Naast vaccinatie wordt uitgestelde zorg genoemd als belangrijke driver van de oversterfte. Ik hoor nooit iets over de psychische component. Die wordt zwaar onderschat en ik denk dat die weleens in dezelfde orde van grootte zou kunnen liggen als uitgestelde zorg. Mensen worden ziek van angst en ellende. Ziek van "tussen de oren" kan ook echt ziek zijn en levensverkortend werken.
This is a biigeworked version of a June 2021 article
Research into side effects yields unlikely results time and time again. The power of the suggestion regularly exceeds the imagination. Recently there is research done again, nu bij behandelingen met statines, die het risico op hartaanvallen en beroertes verminderen. "De recente SAMSON-studie (Self-Assessment Method for Statin Side-effects Or Nocebo) toonde aan dat 90% van de bijwerkingen van statines ook door placebo worden opgewekt."
In andere studies had 50% van de patiënten last van langdurige bijwerkingen terwijl dit niet meer dan 6% a 10% zou moeten zijn. Bepaalde bijwerkingen hangen namelijk samen met genetische aanleg. Mensen kunnen bepaalde genvarianten hebben die er inderdaad voor kunnen zorgen dat statines ongewoon lang in de bloedbaan blijven, maar dat komt slechts bij weinig mensen voor. Het is echter een bij patiënten bekende bijwerking van statines - en precies daardoor wordt hij vaker ervaren. Een van de genoemde verklaringen is dat klachten soms overeenkomen met normale 'achtergond'klachten. Die verergeren eigenlijk niet maar worden opgemerkt vanwege de extra alertheid. Men wordt zich er bewust van en schrijft ze toe aan het medicijn.
The nocebo effect in medication generates new side effects
"Het nocebo-effect van statines is versterkt door negatieve publiciteit en het feit dat veel van deze vermeende bijwerkingen zeer subjectief zijn," zegt onderzoeker Dan Carr van de universiteit van Liverpool. "Mensen hebben de neiging om ongegronde vooroordelen te hebben over hun risico op bijwerkingen. Een op de drie mensen denkt bijvoorbeeld allergisch te zijn voor penicilline, maar slechts 10 procent van de groep die dat denkt is daadwerkelijk allergisch." (article in The Telegraph)
This phenomenon is by no means new. Much has been said and written about the nocebo effect of drugs and vaccines. I sometimes look at this hilarious video of Dr. Ben Goldacre on Nerdstock, which you have to play at half speed because he speaks at lightning speed. Twelve years old but still current.
Goldacre, for example, describes a study in which people were convinced of side effects because they had been warned in advance, when in reality the drug in question had the opposite effect. Subjects were told that a drug was being tested for cardiac arrhythmia with the possible side effect: nausea. It made people vomit, when in reality it was a well-known remedy for nausea.
Maar ook fysiek meetbare effecten doen zich voor: zo waren er minder hartproblemen bij mensen die een pacemaker hadden gekregen, nog voordat de pacemaker werd aangezet. Er waren significant minder maagzweren bij mensen die drie suikerpilletjes per dag kregen dan bij mensen die maar 1 suikerpilletje per dag kregen. Bloedwaarden veranderden puur op suggestie. Zoutwater-injecties bleken aanzienlijk beter te werken dan suikerpilletjes, gewoon omdat een injectie als een zwaardere therapie wordt ervaren: "the impact of the intervention". De geest is krachtig en lichaam en geest zijn geen gescheiden systemen.
Je kunt het niet zomaar afdoen met "het zit tussen de oren". Die mensen kunnen echt ziek en kwetsbaar worden.
Illness and the sickening nocebo effect
The basic idea that has been demonstrated is that the expectations that people are told have a huge influence on the further course of their healing process, their health and their well-being, which all also has an effect on immune system, vulnerability and life expectancy. In the statin example, just because of the announced possible side effects, five times as many people suffered from the mentioned possible side effects than if they had had a different expectation or simply did not know about it.
Let's keep this ratio in mind when looking at experiencing a disease. We compare the expectation of what a disease does to you with the expectation of drug side effects. We also compare how those effects are announced or predicted because that is how that expectation is formed.
