The Biggest Cover-up in History (2nd draft)

I've updated my Netflix scenario. Version 2.0 of the Previous synopsis of June 2021. So the same concept with some new elements added, fitting seamlessly. The first paragraphs are largely taken from the June 2021 version. Do you have any additions to the storyline for Nepflix? Let us know in the comments, turned on below this article for the occasion.

A scenario that answers questions

Why I have come to find the Gain-of-Function debate interesting is that this 'narrative' (because that's what it is: a coherent story) can be a supporting explanation for the incomprehensible hyperreaction of the WHO, the NHI (National Health Institute), Fauci and the institutions and governments that work with them.

The Lab Leak theory seems to be fodder for conspiracy scenarios, but it is the opposite: conspiracy scenarios are relegated to the realm of fables. In the case of Lab Leak, an accident is at the root of the misery, with all the hysterical attempts to cover it up. That is really very different from virus spread as the first step of a preconceived plan by a power-hungry elite.

Episode 1: “Oops”

Some American scientific institutes maintain politically undesirable ties with China in order to continue research that is very difficult to do in the West. The Obama administration banned Gain of Function (GoF) research in America, after which they turned to China for virus research.Wuhan Institute of Virology. GoF research experiments with the infectiousness and/or lethality of viruses.

If a few sick people are spotted around the lab in Wuhan, it attracts the attention of employees and virologists of the Wuhan lab. [This can be imagined by an infected employee in the lab lighting his family, as far as I'm concerned, that can be done right in the first episode. Just to point out that it's fiction.]

The virus in question is quickly recognized. "Shit – it's ours...".

All alarm bells are ringing. Not only with regard to the health risks, but especially for keeping the GoF research and the American-Chinese cooperation in it under the radar, also with the Chinese army. That's wrong. This must be immediately and ruthlessly suppressed at all costs, the people involved agree on that, the virologists and pharmaceutical companies are unanimous. Pharmaceutical companies? Certainly, because the official goal of the study was to have vaccines ready in time in case a dangerous virus jumped from animals to humans...

The mood is depressed for a while, but a ray of hope appears: if they do it smartly, they might get the FDA on board, because of course they are also involved, which has financed. And so is the U.S. government. That offers hope.

There is a threat of loss of face for the Chinese, FDA and therefore America, and not least for the virology sector. To avoid the possible appearance of an escaped lab virus and thus avoid international embarrassment, thorough precautions are being taken by the government.

Databases are erased. Areas are cordoned off. The virus must not be allowed to spread further under any circumstances, so even the strictest measures are still inadequate, according to those involved. Imagine that the virus is sampled and researched elsewhere and strange things are discovered in it... Everything really has to be done.

Inform those involved

The first fellow virologists who are contacted are understanding and happy to help, because if the link with the Wuhan lab is made, oops-oops. In China, too, the heaviest means are being used to prevent the spread of the virus, up to and including lockdowns. China should not be blamed for this fumbling with the Americans.

In America, Fauci understands the danger. He knows full well that research is being done that takes the edge off, which is why he funds it through the medium with the help of a relationship, Peter Daszak. One might think that experimenting with compound viruses was intended as “gain-of-function” research. It was admittedly not the intention that a super contagious deadly virus would result from it, but yes, it could not be ruled out either. After all, they were experiments, you do them to find out things.

Fauci is mobilizing the sectors involved. They agree that this must be stopped at all costs. They pull out all the stops. Directed publications, even in authoritative medical journals (Nature Medicine), appear in which the lab-leak theory is consigned to the realm of fables.

The WHO is also informed by the Chinese, their biggest sponsor. Of course, the officials at the WHO had heard something about it in the corridors, but really...? Of course, they are also shocked. Out of self-preservation, they decide to participate. After all, the world needs a WHO! Especially when accidents happen. And besides, this could also mean to the WHO what Chernobyl was to nuclear power. They should have known and guarded this. The WHO informs their other major source of WHO revenue, the pharmaceutical companies. Fortunately, they appear to be already aware. It's a small world.

GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), with a facility in Wuhan, is a major shareholder in Pfizer. Pfizer is working on the vaccines to be able to use them quickly against modified/mutated viruses and therefore already has a few things in-house. The good intention was really to have life-saving, quickly adaptable vaccines ready if new dangerous viruses emerge.

Communication strategy

Then they have to choose. Are we going to publicize this or not? The contagiousness soon makes it clear that there is no stopping it. So there must be a test as soon as possible to be able to signal where the virus is rearing its head so that a lockdown can be quickly imposed where necessary. After all, that's what the Chinese do.

