Hoe complotpraktijk lijkt op complottheorie

As major drivers of panic measures and scientifically unfounded policies I mentioned earlier covering irresponsible virological research and the fear of disclosure of Sino-American cooperation regarding bioweapons or biological warfare (BW). A project that took place behind the geopolitical scenes in complete secrecy and violated guidelines on all sides: from security measures to international treaties. After all, everything could be arranged through exemptions, goodwill from supervisors and shortcuts for financing with taxpayers' money. Such an entanglement grows organically and is, strictly speaking, not a conspiracy, not a preconceived plan. But the resulting practice is identical. If something like this were to leak, it would seriously harm the interests of the State.

A brief recap of the geopolitical/bioweapon argument

Een korte recap met betrekking tot dit aspect: de belangendruk wordt met deze achtergrond tot het hoogste niveau opgevoerd. Ook de link met de vaccins als enige redmiddel is voorstelbaar onder deze hoogspanning. De vroege beslissers (allen uit farma-hoek, dus zeker geen ervaren beleidsstrategen) hoopten zo in de allereerste stadia om zoveel mogelijk "intern" op te lossen. Als er een immens probleem is en iemand stelt een oplossing voor, zeg je dan: "dank je maar we kijken nog even rustig rond"? Als een Chinees-Amerikaanse ultrageheime, levensgevaarlijke samenwerking op het punt staat blootgelegd te worden?

Conditions must be set and commitments must be made. The pharmaceutical company or representative who stuck his neck out will have wanted to pass on the risk. The promises that were made had to be kept, if only because no one was allowed to clap out of the school. Anyone who knows a better explanation for what happened around the vaccines, panic measures and protocol breaks, may say so. Maslow perhaps?

"Als een hamer je enige gereedschap is, lijkt elk probleem op een spijker".

Abraham Maslow

It helps when you see that right-thinking allies also see some of the links in my speculative chain reaction, even if they don't put it in the same context. Especially for someone like Jan Bonte, my story is too hypothetical. A plausible narrative is not enough for them, they want to see scientific evidence. (Me too, but I also like to explore)

You might even wonder if this is still science. Different criteria apply here, different judgments can be made here.

Was there a motive? ✅

Was there an opportunity? ✅

Did they have the means? ✅

Is the alibi missing? ✅

Opportunity and Resources were unlimited. The alibi may lie in data and decision-making, the crucial elements of which are jealously kept under lock and key by all governments. That seems incriminating to me, but I am not a Public Prosecutor. We try to reconstruct the Motif by connecting the dots.

Note: even with four green ticks, it is still not proof. If the omerta is properly maintained and we keep an unreliable government that continues to hide information, then the judgment of any judge will depend purely on political affiliation and/or the case will be dismissed due to lack of evidence.

I have noticed that the subject of 'excess mortality' is no longer pleasant. It can no longer be mentioned, just like WEF and Putin. The ranks close, their lips tighten. Those who don't know exactly what happens don't want to know either. We are waiting for someone who combines 'inside information' and file knowledge with a conscience. A rare combination, as it turned out.

I would like to draw the attention of those who follow this topic to a tweet by Jan Bonte, who is reading up on biological warfare and making discoveries. I couldn't include that Tweet in my piece (from 1 day earlier), otherwise I would have done so. Maybe you've already read it, I left this article for a few days.

The Tweet is about the fact that virological research can easily be placed in the corner of biological warfare. I am convinced that this contributed to the panic reflexes after discovering the 'mistake in Wuhan'.

"You will stop it. Whatever it takes". Heb ik teveel 24 gekeken?

For those who can't or don't want to visit Twitter, the text is also available in full below. And then I'll stop with this story for the time being.

---

Whatever it takes...

They really pulled out ALL the stops.

There was no lableak ❌
School closures stop the spread ❌
Hand washing is protective ❌
The vaccines are the only way ❌ out
It mainly goes through large droplets ❌
It comes from a pangolin ❌
Without measures, things would have gone ❌ very differently
Disinfecting hands is protective ❌
The curfew is not fun but necessary ❌
It comes from a raccoon dog ❌
The vaccines are safe and effective ❌
A 1.5-metre society stops the pandemic ❌
Without vaccination it would have been ❌ much worse

Is there actually anything they have NOT tried, aside from vaccine-competing and anti-drip theory methods?