Als de overheid een jaar lang onterecht een groep mensen onder financiële druk zet en voor criminelen aanziet, dan is de wereld te klein: "Regentencultuur! Tunnelvisie en controlezucht!"
If society is unfairly split for a year, people are abused, the economy is destroyed, hundreds (thousands?) of unnecessary deaths occur, tens of billions of euros evaporate due to mismanagement, if the media facilitate the necessary propaganda and the courts defend the incumbent power, then it is simply 'news' at the NOS when this comes to light. NOS itself was of course leading in this error of gigantic proportions. That is a difficult position to be in to do justice to the scandal. Isn't it only about aerosols? Just take it a step further.
"Ja maar ventilatie werd altijd al aanbevolen door het rivm" of "Ja maar dat wisten we allang, alleen is nog onduidelijk hoe belangrijk aerosolen zijn"
Various MSM readers and van Dissel fans
Sun message in MSM and the cover of the CDC (American rivm) does not mean that our rivm is refreshed with skilled scientists and independent researchers, or that the Ministry of Health could play a substantive role. Let alone that Maarten Keulemans will be prosecuted. They have proved incompetent with devastating consequences. They should all be driven around with pitch and feathers on a farm cart because neither individuals nor systems have proven to be worth a cut when it comes down to it. If that seems a bit exaggerated to you, you don't quite realize the scope of this paradigm shift yet.
Small droplets, big consequences. Daarom geef ik zometeen een paar voorbeelden van wat dit betekent want "aerosolen als dominante transmissieroute" betekent niet slechts dat de maatregelen niet optimaal waren (of slagen in de lucht) of dat tegenstanders van de maatregelen dus toch niet altijd achterlijke wappies zijn. Die "middelvinger naar de samenleving" was meestal een uitgestoken hand, een aangeboden reddingsboei.
De fysische onkunde van de staatsgeneesheren heeft dramatische gevolgen gehad - en nog steeds. In de toekomst zal het nog lang nadreunen, met name voor onze kinderen. Niet verwonderlijk dat er ook nu nog domkoppen zijn die beweren "dat wisten we allang" en "de anderhalvemeterregel beschermt ook tegen aerosolen" alsof ze alsnog hun gelijk denken te kunnen halen. Ik zeg 'domkoppen' maar er zitten ook slimme mensen bij. Doodsbang denk ik, anders snap ik het niet.
Where the NOS gets the information from 'WHO admits that aerosols are dominant' is unclear. Similar articles state something completely different: "WHO erkent dat er 'bewijs opduikt' van de verspreiding van COVID-19 vanuit de lucht". Dat klinkt aannemelijker: zo'n aardverschuiving zullen de staatsartsen, experts en hun uitvoerders niet zomaar toestaan, daarvoor hebben ze zich te ver ingegraven. Die gaan proberen millimeter voor millimeter ongemerkt bij te schuiven. Maar laten we ervan uitgaan dat de dag wel komt dat de werkelijke besmettingsroute op waarde wordt geschat. CDC heeft de omslag immers al wel duidelijker durven te maken (zie previous blog).
"Een nieuwe wetenschappelijke waarheid zegeviert niet door zijn tegenstanders te overtuigen en hen het licht te laten zien, maar eerder omdat zijn tegenstanders uiteindelijk sterven en er een nieuwe generatie opgroeit die ermee vertrouwd is."
Nobel Prize winner Max Planck, 1949
"Ze" gaan dus toch om. Ontwikkelingen gaan sneller dan in de tijd van Max Planck. Na een jaar soebatten, smeken, zeuren en schelden begint het hun te dagen: goh, de besmettingen vinden anders plaats dan we wisten. Voorlopig houden ze nog vast aan anderhalvemeter en mondkapjes maar dat komt omdat ze het misschien wel moeten aannemen maar nog niet ten volle bevatten.
no conspiracy
So at least the CDC is not involved in a plot to overturn the world order. Once again to reassure fellow Wappies: there are indeed lobbies, there are force fields, there are power currents, there is pharmaceuticals, there is big tech. There are also just bad, unscrupulous people (deforesters for example, animal abusers, drug trafficking). That's how the world works. If you call that a conspiracy, you are putting yourself out of it. As an unworldly idealist, you are difficult to take seriously.
At the same time, the policy has given every reason to think that there were malicious intentions behind it. After all, such callous stupidity is difficult to imagine. But the stupidity of systems squares the weakest points of the managers, as the benefits affair has also shown.
Charlatans in power
Jaap van Dissel is a civil servant, unworthy of the title 'scientist'. And it wins an award for its contribution to the corona crisis. Unbelievable. The equally barren minds he has around him, such as Andreas Voss, have caused untold social, societal, economic and health damage with measures that they could and should have known missed the mark through vanity, arrogance and lack of insight. They must be nice people. I would still like to let them know how they came across in the media. Then I leave aside any possible malice and conflicts of interest: involvement in PCR tests, shares in test streets, cross-connections and even family relationships with interested vaccine producers, financial considerations of hospitals. I now understand where the term 'care mafia' comes from.
The OMT turns out to be a regent-like clique of upwindlers. The House of Representatives, well, those are politicians, they don't know very much and are generally not mathematical wonders. It is not for nothing that they are representatives of the people, advocates.