Pfizer sends the necessary technical information about the most recent virus to the WHO, which passes it on to Drosten (and possibly Koopmans, not knowing that Koopmans is aware of the Wuhan research through her own Erasmus lab). However, that doesn't have to be a big deal. How can it be justified, then, that they could have developed a test so quickly for a novel virus from an unknown source? They write in their paper that they found that on twitter... Serious.

“Before public release of virus sequences from cases of 2019-nCoV, we relied on social media reports announcing detection of a SARS-like virus. We thus assumed that a SARS-related CoV is involved in the outbreak.”

(source: justification of the RT-PCR test of a.o. Koopmans and Drosten) Sounds solid, doesn't it?

While bioNTech's 2019 annual report states that the pre-clinical research of that vaccine (later called the Covid-19 vaccine) had been completed and the Phase 1 study was well underway! For a virus that only emerged in December 2019? That is alert, not to say foresight! See page 6 of the BioNTech Annual Report 2019:

Emphasizing seriousness

So that's going to be the story. They didn't know anything, they were robbed. For a severe flu virus, it all sounds a bit exaggerated, so how do they ensure that it is really strictly controlled? By exaggerating the seriousness a bit. Fortunately, stories from China are easy to organise. Neil Ferguson sets himself up to work on serious-sounding models, he has already shown that he has a special talent for this. It is not for nothing that Imperial College called itself 'the favourite research partner' of the Chinese. So the lethality is greatly exaggerated. An IFR of 3.4% is a figment of the imagination. After all, they can always say 'better safe than sorry' afterwards. They had no idea what it would bring about.

Unwilling Pharmacists

Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies, meanwhile, are being pressured to roll out vaccines. They refuse: they are still in the middle of studies, the vaccine is far from ready. They don't want to market at all, because insufficiently tested, laboratory animals don't respond well after a few months, etcetera. However, the governments and WHO are putting the pharmaceutical companies under heavy pressure in all kinds of ways. [I'm happy to leave this up to the scriptwriters] "Then you shorten the test period a bit." They are at their wit's end. This must absolutely not be a tragedy because governments, security organizations, doctors, pharmaceutical companies – they are all in the same boat and that must not sink. But the pharmaceutical companies can already see the storm coming if their vaccine does not work properly. That's going to cost them money. In their desperation, the authorities finally offer a sales guarantee and complete indemnification against all possible claims for damages. And on the next occasion, preference will not be given to those who refuse. The pharma then agrees, actually an ideal deal! The FDA commits to a cooperative approach to approval.

The pharmaceutical companies are now very interested in getting their injections approved for children. Then filing claims for damages becomes even more difficult. If the drug is approved for children, adults (under US law) can no longer claim vaccine damage. The reasoning is that childhood vaccines are so harmless that adult claims can never be admissible. At least says attorney Robert Kennedy Jr..

Testing is underway in Europe and after some fiddling with apps in various countries, the EU has the idea that their Digital ID initiative could get a boost with this (also in combination with vaccination). It also fits beautifully into the plans they've discussed in the World Economic Forum's discussion groups.

On Bourla's advice, Ursula makes a phone call to European government leaders. Rutte and de Jonge are eager to take a leading role in this. Rutte excitedly explains to Hugo how they can profile themselves in an EU context, partly using the WEF network. (I'll save the pros and cons of the QR pass for a separate post, that's going to be too much here.) Another unique window of opportunity! The Netherlands as the centre of Europe when it comes to IT, innovation, leadership, hi-tech and in short, the shining example for the world. As a small country, you can't offer much else, you have to seize such an opportunity with both hands. Our EU envoys are committed to doing everything possible to get that QR pass accepted.

We know the sequel, we are still in the middle of it. If they have to give up the QR pass, they will fail in the eyes of the EU and - and they may think it worse - in the eyes of the WEF. (“Dear Mark, can you please find anuzzer bag to walk around wis?”). The 'corona ticket' is falling everywhere. Finally in the Netherlands. And it was basically such a good idea…

take off

They have thrown in the glasses of their own “vindo of opportunity”. They have over-pressurized, manipulated, defrauded, manipulated data, made false promises, threatened fabricated numbers in order to preach hell and damnation.

