[also read the More recent blog article]
Lareb, our vaccine watchdog, says it is not aware of any link between Vector and mRNA vaccines and blood clotting.
The EMA, European Medicines Authority, says it has been investigating whether thrombosis was more common in vaccinated people and found no significant difference.
Yet there are scientific studies that have warned about exactly this connection before.
A causal link with the vaccine is not proven, but is possible and deserves further analysis.
EMA
Thrombosis and corona
Thrombosis is observed in Covid patients, everyone agrees on that.
"49% van de IC-patiënten met het coronavirus krijgt longembolieën of een andere trombose."
Thrombosis Foundation
Where does this blood clotting by platelets come from? There have been studies and warnings that claimed that it was precisely the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 is the culprit. Those studies were only about the virus.
As far as I understand, that protein is precisely the particle that the vaccine generates with our cells. It is the particle that the virus and its fight against it have in common. Isn't that a possible connection to find out?
"Een bijwerking van spike-eiwitten is trombose/microtrombose. Spike-eiwitten die met het hele virus komen, worden normaal gesproken onschadelijk gemaakt door de lokale immuunrespons in de bovenste luchtwegen tijdens een corona-infectie.
Wolfgang Wodarg
Coronavirussen en hun spikes zijn gevaarlijk als ze in het bloed komen. Gelukkig is dit uiterst zeldzaam, tenzij de normaal effectieve beschermende mechanismen in de bovenste luchtwegen zijn omzeild of beschadigd door behandeling of andere omstandigheden."
(original text:
Coronaviruses and their spikes themselves are dangerous, but only if they get into the blood!
Fortunately, this is extremely rare unless the normally effective protective mechanisms in the upper respiratory tract have been bypassed or damaged by treatment or other circumstances.
High-risk side effects of genetic "vaccination" are concealed!
The vaccination, however, bypasses the natural barriers against coronaviruses and goes directly into the well-supplied shoulder muscle. It is not known for sure whether the dangerous spike proteins are formed only there or whether other target cells are also stimulated to do so.]
Low incidence: no more often than in the unvaccinated
Lareb vindt in elk geval dat het niet vaak genoeg voorkomt om ongerustheid te veroorzaken. Hoe ze dat gemeten hebben is ook interessant. Vergeleken met de 'achtergrondruis' van te verwachten trombose was er geen groot verschil.
To compare that, the vaccinated were compared to the unvaccinated. Remember that background noise in the unvaccinated INCLUDES the thrombosis caused by Covid-19. Or are the vaccinated people the same percentage of people who have already had Covid (possibly in the ICU)? And then still get vaccinated for whatever reason? That would be rude, in view of the side effects.
The argument of EMA/Lareb would have been more convincing if only people who have not had the virus among their members had been compared to the vaccinated. Nu vergelijk je eigenlijk de bijwerkingen van het vaccin met die van het virus. En daar blijkt dus geen significant verschil uit te komen...?
Met enige basale kennis van statistiek weet je ook dat niet-significante uitkomsten heel gemakkelijk te bereiken zijn. Daarmee toon je niet aan dat iets niet bestaat; alleen dat je iets niet kon vinden. Bewijzen dat iets niet bestaat op basis van 'het niet gevonden hebben' is überhaupt onmogelijk. Als er harde aanwijzingen zijn dat dat verband er toch ergens moet zijn, dan kun je die aanwijzingen eigenlijk niet van tafel vegen met een paar dagen desk research.
"However, in younger patients there remain some concerns, related in particular to these rare cases."
EMA
If there is less background noise in terms of thrombosis in younger patients (that is a suspicion), then the pattern of what happens through vaccination will be better reflected there. That does not mean that it is not going on in other age groups. There it may be more heavily masked, for example by the 49% of Covid ICU patients who developed thrombosis, plus another percentage who did not end up in the ICU but were also treated for thrombosis.
Few reports
The EMA document also states that after 20 million vaccinations, there were only 7 reports of blood clotting. However, a major and well-known problem is underreporting. It has been calculated from the VAERS database (the American Lareb) that of all side effects that occur, it is estimated that only 1% is reported.
There will probably be a reason why the scientifically described mechanisms (via the Spike protein) are not even named by the EMA. They probably think they are the only ones who can read studies on this.
However, it is now assured that all deaths after vaccination are reported.
In een eerder artikel heb ik ruwweg berekend hoeveel mensen er in een bepaalde leeftijdsgroep (50-64) dagelijks overlijden. Dat leverde op dat er van de gevaccineerden in die leeftijdscategorie in Amerika ca. 4000 per drie dagen overlijden. Zoek je vervolgens in de meldingen database op "overleden binnen drie dagen na vaccinatie", dan vind je 72 meldingen. Dat is nog geen 2% van de overlijdens die moeten hebben plaatsgevonden. Hoe kun je op basis daarvan uitspraken doen?
As a concerned citizen, can I still insist on further investigation? And a little quickly? And stay with those syringes out of our children!?
Links:
Study sept 2020 on the Spike protein as the culprit
Warning and understandable explanation of Wolfgang Wodarg
In addition, archives such as Pubmed contain various articles about blood clotting by these spike proteins and the possible treatments after vaccination. Om dan eind maart 2021 te schrijven dat er "een ontdekking is gedaan door Duitse artsen"... De wetenschapsjournalistiek ten voeten uit.
[also read the More recent blog article]
0 Reactions