UK reports up to 50% more mortality among young vaccinated
Would you like a notification e-mail with each new article?
Reactions
Comments that are not related to the topic of discussion will be deleted. Always keep comments respectful and substantive.
6 Comments
Post a Comment
amnesty Anne Frank monkeypox bhakdi variegated fraud
ionization young people we can query life expectancy face masks Un Lawsuits
thrombosis safety pregnancy Bulgaria Deltavax factcheck
John long covid Repopulation privacy RKI deferred care
asmr censorship conspiracy theory effectiveness iq Excess mortality debate
rivm UK Baseline Burkhardt filosofie nocebo
alijst Parliamentary inquiry Badbatches IC OUR responsibility
narrative paradogma Vaccination readiness Measures norm mortality ivermectin
mdhaero manipulation society women research infection lableak
scientific integrity disinformation communication media vaccination excess mortality
statistics science science corruption aerosols CBS politics
Side effects hve Public health Wuhan Children Australia
Level Wynia praise Government information mediacracy Pfizer
NRC Fauci Post-Covid journalism opinion lockdowns
Germany foreign country Wob sociology placebo obfuscation
Gupta data ChatGPT cardiovascular vitaminD Mortality Monitor
forecast table PeterSweden Ukraine Koopmans Japan Causes
calculator Anti-VAX WOO VE Spike qaly
Under the heading 'Correction by group size' there is the sentence :
"That would mean that for 10,000 vaccinated people (5x as many) you would have to see 50 deaths, with the same mortality rates."
I assume it should read: ... 10,000 UNvaccinated people...
Hi Ed, no, it's correct as it is... Compare: "As an example: In 2,000 redheads, 10 ankle sprains are to be regretted. That would mean that, assuming equal percentages, you would have to see 50 ankle sprains in 10,000 blond people (5 times as many)."
It's about weighing in to a different group of different sizes.
Yes, of course, healthy people in their sixties, etc., are less likely to be vaccinated than weaker people, and weaker people are more likely to opt for vaccination. And people who have had corona are less likely to get vaccinated again.
But there are also tens of thousands of weak people who are not allowed to be vaccinated due to their illness and/or medication use/chemotherapy. For the sake of convenience, let's consider those effects as equivalent. You then keep side effects 'vaccines' and up to four months a year a shut down immune system with four shots a year. The latter effect may have a greater impact on mortality and more serious illness than is currently assumed.
These are quite shocking findings. But don't be surprised. Curious if there will be a follow-up in other media. Do you have a way to get this kind of message posted on other media? Must finally get through to the masses, you would say.
By that 0.06% and 3%, do you mean the difference in group size between, for example, 30 to 35-year-olds and 35 to 40-year-olds who have been vaccinated? I can imagine that people in their early 30s are less likely to get vaccinated than people in their late thirties (the same goes for people in their 40s, 50s, etc.). And that late 30s, 40s, etc., are more likely to die than the early 30s, 40s, etc., respectively.
I don't think there is much further to conclude as long as so little is known about either group.
Yes, exactly. These differences are too small to give a different picture. Vax rates hardly differ within a 10-year cohort. The risk of mortality differs more in the older groups, but still.