Because England kept fairly complete statistics, I have in 2022 various articles dedicated to those English dates. I'm not going to repeat what the problems were that we encountered. That is no longer necessary because a real scientific peer-reviewed analysis has now been done by several Italian scientists, with the same alarmist signals.
The study shows that mortality rates (SMRs) among vaccinees in all age groups are increasing over time and have exceeded expected mortality in some groups. ONS stopped reporting early in 2023, but based on a continuing trend it is predicted that this will also happen or has already happened in the other age groups. This pattern, which starts with clear under-mortality among vaccinated people, is also observed in non-COVID mortality, indicating a bias in the ONS dataset. The risks of vaccination are therefore underestimated.
As an example, the group 40-49 years old. The expected mortality is 1. That seems to be good news: the vaccinated are therefore below the expected mortality. But that also applies to all other causes of death, not including Covid. That is impossible because the injection does not help against cancer, for example. So there is an error somewhere...
One of the graphs from 2022: the vaccinated do not compare favorably with the unvaccinated.
In the 2022 articles we concluded that the population size had been incorrectly estimated. The deceased vaccinees (which were precisely counted) thus became a smaller percentage of the total expected mortality. Fenton, Neil and Craig have written about it extensively and often. So that horizontal 1-line has to be lowered a bit, but how much? In any case, the upward trend does not bode well. It extends over two years – and then the data stopped. But the clock was ticking...
Below is the translation of the Abstract and the conclusion.
All-cause mortality according to COVID-19 vaccination status: An analysis of the public data from the UK Office for National Statistics
Mark Alexandria 1 , Giovanni Malatesta 2 , Giovanni Di Palmo 3 , Marco Cosentino 4 , Alberto Donzelli 5
Affiliations
- PMID: 40028449
- PMCID: PMC11868741
- DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.154058.2
Abstract
Background: The mass vaccination campaign against COVID-19 is widely considered the best response to the global COVID-19 pandemic crisis. However, assessment of the true effect can be performed by analyzing all-cause mortality by vaccination status. The United Kingdom may be the only country to have made public all-cause mortality data by vaccination status.
Methods: Data from April 2021 to May 2023 published by the UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) were retrospectively analyzed by age group and vaccination status; the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for all-cause and non-COVID-19 mortality was calculated relative to the corresponding unvaccinated groups.
Results: We found that in all age groups, all-cause mortality SMRs increased from a certain date, depending on the age group. In all age groups, the SMRs of all-cause mortality were initially much lower than 1. However, their increase caused them to exceed the reference value at a certain date for the age groups 18-39, 80-89 and 90+ (ed: this means: more mortality than expected). For the other age groups, the date on which this excess mortality limit would be reached can be predicted, provided the trend continues. The trends for non-COVID-19 SMRs were similar. Their initial values, which are much lower than 1, indicate significant bias in the ONS dataset, underestimating the risks to those vaccinated, as COVID-19 vaccines are unlikely to protect against deaths not caused by COVID-19.
Conclusions: The increase over time in the SMRs of all-cause deaths in vaccinated compared to unvaccinated, and their exceedance of reference values ​​for certain age groups, needs to be carefully examined to understand the underlying factors. Furthermore, since the initial values ​​of the SMRs are much lower than 1, we hypothesize the presence of significant bias in the ONS dataset, leading to an underestimation of the risks to the vaccinated, as COVID-19 vaccines are unlikely to protect against non-COVID-19 deaths. It would be desirable for other major countries to systematically collect all-cause mortality by vaccination status and in the meantime, pending in-depth research, much more caution should be exercised in promoting mass vaccination campaigns.
Keywords: COVID-19; COVID-19 vaccinations; all-cause mortality; standardized mortality ratio.
And another striking paragraph later in the piece:
Why are SMRs of non-COVID-19 related deaths increasing? Why would the risk of vaccinated people increase with any dose compared to that of unvaccinated people? Apart from the risk of immediate side effects/events, the doubt naturally arises that the vaccine could cause damage to the immune system, putting those vaccinated at greater risk of dying from non-COVID-19 related pathologies.
