Pfizer has shown that it can pretty much make someone disappear from the face of the earth. Digital traces of whistleblower-against-will-and-thanks Jordon Tristan Walker can no longer be found. The man was staged in an unwelcome video – against Pfizer's wishes. Google, LinkedIn, Youtube, Facebook, Pfizer websites, other websites – everything is cleared within a day. Profiles have disappeared, organization charts adjusted with the speed of science. Media ignore the incident, the Public Prosecution Service as well, politicians so far as well. In the Netherlands, people still have some trouble getting the last opponents under it. Again, this is unmistakably unheard of news.
Hey, there's an advertising bus in front of Pfizer headquarters!
Very shortened history of article t.ly/XJ3w: The first video, of which fragments are also shown on the bus, is an undercover operation of project Veritas. In terms of content, protagonist Jordon Trishtan Walker repeats much of the former free publicity about Pfizer's unique research, as they were only too happy to put it out two years ago. However, that story no longer fits so well with the company profile that they want to radiate nowadays.
The pharmaceutical company has therefore decreed that all information about the protagonist in the video from Google /YouTube, LinkedIn, Facebook had to be removed and that the media and politicians must completely ignore the entire incident.
These orders were of course executed immediately.
That's saying something.
He still stands here and there as co-author Listed.
Of course there was someone somewhere again just a little faster with downloading a lot of the stuff. Most of the pages mentioned there are now foetsie. As I understood from Robert Malone, many pages in Wayback Machine have also disappeared – and I find that really frightening. If anyone has been able to figure out if that's really the case, I'd love to hear it in the comments.
Unheard of the Netherlands on D66 sanctions list
All unheard of news. So that would be a suitable item at ON. In the Netherlands they get that broadcaster, Ongehoord Nederland, but not under the thumb. But we are working that.
Kaag has mobilized an army that will be doing a lot of work on the socials against unwelcome information, to be labeled as 'disinformation' and / or 'right-wing extremism'. The medical establishment already has them in the bag (or vice versa) and so does the national media – except FOR ON. Those national media shout that ON does not adhere to the journalistic definition of "disinformation" and thus breaks the "journalistic code". With this, ON would disqualify itself as an interlocutor.
So: first say that we are right, then you can talk to us. This is a state of affairs with which we could always accuse other regimes of communism, fascism, anti-democracy, totalitarianism, nepotism or dictatorship. This is how we are currently doing in the Netherlands.
You might say: fight the nonsense with facts. Unfortunately, the facts fall short, so we have to conspire to bully the mischievous boy (in my time there were few naughty girls) out of the classroom.
We see a sudden information tidal wave, a true media offensive, starting on the day of the first ON broadcast of 2023. That should be a controversial broadcast given the Dutch fatalities that are central to it. That is really of a different order than squabbling between journalists.
What is now being heavily focused on: Unheard of the Netherlands must be abolished. Everyone thinks it because they are wrong. Tjeerd de Groot even used the word 'fascist' before. That line is extended and blown up.
Tjeerd de Groot later tweeted:
"As a member of parliament, I should not have said this about a reporter."
And as a human being, Tjeerd, could you have said that as a human being? About a reporter? And about a scientist? And about a worried Dutchman?
Power is invoked. Dutch people with a finer tuned antenna are mainly found in the comments on Twitter. Fundamental conversations take place in the side branches of the Dutch information flow (own channels, social media) or even outside (blogs, app groups). This is no longer an open culture.
Difficult substantive discussions are unanimously excluded. The Truth™ or Science™ should not be questioned because that is what independent journalism has committed itself to, forgetting that Truth can only prevail with a journalism that has broken free from such commitments.
This is so worryingly wrong, it is incomprehensible that people look away from this. Or perhaps that is why, we have seen that before in history: The intention is good, isn't it? Don't read newspapers?
Putting away unwelcome noise in this way shows... I tend to say fascist thinking. But accusing fascism is also wrong in itself, so let me make of it: totalitarian thinking.
The language of D66 members does not lie, nor does the collaboration of NPO, ombudsman and various Councils and other selective media that present their rhetoric as news.
It must be about the journalistic process, the method, not about a disputed or undisputed fact that is collectively adapted as "journalistic code", or fundamental disagreement that is labeled as "lack of journalistic cooperation". The adapting itself is the problem, demanding unanimity. Why do all these media want to sit on each other's laps? Where in the platoon of journalists have the freethinkers gone, the polemicists, the class boxes!?
It note from Jan today makes things succinctly clear. Read it.
In short: the media bombards us with big cucumber news and both the Pfizer commotion and the Excess mortality special snow under.
About the Pfizer debacle: see their advertorial at the time and project veritas' (preliminary) videos on t.ly/XJ3w
On yesterday's excellent ON broadcast and the points that I have something to say about (I do not always agree 100% with Theo Schetters nor with Herman Steigstra on details) I sometimes come back later, when the ON dust has settled a bit. We need to get a discussion going.
Here is the link to the broadcast: Missed unheard of news? Start watching on NPO Start and the more extensive substantiation of Herman Steigstra, including the text of this article, also as a Dutch version.
If you want to know more about possible personal drivers behind these forces or simply interested in conspiracy or plausible connections, see the article Oekraine => US => Biowapens => Farma => Corona