered.The Telegraph, 15 nov. 20252Artikel in The Daily Telegraph https://archive.is/I7WXq
Nederlanders verwarren The Telegraph weleens met onze eigen De Telegraaf. Die wordt makkelijk weggezet want domrechts natuurlijk. The Telegraph heeft echter een heel andere status. Grok beschrijft de krant als "een van de pijlers van de Britse kwaliteitsjournalistiek."3Grok over The Telegraph: https://x.com/i/grok/share/xKrI54YC8MLwGWtmJ85XXuZQV.
However, left-leaning Guardian readers speak of the paper in terms of "desinformatie en rechtse propaganda met bevooroordeelde koppen", "The Telegraph is in feite Der Stürmer" (referring to Nazi propaganda) and "De krant met Neonazistische complottheorieën". But we know the left-wing method with which uncomfortable questions are dismissed.
It's not a small newspaper either:
| Newspaper | Type | Daily circulation (ca. 2025) | Political color | Quality (reputation) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Guardian | Broadsheet | 100–150k | Left | High |
| The Telegraph | Broadsheet | 250–300k | Centre-right | High |
| The Times | Broadsheet | 300–350k | Centre-right | High |
| Daily Mail | Tabloid | 700–800k | Right | Middle |
| The Sun | Tabloid | 1.2–1.4M | Right | Low |
Het roept opnieuw de vraag op waar de Nederlandse media toch mee bezig zijn. Geen 'wetenschapsjournalist' heeft serieuze aandacht besteed aan het nagenoeg identieke Deltavax-dossier. Dit onderstreept de hedendaagse functie van onze media. Ze zouden de waakhonden van de burger moeten zijn maar ze stellen zich op als waakhonden van de overheid. Contra-narratieven worden ontweken door deze 'bevragers van de macht'.
De uitleg van de Kloks, Keulemansen en Nikki's van deze wereld zouden natuurlijk op een soort Tijs-van-den-Brinkse onnozelheid kunnen berusten. Ik heb ze lang het voordeel van de twijfel gegund. Maar de schijn van onnozelheid wordt steeds lastiger op te houden, ook al doen ze nog zo hun best om ongeïnformeerd over te komen. Het is zo langzamerhand een werkelijk schandalige vertoning die grenst aan volksverraad. De samenleving wordt misleid door het achterwege laten van relevante feiten, vragen en ontwikkelingen. Een lafhartige vorm van desinformatie, de zwaarste soort van 'gaslighting'.
Below is the translation of the article in The Daily Telegraph.
Government 'withholds data that could link Covid vaccination to excess deaths'
UKHSA argued that releasing figures would cause 'distress or anger' to relatives if a link were discovered.
Camilla Turner - Politiek redacteur zondag
November 15, 2025 6:35 PM GMT
Health regulator accused of “cover-up” after refusing to publish data that could link Covid vaccine with additional deaths.
The British Health Service (UKHSA) argued that releasing the data would lead to “suffering or anger” among relatives if a connection were discovered. Public health officials also argued that publishing the data the well-being and mental health of the families and friends of deceased persons would endanger.
Last year, a cross-party group expressed concern about “growing public and professional concern” about the number of additional deaths in the UK since 2020. In a letter to the UKHSA and the Department of Health, the MPs and peers wrote that potentially crucial data – which links the date of people's Covid vaccinations to the date of their death – although they had been released to pharmaceutical companies, they had not been made public. They argued that the data “on the same anonymized basis as they were shared with the pharmaceutical groups” should be made public and that there seemed to be no credible reason why this should not be done immediately.
UsForThem, a campaign group, asked UKHSA to release the data under freedom of information legislation. However, the agency refused and argued a number of different arguments including publishing the data “could lead to wrong information” that “a negative effect would have on the vaccination rate” among the population.
UKHSA also claimed that there would be a risk that individuals identified despite the request for an anonymized dataset. After a two-year battle, the Information Commissioner ruled in favor of the UKHSA and supported the refusal to make the data public.
Photo caption: Campaigners want data that could show a link between mass vaccination against Covid and the number of excess deaths in the UK to be made public.
Reform UK is calling for one public inquiry into the number of additional deaths and alleged harm from the Covid vaccine.