After all, it is a similar process: announcing possible undesirable effects of an event and then actually taking place. Whether it is a treatment or an infection. There is no reason to believe that this mechanism would work differently when experiencing disease symptoms than when experiencing side effects of medication.
What did we know?
The symptoms of known diseases are better known than the side effects of most medications. A wide audience, if not the whole population, knows about it. Side effects of medications are only told to the patients, unless it concerns vaccines whose side effects have not yet been properly investigated, then no one hears anything.
Kijk naar het profiel van Covid-19, wat wisten we daarvan? In China viel iemand zomaar dood neer op straat! Zelf gezien nota bene, niks kleine lettertjes op een bijsluiter! De desastreuze en vaak dodelijke symptomen zijn keer op keer getoond, beschreven, in beeld gebracht, herhaald en onderstreept door getuigenissen van 'slachtoffers', ervaringsdeskundigen, artsen en hoogwaardigheidsbekleders. Wetenschappelijk bevestigde rampspoed. Het is zelfs reden om in isolatie te moeten. Rechters papegaaiden het in hun vonnissen...
It was continuously on television: a camera crew even went into the ICU to regularly inform us about choking patients on ventilators. And if you didn't follow the rules, it was your fault if family or loved ones died. The entire population, let alone 15 million people, were constantly threatened with death and put under heavy pressure by the authorities, namely the politicians in consultation with the united media and doctors who knew, because otherwise they could feel guilty about the premature death of grandma and grandpa. With that 15 million I don't count the little ones, maybe that's wishful thinking but they don't read a newspaper and don't watch Op1. On the other hand, they were dragged into the regime and it must have been explained to them why. Hopefully in a meek way.
Het werd ook nog als de meest verschrikkelijke dood ooit voorgespiegeld: je zult maar stikken, dat schijnt echt de allerergste dood te zijn, erger dan verdrinken! Nee, het is goed ingepeperd. Alles is uit de kast getrokken om angst aan te jagen. Experts voorspelden doemscenario's. Later meenden mensen met hun mondkapjes opa en oma te hebben beschermd en met hun vaccinatie het eigen vege lijf te hebben gered. Ze showden opgelucht en trots gemondkapt hun schouderpleisters en hun gevaccineerde peuters op social media. Zo goed werkte het!
Dokter Carr noemde hierboven "de negatieve publiciteit" als belangrijke factor. Bij wie staat die publiciteit rond statines nog in het geheugen gegrift? Vergelijk dat eens met de angstcampagne die is uitgerold: het gedreig en de dagelijkse ramptijdingen die unaniem via alle media over de argeloze burgers werd uitgestort. Breed uitgemeten nieuws over stijgende besmettingen zodra er wat meer PCR-testen waren gedaan. De ene voorspelling was steevast nog desastreuzer dan de andere. Er was altijd wel weer een record, een hoogste cijfer, er was altijd wel iets erger dan gisteren of vorige week.
In other countries, some media and agencies have already apologized for this. Dutch journalism does not have the decency for this, the government lacks the conscience.
Which is worse?
Deze aanhoudend herhaalde aankondigingen van symptomen, het tonen van nabestaanden en zieken, de bedreigingen in beeld en geluid door media met landelijke autoriteit en van oudsher betrouwbare personen die zelf doodsbang waren (en vaak hoog risico, te zien aan de bestuurs-BMI's) moeten een enorme impact hebben gehad. Een zakelijke waarschuwing voor een onbedoelde bijwerking, zoals in de onderzoeken die Goldacre noemt, valt daarbij volstrekt in het niet. Terwijl dat wel zorgde voor vijf keer zoveel mensen die er last van hadden. Hoe reageren mensen dan wel niet als ze geïnfecteerd raken door een virus waarvan ze voortdurend horen dat ze grote kans lopen om op de IC te belanden en slechts kunnen bidden dat ze aan de dood zullen weten te ontsnappen?
