De data-analisten van het Eucalyptisch Genootschap plaatsen belangwekkende artikelen op hun website. Sinds enige tijd hebben zij "Corona dashboard 2.0" in het leven geroepen. Hieronder enige krenten uit hun pap.
Unexplained excess mortality per week with trend line
Orange = corona, green = unexplained
Net protection after vaccinations
immunity.
Unexplained excess mortality and vaccinations brought together in 1 graph
A possible explanation for the excess mortality lies in side effects of the vaccinations. This can only be confirmed by autopsies. We therefore call for investigation. It is incomprehensible that this has not already been set in motion - and that is a euphemism.
The orange line shows an increasingly rapid upward trend of unexplained mortality. Started about 5 months after the start of the vaccinations and has now grown to about 4000 deaths. We just hope that this growth will decrease. The curve shows no sign of this yet.
This excess mortality curve was noticed about 4 months after the start of the campaign. Hypothetical: excess mortality may have started 3 to 4 months earlier, but was compensated by undermortality after the tough 2020-2021 season and thus remained under the radar for a while.
Accountability for the course of the vaccination effect
Swedish research (grafiek 1) wijst uit dat het Pfizer-vaccin twee weken na de tweede injectie begint te werken. Tot dan is de status van de gevaccineerde "niet gevaccineerd", mocht hem in die tussentijd een ziekte te beurt vallen. Of dat ook zo geldt voor vaccinatiegerelateerde aandoening is onduidelijk, blijkt uit inquire at the rivm.
The vaccine then remains effective for 2 to 3 months in accordance with the protection indicated by the manufacturer. After that, the effect against infection begins to wear off. (Protection against hospitalization collapses more slowly, protection against ICU even slower. In due course, there will also be more insight into those figures.)
After another 6 months, the infection protection is gone.
The above cycle has been calculated numerically, taking into account the persistent vaccination and the pace at which it has happened. Not taken into account is the expanding immunity thanks to infections. For this you can add about 5% to the reported protection in the last column. (See accountability at moreelkompas.nl)
Why does the loss of vaccine effectiveness lead to a higher risk of infection? Options:
- False security and disinformation: people unsuspectingly enter infectious environments
- Damaged immune system: The immune system is no longer as alert to this type of 'attack' after the fake impulse
- (ADE: The immune system goes haywire when confronted with the real virus. You would expect this to lead more to severe illness after infection, not so much to more infection - but we don't know.)
