The fact that government institutions, media and even scientists still think they can bury their heads in the sand shows how unworldly they are. They are caught red-handed and, if all goes well, they look surprised. Or not even that: they keep going and if you're not careful, you'll get the authorities after you because that's who they are, after all.
Previously we saw Dr. Helmut Sterz, former chief toxicologist at Pfizer1See Helmut Sterz, former chief toxicologist at Pfizer Europe, opens the door to the German inquiry committee, coryfee in de Wetenschappelijke-wappie galerij van onze Oosterburen. We hebben er nu weer twee met stevige statements: Stefan Homburg en Paul Cullen. Lees hun bio's, kijk de video's en/of lees de samenvattingen.
Paul Cullen
Volledigheidshalve geef ik ook kort het niet-onderbouwde deel over het geplande aspect van de pandemie weer. Zelf zie ik voorbereiding op een reëel bestaand onheil niet als bewijs van planning. Als de autoriteiten volledig waren overvallen door iets als een pandemie, dan zou iedereen zeggen: 'Daar hadden jullie je toch op kunnen voorbereiden, simulaties van kunnen doen en zo!?' Dat zou dan gelden als bewijs van incompetentie, gebrek aan visie, verwaarlozen van bewaking van de volksgezondheid - noem het maar. Dus gedegen voorbereiding zie ik niet als bezwarend.
The other argument, the Epstein, is a different type of preparation: what opportunities may arise where big money can be made? The question itself is amoral, regardless of whether a crisis scenario actually manifests itself. Perhaps there has also been brainstorming about a comet impact, the pole shift (changing the Earth's magnetic poles), the financial collapse (after all, that's what the EU is also working on), a sudden climate change and other crises that I can't think of at the moment.
Het is zoeken naar het motief achter alle onzin. De 'politieke wensen' die hij aanvoert acht ik onaannemelijk. Dat politiek de voorgestelde controleverhoging en angstaanjagerij omarmde, ligt helemaal in de opportunistische kant van het machtsmonster. Vandaar: geen weerstand uit die hoek, die kregen ineens de wind mee.
I'm not going to rehash my more plausible scenario. In one long sentence: the media have indiscriminately passed on to us (and therefore the politicians) the scientific excuses to cover up the leaked bioweapons research and, if any fact checking was done, it was done either by those directly involved or by institutional scientists who did not know the ins and outs of it either; they in turn relied on those directly involved. Thus the viral seed has been planted for the Scamacia Covilyptus that would soon overrun the world thanks to careful maintenance and spraying by state media and politicians, in the form of fear sweat2See various articles, for example Drip virology, zoonosis and disproportionate measures fit together seamlessly.
I assume the rest of the story has been known to Virusvaria subscribers for years.
Dr. Paul Cullen, bio
Prof. dr. med. Paul Cullen, born in 1960 in Dublin, is a doctor and publicist. He studied medicine at University College Dublin and biochemistry/molecular biology at King's College London. He is a specialist in internal medicine and laboratory medicine, and a clinical chemist. He has worked in Dublin, Hannover and London. In Münster as head of one of the largest diagnostic laboratories in Germany and professor at the university. His name is linked to hundreds of scientific publications and he has contributed to several textbooks. He is active as a publicist and speaker on ethical issues in medicine and biotechnology. From 2011 to 2024 he was chairman of the organization "Ärzte für das Leben". He has been a board member since 2016 and vice-chairman of the Bundesverband Lebensrecht since 2023.
De video "Corona und die Impfung: Gesundheitliche und ethische Aspekte" presenteert een kritische analyse van de coronapandemie, waarbij Cullen betoogt dat de maatregelen en vaccinatiecampagnes gebaseerd waren op verkeerde informatie, politieke druk en financiële belangen.