Is it crazy that such brainwashers suffer from everything? And keep? Because the same mechanism applies to Long-Covid and we undoubtedly see it to a lesser extent (I will come back to this in a moment) with vaccination damage. At the WHO it can be read that there is a list of more than 200 (!) different symptoms that people suffer from because of Long Covid. Which drug or disease leads to a list of TWO HUNDRED different symptoms!? How diffuse can it be, maybe people talk to each other? The list is eagerly supplemented because the vaccines are all the more necessary. They help against Long Covid. They think. It is said. Sometimes.
Dit neemt vormen aan die doen denken aan het fenomeen van 'collectieve ziektebeleving' waarvan ik al eerder enkele voorbeelden gaf. Omdat dat alweer een jaar geleden is, heb ik ze onderaan het artikel nog even herhaald. Straks echt even lezen, bijzonder en hilarisch!
Long Covid data from the ONS (UK CBS)
How sentiment determines attribution to a disease. Last year, there was a study, still in the heat of the moment, in which only 2% of all schoolchildren originally reported as Long-Covid turned out to actually have Long Covid, after the symptoms were compared with the symptoms of children who had not experienced Covid-19.
Een professor geeft aan dat die klachten dus kennelijk veel voorkomen bij schoolkinderen, ongeacht doorgemaakte Covid-19 - tenminste als we de testen mogen geloven.
I would add, however, that we may have made those other unpricked children just as sick, purely with horror stories.
About that research in schools:
- Read the full Article on Daily Mail
- In March 2022, Daniël van der Tuin on Twitter a short summary (text below:)
Officiële data van het Britse Office for National Statistics (ONS) laten zien dat "long covid" bij kinderen drastisch overgerapporteerd wordt. Het kwam voor bij 1% van de jongeren onder de 11 jaar. 1/4
The ONS says only one in 100 primary school-age pupils actually has long covid, despite half of parents reporting at least one of the symptoms. 2/4
Since March 2020, 47.5% of children with long-term symptoms have tested positive. However, 46.6% with the same symptoms did not test positive. 3/4
In reactie op de bevindingen zei professor Viner: "Deze gegevens benadrukken hoe vaak symptomen zoals vermoeidheid of hoofdpijn voorkomen bij kinderen en tieners, ongeacht of ze covid-19 hebben of niet." 4/4
The power of the mind.
I would like to remind you of the research of Peil.nl, 12 February 2021:
58% of the vaccinated estimate the risk of hospitalization due to covid at least a factor of 20 times too high and 36% even at least a factor of 60!
19% of those vaccinated thinks they have a 10% or more chance of getting to the hospital after infection. In fact, 4% think it's higher than 30%.
Ons beeld van de werkelijkheid is zeer verwrongen - Maurice de Hond
After the very successful horror and anxiety campaigns, I expect that we will not speak of five times as many reports of symptoms, as with the statins, but rather in the order of 50 times as many. I have learned from the eminent role models in medical TV science: if necessary, you suck something out of your thumb. In a few years' time, we will be editing the talk show and House of Representatives fragments in succession, where they were fantasized about with certainty.
Pierre Capel
This Emeritus Professor of Experimental Immunology has been warning for years about the effects of anxiety on our health. He wrote a book about it in 2018.
See this video from Aug 20, 2020 of
Search Pierre Capel Fear DNA.or
scroll through his rumble videos
More on this in Part III
En dan hebben we het nog gehad alleen over de patiënten met meer hartaanvallen, meer hoge bloeddruk, concentratieproblemen, vergeetachtigheid... Brain fog? Vermoeidheid? Lusteloosheid? Benauwd gevoel? Niet meer zo goed ruiken als voorheen? Moe? Hoe zit het dan met de diagnosticerende artsen: hoe worden diagnoses eigenlijk beïnvloed, glijden die moet hun focus ook niet in de richting van die allesvernietigende ziekte die de hele zorg in zijn greep houdt?
In the meantime, it is Part 2 of this post also online. There, we extend the behavioural change of fear spiral to consequences for the medical sector: diagnoses and treatments. And so are statistics.
TRUE COLLECTIVE DISORDERS AND DELUSIONS
Clown sightings in 2016
Waarnemingen van mensen in kwaadaardige clownkostuums in de Verenigde Staten, Canada en 18 andere landen werden afgedaan als een geval van massahysterie, waarbij werd gesteld dat angst voor clowns (die vaak voorkomt bij kinderen en volwassenen) een onderliggende oorzaak kan zijn. De website Vox beweerde eveneens dat "De grote paniek van de clown van 2016 door vrijwel iedereen in stand is gehouden, behalve door echte clowns."
