LinkedIn vs Herman Steigstra, OM vs Mona Keijzer, Nivel vs Maurice de Hond

Censuur werd in het vrije Westen gezien als een vorm van machtsmisbruik die dictators en andere ondemocratische regimes aan de macht houdt. Inmiddels is censuur volgens de regimes in het westen het enige wat nog helpt tegen misinformatie. Valide argumenten zijn er niet meer of ze overtuigen niet. Ze realiseren zich niet dat hun collega's in de dictaturen er precies zo over denken.

We zien het op alle niveau's terug. In de media is het fenomeen verreweg het kwalijkst: de journalistiek zou de burgers tegen zulke tendenzen moeten beschermen, bij uitstek. Rechtspraak zou een toevluchtsoord moeten zijn. Juist in totalitaire landen voegen de media zich naar de heersende macht. In fascistische landen spreken media, industrie, wetenschap en overheid met één mond. En Vrouwe Justitia doet haar best als cheerleader.

Censorship takes many forms and always comes from the wrong side, as do misleading narratives of actors who believe themselves to be above the law.

Three cases: LinkedIn vs Herman Steigstra (his own story), The Public Prosecution Service against Mona Keijzer, Nivel against Maurice de Hond.

LinkedIn vs Herman Steigstra

Herman himself writes (also can be read on X):

Censorship

Liquidated on LinkedIn. Censored in the media. Ignored in the #papierenkrant. That is the situation we have now arrived in. After what started on 16 March 2020 with an admittedly intense, but open and honest speech by Mark Rutte, we have now arrived in a situation where countries, which we believe do not sufficiently respect freedom of expression, are jealous of our own country. First, read this excerpt from Rutte's speech:

Here are a few important facts. It is assumed that herd immunity will be achieved within a period of a few months: "those who have had the virus are usually immune afterwards". It's really there! And so it is, the experts have spoken. Herd immunity must be built up in a controlled manner, hospitals must not be overloaded. "Flatten the curve". Avoid contact between people, as long as there is no decrease in infections and hospitals are still in the danger zone.

How different is the situation that arose not much later. Constantly monitoring our behavior became the new norm: the 1.5m society, gatherings were banned for a long time. A few months turned into more than four years. Herd immunity was replaced by immunity from a syringe on the WHO's prescription, which you have to replenish several times a year from now on. In the meantime, the eighth syringe has been circulated and a large part of the population thinks that is normal. We don't have to protect each other anymore, the syringe does that for you. After all, herd immunity no longer exists.

Not only was our behaviour controlled, but also any form of criticism or contradiction of the new policy was brutally suppressed. BIG registered doctors who did not conform to the new regime were persecuted, threatened and their BIG registration was at stake, imposed by the government. And we tolerated it. All based on the trust in the vaccines that the government instilled in us.

However, step by step, the truth is coming out, but the long arm of pharmacy is strong. Step by step, the failure of the protective effect of the vaccines is coming to the surface. It seems that the excess mortality we have seen since April 2021 has a strong relationship with the vaccines.

The traditional media are still willing to spread the message of pharmacy. In fact, platforms like LinkedIn are actively liquidating accounts that don't follow government guidelines. Nivel presented a study, the outcome of which was too ridiculous to be true. The calculations were therefore withdrawn, but the conclusion remained: unvaccinated people died up to ten times as fast as soon as the vaccine was available for their age group. So the availability suddenly created a tenfold chance of dying from any cause. Of course, this goes against all logic.

Now that the death rates have followed the vaccination figures for the third consecutive year since the end of September, reports about this are particularly painful for the pharmaceutical industry. LinkedIn thought this was a good opportunity to go along with requests to liquidate unwelcome accounts. Unfortunately, it is impossible to discuss this with LinkedIn, because only active registrants can contact the helpdesk. An extra lock on the door of this organization.

The immediate reason for blocking my account (I assume, no reason has been given to me) will have been to show this graph, based on the latest published RIVM figures:

For the third time in a row, there was an exact synchronization of the vaccinations and the excess mortality wave, and a slightly less synchronous course with previous vaccinations. That must hurt as a pharmaceutical company when that becomes visible. You'll do anything to stifle that sound.

