Call for Federal Inquiry into the Lockdown Scandal

Epidemiologist Professor Gupta wondered where the idea of using lockdowns during an epidemic had suddenly come from, against all consensus. Now there are ideas about that: from China. A blog reader tipped me off to an alarming letter from (former) officials and lawyers, addressed to national security services and Ministries of Justice: FBI, MI5, Australian, German and Canadian security services. Who sends that letter to Grapperhaus?

Het is een oproep tot onderzoek van de mogelijk criminele aspecten rond de plotseling ingezette lockdown-therapie ter bestrijding van corona in begin 2020, geïnitieerd door China, gepropageerd door de WHO en daardoor gedistribueerd over de rest van de wereld. De schade is niet te verantwoorden en de voorgewende redenen wijzen op zijn minst op wanbestuur. Tegelijk herken ik wat ik vroeger "Amerikaanse paranoia" zou hebben genoemd - maar het zijn rare tijden:

Lockdowns as a new weapon in post-nuclear warfare

Stacey Rudin

This group argues that the lockdowns were copied from China, which would have had criminal intentions with them. Michael Senger's pinned Tweet sets a very aggressive tone:

One of the authors, Randy Hillier, summarized their document in a letter to the Australian government as follows:

1. Lockdowns arose on the orders of Xi Jinping, General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, and were disseminated into global policy by the World Health Organization with little analysis or logic
2. The most influential Covid-19 modeling institution, described as 'China's top academic partner in the West', is by far the most alarming and inaccurate Covid-19 modeler
3. Deadly Recommendations for Early Mechanical Ventilation Came From China
4. The world-dominating, wildly inaccurate PCR testing protocols are based on incomplete, theoretical genome sequences provided by China
5. Excessive PCR testing protocols came from China
6. Studies showing significant asymptomatic transmission, the only scientific basis for lockdown of healthy individuals, came from China
7. The CCP conducted an early, broad, systematic, and global propaganda campaign to promote its lockdown response
8. Many leading pro-lockdown scientists show striking pro-China bias
9. Many other influential Lockdown supporters are utterly unfit to advise world leaders on pandemic policies and often exhibit a conspicuous pro-China bias
10. Several top public health officials among the nations are dramatically un(dis)qualified and show striking pro-China bias
11. Prominent Lockdown supporters have proven to be unusually indifferent to the devastating consequences of their policies

Read the (long) document (with 250 references to external publications) in which they explain how they arrive at these points: Request for accelerated federal investigation into scientific fraud in public health policy

Unscientific decisions? Experts think so

Yesterday I posted the Public Health Roundtable in Florida below. Many essential questions are raised. It is the turn of mouth masks, infection in the open air, immunity, etc. I gave a complete overview in the previous post

In the first 10 minutes of this hearing, the lockdowns are discussed but on 1:19:40 Professor Gupta expresses her astonishment at the nonsensical suggestion to use lockdowns. The authors of the document are not alone in their surprise at the use of lockdowns.

I think the lockdowns are the single biggest public health mistake in history.

Jay Bhattacharya, Professor of Medicine at Stanford, Director Stanford's Center for Demography & Aging

Lockdowns zijn voorheen nooit overwogen en zelfs expliciet ontraden door de WHO. Het "Hammer and Dance"-verhaal is bedacht op 19 maart 2020; niks wetenschappelijks, nooit onderzocht, gevalideerd of wat dan ook. As je alles zo op een rijtje zet, zou je er inderdaad makkelijk kwade opzet achter vermoeden. (ik ben goed van vertrouwen, dus ik geloof dat niet zo.)

The damage that these suggestions and theories ultimately caused cannot yet be estimated. You can't just achieve that with a war. The health benefits they have delivered are disputed. The fact that a totalitarian regime can effortlessly bring something like this down on its citizens is a reason for us not to embrace totalitarianism. If our own governments start behaving this way, we call it 'criminal action'. There has never been a scientifically substantiated excuse for this, only parroting OMT members.

Uit dit verzoek tot versneld onderzoek kun je opmaken dat het door onze Nederlandse rechters aangevoerde excuus van "battle of scientists" in werkelijkheid een verhaal is van belangenverstrengeling, vriendjespolitiek en andere vormen van beïnvloeding, machtspolitiek, China-aaien en mogelijk -nooit uitsluiten- kwade intenties. Opnieuw klinkt het veelgehoorde verwijt dat er valselijk uit naam van de wetenschap is gehandeld.

This is the biggest public health fiasco in history, unfortunately.

Martin Kulldorff, Professor Harvard Medical School, Biostatistician and Epidemiologist

The WHO and its intermediaries (RIVM, van Dissel, Voss and all other cronies in the information chain) must feel an increasing responsibility for their collaborationist role in this totalitarianism.

Het aspect dat hier (voor mij althans) voor het eerst duidelijk wordt blootgelegd, is wat Ivor Cummins ook al zei in een van zijn status updates: "They're turning Europe into China". In het begin is het openbaar geslijm van de WHO richting China wel opgevallen maar veel verder kwam ik daarmee niet.

Uncritical copying

It is even worse when you realize that in the entire further rollout of those horror movie scenarios (because that is not much more than what came out of those 'models') in the entire official medical, government and media chain, NO ONE has stood up (van Haga did his best but often got no answer or was snubbed).

Every dissent was smothered in the most disgraceful ways. The RIVM, OMT, House of Representatives, 'journalism' (I put it in quotes because I actually understand something else by it), the court, in short, too many officials have played an extremely cowardly role. Really horrible to realize that, as if I saw my neighbors being taken away in army trucks. Wake up Netherlands...

Do I believe it myself?

No, I don't believe it's in China's interest to decimate the world market. Who are they supposed to make money from? So I don't believe it's a form of war. I will hold off on malicious intent for a while, unless we borrow money from them for the reconstruction of the economy.

It seems self-evident to me that everything has been indiscriminately taken over from China because of their power and their money, that is the nature of things. That no thought has been given at all to their transparency, their views on fundamental and human rights, their totalitarianism - that is also evident.

But I don't blame the Chinese for that. They are the government advisors, the cabinet that turned sense to zero, the House of Representatives, journalism and the judges involved. A mistake can be made at the beginning of such a chain. If no mistakes are made, that means no decisions are made. So I can somewhat justify that, even if it is with difficulty. But I have no respect for any subsequent link that fails to correct it, on the contrary. That's where incompetence really turns into criminal behavior.

[It was already clear in April 2020 that those IC treatments were not good. And the media kept filming in the ICUs how bad the disease was. I remember that so well because it was the reason for me my first blog articlesn.]

The biomass fraud, the benefits affair, the Omtzigt scandal, the corona fiasco... What is the entire House of Representatives actually set up for?