Below is a comprehensive summary of the most important points from the approximately 1-hour video:
Assessment of the pandemic and measures
Cullen stelt dat er geen sprake was van een "pandemie van de ongevaccineerden" of zelfs van een ongewoon ziekteverloop in vergelijking met andere jaren. Voor bijna alle maatregelen, zoals mondkapjes en social distancing, ontbrak de wetenschappelijke onderbouwing. Intern wist het Robert Koch Institut (RKI) dat de gezondheidsrisico's vergelijkbaar waren met een normale griep, maar naar buiten toe werd gecommuniceerd dat het risico "hoog tot zeer hoog" was om de politieke wensen te vervullen.
Hij noemt de reactie van de samenleving een "multiorgaanfalen van de maatschappij", waarbij instituties zoals kerken, universiteiten en de media de maatregelen actief ondersteunden in plaats van kritisch te blijven. Slechts enkele individuen, zoals Stefan Kohn en rechter Christian Dettmar, worden als "helden" aangemerkt omdat zij zich tegen de staatslijn verzetten, wat hen trouwens duur kwam te staan3Added to The fate of Covid dissidents.
The vaccines and medical consequences
Cullen labels the mRNA vaccinations as the "grootste medische misdrijf aller tijden" because of in particular:
- Lack of effectiveness: According to the speaker, the vaccines were virtually ineffective, except for possible temporary protection against serious progression.
- Serious side effects: The side effect profile is said to be ten to a hundred times higher than with other vaccines. Based on his own calculations, the speaker estimates that 1 in 500 vaccinated people died immediately from the shot and that 1% to 3% suffered permanent damage.
- Lack of transmission protection: Hoewel de vaccinplicht werd gerechtvaardigd met het argument "bescherm jezelf en anderen", zou Pfizer nooit hebben getest op het voorkomen van transmissie. De overheid was hiervan vanaf het begin op de hoogte.
- Impact on birth rates: It points to a decrease in the birth rate of about 10%, which, according to the source, is probably due to an increase in the number of miscarriages after vaccination.
Global coordination and financial interests
A significant part of the lecture focuses on the claim that the pandemic is a planned military operation was. The speaker points out:
- Long preparation: Al 20 tot 25 jaar zou er gewerkt worden aan pandemie-scenario's via simulaties zoals "Event 201" en "Dark Winter".
- Involvement of NATO and intelligence services: In the Netherlands, Minister Fleur Agema is said to have stated that the corona policy was driven by NATO and national security coordinators.
- Financial motives: A link is made between Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein and large banks such as JP Morgan. The pandemic is described as a "strategische categorie voor kapitaalverwerving", waarbij verzekeringsproducten ("pandemic bonds") automatisch uitkeerden bij het uitroepen van een pandemie.
Medical ethics and propaganda
The fundamental principles of medical ethics, such as the Eed van Hippocrates ("breng geen schade toe") en de Nuremberg Code (vrijwillige instemming), zijn op grote schaal zijn geschonden. Echte informed consent was onmogelijk omdat risico's werden verzwegen of gebagatelliseerd.
Furthermore, it was used manipulative propaganda. Foto's van legertrucks in Bergamo of brandstapels in China werden uit hun context gehaald of vervalst om angst te zaaien. Deze beelden waren cruciaal om de bevolking te dwingen tot gehoorzaamheid.
Social lessons and vision of the future
Finally, Cullen sees parallels between the corona policy and the current one climate policy, waarbij hij beide ziet als instrumenten voor een "antihumane agenda" gericht op controle, onvrijheid en armoede. Hij concludeert dat:
- Most people prefer the majority over the truth.
- Propaganda in modern times is still extremely effective.
- Wetenschap is veranderd in een soort "pseudoreligie".
The lecture ends with the call that when institutions fail, the moral responsibility passes to the individual.
With regard to the data surrounding excess mortality, Cullen makes a sharp distinction between the period before and after the start of the vaccination campaigns.