Scientists and researchers, led by scientists such as pensionado Pierre Capel and the equally independent Maurice de Hond, have been ridiculed, censored, balded or fired, and they deserve at least generous apologies. The total bankruptcy of established (read: government-claimed) science is appalling.
Would it help if Maurice became De Jonge's successor? Well, then we end up in Maurice's tunnel vision. The system should be more open to dissent. If Maurice could arrange that... but Rutte can certainly do it better, provided with the right advisors: philosophers of science, statisticians, engineers, public health experts - not to be confused with (veterinary) doctors. And preferably without politicians, who should not concern themselves with things that you can investigate or simply have to calculate.
Conclusions at the beginning of the end of the corona crisis
It's really 1984: Big Tech and MSM are driving the people
It is clear: Big Tech collaborates unscrupulously with the powers that be, no matter what. They censor, they blacklist, they spread disinformation - if that's what the government wants. 1984 is really now, in that respect this was an educational experiment.
MSM - a term I refused to use until recently - serves as a propaganda channel for the government. Journalists are generally reporting officers, not Tintins with a nose for injustice or other stinking matters with news value. They do not do source research or they get stuck because they cannot read studies. The science journalists, the fact-checkers - all incompetent idiots. What kind of society do we live in...
And now what? no idea if this can be reversed, or how.
Zigzagging Judiciary
The legal officials, the judiciary, they are of the same cloth a suit. They have effortlessly allowed themselves to be pulled in front of the cart of a minister who also privately flouted his own laws. It's of a *** content that I didn't think possible. In the court rulings are incomprehensible violations of basic fundamental and civil rights based on nothing but fearful docility. They look away. Hearings are hastened or trained, a judge is replaced at the last minute because he would have a cough. It's Kafkaesque, but then narrowed down by an obvious double agenda: pricking because nothing helps. No, you think it's crazy: if you don't want to see how something works, you can't fight it.
RIP Freedom
Free speech was only for those who agreed with the State Narrative. The others had better keep their mouths shut or at least had to walk on eggs. I myself was warned by friends that I had to watch out for the AIVD, that they probably had me in the nick of time. Protests against this repression were crushed, even though the dissident conviction was scientifically substantiated.
Freedom was lost. If there are large groups of people who feel that their freedom is being taken away, the rest should not shout for those complainers to shut up. That does happen and this underlines the complaint. For example, there is shame in the FVD campaign in which May 4/5 is linked to the current crisis of freedom. Indelicate? Yes, tasteless, I think. Abuse of the May 4/5 'brand'? Certainly. But untrue? Well no. Our acquired, almost unbridled freedom has crumbled in 2020 due to incorrect regulation and manipulative fear-mongering. Freedom of movement, freedom of opinion, freedom of publication, freedom of choice of vaccination, freedom of contact... much has been affected on arbitrary grounds with a mask of science. That is abuse of authority.
End to life-threatening false security
Finally, people can be taught how to protect themselves. Then there will soon be no more corona pandemic. That is not to say that respiratory infectious diseases no longer exist, but if a group of people still contract something like this, they have been careless, in dirty rooms. But at least then we are not gullible, relying on abused trust, sent into the battlefield with a rubber sword. That is equivalent to murder.
IC does not need to be scaled up
The IC capacity no longer needs to be increased. If everyone learns how to protect themselves against the virus, large outbreaks will hardly occur again. Public spaces are becoming virus-free. The annual flu wave will halve. Maybe decimate; those winter mortality peaks become more spread over the following months or over the entire year. The average life expectancy is going up a bit thanks to corona (which will cause healthcare costs to rise further).
And now? Pointing the finger at the guilty?
There are no excuses. People just consciously didn't want to believe it. If I just read back my own reflections, I have known for a year now what has now been supposedly 'discovered' and 'admitted'. The sources that Maurice de Hond provided at the time were already decisive. Anyone who has taken note of this and has not 'believed' it is a scientific ignoramus, a fearful couch potato or a malicious profit-grabber. Maybe I haven't studied enough or just short-sighted, but I think I'm mainly too scared - and then my mind falters. This is allowed for citizens. I expect a fearless and more thoughtful attitude from leaders, journalists and scientists. Is fear not an acceptable excuse for scientists? No, definitely not. It is a signal of dependency, entanglement, corruption, subjectivity, self-interest. Unworthy and self-disqualifying.
Science says: guilty
A few weeks ago, a study was published. (see blog article) in which 80 publications were checked on how scientific insight has progressed last year. The conclusion must be that after April 2020, the adherence to lockdowns, with the encapsulated aerosol denial, is culpable mismanagement. Reprehensible and even prosecutable given the ruthless damage that has been knowingly done. Ferdje Grapperhaus can wet his chest.
We look at the bankruptcy of the rule of law, of journalism, of politics. Those three have not been able to keep the country in a sensible, sustainable, substantiated course. You can replace the dolls, but that does not solve the system errors.
There is still a lot to do: get the biomass and the rest of the Green Mafia out of the climate tunnel, on the way to physically and biologically based and feasible solutions for a livable, free world - and not just for people.
But first, an indoor climate plan: clean breath for everyone.
N.B.: I'm curious how Reiner Fuellmich is going to cut his class action. Started as a freedom advocate, after months of research, he is completely on the conspiracy track. Will he make it so that the CDC is now suddenly changing course because the WHO/WEF plan has failed? The first rat to leave the sinking ship? Or is it a mitigating circumstance that they still repent after their error?
