One pro-vaccine article in the Volkskrant. Now I would really like to believe Maarten Keulemans, but given the nonsense he has proclaimed with regard to aerosols, I do not dare to assume that he has now conducted independent and critical research. He must have gotten his info from the manufacturers. They are of course fully cooperating.
Even now, the real critical questions are missing from his review in the Volkskrant. For example, he writes that among the 20,000 test subjects there were few side effects:
"bij het Modernavaccin krijgt 9 procent spierpijn, 5 procent gewrichtspijn, 5 procent hoofdpijn, 10 procent vermoeidheid en een paar procent koorts".
Maarten Keulemans describes in the Volkskrant what he means by few side effects
If I add up all those percentages, I come to 30%. Let say 20%, with some overlap of complaints. So that's 4,000 (four thousand!) people with flu-like discomfort.
There were also 10 vaccinated people with complaints who tested positive. It is assumed that they still got corona, despite the vaccination. After all, false positives do not exist and people without complaints have of course not been tested, who knows, who knows, hundreds of positives may have resulted. If those 10 turn out to be the 'vulnerable' in real life, we will have made no progress.
Among the control group of 20,000 UNVACCINATED people, 87 (eighty-seven!) people with cold and flu symptoms were found who tested positive for corona. No deaths, no hospitalizations.
I don't know how long the vaccine will remain effective and how many more quacks and corona cases could be added in that time frame. But if the producers claim an effectiveness of 90% based on these figures, then I will also calculate with it myself.
Five million quacks sacrifice themselves for 110,000 people with symptoms and a positive PCR test
In the case of integrated vaccination, this translates into guaranteed five million quacks, in a few months. How the elderly/vulnerable react to side effects such as fever and muscle pain - after all, the heart is also a muscle - has not even been examined. Consequences for healthcare capacity have probably not been considered.
Do you not hear yourself or ask if the cure is not worse than the disease?
Without vaccinations, calculated to the total population, we are talking about 110,000 'infections'. We are now at 117,000, so that is correct. The question arises:
What is the effect on mortality, especially in the vulnerable groups where the deaths occur? That's what it was all about, wasn't it?
Actually, we don't know anything yet. We do not know whether and if so how many fewer people die from it. We don't know anything about long-term effects. We don't know how the vulnerable react. The only thing we do know for sure is that five million people will suffer from it. Let's hope that no accidents happen among the first of those five million, mainly vulnerable.
I would say: first vaccinate some nursing homes and wait for the results, then we will look further. After all, the vaccine is very safe, so what could be against it...?