So much for the study. According to the AD, regret may not be such a thing, but if they want to keep it that way, I suspect they will not pay much attention to this study. And Keulemans can make a phone call to Van Dissel: “England is not the Netherlands.†Or “It remains observational research. You can only trust double-blind peer-reviewed RCTs.â€
Exactly: it messes with your immune system, causing it to function suboptimally, with all the long-term consequences that entails.
Seems to happen to several people.
Personal experience before covid vaccine/genetic engineering (AstraZeneca) and after vaccine/genetic engineering.
Every year I got the flu twice, apparently I have a slow immune system and changing seasons costs me at least 4 days of flu and a week of recovery. It's no different. No matter what I do in terms of supplements, diet, etc. I am quite ill for a day and go to bed, the rest I sit/lie in the living room.
It always started with a tickle in the throat, then the whole throat turned red-yellow and an inflamed thick throat and when that almost seemed to be over, I caught a cold or the flu. And that at least twice a year and even more if there is a lot of stress. After Gene therapy. No more inflamed throat, tickle in the throat, just rinse sambuca and it's gone. Now it starts straight away in the lungs, makes me very nauseous and develops pneumonia. Now very sick for three days with little fever and one day very sick with fever.
No more colds and no more sore throat, but the clinical picture is more severe for me. And I'm sick every quarter now. I hope that this will decrease and I will try everything with vitamins and diet. I continue to live a very healthy life and my BMI is 20 years younger.
What I mean by this is that there is much more going on than what is registered. To what extent are the mild illnesses increasing, with the latest waves of flu it seems that I am not the only one and in addition to flu, other viruses are also present, or is that just the media making everything up. Just like the measles, first 60 and now 120 cases in the Netherlands and that is news? I think everyone used to get measles. I've had it too (I've had them all, those childhood diseases) and was barely sick from it.
So the fact that more people are dying is one thing, but more suffering from diseases is, in my opinion, very underestimated? What do you think?
Just read that a measles outbreak can now cause more pro-flowers than in the past. This is because many decades ago mothers had usually suffered a natural measles infection, which gave their children the relevant immune response/cells at birth.
As a result, in most children, measles was previously nothing more than a childhood disease that was simply part of it. The later mothers who have received the shot against measles do not pass on the same information to their babies as those who had a natural infection.
This does not mean that measles is now a dangerous, fatal disease, but unfortunately the current generation no longer has the luck that the elderly had with their unvaccinated mothers.
Just don't say it too loud because they will probably think of an extra shot for that.
More suffering due to diseases - I often think about that: there is little or no insight into that, in any case much less than "number of deaths per year" and certainly not as long as it does not lead to overcrowded hospitals. You have to rely on what people in the medical world notice, e.g. “younger people are much more likely to suffer from disease Xâ€, etc.
CBS's cause of death statistics are now 6 months behind schedule, but "late" can be deduced from this in terms of trends.
What could also show a trend is the number of single-vehicle traffic accidents, and also the number of traffic accidents in general with an unclear cause or with "unwellness" as the cause. For a while I noticed that quite a few motorists left the road for unknown reasons (and even drove into a ditch) at times when people were not normally drinking, but you cannot say much about that without knowing the real cause. If someone escapes unscathed, it may not be investigated further and certainly not “totaledâ€.
I think it was also very busy at damage repair companies after the vaccination rounds.
Just check death from falls.
I totally agree with you Lou. The excess mortality figure is in a way the canary in the coal mine. The number of people with a compromised immune system will be many times higher than the number who have died from the effects of vaccination. How that manifests itself is another story.
Can that be proven? Difficult, then you would have to compare unvaccinated groups with vaccinated groups. But with comparable health profiles. But then you still have a subjective judgment about whether you are sick or not. Or register in hospitals whether people have been vaccinated or not. But that's not going to happen.
