Anyone who is now called a 'Holocaust denier' or 'right-wing extremist' deserves special attention. Someone can actually propagate right-wing extremist views, which is then quickly discoverable. He or she may also have said something important that others don't like. The 'mislabelling' of critical voices is a common method of sidelining critics, as Minister Kaag made clear this week: dissenting voices spread right-wing extremist disinformation.
On the other hand, such a Yolande Sap can proclaim blood-curdling nonsense, as long as it is in line with the roadmap of the incumbent. I already made one there Message about.
Interesting in this context is alleged Holocaust denier Peter Imanuelsen, who writes under the pseudonym PeterSweden. He has a total of about 700,000 followers. He wrote about an 85-year-old Jewish woman in Germany, Holocaust survivor and esteemed composer, Ukrainian by birth, who definitely did not want to be vaccinated. A judge ruled that the two basic vaccinations had to be administered under duress and that she needed psychiatric attention. This was reversed on appeal. Imanuelsen writes:
German court rules that Holocaust survivor must be injected.
History repeats itself again.
What on earth is going on in Germany? A court in the city of Stuttgart ruled that 85-year-old Holocaust survivor Inna Zhvanetskaya should be forcibly injected with the covid vaccine and then thrown into a psychiatric ward.
No, I'm not making this up. A court in Germany has ruled this. This happened a few days ago, and thankfully it has since been overruled by a higher court. But the fact that a court could decide this is absolutely insane and needs to be discussed.
She would be sent to a doctor against her will to be vaccinated twice against covid, before being placed in a closed mental institution.
It is said that she went into hiding. Imagine. Jewish people who have to go into hiding again in Germany.
Of course, the Jewish community in Germany is outraged by this. That should be everyone. It does not matter that it has been rejected by a higher court. This should never have happened. Fire the judge who came up with the ruling.
We are entering dangerous territory when courts decide that people can be injected without their consent. Especially when you consider that the mRNA injections have no long-term safety data.
Consider also the Australian data that showed that those who received 4 doses of the vaccine were 330% more likely to be hospitalized with covid than those who received 1 dose.
I have just spent some time looking for reports about the above case. Try it yourself. I can't find an article in the major Dutch (or German) media. While it concerns a vulnerable (!) artistic (!) woman (!) of Ukrainian (!) origin and Jew (!) also.
Covid rules.
I suspect that even tinted skin and special gender or orientation would not have helped her against the Covid madness.
Jerusalem Post wrote about it, just like the less authoritative report24 (click box) and many other 'alternative media'. What I saw in the local Stuttgart media too often contained the words "right" and "far right" to take seriously, pure framing.
Also, her dementia would have taken such forms that the judge made the right decision to have the 86-year-old vaccinated... For some, vaccine refusal is a sign of informedness, for others, of confusion.
One is really completely lost, see Yolande Sap.
Now Imanuelsen has been defamed before as a Holocaust denier, an allegation he has always denied. Nevertheless, he is under fire and even his dog has been poisoned (so I can't stand that at all). The dog has survived, as Imanuelsen describes in I just got cancelled.
The proof
The 'proof' of his alleged Holocaust denial is a manipulated screenshot of a tweet, which was eagerly made by the hateful, disinformation-spreading and praised Marc van Ranst. shared on Twitter. It is also very easy to adjust texts in a tweet for a screenshot, see as an example the small corrections that I made in a random tweet. ('dusease' but yes, the u is next to the i.)
I can resist the temptation to do something with a tweet from Marc van Ranst. So it's that easy.
Just a little longer
Well you think you're done but what really mattered to me was another article by PeterSweden. When I look for basic material for my own article, I (fortunately) come across articles that save me a lot of research and that I wonder why I would share that again. I regularly get signals that this is appreciated by this and that. So when I had read that article, I went to see who the best man is - always check - and in doing so I came across alleged right-wing extremism, an accusation in which all my bullshit antennae always immediately whizz up. Hence this prologue. He was also concerned with excess mortality at an early age and describes the current situation in Australia and England in this article. You may also read another time if it does not suit you 😉 now. Have a taste of one's own medicine...
I was only called a fascist in a whatsapp group, because I objected to the term covid wappies and the thus putting away free school parents. Because of my medical choice, I was literally 'a fascist' for her.
My opponent claimed to feel unsafe because of my presence and demanded that I declare myself to be anti-fascist. Because I am indeed against the fascisime and was tired of her totalitarian side, I did that.
I'm so tired of this stereotypical aggression. They are themselves what they compare others to.