Because England kept fairly complete statistics, I have in 2022 various articles dedicated to those English dates. I'm not going to repeat what the problems were that we encountered. That is no longer necessary because a real scientific peer-reviewed analysis has now been done by several Italian scientists, with the same alarmist signals.
De studie toont aan dat de sterftecijfers (SMR’s) onder gevaccineerden in alle leeftijdsgroepen in de loop van de tijd stijgen en in sommige groepen de verwachte sterfte hebben overschreden. ONS is vroeg in 2023 gestopt met rapporteren maar uitgaand van een doorzettende trend wordt voorspeld dat dit ook in de andere leeftijdsgroepen zal gebeuren of al is gebeurd. Dit patroon, dat begint met duidelijke ondersterfte onder gevaccineerden wordt ook waargenomen bij non-COVIDsterfte, wat wijst op een vertekening in de ONS-dataset. De risico's van vaccinatie worden hierdoor onderschat.
Als voorbeeld de groep 40-49 jaar. De verwachte sterfte is 1. Dat lijkt goed nieuws: de gevaccineerden zitten dus onder de verwachte sterfte. Maar dat geldt ook voor alle andere doodsoorzaken, Covid niet meegerekend. Dat is onmogelijk want de prik helpt niet tegen bijvoorbeeld kanker. Er zit dus ergens een fout...
One of the graphs from 2022: the vaccinated do not compare favorably with the unvaccinated.
In de artikelen van 2022 concludeerden wij dat de populatiegrootte verkeerd was geschat. De overleden gevaccineerden (die precies waren geteld) werden zo een kleiner percentage van de totale verwachte sterfte. Fenton, Neil en Craig hebben er uitgebreid en vaak over geschreven. Die horizontale 1-lijn moet dus een stuk omlaag, maar hoeveel? Hoe dan ook, de stijgende trend belooft weinig goeds. Hij strekt zich over twee jaar uit - en toen stopten de data. Maar de klok tikte door...
Below is the translation of the Abstract and the conclusion.
All-cause mortality according to COVID-19 vaccination status: An analysis of the public data from the UK Office for National Statistics
Mark Alexandria 1 , Giovanni Malatesta 2 , Giovanni Di Palmo 3 , Marco Cosentino 4 , Alberto Donzelli 5
Affiliations
- PMID: 40028449
- PMCID: PMC11868741
- DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.154058.2
Abstract
Background: The mass vaccination campaign against COVID-19 is widely considered the best response to the global COVID-19 pandemic crisis. However, assessment of the true effect can be performed by analyzing all-cause mortality by vaccination status. The United Kingdom may be the only country to have made public all-cause mortality data by vaccination status.
Methods: Data from April 2021 to May 2023 published by the UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) were retrospectively analyzed by age group and vaccination status; the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for all-cause and non-COVID-19 mortality was calculated relative to the corresponding unvaccinated groups.
Results: We vonden dat in alle leeftijdsgroepen, all-cause mortaliteit SMR's toenamen vanaf een bepaalde datum, afhankelijk van de leeftijdsgroep. In alle leeftijdsgroepen waren de SMR's van de sterfte door alle oorzaken aanvankelijk veel lager dan 1. Door hun stijging kwamen ze echter op een bepaalde datum voor de leeftijdsgroepen 18-39, 80-89 en 90+ boven de referentiewaarde uit (ed: this means: more mortality than expected). Voor de andere leeftijdsgroepen kan de datum worden voorspeld waarop deze meersterftegrens zou worden bereikt, op voorwaarde dat de trend aanhoudt. De trends voor non-COVID-19 SMR's waren vergelijkbaar. Hun beginwaarden, die veel lager zijn dan 1, wijzen op een aanzienlijke vertekening in de ONS-dataset, waardoor de risico's voor de gevaccineerden worden onderschat, aangezien het onwaarschijnlijk is dat COVID-19-vaccins beschermen tegen sterfgevallen die niet door COVID-19 worden veroorzaakt.
Conclusions: De toename in de tijd van de SMR's van sterfgevallen door alle oorzaken bij gevaccineerden in vergelijking met niet-gevaccineerden, en hun overschrijding van de referentiewaarden voor bepaalde leeftijdsgroepen, moet zorgvuldig worden bekeken om de onderliggende factoren te begrijpen. Aangezien de initiële waarden van de SMR's veel lager zijn dan 1, veronderstellen we bovendien de aanwezigheid van aanzienlijke vertekeningen in de ONS-dataset, wat leidt tot een onderschatting van de risico's voor de gevaccineerden, aangezien het onwaarschijnlijk is dat COVID-19-vaccins beschermen tegen niet-COVID-19-doden. Het zou wenselijk zijn dat andere grote landen systematisch sterfte door alle oorzaken naar vaccinatiestatus verzamelen en in de tussentijd, in afwachting van diepgaand onderzoek, moet er veel meer voorzichtigheid worden betracht bij het bevorderen van massale vaccinatiecampagnes.
