Nu het vaccin er komt, moet worden bepaald "wat te doen met de viruswaanzinnigen, de weigeraars en de sceptici." Dit noopt de landelijke media weer tot plaatsen van typerend incoherente MSM-verhalen, artikelen en opinies.
Read first The opinion piece by Stevo Akkerman in the Trouw of November 20 and then let's reverse his line of thought. He wonders what should happen to people who have refused the vaccination and become ill with a positive test. You can also approach that from the other side.
Behalve je af af te vragen wat we straks aan moeten met coronavaccin-weigeraars kun je je ook afvragen: "Wat te doen met de slachtoffers van overhaast genomen vaccinaties?"
Anyone who deliberately wants to take the risk of a certain vaccination has that freedom. So far, the skeptics have not made a fuss about that. Nevertheless, they should also think further about measures against possible vaccine victims.
Werknemers die te onbesuisd "ja" hebben gezegd
An employer who will soon lose some of his employees to the long-term effects of the vaccine, what about that? Should he continue to pay wages? Should those workers all get benefits if they have a headache all day from a drug they knew could happen?
People who are going to take up care because the vaccination does not work well for them or because chronic conditions develop, they consciously took that risk when they started.
There is something to be said for giving priority to the more thoughtful unvaccinated, for example in healthcare.
Now the chance that long-term effects will actually occur is very small - but not excluded. With other vaccines it is almost never voorgevallen. BIJNA nooit. Dat wordt geaccepteerd, maar als het om corona gaat horen we altijd: "Ja maar het zal je kind maar net treffen, of je ouders". De argumentatie die de meeste angst veroorzaakt werkt helaas altijd het best.
Remember that a lung virus never jumps from person to person via droplets. Well OK, almost never. Yet all measures are based on that.
Ik hoor niemand over een "niet-gevaccineerd pasje" dat privileges in de zorg gaat bieden als de halve wereldbevolking straks met bijverschijnselen voor de ziekenhuis- of apothekersbalie staat.
"...wie als eersten gered mogen worden." 😂😂
Dat woordgebruik ook, "gered"! Elke injectie redt dus iemand, OK. Kudde-immuniteit is dus niet echt nodig. Maar als het met individuele bescherming kan, waarom injecteren we dan niet alleen jaarlijks de kwetsbaren? Probleem opgelost. Mortaliteit is immers alleen een probleem bij ouderen. Gewoon net als de griepprik of misschien wel in de cocktail zodra de nieuwigheid er een beetje af is.
Herd immunity is not an argument, which is also clear from the formulation 'who should be saved first'.
The vulnerable will have to go and get the flu shot. The regular flu shot is only achieved by 50% of the vulnerable people who are invited to it. Of the entire population, only 20% get the flu shot, while 6,500 people die from the flu every year. Have passes ever been invented for that?
It's all wafer-thin and ill-considered. We don't even know yet whether the short-term side effects among the non-vulnerable cause less discomfort than covid infections. Or even less mortality among the vulnerable.
The long-term effects are yet to be seen. Because the test subjects are also vaccinated and can therefore no longer be compared, these effects will only become apparent after the population has been vaccinated. We are all test subjects and we can start in the group of unvaccinated people.
It surprises me that no one really needs to know whether long-term effects play a role, especially with a completely new process. Billions of people are injected with that stuff. Hugo de Jonge seems to take responsibility for the Netherlands with a smile. To me, that indicates a lack of intelligence (or competence), just like blindly following the RIVM. Irresponsible behavior. I hope for him (and for us) that it ends well.
There is so much to say about vaccination: Among mountaineers, mountaineering is more deadly than a corona infection. They are allowed to keep climbing, right? Well, there are also daredevils, adventurers, nature lovers, bon vivants who would like to live on without this vaccination.
Similar comparisons can probably also be made with smokers, drinkers, obese, you name it. The corona psychosis should stop now.
For the record: I am still strongly in favor of vaccinations, always been an outspoken pro-vaxxer. Just ask my American friends. At the time, I just didn't know very well how things were going in America with the pharma lobby.
