As major drivers of panic measures and scientifically unfounded policies I mentioned earlier covering up irresponsible virological research and the fear of exposing the Sino-American cooperation on bioweapons or biological warfare (BW). A project that took place behind the geopolitical scenes in the deepest secrecy and violated guidelines on all sides: from security measures to international treaties. After all, everything could be arranged by means of exemptions, benevolence from regulators and shortcuts for financing with taxpayers' money. Such entanglement grows organically and is not, strictly speaking, a conspiracy, not a preconceived plan. But the resulting practice is identical. If such a thing were to leak out, it would be seriously damaging to the State's interest.
A brief recap of the geopolitical/bioweapon argument
A brief recap on this aspect: with this background, the pressure of interest is raised to the highest level. The link with the vaccines as the only recourse is also conceivable under this high voltage. The early decision-makers (all from the pharma angle, so certainly not experienced policy strategists) hoped in the very first stages to solve as much as possible "internally". If there is a huge problem and someone suggests a solution, do you say: "thank you but we'll take a look around"? When a Sino-American ultra-secret, life-threatening collaboration is about to be exposed?
Conditions must be set and commitments must be made. The pharmaceutical company or representative who stuck his neck out will have wanted to pass on the risk. The promises that were made had to be kept, if only because no one was allowed to clap out of the school. Anyone who knows a better explanation for what happened around the vaccines, panic measures and protocol breaks, may say so. Maslow perhaps?
"If a hammer is your only tool, every problem looks like a nail".
Abraham Maslow
I heard from some people that I had gone way too far with the above hypothetical story and that those connections had been dragged in by the hair. A bit of what is also said of David Martin.
It helps when you see that right-thinking allies also see some of the links in my speculative chain reaction, even if they don't put it in the same context. Especially for someone like Jan Bonte, my story is too hypothetical. A plausible narrative is not enough for them, they want to see scientific evidence. (Me too, but I also like to explore)
You might even wonder if this is still science. Different criteria apply here, different judgments can be made here.
Was there a motive? ✅
Was there an opportunity? ✅
Did they have the means? ✅
Is the alibi missing? ✅
Opportunity and Resources were unlimited. The alibi may lie in data and decision-making, the crucial elements of which are jealously kept under lock and key by all governments. That seems incriminating to me, but I am not a Public Prosecutor. We try to reconstruct the Motif by connecting the dots.
Note: even with four green ticks, it is still not proof. If the omerta is properly maintained and we keep an unreliable government that continues to hide information, then the judgment of any judge will depend purely on political affiliation and/or the case will be dismissed due to lack of evidence.
I have noticed that the subject of 'excess mortality' is no longer salonfähig. It should not be mentioned anymore, just like WEF and Putin. The ranks close, the lips tighten tighter. Those who don't know exactly how it works don't want to know. We are waiting for someone who combines 'inside info' and dossier knowledge with a conscience. A rare combination, as it turned out.
I would like to draw the attention of those who follow this topic to a tweet by Jan Bonte, who is reading up on biological warfare and making discoveries. I couldn't include that Tweet in my piece (from 1 day earlier), otherwise I would have done so. Maybe you've already read it, I left this article for a few days.
The Tweet is about the fact that virological research can easily be placed in the corner of biological warfare. I am convinced that this contributed to the panic reflexes after discovering the 'mistake in Wuhan'.
"You will stop it. Whatever it takes". Have I watched too much 24?
For those who can't or don't want to visit Twitter, the text is also available in full below. And then I'll stop with this story for the time being.
Read the tweet here or click on the Tweet itself
I am busy reading about biological warfare and the various programs as they were and are in the US, the Soviet Union and China, but also in Japan, for example.
For example, I didn't know this:
"A combination of past and present geo-strategic factors has a clear impact on China's approach and outlook on bioweapons. The first major factor is the repeated Japanese bioweapon attacks and BW experiments on the Chinese population, which took place from 1933 to 1945 and killed and injured tens of thousands of people, without the Chinese being able to stand up or retaliate."
"The Japanese military's use of BW against the Chinese had a long-lasting impact in China. China's official Xinhua news agency reported in 2002 that "between 1933 and 1945, at least 270,000 Chinese soldiers and civilians were massacred by Japanese troops using germ weapons," according to an "in-depth study by Chinese and Japanese scholars."
In 1972, the Biological Weapons Convention was drafted, whereby the states that ratified this treaty would destroy their bioweapons and not develop new ones. All but ten countries, including Israel, signed this convention.
But you don't have to develop a bioweapon to get your hands on one. You just have to develop a vaccine to use one of nature's.
All institutes that, according to international reports and open source sources, are involved in research into (the defense against) bioweapons, both in China and abroad, are involved in, or even specialized in, the development of vaccines.
Against the plague. Against anthrax. Against the Marburg virus. Against Ebola. Against the bird flu virus. And against a whole range of pathogens that can be used as bioweapons, and sometimes very easily too.
This is in line with the convention. And as soon as a vaccine is found, the bioweapon is included for free. Dual-use research, but just a little different. #OriginOfCovid
[So much for @john_bumblebee]
Whatever it takes...
They really pulled out ALL the stops.
There was no lableak ❌
School closures stop the spread ❌
Hand washing is protective ❌
The vaccines are the only way ❌ out
It mainly goes through large droplets ❌
It comes from a pangolin ❌
Without measures, things would have gone ❌ very differently
Disinfecting hands is protective ❌
The curfew is not fun but necessary ❌
It comes from a raccoon dog ❌
The vaccines are safe and effective ❌
A 1.5-metre society stops the pandemic ❌
Without vaccination it would have been ❌ much worse
Is there actually anything they have NOT tried, aside from vaccine-competing and anti-drip theory methods?
John Gotti eventually flipped out of the school as well. So there is still hope.
Your list is somewhat similar to Clare Craig's list in her book 'Expired'. Recommended.
She mentions 12 'beliefs'. Some of these points are no longer believed even by MSM, but they were the driving forces behind the measures. In the beginning, they were seen as conspiracy theory.
1. Covid spreads through direct contact
2. Everyone was susceptible to infection
3. There is a high chance that you will die from Covid
4. Death certificates are always correct
5. A new variant brings doom
6. If you test positive, you have Covid
7. 1 in 3 people spread Covid while having no symptoms
8. Lockdowns have saved lives
9. Lockdowns don't cause any harm
10 Face Masks Reduce Transmission
11 Children are resilient (in the sense that you can impose all kinds of measures on them without causing harm)
12 Zero Covid is a realistic goal
Everything, absolutely everything that has been claimed around Covid turns out to be nonsense.
The iatrogenic damage caused by improper treatments is also an important factor.
All of virology is 100% pseudoscience and all so-called vaccines ever given are only harmful!
, including the text of this article, also as a Dutch version.
https://telegra.ph/U-bent-voorgelogen-door-deskundigen-die-niet-beter-weten–the-hard-virus-truth-05-19
Willem Engel and a large part of the alternative media seem to work for the government since they have no interest in the truth.
Virus Truth Never Spoke Virus Truth!
https://telegra.ph/U-bent-voorgelogen-door-deskundigen-die-niet-beter-weten–the-hard-virus-truth-05-19