The figures now make it painfully clear that the vaccines have not had any positive contribution to our health. You should expect mortality to decrease after you have vaccinated the vast majority of the population. You see just the opposite: an increase in excess mortality after each round of vaccinations. Up to eight times. Only studies from 2020 are cited, as evidence that vaccines appear to prevent deaths from covid-19. This is probably where the fallacy lies: only mortality from covid-19 is avoided in this way, not the mortality itself.

The natural immunity that Rutte talked about on March 16 no longer counts. People who agree with Rutte's statements no longer count. Their accounts on LinkedIn are liquidated, their calculations and charts are ignored by the media.

Even young people were encouraged to take the vaccine, resulting in hundreds of deaths, as shown in this graph.

Until 2020, there was no excess mortality in the two youngest age groups. In 2021, it was among the previously vaccinated 20-30-year-olds. In 2022 also for 10-19 year olds. Nearly 600 more young people died than average. They are the canaries in the coal mine. In this age group, there is normally virtually no mortality. Of course, the pharmaceutical industry will deny any connection with vaccination.

We zijn inmiddels bijna gewend aan het idee dat de bewijslast door de overheid is omgedraaid. Normaal gesproken wordt een medicament uit de handel genomen na enkele verdachte overlijdens. De producent krijgt vervolgens de gelegenheid om aan te tonen dat de verdachte overlijdens geen relatie hadden met het medicament. Maar nu wordt de bewijslast neergelegd bij de overledenen. Voor 50.000 verdachte overlijdens moet de consument bewijzen dat de vaccins hiervan de oorzaak waren. Elke publicatie die een bijdrage zou kunnen vormen bij deze bewijsvoering, wordt geweerd, censuur tiert welig in dit eens zo democratische land."

Public Prosecution Service vs Mona Keijzer

Earlier, we paid attention to the peculiar handling of the lawsuits filed by Virus Truth and the way in which Willem Engel was prosecuted (which led to nothing but harassment). In Germany, we see something similar with Reiner Fuellmich. The banishment of troublemaker (because truth-seeker) David Icke has been extended for another two years.

Now it's Mona Keijzer's turn. A minister who is being tackled for what she, still as a member of the House of Representatives, said in a talk show. At the time, she resigned from the Rutte cabinet because she could not reconcile her conscience with the unsubstantiated and therefore ill-considered and harmful corona policy. She is now found guilty by the Public Prosecutor's Office of another counter-narrative, which concerns the views on Islam. There seems to be a woke virus going around in administrative circles. Common sense must be eradicated root and branch.

In Elsevier's Weekblad criticizes Afshin Ellian ¹Afshin Ellian is a Dutch-Iranian jurist, philosopher and publicist. He is Professor of Social Cohesion, Citizenship and Multiculturalism at Leiden University. Ellian was born in Iran and fled to the Netherlands in 1983 because of political persecution. He is known for his incisive analyses of democracy, the rule of law and freedom of expression, and has regularly been critical of radical Islam and political issues of integration and security. His work often focuses on defending democratic values and the importance of freedom of expression. het oordeel van het Openbaar Ministerie (OM) over Mona Keijzer's uitspraken over antisemitisme in islamitische culturen. Het OM vond haar opmerkingen beledigend en in strijd met de wet, hoewel ze niet strafrechtelijk vervolgd wordt. Zo breng je reputatieschade toe zonder juridische consequenties. Ellian stelt dat het OM onterecht handelt en dat Keijzer's politieke vrijheid wordt aangetast. Hij pleit ervoor dat Keijzer naar de rechter stapt om haar vrijheid van meningsuiting te verdedigen en stelt dat het OM de principes van de democratische rechtsstaat ondermijnt.

Afshin Ellian cites the following arguments:

1. The Public Prosecution Service has insufficient knowledge about Islam and anti-Semitism in Islamic cultures.
2. Mona Keijzer has the right to freedom of expression and political statements.
3. The Public Prosecution Service undermines the democratic rule of law by assessing political statements without sufficient legal basis.
4. Keijzer would have to obtain a court ruling to protect her freedom of expression.

He substantiates this with:

1. A report by the General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD) about anti-Semitism within radical Islamic groups, documenting anti-Semitic views in Islamic circles.
2. Reports of the European Parliament and the European Commission who identify Islamic anti-Semitism as problematic in certain communities.
3. Investigations of the Simon Wiesenthal Center and NGO Monitor, which discusses anti-Semitic statements in Islamic circles.

