Who read last week's virusmiscellaneous article "Drip virology, zoonosis and disproportionate measures fit together seamlessly" can skip to point 4. Maurice emphasized the aerosol-related points in "The breathtaking connection between aerosols and lab leak“. There's another layer underneath.
1. The zoonosis excuse
The zoonosis theory is intended to disguise the lab leak. Those involved in the lab leak insist that the virus has jumped from nature (the market) to humans, while the opposite has been clear for some time. Why this spasmodic tenacity? Lableaks have happened before. These were neatly reported, including the disease caused and deaths.
This time, apparently, something different is going on, because not only was the reporting missing. It was worse: the databases with research information from the lab were taken off-line by the Chinese. All of a sudden, the whole history was a mess. That, too, is deviant behavior, which indicates that there is more to it this time.
What was absolutely not allowed to come out, what was really 'Classified', what the State interest is involved in, was not at all that there had been an accident in a lab with a virus that causes a particularly nasty flu. For the virologists involved, exposing their irresponsible and even forbidden long-term studies was problematic, but that too is secondary.
The Real Problem is dat er via slinkse wegen Amerikaans belastinggeld naar Amerika’s grootste bedreiging (China) gaat, waar vervolgens kennis over steeds gevaarlijker aerogene virussen wordt gedeeld. En zoals we weten zijn, zeker in China, wetenschap en leger geen strikt gescheiden containers, al helemaal niet als het gaat om potentieel als biowapen inzetbare technieken. (Denk bijvoorbeeld aan een virus & vaccin pakket, vergelijkbaar met gifgas en gasmaskers.)
Illegal and irresponsible virological research into airgenic viruses, frowned upon and even banned in the U.S., was carried out in China anyway. Facilitated and paid for by the U.S. authorities through waivers and detours of money flows and failing supervision. You can't think of anything more frightening.
2. They're just drops
The same goes for the droplet theory. Virologists are reluctant to admit that dangerous virological research is being carried out at too low a safety level. By persisting in 'droplet contamination', they justify the low level of security used in the lion's share of their investigations. At least, the security level is too low for research on unknown airgenic viruses or for experimental tinkering with viruses. This has to be done at BSL-3 level. The cold virus, on the other hand, may be studied ('characterized') at BSL-2 level, but if it is tinkered with, it becomes a different story, then Gain-of-Function problems also come into the picture.
This has created a grey area in which the virologists have pushed the boundaries and where they have also coloured outside the lines by combining virus components. That went best in China.
And once again we come to this collaboration between two superpowers with failing regulators. Not to be sold to the citizens.
These government interests far outweigh the issue of the reputation of virological research. Let alone that a question of guilt at the level of "which lab employee exactly dropped the tube?" matters. It is about the dismantling of the failing systems of the greatest powers on this planet, who are working on techniques that can – and will have – disastrous consequences, because they will continue to do so until it ends for good. It is precisely those parties that have the most money, the most connections with the legal system, with the media, and where the politicians with immunity and unlimited resources are. Need billions? Billions on the table. Everyone who receives grants, including scientists, considers themselves part of that camp. The question is whether it can still be stopped.
3. Chinese methods of the WHO
The entanglement of U.S. and China has also had an impact on political-medical decision-making. There, too, the top showed deviant behavior. The tyrannical lockdowns were contrary to all the knowledge that had been gained and were diametrically opposed to the WHO guidelines at the time, which stated that society should not be disturbed too much. But China has an influential position within the WHO; the WHO hung on the every word of the Chinese. The WHO itself sailed blind because all the data had been deleted and only the Chinese knew all about it. They also had different kinds of solutions to the problem that had arisen, with less attention to the individual and the dynamics in society. The view was so different that in March 2021 it led to a call to the federal government in the U.S. to investigate where all these measures came from and whether they could not be intended to cause harm.
Below are the most important points that could not be reconciled with the state of science or pandemic protocols.
Key takeaways from the call
- Lockdowns arose on the orders of Xi Jinping, General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, and were disseminated into global policy by the World Health Organization with little analysis or logic
- The most influential institution for Covid-19 modeling, described as 'China's best academic partner in the West', is by far the most alarming and inaccurate Covid-19 modeler (Imperial College)
- Deadly Recommendations for Early Mechanical Ventilation Came From China
- The world-dominating, wildly inaccurate PCR testing protocols are based on incomplete, theoretical genome sequences provided by China
- Excessive PCR testing protocols came from China
- Studies showing significant asymptomatic transmission, the only scientific basis for lockdown of healthy individuals, came from China
- The CCP conducted an early, broad, systematic, and global propaganda campaign to promote its lockdown response
- Many leading pro-lockdown scientists and top public health officials among the nations are dramatically unqualified and show conspicuous pro-China bias
- Prominent Lockdown supporters have proven to be unusually indifferent to the devastating consequences of their policies
Measures have been implemented without even discussing, let alone dispelling, these doubts. Why would they do that, announce measures that go so far, which we already knew would cause great harm? Well, here we go again: it went far beyond public health. The (American) State interest was at stake. The pressure was put on to the maximum.