No excess mortality in 2020
In 2020, het jaar van de "gevaarlijke" Wuhan- en Delta-varianten en zonder beschikbare vaccins, was er eigenlijk no excess mortality, zegt Cullen. Hij stelt dat de ziekenhuizen in die periode zelfs voor 14% onderbezet waren en dat op geen enkel moment meer dan 2% van de patiënten met Covid in het ziekenhuis lag. De maatregelen waren volgens hem dan ook gebaseerd op een "hoog risico" dat door het RKI intern als "matig" (vergelijkbaar met een normale griep) werd ingeschat.
Significant excess mortality from 2021
In tegenstelling tot 2020 signaleert ook hij vanaf 2021 tot en met 2024 wel een duidelijke oversterfte van 8% tot 10%. Hij benadrukt dat de levensverwachting in 2021 "als een steen" viel, niet alleen in Duitsland of de VS, maar wereldwijd. Hij koppelt deze stijging direct aan de start van de vaccinatiecampagnes.
Estimation of vaccination deaths
De spreker noemt de mRNA-vaccinaties het "grootste medische misdrijf aller tijden" en onderbouwt dit met de volgende cijfers:
- Direct mortality: Based on his own calculations and those of mathematician Roben Rockenfeller, he estimates that approximately 1 in 500 people died directly from the vaccination.
- Absolute numbers: This would amount to 100,000 deaths for Germany and at least 10 million people worldwide.
- Permanent damage: He estimates that 1% to 3% of those vaccinated are damaged in such a way that their life expectancy is shortened.
Combined effect with birth rates
Naast de oversterfte wijst de bron op een daling van het geboortecijfer met ongeveer 10%. Door de oversterfte aan het begin van het leven (geboortes) en de oversterfte aan het einde van het leven bij elkaar op te tellen, concludeert hij dat er inmiddels een vijfde van een jaargang "ontbreekt", een effect dat volgens hem normaal gesproken alleen in oorlogstijd zichtbaar is.
Criticism of the detection of risk signals
De spreker beschuldigt instanties zoals het Robert Koch Institut (RKI) ervan de data te manipuleren om risicosignalen te verbergen. Hij stelt dat het RKI bij het analyseren van sterfgevallen de "normale" basissterfte weglaat uit hun grafieken. Hierdoor wordt een signaal pas zichtbaar als het aantal mensen dat with a vaccination dies is higher than the total normale sterfte, wat volgens hem een methodologische fout is die risico's onzichtbaar maakt.
Naschrift: Op een aantal van de door Cullen genoemde punten is best wat af te dingen - maar dat gebeurt niet. Transparante cijfers zouden dat makkelijk moeten kunnen weerleggen. Toch is er geen degelijk onderzoek en geen openheid van zaken. De instituten die openheid weigeren hebben geen behoefte aan een wetenschappelijk debat. Mijn lezing is dat de gevolgen te desastreus zouden kunnen zijn. De strategie is daarom: vertragen, saboteren, uitstellen. Hopen dat het probleem weer achter de horizon verdwijnt. Pas als alle termijnen zijn verjaard en/of de hoofdrolspelers het aardse hebben verlaten, zal er wel een spijtbetuiging komen van de dan dienstdoende functionaris. Met de belofte: "Dit nooit weer!" En dan maar hopen dat niet als metafoor is bedoeld.
Stefan Homburg
Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg, bio
Stefan Homburg (Lüdenscheid, 1961) is a retired German professor of economics. He studied economics, philosophy and mathematics at the University of Cologne, receiving his PhD in 1987, and was subsequently a professor at the universities of Bonn and Magdeburg before moving to Hannover. Until his early retirement in 2021, he was director of the Institute for Public Finance at Leibniz University Hannover.4See Wikipedia over Stefan Homburg
He advised the German government in various committees, including the Advisory Council of the Ministry of Finance and the Federal Commission for Sustainable Development. At the age of 23, he was already co-author of a standard macroeconomic work that was translated into seven languages.
In April 2020, he made his first critical public statements about corona policy — in interviews and opinion pieces Die Welt — and continued to do so consistently. His YouTube channel and Twitter account grew significantly as a result. He says he finances his channel without external sponsors or donations.5Website: Children's Health Defense
In short: a serious academic with a long track record, not an outsider. Whether you agree with him or not, he knows what he's talking about. Below the video (only 13 minutes) a summary.