Recurring epidemic of mass hysteria in Nepal (2016-2018)
Een uniek fenomeen van "terugkerende massa-epidemie hysterie” werd gemeld vanuit een school in het Pyuthan-district van West-Nepal in 2018. Nadat een 9-jarig schoolmeisje huil- en schreeuwepisodes kreeg, werden al snel andere kinderen van dezelfde school door de aandoening getroffen, wat resulteerde in liefst 47 getroffen studenten (37 vrouwen, 10 mannen) op dezelfde dag. Sinds 2016 komen er elk jaar op dezelfde school vergelijkbare episodes van massale psychogene ziekte voor. In 2016 werden twaalf leerlingen getroffen en in 2017 werden in totaal 18 leerlingen van dezelfde school getroffen met verschillende symptomen op één dag. Daarom werd het gezien als een uniek geval van terugkerende massahysterie.
Emirates Flight 203 (September 2018)
106 van de 521 passagiers op een 14-uur durende vlucht van Dubai naar New York meldden symptomen zoals hoesten, niezen, koorts of braken. De piloot bracht het grondpersoneel van de luchthaven op de hoogte en zette het vliegtuig in New York aan de grond. Personeel van de Amerikaanse Centers for Disease Control and Prevention evalueerde de passagiers, van wie er 11 naar het ziekenhuis werden gestuurd. Een paar passagiers op de "vlucht uit de hel" bleken verkoudheid of griep te hebben, terwijl de andere passagiers ervan overtuigd waren ziek te zijn geworden nadat ze de mensen om hen heen hadden geobserveerd.
Ketereh, Malaysia (2019)
In augustus 2019 meldde de BBC dat schoolmeisjes op de Ketereh National Secondary School (SMK Ketereh) in Kelantan begonnen te schreeuwen, waarbij sommigen beweerden 'een gezicht van puur kwaad' te hebben gezien. Professor Simon Wessely, voormalig president van het Royal College of Psychiatrists, suggereerde dat het een vorm van 'collectief gedrag' was. Robert Bartholomew, een medisch socioloog, dacht dat dit te wijten was aan de striktere implementatie van de islamitische wet in de school. De school reageerde op de uitbraak door de bomen rond de school om te hakken, in de overtuiging dat die de thuisbasis waren van bovennatuurlijke geesten. Dat hielp.
Starehe Girls' Centre, Kenia (oktober 2019)
52 studenten werden geïsoleerd met een onbekende ziekte, die symptomen vertoonde van een hoge hoest, niezen en lichte koorts. Dit aantal liep later op tot 68. Toen het aantal zo toenam, sloot het schoolbestuur de school en instrueerde de ouders om hun dochters op te halen. Monsters verzameld van de getroffen studenten toonden slechts twee gevallen van rhinovirus (verkoudheidsvirus). Na psychologische beoordelingen van de studenten te hebben uitgevoerd, concludeerde een medisch team dat door het Keniaanse ministerie van Volksgezondheid naar de school was gestuurd, dat de 'mysterieuze' ziekte een geval van massahysterie was.
Source: Wikipedia (only the last five years, further back there are also hilarious incidents described)
On January 4, 2021, Erwin Kompanje published a wonderful article about this.
.
No contamination can be demonstrated, but still 'chronic COVID-19'?
I heard one of our intensivists say to an intensive care nurse, after they had done post-covid consultations together, that he was surprised that many patients were 'doing so well'. Patients who we had treated critically ill in intensive care in March-April where they had been mechanically ventilated and who now came to the consultation hour.
The same week I read the article 'Long haulers are redefining COVID-19' by Ed Yong in The Atlantic. He writes that of 'of 1400 long haulers, two thirds of those who had antibody tests got negative results, even though their symptoms were consistent with COVID-19' and 'Of the long haulers, most are women. Their average age is 44. Most were formerly fit and healthy. They look very different from the typical portrait of a COVID-19 patient – an elderly person with preexisting health problems'. The patients felt misunderstood, doctors told them that they might have Chronic Fatigue Syndrome or Myalgic Encephalopathy, which they saw as an incorrect diagnosis. It was really COVID-19.