The medics protected their shop, the politicians were frightened, and then out of fear saw an escape in the form of an unprecedented leap forward. Can that cost something? Yes, that can cost a bit. The pharmaceutical companies acted as subservient and pocket-filling. The de vax/pas combi was crowned the Only Way Out, although it meant sacrificing human lives because effective home medicines had to be banned. Vitamin D was out of the picture. The virus was not allowed to be spread through the air, only through 'drops'. This is to prevent attention to ventilation, a cheap epidemic stopper. After all, every other way out did not lead to the QR pass and everything would be better rebuilt with that. Maxima thought so too.

Unfortunately, no one foresaw the prevailing incompetence. For example, virologists turned out to have little expertise and politicians confused coercion with strategic communication. This is one of the reasons why things have gotten so out of hand: to the extent that a virus can be fought ad hoc, everything has been done wrong. The test showed no infection, lockdowns backfired on mortality, other measures made things worse rather than better because virology had no idea about virus transmission while Maurice de Hond tried to provide all the studies on the subject. But then again, how do you combine that with a QR pass... In the meantime, politicians split society to get everyone on the same page: that of the pass. Forgetting that the people of the Netherlands still thought they were part of a democracy.

The Dutch virodrama

Because of the code of silence, it was not possible to work scientifically and the civil servants/scientists got bogged down in their own groupthink, which was converted into mass formation by the people via the cabinet/media. And if that virus was to be effectively controlled, what was to be done with those vaccine contracts? After all, they had been signed - some of them had been confronted with because Ursula had signed them on behalf of all EU countries - and without those vaccines, the coercive means to get people to get the QR pass would lapse. So I went ahead to the only way out with a pass.

One country after another is now stopping, the Netherlands is failing to act as a leading role model and the government is making itself the rise of the world. Ursula van der Leyen tried to save some money by discussing vaccination obligations, as the Pfizer boss had tipped her off in a text message (she got the number from her husband, who is the CEO of a competitor of Pfizer, and also an mRNA specialist. He also thought it was a very good plan.)

And in between all this, De Jonge's family ties with pharmacy, Omtzigt with the WEF, corona envoy Sijbesma with yet another pharmaceutical, conflict of interest of OMT members with patents, pharmaceuticals and test facilities, the power of Grapperhaus over the court, the WHO club with Koopmans who went to investigate in their own Wuhan lab (“No, looked neat”), rivm and CBS who are supposed to investigate their own functioning and output. So assuming they normally just do something. And all against the background of enormous unnecessary deaths, a collapsing public health and economy, disrupted childhoods, a torn society and withered trust in government, the rule of law, media and the medical sector.

You can fill several seasons with it. I see incompetence and outdated power structures and systems. Weak people, all of them career-wise swirled up until they got stuck in a place where they couldn't get a promotion. With “Keeping frogs in the wheelbarrow”, a smooth politically correct chat and more such skills, you will come a long way. Fitting in at the store is fine. Until the shit hits the fan.

I'm trying to come up with a story (actually everything can be verified) with a timeline that develops in real-time, a branching chain reaction with dynamically appearing opportunities and threats that different power blocs respond to. Then you can't speak of 'planning' and therefore not of 'plandemic'. Whether you can call it a "conspiracy" depends on your definition of that word. A lot of bonds have been forged, that's for sure.

Well, that's why there was an immediate test. That is why we spoke to the media in advance. That's why the vaccines were ready so quickly. Therefore, a court order could be reversed the same day. That is why the data remains obscure and every effort is made to plausibilize the data. That is why fundamental rights have been violated. Contradiction is silenced. Excess mortality is ironed out or attributed to still-covid. Errors are condoned by the PR officials at the national media. Everyone does it in their pants in The Hague. Van Dissel knew it, OMT probably also, De Jonge knew nothing about that lableak but everything about the only way out, Rutte just happened to laugh out loud when it was told, so he probably doesn't have an active memory of it.

That is why we are still not allowed to know anything about how it went wrong and we invent our own narrative. The longer it takes, the smaller the corner where everyone paints. Disastrous.

Oh yeah, where did that 5 billion go again? Oh dude, say “Sywert” and no one is talking about it anymore. GGD abuses? Say “Forum!” and we're done with that too.

Maybe not a conspiracy but The Biggest Cover-up in History.

P.S.: Sign the petition against the corona pass. Started last night, now over 100,000 signatures. Link:

https://onverdeeldopen.petities.nl/?t=Brede%20coalitie%20voor%20het%20onmiddellijk%20afschaffen%20van%20het%20coronatoegangsbewijs