"Spoedcursus corona" - samenvatting of a pandemic in three graphs
Chart 1 – Severe Respiratory Infections (SARI) De zwaarste pieken in ziekenhuisopnames lagen in maart 2018 en december 2022 - niet in 2020. Bovendien daalde het aantal ernstige luchtweginfecties al weken for the 2020 lockdown, which, according to the speaker, proves that the lockdown did not prevent exponential growth.
Graph 2 – Mortality rates Ook de oversterfte in 2020 was, gecorrigeerd voor leeftijd, niet uitzonderlijk. De gemiddelde leeftijd van zogenaamde coronadoden lag volgens het RKI op 83 jaar - vergelijkbaar met andere overledenen.
Graph 3 – PCR incidence De 7-daagse incidentie, jarenlang prominent in het nieuws, had volgens Homburg niets met feitelijke ziekte te maken. Als illustratie wijst hij op de piek in voorjaar 2022 - bijna 50 keer zo hoog als tijdens de eerste lockdown - waarbij er helemaal niets gebeurde, mede omdat de Oekraïne-oorlog het nieuws domineerde. Hij stelt ook dat sneltests op een gegeven moment werden meegeteld, wat de cijfers kunstmatig opdreef.
Conclusion Normal cold waves were renamed into a pandemic via PCR statistics, resulting in lockdowns, school closures and a vaccination drive. Internal RKI minutes (via a whistleblower) allegedly confirm that the institute itself knew that the epidemiological situation did not justify the measures, but withheld that conclusion internally.
The only possible official response is to bury one's head in the sand. Great job guys! Just hold on a little longer.
Footnotes
- 1
- 2See various articles, for example Drip virology, zoonosis and disproportionate measures fit together seamlessly
- 3Added to The fate of Covid dissidents
- 4See Wikipedia over Stefan Homburg
- 5Website: Children's Health Defense
2 excellent analyses. Homburg explicitly says that it is pointless to look at the motives. It's about the actions, which, again, indicate stupidity, tunnel thinking and groupthink. Exactly as TS Kuhn described it in the 1960s. And the Rule of Rescue put politicians, media and citizens in good following mode. No conspiracy or criminal intent is needed to explain all this.
Exactly. That is the reservation I make about what Cullen says. This is much more in the direction of a 'preconceived plan'. The signals he thinks he sees are weak, they do not necessarily point in that direction.
Anyway, I have emphasized that so many times... It is indeed about the deeds and not for the reasons or motives.
I can't read their thoughts at the time, so the question of why always remains: 'Conspiracy or opportunism'? Miranda Boorsma wrote a book about it: Conspiracy of opportunism? .
I classify your qualifications 'stupidity' and 'reputation preservation' under 'opportunism' or 'incompetence'. I don't know exactly; the closer to the source the better the term 'malicious' will apply, 'against my better judgement'. In that sense, 'reputation maintenance' with enormous social damage can also be called 'evil'.
But the final actions, that's what matters, are what they are, regardless of intention, excuse, extenuating circumstances. It is, as you say yourself, the actions that count.
Fear that a number of wealthy money addicts (in the sense that they need more and more to find satisfaction. Cf. Heroin) play an important role in the course of events. Not stupidity, just smartness. By anticipating possible developments and helping to initiate them, they ultimately manage to accumulate more (ultimately unsatisfied) capital.
Follow the money can bring clarity to this. I don't think they act in the public interest but personally and could therefore be seen as malicious.
(Kuhn deals with historical developments in science in which big money did not yet play a major role as it does today)
And yet the run-up to Covid also stinks. Serious.
However, a cover-up regarding premeditation is hardly demonstrable, other than mortality figures.
I'm not going to spend my life on it, but the little information I have received makes me suspect the worst. Then people think I'm just a conspiracy theorist: Motive, Means, Opportunity? Yes. Smoke? Yes.