It is seen as a limitation of modern medicine: the ability to treat chronic pain, chronic fatigue, brain fog and other cognitive disorders, and a wide range of other symptoms and complaints that cannot be explained somatically. The complaints are real for the patients, but cannot be explained to the doctors because no physical cause can be found. Not during physical examination, not during X-ray examination, not during extensive blood tests and examination of other body fluids such as urine or cerebrospinal fluid. Frustrating for patients, their loved ones and the care providers. It is therefore not at all surprising that many patients see the cause of their suffering in a chronic physical illness. Chronic infectious diseases in particular have been frequently mentioned, such as Candida, Brucella, poliomyelitis (infantile paralysis), Epstien-Barr virus (infectious mononucleosis) and Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease). In addition, many other external factors are considered responsible: radiation, 5G, high-voltage pylons, transmission towers, chemicals, and so on. Diseases such as chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia are also often classified as unexplained diseases. The patients suffer from their complaints, sometimes for life.
Chronic Lyme disease is one of the most well-known 'unexplained' chronic (post)infectious diseases. No antibodies or active infection can be detected, long-term antibiotics usually have the same effect as a placebo in randomized studies. The group of patients is very heterogeneous. It is not surprising that patients do not find a response to conventional medicine, but alternative treatments also fail in the sense that the symptoms do not disappear (completely). Many patients have undergone expensive, time-consuming, invasive but ultimately fruitless treatments and feel misunderstood and ostracized.
Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) (then called atypical polio) was first described in 1934 when a group of nurses in Los Angeles presented with a wide range of atypical symptoms. 75% of patients were female and younger than 30 years. No direct connection has ever been found with the 'real' infantile paralysis. The term ME was described in the British Medical Journal in 1957 in the article 'An outbreak of encephalomyelitis'. Here too, female nurses at the Royal Free Hospital in London were particularly affected. It was therefore also called 'Royal Free Disease'. The neurologists/psychiatrists McEvedy and Beard gave their (psychiatric) opinion on the incident in the British Journal of Psychiatry (1973; 122; 141-150) and called it 'Mass hysteria'. The main reason for this was that no complaints could be objectively explained, the patients were neurologically completely 'normal' and that it was mainly young women who were affected. Although contradicted by many (particularly by the patients themselves), ME and CFS appear to be controversial diagnoses. This is mainly because regular doctors cannot do anything for patients and therefore cannot be assigned to a specific specialist (neurologist, infectious disease specialist). In addition, the symptoms are non-specific and broad. Many regular doctors do not accept ME and CFS as diseases. The Association Against Quackery therefore calls it a 'fashion disease' or 'non-disease'. Others called it 'The stress of living in the 20th century' or the 'Yuppie flu'. In addition, patients do not want to be labeled ME/CFS. It has a bad name.
In 1829, John Mason Good described the picture of Neurasthenia in his book 'The study of medicine'. In 1869, the American neurologist Georg Miller Beard (1839-1883) gave a lecture on 'Neurasthenia, or nervous exhaustion'. A report appeared in the Boston Medical and Surgical Journal on April 29, 1869. The symptoms he described were largely identical to ME/CFS and the unexplained syndromes associated with infectious diseases (such as polio, borreliosis, etc.). Beard explained the exhaustion of the nervous system by the increase in stressful life in busy cities with all the burden and responsibility. He wrote two books about it and called it the 'American disease'.
It seems as if the clusters of symptoms are all about the same thing: Neurasthenia, Postviral fatigue syndrome, Benign myalgic encephalomyelitis, Chronic fatigue syndrome, Bodily distress disorder, post-lyme syndrome, atypical polio, etc.
It is characteristic that there are no objective indications for any of the syndromes mentioned that can explain the symptoms. That is why they are also called SOLK (Somatically Inadequately Explained Physical Complaints). SOLK is used by regular doctors as a 'exclusion diagnosis' when no somatic, demonstrable conditions are found that explain the complaints. A mainly psychological component is then suspected and the somatic doctors refer to psychological and psychiatric care providers. In the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), SOLK is summarized as Somatic Symptom Disorder (Somatoform disorder).