China and the U.S., two superpowers, had collaborated. There was collaboration on technology that can produce bioweapons: a deadly virus with a matching immunizing vaccine. Somewhere during that development process, something had leaked – they didn't know exactly what in the beginning, it hadn't even been tested on humans yet. The WHO was keen to keep both China and the U.S. on good terms. So every conceivable means was used to keep it as small as possible.
De positie van de WHO laat twee opties open. De eerste is dat de top heel goed wist wat er al jaren aan de hand was en dus als medeplichtige moest meespelen, al was het maar om zichzelf in stand te houden. Tweede optie: De WHO is een clubje useful idiots dat danst naar de pijpen van de financiers. De B&M Gates Stichting is niet voor niets een van de grootste bijdragers. Voorzitter Tedros riep het op de eerste persconferentie nog uit: “It’s airborne! Corona is airborne!”, werd daarin ter plekke gecorrigeerd en zwakte het onmiddellijk af met iets van “niet in militaire zin”. Hij zei maar wat, kennelijk bereid om zijn belangrijke en nadrukkelijke waarschuwing onmiddellijk te laten vallen. Niet duidelijk beargumenteerd, maar het had iets met het leger te maken. “Oh ja: we hadden afgesproken dat we niets van het virus wisten.”
When the draconian approach turned out to be a failure, they couldn't say 'never mind, mistake...'. And why would they, finally they had a grip. If they followed through now, they could vaccinate all misery out of the world, Mr. Gates had said so himself... So, for years, we were burdened by a coercive regime, separatism and new opportunities for some, from the WPG to Princess Máxima with her Digital Identity-linked EU CBDC. Power grabs were there for the taking.
4. Only the vaccine can save us
Medicines with suspected efficacy against corona were banned, and antibiotics were also prescribed much less. Off-label medication was considered a crime. All of that was far from normal. In the case of an incipient serious flu epidemic, there has never been a trace of such rules. How did people become so convinced that we would soon have a vaccine that would solve everything?
The sales pitch of the mRNA platform was that in the future, pharmaceutical companies could build a 100% suitable vaccine on any virus at the push of a button. That would be ideal for cleaning up the whole problem thoroughly. Only, that platform wasn't quite finished yet, the mRNA injections hadn't been tested yet. But decisions had to be made quickly, the pressure did not allow for delay – and the solution was at the table with the first ring of stakeholders: the vaccine manufacturers. So they were given an assignment. It was a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, but they didn't want to take the risks themselves.
Ministers with responsibility for public health clung to the sales speak of the pharmaceutical companies, while at the same time signing the purchase contracts in which the same pharmaceutical companies explicitly stipulated a turnover guarantee on a product that would probably not work, could have side effects and could have long-term effects.
They relied on the conflict-of-interest NIH and the FDA, signed and had to inject millions of vaccines. With a convincing 'safe and effective', the insiders fought their cognitive dissonance. Despite those who knew the above contract. They kept their mouths shut. There was no turning back. People who smoke a fuse at the lie 'safe and effective' were blackmailed with the lie 'you are doing it for someone else', with the explanation that especially your nearest and dearest should pay the price.
We don't know if this would have happened in a pandemic of natural origin, without the China/US affair – in any case, it has never happened before, while we have had quite a few pandemics and even lab outbreaks in the past.
Looking back on the panic
Top virologists and front-line government leaders had a common goal: this outbreak had to be nipped in the bud no matter what, at all costs. In addition to the State interest, the reputation of the Virology-Pharmacy sector was of course also at stake in the background, especially important for some officials.
To justify the draconian interventions, lie campaigns were rolled out and the news services were happy to supplement that with people falling dead in the streets and army columns with coffins. Media received a subsidy for their communication assistance to the government. After all, it resulted in a lot of extra work and it was in the national interest that people were well informed, so you make agreements about that.
The healthcare industry eagerly latched on to the new protocols. They caused lethal intubations in desperate Covid patients who were not given antibiotics, in ICUs that were then happily filmed and framed as the horrors of this epidemic disease.