Richard Tice, the party's vice chairman: “We knew there was concern about the number of excess deaths, which is why we called for an investigation. Instead, the unelected quango4Quango: Whatbut Autonomous Non-Governmental Ohrganisation UKHSA involved in a scandalous cover-up about how and why people die."
”Dit is volstrekt onaanvaardbaar, en de minister van Volksgezondheid moet hen overrulen. Als we niet bereid zijn om lessen te trekken uit de vraag waarom mensen sterven, wat voor soort samenleving zijn we dan?"
Ben Kingsley, legal director of UsForThem, said the way the UKHSA handled the case “shows a desperation that this data should not come to light in any form”.
"Het is pervers dat de UKHSA beweert dat deze gegevens niet mogen worden vrijgegeven omdat het publiek zich verdrietig of boos zou kunnen voelen als patronen of correlaties zouden worden vastgesteld."
Ben Kingsley, Legal Director of UsForThem
“You have to wonder why the public is deemed incapable of dealing with this data. It reveals a condescending mentality that has also characterized the response to the pandemic: 'do as we say, don't ask questions, we know what's best for you'.”
Kingsley compared the government's approach to the response to the contaminated blood scandal, in which thousands of people contracted HIV and hepatitis C from contaminated blood products.
"De onderzoekscommissie naar besmet bloed publiceerde haar rapport terwijl deze zaak nog liep“, he said. ”We hebben geleerd dat de regering jarenlang dacht dat het publiek de waarheid niet aankon, dus hielden ze die voor ons verborgen."
"Nu zien we zeer vergelijkbaar gedrag van de UKHSA – we weten niet of de gegevens enig bewijs van correlatie zouden onthullen, laat staan causaliteit, maar we zien dat ze wanhopig proberen te voorkomen dat ze die vraag in het openbaar moeten beantwoorden. “
A spokesperson for the UKHSA reiterated: ”Het beschermen van de vertrouwelijkheid van patiënten is van cruciaal belang. Het vrijgeven van deze gegevens bracht een reëel risico met zich mee dat ze zouden kunnen worden gebruikt om personen te identificeren, wat tot aanzienlijk leed zou kunnen leiden."
“The UKHSA provided a carefully anonymised version of the dataset, which removed the risk of identification. We welcome the tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeal.”
The last quote may give the impression that the requested data has indeed been provided. That's a lie.
What did/didn't the applicants receive?
- Vóór de hoorzitting: UKHSA gaf een "kleine, low-resolution dataset" vrij, maar die was niet bruikbaar voor analyse (bijv. correlaties tussen vaccin-datum en sterfte). Dr. Craig: "This did not allow for meaningful analysis."
- Na de hoorzitting: Er werd niets aanvullends verstrekt. Dus er kwam géén volledige, geanonimiseerde dataset zoals gevraagd (leeftijd in 10-jaren-groepen, vaccin- en sterfdatums met lichte random aanpassingen van 1-3 dagen). De aanvragers stellen dat dit een principekwestie is: UKHSA beschermt het publiek tegen "begrip van de informatie", in strijd met FOI-geest (FOI = WOO in NL).
- In summary: The applicants' proposal was: Simple anonymization (randomly shifting days), and with 50-60 deaths per week per age group, identification of individuals is therefore excluded.
Het tribunaal accepteerde UKHSA's claim dat deze anonimisering ontoereikend is, wat wordt gelogenstraft door de dagelijkse praktijk: het is een breed geadviseerde methode.
Footnotes
- 1
- 2Artikel in The Daily Telegraph https://archive.is/I7WXq
- 3Grok over The Telegraph: https://x.com/i/grok/share/xKrI54YC8MLwGWtmJ85XXuZQV
- 4Quango: Whatbut Autonomous Non-Governmental Ohrganisation
Coincidentally, I was just responding to your previous article when I saw it. Telegraph has indeed sounded the alarm before. And yes, very different from 'our' Telegraaf, but I currently see the latter as the only mainstream newspaper that is willing to publish opposing views. The reporting on BBC propaganda is 180 degrees different from Volkskrant and NRC. There is something structurally wrong in the BBC reporting, just like with our NOS. I don't think we need to explain that here.