Can the 'long COVID-19 haulers' that Ed Yong describes be seen as SOLK? Or is there indeed an effect of infection with SARS-CoV-2? Even if no antibodies against the disease can be demonstrated repeatedly? There is now no one who claims that he/she has 'Atypical polio', because polio is no longer a significant disease in the Western world.
There are some patients with proven and adequately treated borreliosis who subsequently have vague complaints. The Post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome (PTLDS), but there is also a large group of patients in whom repeated infection with borrelia cannot be proven and yet have a wide range of complaints and claim to have chronic Lyme. They have SOLK.
There are now patients who have proven to have had COVID-19 and are left with complaints. In analogy with borreliosis 'Post-treatment COVID-19 syndrome', but perhaps also a large group of patients in whom infection with SARS-CoV-2 cannot be demonstrated repeatedly and who now claim to have chronic COVID-19.
The Lung Fund recently reported that 95% of corona patients still had complaints six months after infection. The mean stream media took this news as truth without any research of its own. Everything to publicize the virus as 'terrible'. Spread more fear.
But hey, the lung fund had recruited members from the Facebook page 'Corona experiences and long-term complaints'. 2113 participants, of which 'only' 345 had been found to have antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Most participants said they had had COVID-19 themselves, without ever having been diagnosed with it. So in the trash with this research. Confounders galore.
Is history repeating itself again, but now with a new current label? Will we eventually label 'long-term COVID-19', as with other infectious diseases, as SOLK for most of those affected? Or will the 'symptom' disappear again with the disappearance of SARS-CoV-2? Time will tell.
I know the story of a cell tower where a lot of people in the neighborhood suddenly got serious complaints. The problem was that the mast was not yet on!
No doubt true,
But no reason not to look at the suspected side effects of phone radiation. It is indeed something that is kept out of the press (because of financial and economic interests and because we are collectively addicted and do not want to know the undesirable side effects).
As negative as the imagination of man (nowadays) works, it can also work in a positive sense. People can also wish for healthier. There are thousands of alternative "healers" who build on that principle. Through meditation etc. people gain focus and positivity. I've experienced that myself. For example, raising your pain threshold through distraction and focusing on no pain. I never let myself be sedated at the dentist and the pain is quite high when he is peeping into your nerve. But I am convinced that the pain is short and the anesthetic bothers me longer. Recently I saw some youtube videos of the Iceman. I was always cold and always cold feet. Due to a different mindset a few exercises I am no longer cold (imagination? Maybe so, but it works for me). Working with a vest in 18 degrees during the day ensured that I was completely numb after an hour. Now I have no cold anymore and cold hands and feet are quickly warm again. I think my secret is because I relax during the day in between. Stress, in my opinion, is the biggest cause of disease.
What I am trying to say is that if you approach people more positively, learn to deal with their bodies, people can become a lot healthier and happier and care becomes a lot cheaper.
But the focus is on medicines or remedies with special powers. Doctors know no better than to write prescriptions for every ailment in general. Actually, you see the same thing with alcohol, 99% of alcohol drinkers think that they can only be cozier with alcohol. Only with a cigarette you can take 5 minutes of rest. How to live and stay healthy should be a compulsory subject at school. Strange that no one is now coming up with a healthcare sector that is becoming more expensive and less affordable every year?
Yes, placebo, that's nocebo's positive brother.
Medical worldview is a belief and optimization of the placebo effect the best drug.
Bird flu also does not exist: https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Taking-Away-Your-Chickens:4.
The WHO ensures that it does exist, they are already preparing us and are already testing the bird flu on humans. https://rumble.com/v2962xp-breaking-the-who-warns-of-next-pandemic-calls-in-big-pharma-redacted-with-c.html?mref=6zof&mc=dgip3&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Redacted+News&ep=2
Long-covid without corona infection.
Research has already been done into this.
https://www.ntvg.nl/artikelen/veroorzaakt-covid-19-wel-long-covid
The latest hypothesis, by the way, is that long-covid is caused by the covid vaccines.