Even chimpanzees conspire, but the elite? No, of course not. Just read the newspapers. Honorable people. Our Netherlands has even had surprisingly little to do with Epstein. I'm just saying. All very nice people here.
The marathon is being held in Leiden today. It turns out to start at the Johnson & Johnson square. What?!?
It is clear that Leiden, with its Bioscience Park, is the Dutch Wuhan, but starting a marathon at the J&J square? It's giving me heart failure.
Hopefully not the runners. Otherwise they can always put up a 'Dying Celt' statue https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Stervende_Galli%C3%ABr#/media/Bestand:Dying_gaul.jpg
😂
Hi Anton,
For me, out of respect for the family, you can delete my comment - perhaps this series too. It hadn't happened yet. Just look.
1 participant has now died.
It has become a bit astringent and bitter. My condolences to the relatives of the 15-year-old girl who became unwell and died during the marathon. She didn't deserve that. What remains is that it is a criminal K-sponsor who goes free.
Terrible news. I do hope that the relatives will have an autopsy done.
I try not to listen to people who recommend labeak, they are peddlers to me who may not be promoting bat sandwiches, but they are promoting monkey sandwiches.
The second speaker is more interesting, ie in 2020 there was no excess mortality in Germany (compared to the Netherlands where there was excess mortality in 2020). I see 2 possible causes: 1) it was spring earlier in Germany than in the Netherlands, which meant that fewer people with flu came to the emergency room in Germany during March-May and Covid could be diagnosed. 2) the who covid protocol was less leading in Germany than in the Netherlands. (Both is also possible)
I don't know when the article with bar charts showing disease in 2020 will appear on vv. If it is possible, it could be interesting to split by region: in March-May 2020 there was also no Covid in Friesland and Groningen, while it skyrocketed in regions where I showed that the Covid protocol made all other diseases in hospitals forget (literally): South Holland, North Brabant, and North Holland (up to the Amsterdam Rhine Canal). I suspect that in Friesland Groningen people still thought about it and did not forget that there were other diseases than just Covid. It would be nice to see that hypothesis confirmed with bar graphs or something like that.
Written in haste (it's Mother's Day, today's program is full)
Good point, Willem. I am convinced, partly because of your observations, that cause 2 is the most important. The peak in deaths in the Netherlands was roughly between mid-March and mid-April in 2020. Relatively short. I was able to find that via the way-back machine on the RIVM site. Unfortunately I can't provide a picture in the comments. Perhaps you can answer whether this corresponds to the introduction of the WHO protocols.
It may indeed be a combination of factors. When the weather improves, people suffer less from respiratory diseases, so less is tested, fewer 'cases' are found and therefore less is 'treated'.
That short peak in itself is suspicious. An actually deadly virus wouldn't just disappear. After that peak, with almost no measures, life continued as usual in the summer of 2020. Until testing started again. The autumn of 2020, when testing really started, yielded so many positive tests that there seemed to be a revival of 'the pandemic' again. This appears to have caused a second wave of iatrogenic deaths. And did all those people actually die FROM Covid or did they encounter a positive test somewhere along the way?
Now I wonder what it was like in Germany (autumn wave).
But, to keep it simple: the fact that there was no spring wave in Germany is of course bizarre. The fact that this 'pandemic' often adhered neatly to national borders confirms that government measures themselves were the cause. Also look at the differences with Belgium. I have an insane photo of a country road in Limburg from May 2020 when concrete blockades were erected on the national border. This was initiated by Belgium because in their view the Netherlands was doing too little. The three-country point was hilarious. Because Germany was open as usual.
It is great that the German government has managed to market these 'vaccines' without excess mortality in 2020.
Jonathan Engler also has a number of examples on his Substack of completely illogical examples where 'the virus' neatly adheres to national borders.