Columnists such as Plasterk, Wierd Duk, Leon de Winter, etc. express a counter-narrative that I do not see anywhere else in MSM. Maybe they are reading along? It would be nice if the Telegraaf would pick this up. I am now a subscriber. NRC thrown out after years of being a subscriber. Just send an email to the editor. Who knows.
I canceled VK, NRC and AD in 2021 or 2022 (I wanted multiple perspectives) and took De Telegraaf because of the columnists. Many people read along, but mainly secretly 😉 Let alone respond here. That would be fun and maybe generate some prestige. But just reading along is already a win.
Email sent to the editor. Small effort, and you never know.
Cees, like you and many of us, I have been concerned for some time about the very poor representation of the facts by our so-called quality media NRC, VK and NOS. Shameful! Now this again: where the population 'cries out' for clarification/explanation/research, we are simply kept 'stupid'. And on all fronts, whether it concerns Covid, climate, environment, nitrogen or Ukraine. What a country and what censorship... pffff. When will the uprising come? It's good that there are still people like you, Anton, and some others, who DO express themselves and dare to speak the truth. Cheers. P.S. My pieces submitted to NRC about these matters are also consistently rejected. Too bad, but what do we expect from editor-in-chief Patricia V?
(Jan, apologies for the late posting: this comment ended up in the Trash for some reason, among hundreds of Russian spam messages.
Anton.)
I so agree with you. You can add news/propaganda about the EU, energy transition, CO2 capture/storage, financial system, and, what topic isn't?
But the funny thing (or ironic or cynical or ??) is that it is precisely in the alto channels that other misinformation is being spread: Putin = Russia = a hero; Trump = totally awesome; Ukraine = Zelensky = just a corrupt gang; NATO = imperialism; digital euro is only bad, etc. While there is also a lot to argue about.
Reality is simply a lot more colored or nuanced and therefore more complex than many would like to see.
Protecting patient confidentiality is no longer a tenable argument in any case because this is now a murder investigation. Would be fun: people have been murdered, but for privacy reasons we are not conducting an investigation.
I don't know how that works legally. Moreover, what applies to citizens does not apply to the government. CBS would even be allowed to edit or destroy data (evidence) without having to be publicly accountable for it. If you try to do that as a company or private individual, you are screwed.
As indicated in the first version, it was known that there were risks associated with mass vaccination.
However, I suspect that the decision to roll out the vaccines was not taken at the level of nation states or national health organizations.
This also applies to the measures prior to vaccination to prepare the population for the 'liberating' vaccines.
(Sweden is the only country in Europe that has been able to successfully respond to this. Due to an independent health organization and possibly not (yet) NATO membership?).
Because national institutions are overruled, they will not be inclined to take any blame. Of course it is culpable. (Swedish van Dissel did have a mea culpa)
The fact that they now supposedly want to protect citizens psychologically is the well-known old trick, previously used successfully when selling the measures and vaccines.
The bodies that are overruled are the NSC (National Security Council) in the US and in Europe. Organizations that have Safety in their name. Represented in the Netherlands by the NCTV, possibly on behalf of NATO.
In itself, I suspect that these organizations serve globally operating networks of powerful people who have the idea that the world population must be reduced at all costs. Vaccines have and continue to serve this purpose.
Recognizing the latter is too painful for many, I fear.
Addition
I found the following to be enlightening in this regard
https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/discussing-the-covid-dossier-with?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1lysl7
Hanlon's razor: “Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.” And that they are stupid is evident from all sorts of things.
'It once again raises the question of what the Dutch media are doing.'
With what the media always does: confirming and following the issues of the day.
Change or exhibitions never come from the media, or if they do come from the media, then years after everything had already become clear within the issues of the day. All the President's Men is not based on truth but a film adaptation of what passes for truth = once again a confirmation of the issues of the day.
How you can change the issues of the day is becoming a mystery to me. For me, the trend of the day is a kind of climate model in which a low pressure area causes the wind to come from the west. But how did that low pressure area originate? - delusions of the day repeaters don't know it either, but they are smart enough to go along with the delusions of the day, as long as... the wind comes from the west.
We used to call the trends of the day imitators: wind vane. That term still stands.