To me it is clear when you look at the mechanism behind the mRNAs. I didn't take them. The last time I seriously had the flu was December 2020, so probably Covid. Not anymore after that. Two colds in one day.
Maybe we can set up our own poll?
To my shame, I received 1 (say and write one) injection. Allowed to aspirate but still angry with myself.
Our immune system is fantastic, but it must remain trained. I have worked in education for forty years and have never had the flu, despite having been exposed to every virus that virologists have ever studied/devised. And I have always passed up the flu shot.
My “two centsâ€: it is not despite but because. A kind of natural microvaccinations.
And maybe you shouldn't tinker too much with that wonderful immune system by getting flu shots and corona boosters every year. Just regularly go to the movies, concerts and cuddle your (grand)children.
And of course there is nothing worse than staying indoors with the windows closed (lockdowns)!
Indeed, it seems like a good idea to avoid viruses as much as possible. The idea is that less virus load means less illness. However, you cannot keep this up indefinitely.
Your body gets to know viruses (and other pathogens) through exposure to them. You prefer to do the latter with a low virus load that does not make you sick. Preferably in the summer too. Then your body is prepared for the dry air in the winter season in which viruses are rampant. Exposing an “untrained†immune system to a high viral load is asking for trouble.
I also think that very good ventilation of classrooms will have an adverse effect on the outbreak of epidemics. This is because children in particular have a good immune system that makes short work of pathogens, so that the epidemic does not even have time to start. If they are not exposed to this, they will be exposed to a high virus load at once, they will become ill and perhaps even become super spreaders; dangerous for vulnerable people.
It actually says a lot that you haven't been sick in 40 years despite close contact with many children in poorly ventilated areas.
100%
People in England who have not been vaccinated had on average an 18% higher chance of having been admitted in the five previous years than people who have been vaccinated, with the chance for the vaccinated being set at 100%.
Since hospitalization is a very reasonable indicator of health, it can be said without a doubt that the health of the unvaccinated was considerably worse than that of the vaccinated.
and therefore the risk of mortality was also higher.
so any mortality among the vaccinated that is not significantly lower than the mortality among the unvaccinated is in fact a death due to the vaccination.
Interesting Jan, where did you get that from?
john dee, the english former statistician at nhs.
https://jdee.substack.com/p/primary-clinical-outcomes-for-a-single-90d
The Czechs are on it, too: https://www.mp.pl/paim/issue/article/16634/ (Letter to the Editor, Feb. 2024)
Of course, nature cannot do anything by itself. Large, very profitable billionaire companies know much better how nature works: it doesn't work and everyone will die if you don't use their (experimental) remedies. In fact, you're an antisocial misanthrope if you don't believe their sales stories. It is still the same song as the seller of the elixir of life on the medieval market square. Only at that time it did not yet have a worldwide liability exclusion and protection by all boards and media.
You will receive:
Dear Anton,
Zou je grond van "first do no harm"
Marianne Zwagerman, the Telegraaf columnist, might be of interest
in a solid article in this newspaper
see: https://1drv.ms/w/c/13426ae541632a0a/EWXWzLbmTBpKlptT6jYsZBcBg5DtJZSBQpiGCdWogFWy8A
Hello Rob,
“The main thing is not to harm†and “Where there is pus, remove itâ€.
And by 'this newspaper' I think you mean the Telegraaf.
And Marianne Z, well, I would give away one of my guitars to have a cup of coffee with her. She asks questions so often that I think “I would like to tell you more about it†but yes. My natural talent is to stay under the radar.
Maybe you can contact her through Dick?
And I will also post a translation of the Kirsch article.
.d.d. the Telegraph. When Dick gets back I'll ask him.
Thanks again for Wakefield's prophetic video, which was ruthlessly cancelled
the rules of the “Disinformation Playbookâ€:
(https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/disinformation-playbook)
I had this with the help of A.I. about just article by Steve Kirsch:
https://1drv.ms/w/c/13426ae541632a0a/EVLFBuvNjjpPp-CbZkNlshEBrVw3XpGdSUW_lZ1BG5UQ3Q