Perhaps the virologists themselves didn't know exactly which sample had 'escaped' or how that would turn out in humans and they decided to be on the safe side, who knows. She probably didn't. After all, the virus was not ready yet, otherwise the production of the vaccine would have been taken up more energetically.
The WHO spread the fear propaganda, partly at the instigation of the generously sponsoring Chinese. Of course, after such an over-exaggerated horror story, pundits and authorities can't come back with "Oh that? Yes, that may have been a bit exaggerated at the time. We had to make 100% of the decisions with 5% of the knowledge because the other 95% had put the Chinese under lock and key."
Top officials around the world had been frightened to such an extent that they ran off with their own panic and made everything even more difficult to make it clear to the political weight in their own parliaments that they had to be at the forefront of everything that would come from the WHO. With leaders like Trudeau and Netanyahu (who offered his own people as guinea pigs) leading the way in handing out the vaccines. You can't undo any of that.
The sequel
It applies not only to politicians but especially to OMT members and related people: anyone who fell for this and still held out after six months while evidence to the contrary piled up, both in terms of aerosols, zoonosis, measures and later with the vaccines, was either incompetent or complicit and has entered an area where criminal acts have been committed such as negligence, carelessness, data fraud, forgery, conflict of interest, conspiracy, disinformation – resulting in preventable deaths. Attempted manslaughter.
Even more reason to keep the lid on the pot. I wish the members of Parliament's Committee of Inquiry much strength and wisdom, but above all unselfishness.
Dazzlingly clear. It's never been a real pandemic. People have indeed become seriously ill from it, and people have certainly died from it. But that is of all times. This also happens during flu waves. I do wonder how many people have died because of the adjusted protocols.
It is obvious that the measures (medical and non-medical interventions) have caused many times more misery than the virus itself. But whether that can ever be traced remains to be seen.
Furthermore, it remains amazing that 'we' (I mean the skeptics who read these kinds of blogs) look at the same situation so completely differently than the believers. It has nothing to do with facts, but with an almost religious belief in a narrative. We are the Gentiles. Ever since I was a child, I have been amazed by the phenomenon of religion and the misery that comes with it.
Nietzsche had already figured it out:
Nein, gerade Tatsachen gibt es nicht, nur Interpretationen.
Furthermore, it is interesting to understand where the line was (is) between malice and useful idiots. Hugo is an evil useful idiot. That is also possible. I won't say anything about Rutte, we want to keep it tidy here.
I agree with you that at a certain point 'they' couldn't go back. With which they gradually worked themselves deeper into misery. What percentage of the population(s) would still believe in it?
And then that vaccination urge. Is that purely commercially driven? Saw ads promoting vaccines against the RS virus for the elderly. Scare tactics. But this also goes further. Pets are also being vaccinated en masse. A lot of money is made with that too.
Another bull's-eye, Anton! What more is there to say? We can only hope that the 'committee' dares to hit the nail on the head, and does not lose itself in side issues. It won't be up to a few (e.g. PvH), but I have huge doubts about the rest. Just think of the alignment of the proposal to finally start research into the link between excess mortality and the jabs. What a shame again, and with a new House of Representatives. It is clear that the usual suspects (D66, GLPVDA, VVD, CU,...) are once again obstructive, but that NSC is also joining that herd: unbelievable and unheard of. What a country, what a government, what a bunch of bastards...
Chapeau! Best article (so far...) on the 'Covid19 pandemic' on this blog.
A nice sketch of the possible hare path. You attribute a central role to the WHO, where I myself think of the security services. Everyone in the parliaments and media was on the same page internationally. What power does that applause machine get so synchronized? In my opinion, the WOB and WOO messages provide a clear answer to this.
I see the security services more as experts who have flown in to set out the lines. If the army could have been deployed, they would have done so. That is not to say that the army would have been the cause of the misery. They carry out a task that they are good at, because it is requested by other government experts who do not have the necessary expertise and infrastructure themselves.
Hello Anton,
According to Sacha Latypova, it's the other way around. The U.S. military has made things laugh. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EgRzLpA0QM from minute 11). Personally, I think that is a view that could explain the unanimous Western idiocy in science, politics and media.
