Robert Malone, in his most recent Substack, laments that the Corona investigative committee focuses on the production lab of the merchandise that has been marketed as "offer you can't refuse". He nuances that, but I don't find that disappointing at all. I am convinced that this is only phase 1. The naming convention Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic is there for a reason. The lableak is a strategic starting point. The U.S. Covid Commission is beginning to behave, as Malone himself says, like a federal investigator trying to root out a corrupt organization through a RICO*-like investigative strategy.
Note: The links to the Substack and to the translation will appear at the bottom of this article
* RICO: The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act is a United States federal law that provides for extensive criminal penalties and a civil claim for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization.
The Wuhan lab is a node in the web of pharma-commerce, science and the military (bio-warfare). Once that production point has been established, they can go in different directions from there. Then it will be the turn of the people involved, the stakeholders, the money flows and the distribution channels. Because that lab doesn't just do it. The stuff also has to be exported, imported, and marketed through dealer organizations.
The distribution channels are already coming into the picture: Peter Hotez is also called up. He has nothing to do with the lab, he is the big pusher of the vaccines. So the committee is already making an important connection to the next step.
If you don't know Peter Hotheez, this video to get acquainted. At first very critically and after the approval he turns 180 degrees. Then, all of a sudden, he's a vaccine promoter. After that, the required vaccine threshold and the number of shots needed will remain, while the effectiveness will continue to decrease.
In the video below, the development time mentioned by this expert changes from 20 years to less than 1 year.
As far as that will go, Malone doesn't get any further than Peter Daszak's Eco Health Alliance, but that's just the NGO that served as a Chinese conduit for tax dollars to be spent in China. So how far can such a committee go? To the Dept. of Defense, the White House, Secret Services...? We can only wait and see.
Now compare this strategy with the Step-by-step plan of our parliamentary committee of inquiry. That means ticking off protocols, votes in the House of Representatives and advice from experts who really knew best at the time. Where else are you supposed to get your knowledge from?
The Lablek could perhaps also have served as a starting point for this committee, given the involvement of Dutch scientists and universities. It's not even mentioned.
If you don't want to miss any of the developments, follow Jan Bonte on Twitter. He manages to write an in-depth book about it and to keep us informed of his progress and revisions through X.
You can read how inevitable the net closes on Robert Malone's Substack:
- EN translation: Select Subcommittee for the Coronavirus Pandemic does a RICOOTJE
- Original: https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/select-subcommittee-on-the-coronavirus
"Things are really starting to get tense in America now" as I read this, my partner starts talking about the American economy... on collapse?
Let that wait a little longer, because first we have to get to the bottom of it! Hope is alive and at the beginning of 2020 it felt so incredibly lonely, but every day I saw the like-minded people growing with regard to the crisis of that moment and there are now so many that it has become impossible to follow everything. I'm looking forward to Jan Bonte's Wuhan book. Every time happy with an article here. Maurice. Broadcasts of blckbx, dfacto, etc.
If the 'Lablek theory' is correct, and you can no longer doubt it, then it will have enormous consequences for international relations.
The bottom line is that this theory implies that specific people and specific countries and organizations are responsible for the emergence and escape of the virus, and therefore also responsible for all the consequences of the pandemic. In other words, nothing can be blamed on 'blind', natural causes, as in the case of zoonosis theories.
According to RFK Jr.'s detailed analysis, in the excellent book 'The Wuhan Cover-Up', China, the US and the WHO are the main responsible actors. China and the U.S. especially by violating international agreements on biological warfare and gain-of-function research. Kennedy also mentions Germany and Japan more extensively, but mainly in relation to biological warfare in the past (WW2).
Where countries and organizations are responsible, claims can also be filed. That's why I find the silence of Dutch politicians the strangest thing.
After all, a conservative calculation shows that a claim for costs of the pandemic and compensation for the loss of life in the Netherlands can quickly amount to several hundred billion euros. In any case, an amount that will dwarf all the cuts made by a new government.
Furthermore, the Netherlands also has interesting settlement options for any claims with the main responsible parties. Think of the (increase of) the NATO contribution to 2% of GDP, regular WTO contributions or else by settling import duties on Chinese and American products and services via the EU (NL is a net EU contributor, so we can put pressure on the EU with regard to import duties).
Je zou dus mogen verwachten dat onze politici toch op zijn minst enige belangstelling tonen voor de ‘Lablek’ en vooral ook de activiteiten van de Amerikaanse congresleden.