Fauci wants to involve six-month-old babies in the vaccination campaigns. Why does that remind me of drug dealers handing out their stuff in the schoolyard? This can't seriously be true... I thought three weeks ago. I heard little about it after that and then dismissed it as wappie news. This seemed like a deep-fake video to me:
I didn't take the video seriously. Due to the recent developments around the vaccines, I went back to look for the video. It is immediately noticeable that the websites that sound the alarm with this video are almost all 'suspicious' wappie and anti-vaxx sites, where a lot of incorrect information can also be found. After all, fear-mongering and data manipulation work on both sides of the spectrum.
Fact-checking is therefore difficult. In the 'Old Media' it is not (hardly?) publicized, the RIVM is not always a reliable source, if they would say anything about it at all and I don't find much on WHO.int.
The larger American news agencies still dare to sell it: Reuters, CBS, CNBC. It may have to do with the fact that in the US the perception of vaccinations is different from ours. A doctor who advises against vaccination risks a later claim, so generous vaccination seems a bit more accepted among the majority of Americans – probably hence the fierce anti-vaxxers. But even in the American media they are reluctant with the reporting: they speak of "elementary school students and younger".
Experiments on babies will not be warmly welcomed in the Netherlands. That will probably be South America or Africa.
Dutch media apparently did not venture into this news. The involvement of children under the age of 12, including babies, is generally not included in the reporting. That would only make the viewer/reader angry – and anger is not the goal of their information strategy.
It is also not easy to fool the right-thinking Dutchman into thinking that all babies should start a - probably annual - vaccination cycle against corona. The research on babies will also not be warmly received. That could be a reason for our media to keep it under wraps for a while. Perhaps a targeted fear campaign should first be carried out to prepare the population for this as well. When will the first covid baby mortality come into the picture? It seems a matter of time.
Is the intention to inject babies still due to fear, risk aversion, incompetence or tunnel vision?
It will annoy some people that I pay attention to this. After all, it is not conducive to vaccine readiness and that is in the public interest anyway... No one has yet been able to explain to me exactly how that works with a mutating and annually flaring virus that is dangerous for a well-defined group that is vaccinated. Anyway, the plan is in any case not a wappie fabrication or deep fake video. It is more often summarized without explicit mention of vaccinating babies than the video, including the unambiguous statements of Fauci himself, is shown.
- CBSNews (video) including the above video fragment: https://youtu.be/SV895eO-TAs
- CNBC (article): https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/17/us-could-start-vaccinating-young-kids-in-early-2022-dr-fauci-says-.html
- Reuters (article): https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-usa-fauci-idUSL1N2L50DJ
Measuring with double standards
And then also: what do you actually inject those babies with? I remember screaming murder and fire about genetically modified soy, even though that could prevent famines in the third world. One of the concerns was the unfamiliarity with the long-term biological effects of genetically modified crops and, of course, the consumption of GMO food.
Another argument against the genetic engineering toolbox was the sliding scale: in no time at all, this kind of technique was in danger of being applied to humans as well – and that was a frightening prospect at the time.
Now the time has come. It was actually time for a long time, only now one can invoke urgency and rush everything through. Now is the time for governments to remove anti-GMO provisions from legislation and regulations so that a modified RNA can be injected into the entire world population - including the Dutch.
I myself was not against GMO at all. Now that I see the uncontrollable forces at play and how organizations and governments are affected by them, I come back to that – oversight and control are simply inadequate for these global operations, supported by a handful of corporations and their lobbyists.
Do you vaccinate your baby for someone else...?
Are babies a source of infection? Do they pass on the virus and if so, how did they become infected? Do they still go to work if they don't feel well? How many babies have died from Covid?
Experimenting on babies to see if the vaccine is effective? Against what!?
Determine what the safe dosage is perhaps? I can think of other experiments. Just don't do it!
Of all Covid deaths, 1% are under the age of 65. Why does that group have to be vaccinated at all if the over-65s are all protected? The average age of the covid death is a few months below life expectancy. The vast majority have comorbidities. It is therefore even conceivable that it will soon turn out that the survivors have become older than life expectancy. Then you're back to the average. Under the age of 50, the mortality risk is already very small, and it only gets smaller (if possible) with age.
I can't reconcile it all very well, so I write it down again. The title is not "Genetic experiments on babies". I thought that sounded too bad. I think it's really terrible what is being called upon us. What's going on with those vaccine pushers...