Mona Keijzer's opmerkingen zijn feitelijke constateringen. Maar Vrouwe Justitia houdt niet van anti-narratieven. Wat zegt dat over hoe we onze samenleving hebben georganiseerd?

Nivel vs Maurice de Hond

The conclusions of Nivel's excess mortality report lack any basis, that was soon clear. Maurice de Hond, already chased back into his hole because of the aerosols, does not allow himself to be muzzled. He is now in serious correspondence with Nivel about the excess mortality report, with at least one disconcerting answer.

More on that in detail at maurice.nl

The Nivel problems in a nutshell:

The Nivel²knowledge organisation with 400 affiliated GP practices that are considered representative wanted to investigate the link between mortality and vaccination status. To this end, they created comorbidity profiles of both unvaccinated and vaccinated people in CIMS³ CIMS is one of the databases in which vaccination statuses and dates are tracked. De kenmerken van beide groepen hebben ze over hun eigen (historische) patiëntenbestanden heen gelegd. Zo ontstond een groep die qua gezondheidskenmerken matchte met de CIMS-gevaccineerden en een die overeenkwam met de CIMS-ongevaccineerden. Op basis hiervan zijn voor beide groepen sterfteverwachtingen gemaakt. Deze sterfteverwachtingen zijn vervolgens vergeleken met de werkelijke sterfte onder de CIMS-gevaccineerden en onder CIMS-ongevaccineerden. Het verschil tussen de Nivel-verwachting en de geobserveerde sterfte werd als "oversterfte" en "ondersterfte" geduid.

This resulted in implausible, impossible figures (I'm not going to retype Maurice's articles here, I've contributed to them as well). Nivel concluded from those figures that there was under-mortality among vaccinated people and a huge, unprecedented excess mortality among unvaccinated people.

Nu bleek een aanzienlijk gedeelte van de "ongevaccineerden" te bestaan uit gevaccineerden die niet waren geregistreerd vanwege administratieve problemen en/of vanwege bezwaar tegen hun registratie. Meer dan de helft van de overleden 'ongevaccineerde' 60-plussers zou wel degelijk gevaccineerd zijn. Dit heeft tot gevolg dat

1. The health profiles were compiled on the basis of the wrong people, so the expectations were already wrong
2. de geobserveerde sterfte per vaccinatiestatus niet overeenkomt met de werkelijke vaccinatiestatussen waardoor een aanzienlijk deel van de overlijdens onterecht aan 'ongevaccineerd' is toegewezen.

Nivel has recognised this and mentioned it in a revised report. Because it is mentioned in the report, according to Nivel, the figures do not need to be adjusted and the conclusions can stand. The entire scientific community is watching as Maurice once again fights a lonely battle.

Withdrawing is not: taking offline

Nivel also says they don't want to retract the report because they want to keep it online so others can learn from it. The general practitioners and the highly learned supervisory committee members are apparently not aware that withdrawn studies will also remain online. In fact, it should be so that others don't make the same mistakes, preferably with an explanation from the authors as to why they decided to withdraw the article.

Dan kan iedereen zelf beoordelen hoe begrijpelijk, slordig of kwaadaardig de intenties waren - of iets ertussenin.

If, despite this, the conclusions are still prominently communicated, it is against scientific mores.

Take, for example, Andrew Wakefield's offending article, in which he had looked for common characteristics of children with autism. That article is still common can be found on the website of The Lancet.

Very instructive by the way, to read through that!

Counter-arguments and justifications today look like the image below. But this is about something else: DNA pollution that the establishment believes the public doesn't need to know about.

If you don't want transparency, you have a reason to be sneaky.

https://www.arkmedic.info/p/would-you-like-plasmids-with-that

Footnotes

• 1
  Afshin Ellian is a Dutch-Iranian jurist, philosopher and publicist. He is Professor of Social Cohesion, Citizenship and Multiculturalism at Leiden University. Ellian was born in Iran and fled to the Netherlands in 1983 because of political persecution. He is known for his incisive analyses of democracy, the rule of law and freedom of expression, and has regularly been critical of radical Islam and political issues of integration and security. His work often focuses on defending democratic values and the importance of freedom of expression.
• 2
  knowledge organisation with 400 affiliated GP practices that are considered representative
• 3
  CIMS is one of the databases in which vaccination statuses and dates are tracked