You may also wonder what the fads of the day are called by imitators of people who do not go along with the fads of the day. Answer: upwind pissers. Not really useful either...
Fortunately, not everything depends on the direction of the wind.
Those who sail with the wind go the fastest. Which way, that is the question.
Not that I know anything about sailing.
I heard from a sailor that it must be close to the wind. In any case: going against the wind is always slower.
Good that you continue to write about the biggest scandal of this century, Anton. We must never give up on uncovering the truth. You get 5 stars from me!![]()
Great, it goes on. I'll add them!
Quite simply, the greatest crime against humanity in all of history, in which international governments, in collaboration with the acquired globalist left-wing media, played the most important role.
It always takes some getting used to, but that's how people are. They conceal criminal behavior, or actively participate in it, for a living and/or because of fear.
If I later reach hell and meet Keulemans and his supporters there - the chance is small - I will bring this article to their attention. Better late than never.
To survive in our world full of criminals of all kinds, misanthropy is recommended.
You don't have to wait that long 😉
We're here now, so...
Divide and multiply, I say!
“Protecting” the population from intense information does not seem necessary to me at all. The most terrible medical events are recounted at a children's birthday with the greatest ease and without shame. The group was not large but consisted of different families and friends, so it was a “reflection of the population” 😉. No fewer than 4 children died during pregnancy, two of which just before delivery (do these children count in the figures?) and several miscarriages with previously rarely occurring causes. Things are also strange during deliveries. I will spare you the details, but it mainly concerns clots and foreign tissue, which are in any case unsuitable stories for a children's birthday. It seems as if people can cope with suffering much better. Of course, these are also fallacies to withhold information, but the fact that the pricking continues is really next level.
I count from 1 year onwards, precisely because 0-year-olds and pregnancies are so complex. For example, you would have to compare the number of successful fertilizations with the number of terminated pregnancies and 0-year mortality. But when is fertilization successful? After a positive pregnancy test? Will they be registered at all (I don't think so). Or after 3 months of pregnancy…? It's all thin ice.
Yes, I understand that and certainly not your job either. You (and others too) already do so much good math! I have a retracted article (large hospital in the Netherlands) from the departments involved in the birth of children and before. That was alarmist and the corona shots were implicated as the cause. Unfortunately I can't find it anymore so apparently I didn't save it properly... Fortunately it doesn't depend on me and others are constantly rattling the doors of the cesspool.
This is where Anne Laning appears in the pension file. So he is apparently a very popular figure in that world...... https://www.binnenlandsbestuur.nl/financien/voorlopig-nog-geen-btw-over-pensioenpremie
Certainly. He is committed to sewage water measurements. From this he reads that it is still Covid that causes excess mortality. Despite the fact that it is hardly, if ever, identified as a disease.
I just responded to the previous post, which was extremely difficult! Thumbs up went well, but my response... I received a message that my response could not be shared because the website has moved or something like that. My response under the copy button, via the 3 dots to the desktop version, then back again, only then could I edit my response. Maybe that has something to do with the fact that there were few readers?
No, there were internet problems today. Cloudflare had an outage, I was able to work around it, but that caused other problems later because I restored everything incorrectly. Should be going well again now!
In 2009, millions of people in the Netherlands received the vaccine against Mexican flu. In 2010, Sweden and Finland saw a marked increase in narcolepsy in vaccinated children. In 2011, the EMA confirmed the link with the vaccine that was also used in the Netherlands (Pandremix). 20 cases of narcolepsy after vaccination were reported to the LAREB.
In 2018, the government released 5 million in compensation for the victims of this affair. In 2023, a settlement was reached with an unknown number of people (< 20), with the government not admitting that there is a causal link between the vaccines given and narcolepsy...
Just in case you still have any illusion that our government will be honest about the problems with the Corona vaccinations and will start paying compensation.
En eerlijk gezegd, ik snap het nog ook. Als je ziet dat de Pandremixslachtoffers waarschijnlijk zo'n 300.000 tot 500.000 hebben ontvangen, hebben we het voor de Coronavaccinslachtoffers over tientallen tot honderden miljarden…
Yes, I understand it all too. But it would be nice if we could prevent it in the future. I don't think that will work without guilt and punishment.