I agree with his conclusion that there probably never was a new, deadly virus spreading around the world. The images from China (also shared here) with people lying dead as if on command are no longer alarming but hilarious. It is clear that Gain Of Function was being tampered with in bio labs. I also believe that something went wrong, but not that this escaped virus spread across the world. The cover-up must be real. They were shocked.
The reaction was probably worse than the supposed problem. But of course we see that more often. Don't think it was a conspiracy in the classic sense either. But they had been peddling that mRNA technology for a long time and it just didn't work. More along the lines of 'never waste a good crisis'. And the widespread (but in my view unjustified) confidence in vaccines has been abused.
Few measures? I think there was a strong lock down from mid-March until well into May with support measures (NOW-1, TOZO, etc.) that were budgeted at 100 billion by EZK!
And: quite a few people actually died from or with Corona. Just not significantly more than with a serious flu wave. The full ICUs are probably more due to the panic and the forced "don't die" oekazes + LCPS, and therefore lack of healthy/normal triage in previous flu waves. But maybe it really was a little worse. That is difficult to determine exactly in retrospect... But I think that the fact that nothing was wrong is a bit of a denial of the facts.
I'm talking about summer, Jan. So indeed after May. In the summer of 2020, the terraces were open, no face masks, vaccinations were not yet available. There were some nonsensical rules such as no more than 4 people at a table. Largely ignored. I had a visitor from Portugal who left the airport wearing a face mask in the summer of 2020. He was surprised at the lack of face masks and that we could simply visit terraces and restaurants. Mortality rates were low. But that can be traced back. Indeed, the government propaganda continued. But that is separate from reality. There must have been scared people.
But the essence of the story is that we had a mortality peak in the Netherlands in April/May and not in Germany.
How can this be explained other than the explanations that Willem gives?
Not new, not deadly either….
but the result of long development work in Chapel Hill, Hamilton and Wuhan, in a network that includes Baric, Shi, Anderson, Munster and Daszak. Sponsor: Fauci, NIAID. Declared purpose: bioweapon and defense against it, via vaccine. Also: Bancel (boss of Moderna) as leader of the WIV Wuhan biosafety lab. BKU strain with furin cut spot probably made by Baric, in collaboration with Munster and Shi. Active on human cells. Etc. etc. Too much evidence to simply dismiss. Conspiracy?? Don't think so, but a lot of 'wrong' lab work and a lab escape...
Het verkopen van een laboratorium ontsnapping en verkeerd laboratoriumwerk is inmiddels ondergeschikt geworden aan de voortdurende wetenschappelijke misleiding door de topvirologen.
Op 1 februari 2020 werden er tijdens een telefonische conferentie kunstmatige eigenschappen aan het covid 19 virus ontdekt en ook besproken.(kans inschatting 60% ,lab versus 40% natuur)
Vervolgens werden er misleidende wetenschappelijke documenten geproduceerd met als enige uitkomst een zoönotische oorsprong.(o.a. Proximal origin of Sars Cov 2 en Lancet letter Covid 19 zie wikipedia),ondertekend door zeer veel virologen. Dit betekent dat deze top virologen hun hachje vanaf toen moesten gaan beschermen door voortdurend leugens te gaan produceren. Hierbij werden ze geholpen door de media, gebrekkige registratie van de basis gegevens en zeer onbetrouwbare uitkomsten van data analyses . Ook over de maatregelen bij een meer of minder ernstige infectie en het toepassen van een nieuw vaccin werden met behulp van de media onjuistheden vermeld. Men kon niet meer terug en de katalysator van dit proces is geen complot maar geld en macht.
Beats. But: in the world of (top) virologists there is indeed disagreement regarding the origin. E.g. Kristian Andersen expressed serious doubts about the wet market origins in that particular telephone conference of February 1. 2020 (where Fauci, Collins, Daszak and some others were also present - Baric too, by the way, but without the others, except Fauci, knowing that. Perhaps Koopmans and Fouchier too, incognito...). Andersen, after a lot of pressure from Daszak, among others, eventually changed tack on that article (proximal origin...).