Keywords: COVID-19; COVID-19 vaccinations; all-cause mortality; standardized mortality ratio.
And another striking paragraph later in the piece:
Waarom nemen de SMR's van niet-COVID-19-gerelateerde sterfgevallen toe? Waarom zou het risico van gevaccineerden met welke dosis dan ook toenemen in vergelijking met dat van niet-gevaccineerden? Afgezien van het risico op onmiddellijke bijwerkingen/gebeurtenissen, rijst natuurlijk de twijfel dat het vaccin schade aan het immuunsysteem zou kunnen toebrengen, waardoor de gevaccineerden een groter risico lopen om te sterven aan niet-COVID-19-gerelateerde pathologieën.
Tot zover de studie. Prikspijt mag dan volgens het AD niet zo'n ding zijn maar als ze dat zo willen houden vermoed ik dat ze aan deze studie niet veel aandacht zullen besteden. En Keulemans kan er een telefoontje met van Dissel aan wagen: "Engeland is Nederland niet." Of "Het blijft toch observationeel onderzoek. Je kunt alleen dubbelblinde peer reviewed RCT's vertrouwen."
Exactly: it messes with your immune system, causing it to function suboptimally, with all the long-term consequences that entails.
Seems to happen to several people.
Personal experience before covid vaccine/genetic engineering (AstraZeneca) and after vaccine/genetic engineering.
Every year I got the flu twice, apparently I have a slow immune system and changing seasons costs me at least 4 days of flu and a week of recovery. It's no different. No matter what I do in terms of supplements, diet, etc. I am quite ill for a day and go to bed, the rest I sit/lie in the living room.
It always started with a tickle in the throat, then the whole throat turned red-yellow and an inflamed thick throat and when that almost seemed to be over, I caught a cold or the flu. And that at least twice a year and even more if there is a lot of stress. After Gene therapy. No more inflamed throat, tickle in the throat, just rinse sambuca and it's gone. Now it starts straight away in the lungs, makes me very nauseous and develops pneumonia. Now very sick for three days with little fever and one day very sick with fever.
No more colds and no more sore throat, but the clinical picture is more severe for me. And I'm sick every quarter now. I hope that this will decrease and I will try everything with vitamins and diet. I continue to live a very healthy life and my BMI is 20 years younger.
What I mean by this is that there is much more going on than what is registered. To what extent are the mild illnesses increasing, with the latest waves of flu it seems that I am not the only one and in addition to flu, other viruses are also present, or is that just the media making everything up. Just like the measles, first 60 and now 120 cases in the Netherlands and that is news? I think everyone used to get measles. I've had it too (I've had them all, those childhood diseases) and was barely sick from it.
So the fact that more people are dying is one thing, but more suffering from diseases is, in my opinion, very underestimated? What do you think?
Just read that a measles outbreak can now cause more pro-flowers than in the past. This is because many decades ago mothers had usually suffered a natural measles infection, which gave their children the relevant immune response/cells at birth.
As a result, in most children, measles was previously nothing more than a childhood disease that was simply part of it. The later mothers who have received the shot against measles do not pass on the same information to their babies as those who had a natural infection.
This does not mean that measles is now a dangerous, fatal disease, but unfortunately the current generation no longer has the luck that the elderly had with their unvaccinated mothers.
Just don't say it too loud because they will probably think of an extra shot for that.
More suffering due to diseases - I often think about that: there is little or no insight into that, in any case much less than "number of deaths per year" and certainly not as long as it does not lead to overcrowded hospitals. You have to rely on what people in the medical world notice, e.g. “younger people are much more likely to suffer from disease X”, etc.
CBS's cause of death statistics are now 6 months behind schedule, but "late" can be deduced from this in terms of trends.
What could also show a trend is the number of single-vehicle traffic accidents, and also the number of traffic accidents in general with an unclear cause or with "unwellness" as the cause. For a while I noticed that quite a few motorists left the road for unknown reasons (and even drove into a ditch) at times when people were not normally drinking, but you cannot say much about that without knowing the real cause. If someone escapes unscathed, it may not be investigated further and certainly not “totaled”.
I think it was also very busy at damage repair companies after the vaccination rounds.
