The data analysts of the Eucalyptic Society place interesting articles on their website. For some time now, they have "Corona dashboard 2.0" was created. Below are some cherries from their porridge.
Unexplained excess mortality per week with trend line

Orange = corona, green = unexplained

Net protection after vaccinations

immunity.
Unexplained excess mortality and vaccinations brought together in 1 graph
A possible explanation for the excess mortality lies in side effects of the vaccinations. This can only be confirmed by autopsies. We therefore call for an investigation. That this has not been set in motion for a long time is incomprehensible – and that is a euphemism.
The orange line shows an increasingly rapid upward trend of unexplained mortality. Started about 5 months after the start of the vaccinations and has now grown to about 4000 deaths. We just hope that this growth will decrease. The curve shows no sign of this yet.

This excess mortality curve was noticed about 4 months after the start of the campaign. Hypothetical: excess mortality may have started 3 to 4 months earlier, but was compensated by undermortality after the tough 2020-2021 season and thus remained under the radar for a while.

Accountability for the course of the vaccination effect
Swedish research (graph 1) shows that the Pfizer vaccine starts working two weeks after the second injection. Until then, the status of the vaccinated person is "not vaccinated", should he suffer a disease in the meantime. Whether this also applies to vaccination-related disease is unclear, according to inquire at the rivm.
The vaccine then remains effective for 2 to 3 months in accordance with the protection indicated by the manufacturer. After that, the effect against infection begins to wear off. (Protection against hospitalization collapses more slowly, protection against ICU even slower. In due course, there will also be more insight into those figures.)
After another 6 months, the infection protection is gone.
The above cycle has been calculated numerically, taking into account the persistent vaccination and the pace at which it has happened. Not taken into account is the expanding immunity thanks to infections. For this you can add about 5% to the reported protection in the last column. (See accountability at moreelkompas.nl)

Why does the loss of vaccine effectiveness lead to a higher risk of infection? Options:
- False security and disinformation: people unsuspectingly enter infectious environments
- Damaged immune system: The immune system is no longer as alert to this type of 'attack' after the fake impulse
- (ADE: The immune system goes crazy when confronted with the real virus. You would expect this to lead more to severe illness after infection, not so much to more infection – but we don't know.)
