Dr. John Campbell goes through ONS data
If a former unconditional pro-vaxxer is shocked by documents that have been released by a WOB request, that is not allowed on YouTube. Before I could share the video, it had already been deleted. In the meantime you can see it again on Bitchute (or below).
As Campbell calculates the underreporting, it should be taken with a grain of salt. In any case, it indicates how carelessly the safety of the vaccines is monitored.
YouTube censorship rules changed
Google-owned YouTube has been quietly changing its COVID-19 medical disinformation policy in important ways over the past four months, particularly regarding face masks, social distancing and COVID-19 vaccines.
Since April, YouTube has beenCOVID-19 Medical Disinformation Policyamended to remove penalties for criticizing government and personal practices around face masks, social distancing and COVID-19 vaccines. The original policy had 71 guidelines that restricted content, but the updated policy has only 64 guidelines. And while the platform seems to have reduced its voice restrictions, the updated policy is still very detailed and restrictive.
In AprilForbadeYouTube content that is critical of face masks against the spread of COVID-19, such as:
- "Claims that wearing a mask causes oxygen levels to drop to dangerous levels" and
- "Claims that masks play no role in preventing the contraction or transmission of COVID-19."
YouTube has now banned these remote.
The platform also eventually scrapped one of the two bullet points that made it difficult to discuss COVID-19 vaccines. YouTube banned users from
- "Make claims that COVID-19 vaccines are not effective in preventing the spread of COVID-19"
This has since disappeared from the policy. Previously, it is also forbidden to:
- "To make claims that medication or vaccination is a guaranteed prevention method for COVID-19".
YouTube also removed policy language that banned criticism of social distancing. What is now allowed:
- "Videos claiming that social distancing and self-isolation are not effective in reducing the spread of the virus."
In April, before the changes, YouTube's policy banned: "Claims that COVID-19 vaccines reduce the risk ofcontracting COVID-19don't reduce." The updated policy now prohibits: "Claims that COVID-19 vaccines reduce the risk ofserious illness or deathdon't reduce."
YouTube Vice President of Government Affairs and Public PolicyLeslie Miller:testified during ahearingof the Senate Committee on Trade, Science and Transportation on October 26 that Google's platform more than 1 million videos with alleged "COVID misinfo", including more than 130,000 videos about "Covid vaccine misinfo".
Can users who have been censored under the old policy seek redress?
YouTube also prevented public conversations about masks, social distancing and COVID-19 vaccines between citizens and their elected representatives.
Florida's ConversationGov. Ron DeSantiswith the White House's former coronavirus task force adviser, Dr. Scott Atlas, was also removed.
[that video, by the way, is in this article still to be viewed. A long video in which the state of the ignored science at the time is recorded.]
Other censors included Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL), Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) and the New Jersey State Senate. [follows a list of even more deleted videos: school boards and worried mothers etc. Dr. Scott Atlas addressing a school board.]
YouTube did not respond to the request from MRC Free Speech America for comment at the time of publication.
One struggles, that much is clear.
'It has also been forbidden before to:
"To make claims that medication or vaccination is a guaranteed prevention method for COVID-19."
So it is forbidden to claim that medication or a vaccine are guaranteed to prevent Covid-19?
If that's true, and it's not a mistake in your reporting, I think that's revolutionary, and rightly so.
Or is there a 'g' missing here and is it forbidden to make claims that medication or vaccination are not guaranteed prevention methods against Covid-19?
The link was there; I added a screenshot, see above.
Wow, yes, I see. Thanks for the screenshot. I am very curious if YouTube also acts accordingly!