Baric later spoke out during an interrogation in the Senate... (that FCS, that's MY idea) additional evidence for the lab origin!
I didn't know there was any doubt about the lab leak at all!
In my opinion, the outside world is convinced of a lab origin, and those directly involved deny this with just as much conviction.
If we can call that “scientific discord” nowadays, then I see possibilities for mafia bosses: not allowing access to the accounting and continuing to deny it categorically. With some lobbying in the higher echelons - and there are always some people to convince - you can come out unscathed.
Anton, that is similar to what Marion and Maarten still propagate: they are stoic and defend the wet market theory, it seems, until their last breath. Mafia?
[in addition, the East Indians are deaf to all counterarguments]
By the way: there was discord then (2020); In the meantime, people are aware of the laboratory origin. Only: just try to get it out of their mouths.
De volgende wetenschappelijke publicaties propaganderen uitsluitend de (misleidende) zoönotische origine van Sars Cov 2:
The proximal origin of Sars Cov 2 , (minimaal 4400 citaten en 32.000 keer besproken in media)
The Statement in support of the scientists ,public health professionals and medical professionals of China combatting COVID 19
The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-relatedcoronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it Sars-CoV-2
The Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan was the early epicenter of the Covid-19 pandemie.
Later zijn is er nog veel meer peer reviewde wetenschappelijke publicaties met dezelfde boodschap geproduceerd en verspreid door de media
Wetenschappelijke publicaties over een mogelijk lab leak blijven spaarzaam en onderbelicht en zijn niet verspreid door de media.
Voor het verkrijgen van financiering voor de pandemische paraatheid tegen kwade virussen is dit een ideale situatie. Daarnaast is het opduiken van een werkelijk zoönotisch virus ,zoals het Hanta virus een mooie afleidende gebeurtenis om extra financiën te verkrijgen .
Deze factoren helpen niet om de misstanden omtrent het hele Sars Cov 2 gebeuren (inclusief ziekteverloop , preventie maatregelen en mogelijke oversterfte) te ontrafelen en in de openbaarheid te brengen.
Is it your own? a truly zoonotic virus, that Andean variant of the hantavirus?
How much do we know? For example, why is there (and reportedly was there) no outbreak yet near that rubbish dump near Ushuaia?
The endemic zone of the specific mouse known to carry this virus is 1500 km further north and Tierra del Fuego is an island…
And is it that specific Andean variant?
Zie ook Youtube “The strange timeline behind the hantavirus outbreak”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=El4RadkWWAs
Je hebt helemaal gelijk. Goede tracking en tracing is het parool .Gevolgd door deskundig ,integer ,transparant onderzoek naar de oorsprong , identiteit ,kenmerken en andere interessante zaken. Deze procedures had ik ook eind 2019 verwacht
Who and with what virus in a suitcase without valid papers has been in the area? The Dutch virologist Vincent Munster or is it Vincent M. might have been caught? Smuggling of pathogens... I also heard that the side effect of the Pfizer C-shot contains the side effect: more sensitive to viruses such as the hantavirus... If only the MSM journalists were busy with this, no, it's only propaganda, as I see in my daily scan of this news online.
Interesting! I read somewhere that Moderna has been developing a vaccine against Hanta since 2023... Also Vincent M (yes, from Hamilton, Montana) with all that material in his suitcase. He is the one who played such an important role in the whole corona story. It just shows how virologists act (they just drag virus material around the world), especially those who do gain-of-function [GOF] work... dangerous work that should be banned, see also Meryl Nass about this.
In that sense I agree with our unsurpassed MK: there will be the next pandemic, we just don't know when yet. However, that pandemic will come from a GOF lab, something MK will never say...
Zijn er bij export en/of import van al dan niet met gain of function bewerkte virussen geregistreerde koffers gebruikt door Vincent M? En hoe zit het met de registratie van koffers ,gebruikt voor de export (en binnenlands vervoer) van gehumaniseerde (transgene) muizen?