Here is an extensive substantiation from the video of the Stockholm Conference, Lakaruppropet, January 21, 2023 from minute 7.
https://rumble.com/v28x6zk-sasha-latypova-msc.-nsa-team-enigma-covid-19-countermeasures-evidence-of-th.html
This also makes it clear that the cause of all the misery certainly does not lie with the WEF, and that all WEF wappies equally have butter on their heads and should do some soul-searching about this. Although it may be defensible that certain forces in society thought they had an interest in incentivizing things for personal gain, however, that these forces would have set up a worldwide conspiracy to enslave us is just as absurd as the theory that Covid is a zoonosis and spreads via droplets.
Hey Rogier! Long time no see. No, I don't see that plan either. WEF is more the 'never waste a good crisis' idea. They have tried to take advantage of the chaos and fear to push through their centralist (EU) and totalitarian-technocratic (CBDC, Digital Identity) plans. The career hunters in the Dutch cabinet were only too happy to score points on that, even the WPG got them through. I agree with you that it is also easy to explain without a preconceived plan.
I don't know if it's premeditated or not. The fact that the IDEA seems unlikely is no reason to rule it out. William T. Still's 1996 documentary The Money Masters shows that people at the top can be evil through and through. Maybe that's also a prerequisite for getting there?
I think it's a bit blunt, Rogier. Why this choice of words, 'WEF wappies'? Agree that the WEF community, as Anton calls it, has taken advantage of the 'crisis', and has not consciously orchestrated it. What was needed at the beginning of 2020 was peace and reason. But it is precisely those people who have been silenced. Ioanidis and Jay Bhattacharya. Recognized scientists. Because the media was in the pocket of the governments. Organizations like WHO and WEF have only fanned the fire, and you can blame them for that. That doesn't necessarily make it a conspiracy, but increasing control of citizens is clearly part of the agenda. Rutte and Trudeau play the most well-behaved boys in the class to impress Uncle Klaus. Rutte behaves like a kind of king who makes promises to indicate that the Netherlands wants to be at the forefront of the 'green transition'. What do you mean by democracy?
At best, a prime minister is first among equals. Even the phrase "Prime Minister" is relatively young. Until 1945 the title was 'chairman of the Council of Ministers'. Animal farm where the democratically elected pigs impose a dictatorship on the other animals. Rutte plays the big man abroad. Of course, people then start to believe in conspiracies. It's more of a definitional issue. A conspiracy in the sense that a number of people prepare a scenario and also know how to implement it is rare. But what does exist is that a ruling class (let's call them the elite) shares a common belief that can no longer be questioned.
Amsterdam is a great example. Where a crooked 'left-wing' woke mayor fails to properly arrange the garbage collection, gets into financial trouble, but makes apologies on behalf of 'all Amsterdammers' for a slavery past, where an idiotic 30 kilometers per hour rule has been set, and where they want to make the fire brigade 'inclusive' at all costs (see the NPO documentary). It's all well-intentioned, but these people are completely detached from reality. Dijksma in Utrecht who bans open fires. Jetten who really has no idea. A fool like the Younger who, like a kind of negative king Midas, turns everything he touches into poop. Kuipers disappearing, and Rutte refusing to say what's going on. Not to mention King Rutte himself. I have a firm belief in the unrestricted clumsiness of these self-appointed administrators. I've seen it all happen around me. Large organizations that outsiders think are well managed. Idiotic decisions by 'managers', such as those that have slowly replaced the Rhineland model since the adoption of the Anglo-Saxon model, have gained the upper hand. Without any substantive knowledge. To outsiders, this kind of deeply sad amateurism must come across as a conspiracy. Those directors can't be that bad, can they?
Parkinson's Law squared.
You can call me a wappie, Rogier.
Nice exchanges of thoughts again...
WEF and WHO are certainly not going free. They have already set up the next panic pandemic, of course with the best intentions of their own.
Trick: fear-mongering, power harvesting is fully deployed again. See: https://videopress.com/v/s19hi8nN with illness X in combination with the successfully assured slogan: 'not if, but when'.
(The question is not if, but when the people will be😉 resurrected en masse)
For the time being, we allow ourselves to be frightened and thus supposedly brought further under control in our own interest. With an upcoming virus that is probably no more than a (dead) canary in the coal mine (read: a non-pathogenic but simply findable in vulnerable, sick bodies) in an environment polluted by aerosols and medication, among other things.
Infantilisation, supposedly for the purpose of
civil protection continues cheerfully in Adam (the municipality now transfers money to charity if you stick to the thirty kilometers in Noord)
Indicate via a cheerful green glowing LED lighting powered by solar cells (probably only money is transferred when the weather is nice). If successful, it will soon be used elsewhere in the city.
Now. (Sorry, just had to get this out of the way).