The corona story is becoming more and more fascinating!
COVID doesn't exist. Corona does not exist. Contamination is nonsense. Wake up.
For me, the virus theory is a useful model and COVID is a recognizable package of symptoms.
Look: if I understand you correctly, the number 1024 does not exist either because it has never been isolated. Numbers and numbers are no more than a construct, invented by man. They have never been observed. It's software. That's not to say you can't use them, especially until there is a better model, with a useful conceptual device, to communicate about reality. I am open to a coherent approach that does more justice to what we observe.
So again the question: What is a better model? I don't hear that all the time. Otherwise, write a story about it with a head and a tail, maybe we can turn it into an article.
@Lou: indeed, and as long as sites like this and the so-called "alternative" or "opposition" media continue to propagate the virus lie – for whatever reason – this will not change and large numbers of children and adults will once again fall victim to poisoning with chemical weapons called vaccines. The number of victims is increasing, because it is an excellent business model to make and keep people sick.
@Leo Bryor,
You have a point that the pandemics don't really exist physically.
Santa Claus doesn't exist either.
But we celebrate what every year this fabrication.
Something does not have to exist, or be physically real, to cause the necessary problems.
Actually if something doesn't exist, but we think it does, that's something to really worry about.
And so it does exist, even if it's just a fabrication.
Examples abound in religion, it seems to me.
Fabrications are even the basis for some fundamental rights, and I swear that on the Bible.
Dear Anton,
Are you already aware that the next pandemic has already been announced?
The bird flu.
It is already being pre-sorted by the WHO.
Strange because since 2015 there was no case that a person became ill.
But in 2022, there was 1 person who died from bird flu.
Or was it with the bird flu.
Or was it not bird flu at all, but the person happened to have contracted a bird flu protein.
Or did he work in the lab where they experiment with bird flu and has become infected by a mistake.
Pfizer and competitor mafia is already brewing a vaccine, I suspect.
But possibly that will just be made for variation X and it will mutate very quickly to Y when they let it go.
https://rumble.com/v2962xp-breaking-the-who-warns-of-next-pandemic-calls-in-big-pharma-redacted-with-c.html?mref=6zof&mc=dgip3&ep=2
And also look at this vlog, is the bird flu also a hype (coincidence due to cooperation) like Covid? Wouldn't surprise me.
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Taking-Away-Your-Chickens:4
I actually thought that the bird flu had already blown over.
In the news it is not clearly mentioned anymore, or we don't even see it anymore because we are used to it.
https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/vogelgriep
Bird flu is also a serious matter in 2022.
Or at least it is used to kill birds en masse.
I think if they did the same to people almost everyone would have to be culled because we've all had spike protein in our bodies over the past few years.
Especially because of the vaccinations.
Don't forget that that poultry would otherwise be killed a few months later. We find that perfectly acceptable and it is questionable whether this remedy would be applied 1 to 1 to humans.
The Poultry would indeed be killed, possibly not long after culling. But that is a very simple view to make this somewhat acceptable. At least that's how it comes across. These animals already live in appalling conditions and their martyrdom has been for nothing. At least not acceptable to me at all!
I don't eat chicken anyway and only free-range free-range egg with 3*. Factory farming should be banned anyway as long as torture continues.
Meat must be bred with respect for nature, animals and humans and not just for profit, if we have to continue to eat meat in excess if necessary. Then you also prevent unnecessary suffering such as disease outbreaks, use of too many antibiotics, etc.
I and many with me do not fall under "We" happy.
But your point is clear. The vast majority of people do not care about the suffering of another or other being and only look at their own advantage. That is why we now have a corrupt government, which is also a reflection of Dutch civil society.
In my opinion, a corrupt policy is only possible if enough people knowingly and willingly support it. Everyone knows by now that the government is telling one lie after another and yet the narrative remains that they are doing it for our good, or it will blow over.
@Anton: bird flu seems to be here to stay, with the recent nonsense about "jumping over" on people. There is already a prelude to be able to make a plandemia again in a (short) time.
Enne... beware of the Marburg virus though! 🙂