Bestaan er export certificaten van deze exporten en zijn er registratieverplichtingen?
Beschikken de virologen Vincent M en/of Danielle A(in 2019 werkzaam in het WIV) over
informatie welke toekomstig onheil kan voorkomen?
Zowel bij onderzoek naar de uitbraak van Sars Cov 2 als bij het onderzoek naar de oorzaak van het Hanta virus zijn dit legitieme (niet wappie) vragen voor betrokken virologen.
Legitimate questions, Hans. I think this is entirely up to government agencies. Then the question arises as to how things are arranged in the US. One can assume that there is some degree of control there, just like the controls on plant/animal material that is taken across the border.
However, 'smuggling' of material - be it in the form of raw samples or purified viral material - is childishly simple due to the small scale. Unfortunately. Escapes from labs (via infected staff, or even via lab coats) are not isolated: for example, what happens to material that gets 'lost' after or during a flight? Too many questions. Especially seen in the light of the gain-of-function (GOF) research that is taking place all over the world today. We have tasted the bitter fruits of 1 such escape (from WIV Wuhan, or from 1 of the collaborating institutes, or even directly from material on transport), but there are certainly more examples now. What is the future of this WITHOUT a clear worldwide enforceable ban on the dangerous GOF lab experiments?
Food for regulators and certainly also for responsible researchers such as Vincent M (not to mention Ralph B, Danielle A, etc.).
Speculation remains, but in the Netherlands hospital care has always been (too) close to the wind (possibly with fewer beds and staff).
I suspect that below the major rivers, the number of sick reports with flu-like symptoms (including among staff) was high during carnival, as every year, possibly due to strong, stormy winds with more indoor activities (only smokers went outside ;-).
Due to the overload of healthcare, people there (compared to Germany) previously resorted to WHO protocols, medically negligently, and with much damage they came to a more or less standstill against the wind.
Moreover, Germany later caught up with the Netherlands with vaccinations, as shown by the cumulative excess mortality figures from World in data.
This can partly be attributed to the country's best-known virologist: Drosten.
Who still persists in his vision. Saw somewhere that Koopmans had also joined the outer court again. Well, we cannot remain pandemic prepared enough
For thorough German criticism of Drosten, see:
https://youtu.be/338RFCA_7XQ?si=1FyxZsnsXFEPqRYN
Off topic.
See: https://www.radboudumc.nl/nieuws/2026/radboudumc-vangt-patient-op-met-mogelijke-hantavirusbesmetting
12 (twelve!!) employees in isolation (quarantine) for 6 weeks because they did not follow the procedure, for a (usually) self-limiting disease.
Regardless of whether or not you believe in viruses: 12 employees treating 1 patient, that is a fact: the Radboud hospital says it itself and they are never wrong. And that's at least 12! Over a period of 2 days. And for what: to take some blood and remove some urine (from 1 patient). For this they need 12 people in Radboud over a period of 2 days! 12 people in contact with something (or someone, depending on how you look at it), if I can believe the news (and which I never do, but that's besides the point), which is very dangerous and very contagious. An ounce less perhaps on hands at bedside, what does infection prevention say about that?
By the way: Imagine if there were 20 patients with that virus in that hospital at the same time, then that hospital would be shut down. Healthcare can never handle that! Unless we start acting normal again and say that almost all the people on that boat are still alive (3 out of 150 are dead and misery, even the most uncorrected misery, always comes in threes).
Ai (my great friend) says about the ifr of hantavirus:
'The hantavirus has an Infection Fatality Rate (IFR), which can range from less than 1% to as high as 30-50%'
In other words: anything is possible that is not a prediction.
The chance of cloud cover at 12 noon in exactly 1 year is between 0 and 100%. And after rain, I dare say with certainty, comes sunshine. Can I become a weatherman now?
The chance that Cambuur will become Premier League champion next year is not excluded. Can I now join studio sport as an expert?
But if I say: the chance of dying from Hanta virus is between 0 and 50%, then I am a scientist!