Just check death from falls.
I totally agree with you Lou. The excess mortality figure is in a way the canary in the coal mine. The number of people with a compromised immune system will be many times higher than the number who have died from the effects of vaccination. How that manifests itself is another story.
Can that be proven? Difficult, then you would have to compare unvaccinated groups with vaccinated groups. But with comparable health profiles. But then you still have a subjective judgment about whether you are sick or not. Or register in hospitals whether people have been vaccinated or not. But that's not going to happen.
To me it is clear when you look at the mechanism behind the mRNAs. I didn't take them. The last time I seriously had the flu was December 2020, so probably Covid. Not anymore after that. Two colds in one day.
Maybe we can set up our own poll?
To my shame, I received 1 (say and write one) injection. Allowed to aspirate but still angry with myself.
Our immune system is fantastic, but it must remain trained. I have worked in education for forty years and have never had the flu, despite having been exposed to every virus that virologists have ever studied/devised. And I have always passed up the flu shot.
My “two cents”: it is not despite but because. A kind of natural microvaccinations.
And maybe you shouldn't tinker too much with that wonderful immune system by getting flu shots and corona boosters every year. Just regularly go to the movies, concerts and cuddle your (grand)children.
And of course there is nothing worse than staying indoors with the windows closed (lockdowns)!
Indeed, it seems like a good idea to avoid viruses as much as possible. The idea is that less virus load means less illness. However, you cannot keep this up indefinitely.
Your body gets to know viruses (and other pathogens) through exposure to them. You prefer to do the latter with a low virus load that does not make you sick. Preferably in the summer too. Then your body is prepared for the dry air in the winter season in which viruses are rampant. Exposing an “untrained” immune system to a high viral load is asking for trouble.
I also think that very good ventilation of classrooms will have an adverse effect on the outbreak of epidemics. This is because children in particular have a good immune system that makes short work of pathogens, so that the epidemic does not even have time to start. If they are not exposed to this, they will be exposed to a high virus load at once, they will become ill and perhaps even become super spreaders; dangerous for vulnerable people.
It actually says a lot that you haven't been sick in 40 years despite close contact with many children in poorly ventilated areas.
100%
People in England who have not been vaccinated had on average an 18% higher chance of having been admitted in the five previous years than people who have been vaccinated, with the chance for the vaccinated being set at 100%.
Since hospitalization is a very reasonable indicator of health, it can be said without a doubt that the health of the unvaccinated was considerably worse than that of the vaccinated.
and therefore the risk of mortality was also higher.
so any mortality among the vaccinated that is not significantly lower than the mortality among the unvaccinated is in fact a death due to the vaccination.
Interesting Jan, where did you get that from?
john dee, the english former statistician at nhs.
https://jdee.substack.com/p/primary-clinical-outcomes-for-a-single-90d
The Czechs are on it, too: https://www.mp.pl/paim/issue/article/16634/ (Letter to the Editor, Feb. 2024)
Of course, nature cannot do anything by itself. Large, very profitable billionaire companies know much better how nature works: it doesn't work and everyone will die if you don't use their (experimental) remedies. In fact, you're an antisocial misanthrope if you don't believe their sales stories. It is still the same song as the seller of the elixir of life on the medieval market square. Only at that time it did not yet have a worldwide liability exclusion and protection by all boards and media.
You will receive:
Dear Anton,
Zou je grond van "first do no harm"
Marianne Zwagerman, the Telegraaf columnist, might be of interest
in a solid article in this newspaper
see: https://1drv.ms/w/c/13426ae541632a0a/EWXWzLbmTBpKlptT6jYsZBcBg5DtJZSBQpiGCdWogFWy8A
Hello Rob,
“The main thing is not to harm” and “Where there is pus, remove it”.
And by 'this newspaper' I think you mean the Telegraaf.
And Marianne Z, well, I would give away one of my guitars to have a cup of coffee with her. She asks questions so often that I think “I would like to tell you more about it” but yes. My natural talent is to stay under the radar.
Maybe you can contact her through Dick?
And I will also post a translation of the Kirsch article.
.d.d. the Telegraph. When Dick gets back I'll ask him.
Thanks again for Wakefield's prophetic video, which was ruthlessly cancelled
the rules of the “Disinformation Playbook”:
(https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/disinformation-playbook)
I had this with the help of A.I. about just article by Steve Kirsch:
https://1drv.ms/w/c/13426ae541632a0a/EVLFBuvNjjpPp-CbZkNlshEBrVw3XpGdSUW_lZ1BG5UQ3Q