...or pay via paypal

cards

Reactions

Comments that are not related to the topic of discussion will be deleted. Always keep comments respectful and substantive.

22 Comments
  1. jan van ruth

    head in the sand and keep believing what is being said .....
    it is already certain that the virus has been deliberately made and deliberately spread.
    purpose?
    vaccination of as many people as possible with a self-replicating toxin.
    why?
    in 2014, the WHO in Kenya set up a bill gates-funded tetanus vaccination campaign that made women infertile.
    1 plus 1 is still 2

    6
    1
    Reply
    1. Anton

      Is it certain that the virus was deliberately spread? I've only seen that as an assumption/hypothesis/conspiracy theory. It also seems impossible to me to prove. The panic in the beginning points to the opposite. But definitely not the subject of this blog. These are biological mechanisms.

      1
      2
      Reply
  2. jan van ruth

    panic in the beginning?
    with whom?...
    jan with the cap yes, but really not at bill gates et al....

    Reply
    1. Anton (@infopinie)

      With Fauci and his family. This is evident from the emergency measures, hastily put together 'papers' and tests, etc. See also the FOIA (WOB) documents.

      1
      1
      Reply
    2. jan van ruth

      fauci et al had a problem in the beginning.
      and that problem had a name: Trump and his hydroxychloroquine story.
      hydroxychloroquine was the reason for the panic because a medicine would have made the eua impossible.
      and then the whole plan would fall apart.
      and so Trump was told that although he was president, he should have no illusions about who was really in charge.
      jfk had already experienced what that means....

      4
      1
      Reply
    3. Do

      Panic perhaps, because the virus was not yet completely ready and there was much more to be tinkered with? And the thing that escapes too early is what was not yet intended. With all the lies I've heard now, I think it's a very plausible thought. The people who are now in governments are not the very best and the most reliable people on earth, to put it mildly. Manipulating the people and fooling them with something like that, then you must have a very nasty character.

      Reply
  3. Peter Vlottes

    That the mRNA would hardly appear in blood because it was administered by intramuscular means is layman's talk, another typical aspect that characterizes the low level of discourse. It is not the muscle that determines the degree and rate of release into blood, but the physical properties of the administered substance. If the intention is that the absorption into blood takes place delayed, special provisions for a so-called depot effect will have to be made. Intramuscular administration is primarily intended for convenience. Look at the way in which large, wild animals in wildlife parks are stunned: they simply get a syringe sprayed into a large muscle, usually from a helicopter or moving car, and usually fall down stunned within a few minutes.

    Reply
    1. Jillis Kriek

      Aren't these two separate discussions? In cancer, the LNP take longer to release the mRNA through a kind of plasma shell that keeps it stable. Dendritic cells that normally produce antibodies are now used to make spike protein. Exactly what they should be doing. Suppose that the injected vaccine remains largely in the arm muscle. After that, white blood cells will make spikes that are normally drained to the lymph nodes of course via the blood then the spike will still enter the blood. Only the LNP perhaps to a lesser extent than the spike protein. If the vaccine itself also escapes from the arm muscle, we also see more LNP throughout the body. In the brain, for example. Very disturbing seems to me.

      2
      1
      Reply
    2. Do

      A very good and readable piece. Also very written with a sense of reality. Often you see in such pieces that everything is on the vaccines and on the other hand that everything is on the disease itself. I've also had breathing difficulties for about half a year. Have not been vaccinated and I suspect afterwards that I contracted the disease with only that symptom. Probably contracted in mid-February 2021 and not tested, because I thought it had something to do with old age Also I got heart rhythm disorder at the beginning of May that lasted 2 days after which the heart ran well again until mid-June and I tested positive for Covid and fever and again got that heart rhythm disorder and ended up in the hospital for a day. Now every two months the heart starts to run wild for about 10 hours in total. I suspect my age, but I absolutely do not rule out that this stems from the disease Covid. So and the age(69) and the disease. Now I'm hoping for a heart ear closure to avoid heavy blood thinners. I'm someone who thinks: glad I didn't take the vaccine. Because it could have been even more serious. I mean there are many sides and everything but then also everything has to be investigated. But I certainly don't have a good feeling about this Government. Not from the very beginning. The way they sold those things was enough for me to be very skeptical about these syringes.

      Reply
  4. Hans

    It is waiting for the first Dutch medical 'hotemetoot' who, like the Japanese in the video, dares to make unvarnished criticism of the dangers of the vaccine in public.

    Who takes the lead here and has the guts to speak the truth??

    Reply
    1. Theo

      What kind of meekness is that with John Campbell? This nurser was a great advocate of Covid vaccines in 2021, which he also did not hide given his blogs and videos.

      In March 2022, Campbell found out he had been cheated by pharma and government and transformed into an antivaxer from then on. Mind you, almost 10 months after the first studies on the low protection and the serious side effects of the vaccines had already appeared.

      Campbell clearly wants to end up on the right side of history. For me, these kind of defectors have lost all credibility!

      3
      2
      Reply
    2. Anton (@infopinie)

      I'm just happy with every convert, especially if they were previously fervently pro-vax.

      5
      1
      Reply
    3. jan van ruth

      we are not all born with the absolute wisdom of good and evil.
      some of us need to learn to make the distinction.
      by the way, we are better off with people who have learned to make the distinction than with those who happen to have chosen the right side and insist that they have always been right.
      the latter also immediately sound so know-it-all while they actually know how to blow.
      capisce?

      4
      1
      Reply
  5. Jillis Kriek

    The whole pro- or antivax discussion has also destroyed science. John Campbell always reports fairly objectively on the investigations. Because he has read so many, the last year clearly sees the bewilderment and disbelief in his stories. Previously, he never became personal and his opinion was subordinate to the research.

    5
    1
    Reply
  6. Pyotr

    In Sweden and Denmark, aspiration is taking place. This partly explains why there is much less excess mortality in Sweden. Is there also less excess mortality in Denmark than in the Netherlands, etc.?

    Reply
    1. Jillis Kriek

      That has not been investigated, but it is certainly a possibility.

      Reply
    1. Jillis Kriek

      Indeed. It is also advised against lung Covid.
      You may also know NAC supplementation and quercitin.

      Reply
    2. jan van ruth

      aspirin works just as well against covid as lime tablets...

      Reply

Post a Comment

Je e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Required fields are marked with *